Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Recreational Stream Crossing Effects on Sediment Delivery and Macroinvertebrates in Southwestern Virginia, USA

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Trail-based recreation has increased over recent decades, raising the environmental management issue of soil erosion that originates from unsurfaced, recreational trail systems. Trail-based soil erosion that occurs near stream crossings represents a non-point source of pollution to streams. We modeled soil erosion rates along multiple-use (hiking, mountain biking, and horseback riding) recreational trails that approach culvert and ford stream crossings as potential sources of sediment input and evaluated whether recreational stream crossings were impacting water quality based on downstream changes in macroinvertebrate-based indices within the Poverty Creek Trail System of the George Washington and Jefferson National Forest in southwestern Virginia, USA. We found modeled soil erosion rates for non-motorized recreational approaches that were lower than published estimates for an off-road vehicle approach, bare horse trails, and bare forest operational skid trail and road approaches, but were 13 times greater than estimated rates for undisturbed forests and 2.4 times greater than a 2-year old clearcut in this region. Estimated soil erosion rates were similar to rates for skid trails and horse trails where best management practices (BMPs) had been implemented. Downstream changes in macroinvertebrate-based indices indicated water quality was lower downstream from crossings than in upstream reference reaches. Our modeled soil erosion rates illustrate recreational stream crossing approaches have the potential to deliver sediment into adjacent streams, particularly where BMPs are not being implemented or where approaches are not properly managed, and as a result can negatively impact water quality below stream crossings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arp CD, Simmons T (2012) Analyzing the impacts of off-road vehicle (ORV) trails on watershed processes in Wrangell-St. Elias National Park and Preserve, Alaska. Environ Manag 49:751–766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aust WM, Marion JL, Kyle K (2005) Research for the development of best management practices to minimize horse trail impacts on the Hoosier National Forest. Final report prepared for US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. http://www.parks.ca.gov/pages/1324/files/hoosier%20nf%20trail%20report,%20final.pdf. Accessed 19 July 2013

  • Aust WM, Carroll MB, Bolding MC, Dolloff CA (2011) Operational forest stream crossings effects on water quality in the Virginia Piedmont. South J Appl For 35:123–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayala RD, Srivastava P, Brodbeck CJ, Carter EA, McDonald TP (2005) Modeling sediment transport from an off-road vehicle trail stream crossing using WEPP. In: Proceedings of the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers Conference, 17–20 July 2005, Tampa, FL. Paper No. 052017

  • Barbour MT, Gerritsen J, Snyder BD, Stribling JB (1999) Rapid bioassessment protocols for use in streams and wadeable rivers: periphyton, benthic macroinvertebrates and fish, 2nd edn. US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water Quality, Washington, DC, EPA 841-B-99-002. http://water.epa.gov/scitech/monitoring/rsl/bioassessment/index.cfm. Accessed 19 April 2013

  • Bayfield NG (1973) Use and deterioration of some Scottish hill paths. J Appl Ecol 10:635–648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosworth D (2007) Four threats to the nation’s forests and grasslands. Speech at the Idaho Environmental Forum, Boise, ID, 16 January, 2004. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. http://www.fs.fed.us/news/2004/speeches/01/idaho-four-threats.shtml. Accessed 19 July 2013

  • Bratton SP, Hickler MG, Graves JH (1979) Trail erosion patterns in Great Smoky Mountains Natl Park. Environ Manag 3:431–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown KJ (1994) River-bed sedimentation caused by off-road vehicles at river fords in the Victorian Highlands, Australia. Water Resour Bull 30:239–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown KR, Aust WM, McGuire KJ (2013) Sediment delivery from bare and graveled forest road stream crossing approaches in the Virginia Piedmont. For Ecol Manag 310:836–846

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton J, Gerritsen J (2003) A stream condition index for Virginia non-coastal streams. Report prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. for US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Science and Technology, Office of Water, Washington, DC; USEPA Region 3 Environmental Services Division, Wheeling, WV; Virginia Department of Environmental Quality, Richmond, VA. http://www.deq.state.va.us/Portals/0/DEQ/Water/WaterQualityMonitoring/vastrmcon.pdf. Accessed 19 April 2013

  • Chin A, Rohrer DM, Marion DA, Clingenpeel JA (2004) Effects of all terrain vehicles on stream dynamics: In: Guldin JM (ed) Ouachita and Ozark Mountains symposium: ecosystem management research. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station, GTR SRS-74:292-296

  • Clark EH II (1985) The off-site costs of soil erosion. J Soil Water Conserv 40:19–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Deluca TH, Patterson WA IV, Freimund WA, Cole DN (1998) Influence of llamas, horses, and hikers on soil erosion from established recreation trails in Western Montana, USA. Environ Manag 22:255–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dissmeyer GE, Foster GR (1984) A guide for predicting sheet and rill erosion on forest land. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Technical Publication R8-TP 6

  • Dun S, Wu JQ, Elliot WJ, Robichaud PR, Flanagan DC, Frankenberger JR, Brown RE, Xu AC (2009) Adapting the water erosion prediction project (WEPP) model for forest applications. J Hydrol 366:46–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilsenhoff WL (1988) Rapid field assessment of organic pollution with a family-level biotic index. J N Am Benthol Soc 7:65–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hood SM, Zedaker SM, Aust WM, Smith DW (2002) Universal soil loss equation (USLE)-predicted soil loss for harvesting regimes in Appalachian hardwoods. N J Appl For 19:53–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaller MD, Hartman KJ (2004) Evidence of a threshold of fine sediment accumulation for altering benthic macroinvertebrate communities. Hydrobiologia 518:95–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kratzer R (1993) Pandapas Pond Jefferson National Forest, Blacksburg Ranger District, Montgomery County, Virginia. Thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

