Environmental Management

, Volume 53, Issue 5, pp 913–929 | Cite as

Understanding the Local Socio-political Processes Affecting Conservation Management Outcomes in Corbett Tiger Reserve, India

  • Archi RastogiEmail author
  • Gordon M. Hickey
  • Ruchi Badola
  • Syed Ainul Hussain


Several measures have been recommended to guarantee a sustainable population of tigers: sufficient inviolate spaces for a viable population, sufficient prey populations, trained and skilled manpower to guard against poaching and intrusion, banning trade in tiger products to reduce poaching, and importantly, the political will to precipitate these recommendations into implementation. Of these, the creation of sufficient inviolate spaces (generally in the form of protected areas) has created the most issues with local resource-dependent communities, often resulting in significant challenges for tiger conservation policy and management. Very little empirical research has, however, been done to understand and contextualize the local-level socio-political interactions that may influence the efficacy of tiger conservation in India. In this paper, we present the results of exploratory research into the ways in which local-stakeholder groups affect the management of Corbett Tiger Reserve (CTR). Using a combined grounded theory–case study research design, and the Institutional Analysis and Development framework for analysis, we identify the socio-political processes through which local-stakeholder groups are able to articulate their issues and elicit desirable actions from the management of CTR. Increasing our awareness of these processes can help inform the design and implementation of more effective tiger conservation management and policy strategies that have the potential to create more supportive coalitions of tiger conservation stakeholders at the local level.


Human–wildlife conflict Forest livelihoods Community-based development Sustainable development Conservation policy and management 



We thank the anonymous participants for their valuable contribution to our study. We would also like to thank the Viraat Welfare Society for their hospitality and the Corbett Foundation for their assistance. This study was funded by the Fonds de recherche sur la société et la culture (FQRSC, Grant 138254), the Tomlinson Centennial Fellowship in Forest Ecology, and McGill University. The valuable comments and suggestions made by the anonymous referees are gratefully acknowledged.


  1. Agrawal A (2005) Environmentality: community, intimate government, and the making of environmental subjects in Kumaon, India. Curr Anthropol 46(2):161–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Banerjee A (2012) Is wildlife tourism benefiting Indian protected areas? A survey. Curr Issues Tour 15(3):211–227. doi: 10.1080/13683500.2011.599367 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baviskar A (2001) Written on the body, written on the land: violence and environmental struggles in Central India. In: Peluso NL, Watts M (eds) Violent environments. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, pp 354–379Google Scholar
  4. Baviskar A (2003) States, communities and conservation: the practice of ecodevelopment in the Great Himalayan National Park. In: Saberwal VK, Rangarajan M (eds) Battles over nature: science and the politics of conservation. Ecology and wildlife series. Permanent Black, Delhi, pp 267–299Google Scholar
  5. Boeije H (2002) A purposeful approach to the constant comparative method in the analysis of qualitative interviews. Qual Quant 36:391–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boushey G (2012) Punctuated equilibrium theory and the diffusion of innovations. Policy Stud J 40(1):127–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chan KMA, Pringle RM, Ranganathan JAI, Boggs CL, Chan YL, Ehrlich PR, Haff PK, Heller NE, Al-Khafaji K, Macmynowski DP (2007) When agendas collide: human welfare and biological conservation. Conserv Biol 21(1):59–68. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00570.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Charmaz K (2006) Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage Publications, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. Chhatre A, Saberwal V (2005) Political incentives for biodiversity conservation. Conserv Biol 19(2):310–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clement F (2010) Analysing decentralised natural resource governance: proposition for a “politicised” institutional analysis and development framework. Policy Sci 43(2):129–156. doi: 10.1007/s11077-009-9100-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Contractor D (2007) Evaluating the effect of design and sampling intensity on estimating tiger population and density. Saurashtra Univerisity, RajkotGoogle Scholar
  12. Creswell JW (2009) Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  13. Damania R, Stringer R, Karanth K, Stith B (2003) The economics of protecting tiger populations: linking household behavior to poaching and prey depletion. Land Econ 79(2):198–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Denzin NK, Lincoln YS (eds) (2005) The SAGE handbook of qualitative research, 3rd edn. Sage Publications, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  15. Dinerstein E, Loucks C, Heydlauff A, Wikramanayake E, Bryja G, Forrest J, Ginsberg J, Klenzendorf S, Leimgruber P, O’Brien T, Sanderson E, Seidensticker J, Songer M (2006) Setting Priorities for the Conservation and Recovery of Wild Tigers: 2005–2015. A User’s Guide. WWF, WCS, Smithsonian and NFWF-STF, Washington, D.C.—New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Draucker CB, Martsolf DS, Ross R, Rusk TB (2007) Theoretical sampling and category development in grounded theory. Qual Health Res 17(8):1137–1148. doi: 10.1177/1049732307308450 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fischer A, Petersen L, Feldkötter C, Huppert W (2007) Sustainable governance of natural resources and institutional change—an analytical framework. Public Adm Dev 27(2):123–137. doi: 10.1002/pad.442 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Folke C, Carpenter S, Walker B, Scheffer M, Elmqvist T, Gunderson L, Holling CS (2004) Regime shifts, resilience, and biodiversity in ecosystem management. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 35:557–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Folke C, Hahn T, Olsson P, Norberg J (2005) Adaptive governance of social–ecological systems. Annu Rev Environ Resour 30(1):441–473. doi: 10.1146/ CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ghate R (2003) Global gains at local costs: imposing protected areas: evidence from central India. Int J Sust Dev World Ecol 10(4):377–389Google Scholar
  21. Glaser BG, Strauss AL (1967) The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Aldine Publishing Co., ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  22. Goodrich JM (2010) Human–tiger conflict: a review and call for comprehensive plans. Integr Zool 5(4):300–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gubbi S, Linkie M, Leader-Williams N (2008) Evaluating the legacy of an integrated conservation and development project around a tiger reserve in India. Environ Conserv 35(04):331–339. doi: 10.1017/S0376892908005225 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Guha R (1989) Radical American environmentalism and wilderness preservation: a third world critique. Environ Ethics 11(1):71–83Google Scholar
  25. Huberman AM, Miles MB (2002) The qualitative researcher’s companion. Sage Publications, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  26. Igoe J, Neves K, Brockington D (2010) A spectacular eco-tour around the historic bloc: theorising the convergence of biodiversity conservation and capitalist expansion. Antipode 42(3):486–512. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2010.00761.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Imperial MT (1999) Institutional analysis and ecosystem-based management: the institutional analysis and development framework. Environ Manag 24(4):449–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jalais A (2005) Dwelling on Morichjhanpi: when tigers became ‘Citizens’, refugees ‘Tiger-Food’. Econ Polit Wkly 40(17):1757–1762Google Scholar
  29. Jalais A (2010) Forest of tigers. People, politics & environment in the Sundarbans. Routledge, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  30. Jamal T, Stronza A (2009) Collaboration theory and tourism practice in protected areas: stakeholders, structuring and sustainability. J Sustain Tour 17(2):169–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Janssen MA, Ostrom E (2006) Governing social–ecological systems. In: Tesfatsion L, Judd KL (eds) Handbook of computational economics, vol 2. Elsevier, Amsterdam, North-Holland, pp 1465–1509Google Scholar
  32. Jhala YV, Gopal R, Qureshi Q (eds) (2008) Status of tigers, co-predators and Prey in India. National Tiger Conservation Authority, Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India and the Wildlife Institute of India, DehradunGoogle Scholar
  33. Jhala YV, Qureshi Q, Gopal R, Sinha PR (eds) (2011) Status of the tigers, co-predators, and Prey in India, 2010. National Tiger Conservation Authority, Govt. of India, New Delhi, and Wildlife Institute of India, DehradunGoogle Scholar
  34. Karanth KU (2003) Tiger ecology and conservation in the Indian subcontinent. J Bombay Nat Hist Soc 100(2&3):169–189Google Scholar
  35. Karanth KU (2005) Reconciling conservation with emancipatory politics. Econ Polit Wkly 40(46):4803–4805Google Scholar
  36. Karanth KU (ed) (2006) Tiger tales: tracking the big cat across Asia. Penguin Books, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  37. Karanth KU, Chellam R (2009) Carnivore conservation at the crossroads. Oryx 43(01):1–2. doi: 10.1017/S003060530843106X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Karanth KK, DeFries R (2011) Nature-based tourism in Indian protected areas: new challenges for park management. Conserv Lett 4(2):137–149. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2010.00154.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Karanth K, Nepal S (2011) Local residents perception of benefits and losses from protected areas in India and Nepal. Environ Manage 49(2):372–386. doi: 10.1007/s00267-011-9778-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kashwan P (2006) Why Harda failed: a response. Econ Polit Wkly 41(24):2497–2499. doi: 10.2307/4418356 Google Scholar
  41. Keys N, Thomsen DC, Smith TF (2010) Opinion leaders and complex sustainability issues. Manag Environ Qual 21(2):187–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Khan JA, Kumar S, Khan A, Musavi A, Malik PK, Kushwaha SPS, Khati DS, Sarin GD (2008) An ecological study in the buffer zone of the Corbett Tiger Reserve: Prey abundance and habitat conditions. Int J Ecol Environ Sci 34(2):121–131Google Scholar
  43. Kumar S, Khan JA, Khan A, Musavi A, Malik PK, Kushwaha SPS, Khati DS, Sarin GD (2008) An ecological study in the buffer zone of the Corbett Tiger Reserve: tiger abundance and cattle depredation. Int J Ecol Environ Sci 34(2):133–140Google Scholar
  44. Lele S, Wilshusen P, Brockington D, Seidler R, Bawa K (2010) Beyond exclusion: alternative approaches to biodiversity conservation in the developing tropics. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 2(1–2):94–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Locke K (2001) Grounded theory in management research. Sage series in management research. Sage Publications Ltd., LondonGoogle Scholar
  46. Loyola RD, Oliveira-Santos LGR, MR Almeida-Neto, Nogueira DM, Kubota U, Diniz-Filho JAF, Lewinsohn TM (2009) Integrating economic costs and biological traits into global conservation priorities for carnivores. PLoS ONE 4(8):e6807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Maikhuri RK, Nautiyal S, Rao KS, Chandrasekhar K, Gavali R, Saxena KG (2002) Analysis and resolution of protected area-people conflicts in Nanda Devi Biosphere Reserve, India. Environ Conserv 27(01):43–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. McGinnis MD (2011) An introduction to IAD and the language of the Ostrom workshop: a simple guide to a complex framework. Policy Stud J 39(1):169–183. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00401.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. McShane TO, Hirsch PD, Trung TC, Songorwa AN, Kinzig A, Monteferri B, Mutekanga D, Thang HV, Dammert JL, Pulgar-Vidal M, Welch-Devine M, Peter Brosius J, Coppolillo P, O’Connor S (2011) Hard choices: making trade-offs between biodiversity conservation and human well-being. Biol Conserv 144(3):966–972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Merriam SB (2009) Qualitative research: a guide to design and implementation. The Jossey-Bass higher and adult education series. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  51. Miller TR, Minteer BA, Malan L-C (2011) The new conservation debate: the view from practical ethics. Biol Conserv 144(3):948–957CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Mills J, Bonner A, Francis K (2008) The development of constructivist grounded theory. Int J Qual Methods 5(1):25–35Google Scholar
  53. Musavi A, Khan JA, Kumar S, Khan A, Malik PK, Kushwaha SPS, Khati DS, Sarin GD (2006) A study of tiger human conflict in buffer zone of the Corbett Tiger Reserve: protected area–people relationship. Int J Ecol Environ Sci 32(3):241–257Google Scholar
  54. Mushove P, Vogel C (2005) Heads or tails? Stakeholder analysis as a tool for conservation area management. Glob Environ Change Part A 15(3):184–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Nandhakumar J, Jones M (2002) Development gain? Participant observation in interpretive management information systems research. Qual Res, vol 3. Sage Publications, London, pp 323–341Google Scholar
  56. Negi CS, Nautiyal S (2003) Indigenous peoples, biological diversity and protected area management—policy framework towards resolving conflicts. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol 10:169–179Google Scholar
  57. Ostrom E (2011) Background on the institutional analysis and development framework. Policy Stud J 39(1):7–27. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00394.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Ozaki K, Isono M, Kawahara T, Iida S, Kudo T, Fukuyama K (2006) A mechanistic approach to evaluation of umbrella species as conservation surrogates. Conserv Biol 20(5):1507–1515. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00444.x Google Scholar
  59. Phadke R (2005) People’s science in action: the politics of protest and knowledge brokering in India. Soc Nat Resour 18(4):363–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Post G (2010) Evaluation of Tiger Conservation in India: the use of comparative effectiveness research. Duke University, DurhamGoogle Scholar
  61. Project Tiger (2005) Joining the dots: the report of the Tiger Task Force Union Ministry of Environment and Forests. Government of India, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  62. Rahman HMT, Hickey GM, Sarker SK (2012) A framework for evaluating collective action and informal institutional dynamics under a resource management policy of decentralization. Ecol Econ 83(11):32–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Ranganathan J, Chan KMA, Karanth KU, Smith JLD (2008) Where can tigers persist in the future? A landscape-scale, density-based population model for the Indian subcontinent. Biol Conserv 141(1):67–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Rangarajan M (2003) The politics of ecology: the debate on wildlife and people in India, 1970–95. In: Saberwal VK, Rangarajan M (eds) Battles over nature: science and the politics of conservation. Ecology and wildlife series. Permanent Black, Delhi, pp 189–239Google Scholar
  65. Rangarajan M (2005) Fire in the forest. Econ Polit Wkly 40(47):4888–4890. doi: 10.2307/4417417 Google Scholar
  66. Rastogi A, Badola R, Hussain SA, Hickey GM (2010) Assessing the utility of stakeholder analysis to protected areas management: the case of Corbett National Park, India. Biol Conserv 143(12):2956–2964CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Rastogi A, Hickey GM, Badola R, Hussain SA (2012) Saving the superstar: a review of the social factors affecting tiger conservation in India. J Environ Manage 113:328–340. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.10.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Rastogi A, Thapliyal S, Hickey GM (2014) Community action and tiger conservation: assessing the role of social capital. Soc Nat ResourGoogle Scholar
  69. Robbins PF, Chhangani AK, Rice J, Trigosa E, Mohnot SM (2007) Enforcement authority and vegetation change at Kumbhalgarh Wildlife Sanctuary, Rajasthan, India. Environ Manage 40(3):365–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Rodrigues ASL, Andelman SJ, Bakarr MI, Boitani L, Brooks TM, Cowling RM, Fishpool LDC, da Fonseca GAB, Gaston KJ, Hoffmann M, Long JS, Marquet PA, Pilgrim JD, Pressey RL, Schipper J, Sechrest W, Stuart SN, Underhill LG, Waller RW, Watts MEJ, Yan X (2004) Effectiveness of the global protected area network in representing species diversity. Nature 428(6983):640–643. doi: 10.1038/nature02422 Google Scholar
  71. Rudd MA (2004) An institutional framework for designing and monitoring ecosystem-based fisheries management policy experiments. Ecol Econ 48(1):109–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Saberwal VK (1996) Pastoral politics: gaddi grazing, degradation, and biodiversity conservation in Himachal Pradesh, India. Conserv Biol 10(3):741–749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Sanderson E, Forrest J, Loucks C, Ginsberg J, Dinerstein E, Seidensticker J, Leimgruber P, Songer M, Heydlauff A, O’Brien T, Bryja G, Klenzendorf S, Wikramanayake E (2006) Setting Priorities for the Conservation and Recovery of Wild Tigers: 2005–2015. The Technical Assessment. WCS, WWF, Smithsonian, and NFWF-STF, New York—Washington, D.CGoogle Scholar
  74. Seidensticker J (2010) Saving wild tigers: a case study in biodiversity loss and challenges to be met for recovery beyond 2010. Integr Zool 5(4):285–299. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4877.2010.00214.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Seidensticker J, Christie S, Jackson P (eds) (1999) Riding the tiger: tiger conservation in human-dominated landscapes. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  76. Sekhsaria P (2007) Conservation in India and the need to think beyond ‘Tiger vs Tribal’. Biotropica 39(5):575–577. doi: 10.2307/30045413 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Sinha BC, Qureshi Q, Uniyal VK, Sen S (2012) Economics of wildlife tourism—contribution to livelihoods of communities around Kanha Tiger Reserve, India. J Ecotour 11(3):207–218. doi: 10.1080/14724049.2012.721785 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Springate-Baginski O, Blaikie P (2007) Introduction: setting up key policy issues in participatory forest management. In: Springate-Baginski O, Blaikie P (eds) Forests, people and power: the political ecology of reform in South Asia. The Earthscan Forestry Library, Earthscan, London, pp 1–24Google Scholar
  79. Stoll-Kleemann S (2001) Barriers to nature conservation in Germany: a model explaining opposition to protected areas. J Environ Psychol 21(4):369–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Strauss ALCJM (1990) Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage Publications, Newbury ParkGoogle Scholar
  81. Strauss AL, Corbin JM (1998) Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, 2nd edn. Sage Publications, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  82. Tilson R, Nyhus PJ (eds) (2010) Tigers of the world: the science, politics, and Conservation of Panthera Tigris, 2nd edn. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  83. Vira B (2005) Deconstructing the Harda experience: limits of bureaucratic participation. Econ Polit Wkly 40(48):5068–5075. doi: 10.2307/4417459 Google Scholar
  84. Walpole MJ, Goodwin HJ (2000) Local economic impacts of dragon tourism in Indonesia. Ann Tour Res 27(3):559–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Walston J, Robinson JG, Bennett EL, Breitenmoser U, da Fonseca GAB, Goodrich J, Gumal M, Hunter L, Johnson A, Karanth KU, Leader-Williams N, MacKinnon K, Miquelle D, Pattanavibool A, Poole C, Rabinowitz A, Smith JLD, Stokes EJ, Stuart SN, Vongkhamheng C, Wibisono H (2010) Bringing the tiger back from the brink—the six percent solution. PLoS Biol 8(9):e1000485. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000485 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Wasserman S, Faust K (1994) Social network analysis: methods and applications. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Wikramanayake E, McKnight M, Dinerstein E, Joshi A, Gurung B, Smith D (2004) Designing a conservation landscape for tigers in human-dominated environments. Conserv Biol 18(3):839–844. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00145.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Wikramanayake E, Dinerstein E, Seidensticker J, Lumpkin S, Pandav B, Shrestha M, Mishra H, Ballou J, Johnsingh AJT, Chestin I, Sunarto S, Thinley P, Thapa K, Jiang G, Elagupillay S, Kafley H, Pradhan NMB, Jigme K, Teak S, Cutter P, Aziz MA, Than U (2011) A landscape-based conservation strategy to double the wild tiger population. Conserv Lett 4(3):219–227. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2010.00162.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Wilkie DS, Morelli GA, Demmer J, Starkey M, Telfer P, Steil M (2006) Parks and people: assessing the human welfare effects of establishing protected areas for biodiversity conservation. Conserv Biol 20(1):247–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Wilshusen PR, Brechin SR, Fortwangler CL, West PC (2002) Reinventing a square wheel: critique of a resurgent “Protection Paradigm” in International Biodiversity Conservation. Soc Nat Resour 15(1):17–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Yin RK (2003) Case study research: design and methods. Applied social research methods series, vol 5. Sage Publications, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  92. Yin RK (2009) Case study research: design and methods, 4th edn. Sage Publications, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Archi Rastogi
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Gordon M. Hickey
    • 1
  • Ruchi Badola
    • 2
  • Syed Ainul Hussain
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Natural Resource SciencesMcGill UniversitySainte-Anne-de-BellevueCanada
  2. 2.Wildlife Institute of IndiaDehradunIndia

Personalised recommendations