  • Lane PNJ, Sheridan GJ (2002) Impact of an unsealed forest road stream crossing: water quality and sediment sources. Hydrol Process 16:2599–2612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenat DR (1993) A biotic index for the southeastern United States: derivation and list of tolerance values, with criteria for assigning water-quality ratings. J N Am Benthol Soc 12:279–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longing SD, Voshell JR Jr, Dolloff CA, Roghair CN (2010) Relationships of sedimentation and benthic macroinvertebrate assemblages in headwater streams using systematic longitudinal sampling at the reach scale. Environ Monit Assess 161:517–530

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lynn NA, Brown RD (2003) Effects of recreational use impacts on hiking experiences in natural areas. Landsc Urban Plan 64:77–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manfredo MJ, Driver BL, Tarrant MA (1996) Measuring leisure motivation: a meta-analysis of the recreation experience preference scales. J Leisure Res 28:188–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning RE (1979) Impacts of recreation on riparian soils and vegetation. Water Resour Bull 15:30–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) (2011) Summary of monthly normals, 1981–2010. National Climatic Data Center, Asheville. http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cdo-web/datasets. Accessed 19 July 2013

  • Neal JW, Harris NJ, Kumaran S, Behler DA, Lang TJ, Port PR, Melandri M, Batten BG (2007) Comparison of aquatic-insect habitat and diversity above and below road crossings in low-order streams. J Ark Acad Sci 61:78–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Olive DN, Marion JL (2009) The influence of use-related, environmental, and managerial factors on soil loss from recreational trails. J Environ Manag 90:1483–1493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patric JH (1976) Soil erosion in the eastern forest. J For 74:671–677

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickering CM, Hill W, Newsome D, Leung YF (2010) Comparing hiking, mountain biking, and horse riding impacts on vegetation and soils in Australia and the United States of America. J Environ Manag 91:551–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollard AI, Yuan LL (2010) Assessing the consistency of response metrics of the invertebrate benthos: a comparison of trait- and identity-based measures. Freshw Biol 55:1420–1429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg DM, Wiens AP (1978) Effects of sediment addition on macrobenthic invertebrates in a northern Canadian river. Water Res 12:753–763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy AH, Rosemond AD, Paul MJ, Leigh DS, Wallace JB (2003) Stream macroinvertebrate response to catchment urbanization (Georgia, USA). Freshw Biol 48:329–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS (2012) SAS/STAT 9.3 user’s guide: the NLMIXED procedure. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary

  • Tiwari AK, Rissie LM, Nearing MA (2000) Evaluation of WEPP and its comparison with USLE and RUSLE. Trans Am Soc Agric Biol Eng 43:1129–1135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Törn A, Tolvanen A, Norokorpi Y, Tervo R, Siikamäki P (2009) Comparing the impacts of hiking, skiing, and horse riding on trail and vegetation in different types of forest. J Environ Manag 90:1427–1434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • US Department of Agriculture (USDA), Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) (2013) Web soil survey. http://www.websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/. Accessed 19 April 2013

  • USDA (1972) Unit plan for managing the poverty creek unit, Jefferson National Forest. USDA, Forest Service

  • Virginia Department of Forestry (2009) Virginia’s forestry best management practices for water quality, field guide. Virginia Department of Forestry, Charlottesville

    Google Scholar 

  • Voshell JR Jr, Wright AM (2002) A guide to common freshwater invertebrates of North America. The McDonald & Woodward Publishing Company, Ohio

    Google Scholar 

  • Vowell JL (2001) Using stream bioassessment to monitor best management practice effectiveness. For Ecol Manag 143:237–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wade CR, Bolding MC, Aust WM, Lakel WA III, Schilling EB (2012) Comparing sediment trap data with the USLE-Forest, RUSLE2, and WEPP-Road erosion models for evaluation of bladed skid trail BMPs. Trans Am Soc Agric Biol Eng 55:403–414

    Google Scholar 

  • Wear LR, Aust WM, Bolding CM, Strahm BD, Dolloff CA (2013) Effectiveness of best management practices for sediment reduction at operational forest stream crossings. For Ecol Manag 289:551–561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver T, Dale D (1978) Trampling effects of hikers, motorcycles and horses in meadows and forests. J Appl Ecol 15:451–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkerson E, Whitman AA (2009) Recreational trails in Maine and New Hampshire: a comparison of motorized, non-motorized, and non-mechanized trails. In: Proceedings of the Northeastern Recreational Research Symposium, 29–31 March 2009, Bolton Landing, NY. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station, GTR NRS-P-66, Newton Square, pp 214–222

  • Wilson JP, Seney JP (1994) Erosional impact of hikers, horses, motorcycles, and off-road bicycles on mountain trails in Montana. Mt Res Dev 14:77–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolman MG (1954) A method of sampling coarse river-bed material. Am Geophys Union Trans 35:951–956

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was made possible through the Food and Agricultural Sciences National Needs Graduate and Postgraduate Fellowship (NNF) Grants Program (CSREES Funding Opportunity USDA-CSREES-HEP-002116). We would also like to recognize the Eastern Divide Ranger District of the US Forest Service for granting us permission to conduct this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Forest Resources and Environmental Conservation (0324), Virginia Tech, 228 Cheatham Hall, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, USA

    Kathryn R. Kidd, W. Michael Aust & Carolyn A. Copenheaver

Authors
  1. Kathryn R. Kidd
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. W. Michael Aust
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Carolyn A. Copenheaver
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kathryn R. Kidd.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kidd, K.R., Aust, W.M. & Copenheaver, C.A. Recreational Stream Crossing Effects on Sediment Delivery and Macroinvertebrates in Southwestern Virginia, USA. Environmental Management 54, 505–516 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-014-0328-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-014-0328-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation