Abstract
The governments of countries that allow private land ownership have two main tools to motivate landowner behavior: regulations and incentives. This research examines landowner preferences toward these policy tools and asks specifically: Do private forest landowners in New Brunswick and Maine believe that regulations and/or incentives are effective means to motivate responsible stewardship? Can landowners identify explicit regulations and policies that restrict property rights? Also, we were interested to see if any discernible differences existed between these adjacent jurisdictions from different countries, but that share similar forests and a similar settlement history. We identified and interviewed diverse landowners, recorded and transcribed our discussions, and analyzed the results using a grounded theory approach. Findings suggest that both New Brunswick and Maine participants are fairly comfortable with most regulations and many agreed that a combination of incentives and regulations are in fact useful. Furthermore, landowners in New Brunswick discussed non-monetary incentives as a mechanism to reward “good” stewardship; while Maine respondents articulated a degree of responsible stewardship that transcends a need to incentivize landowners. This study demonstrates that diverse landowners may be more comfortable with environmental regulations than previously understood and may be interested in non-monetary incentives.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Acheson J, McCloskey J (2008) Causes of deforestation: the Maine case. Hum Ecol. 36:909–922
Anderson JE (2003) Public policymaking: An introduction. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, pp 1–34
Anderson LJ (2006) Comparative perspectives on property rights: the right to exclude. J Leg Educ 56(3):1–12
Anonymous (2008) Many New Brunswickers concerned about uranium exploration. Canadian Broadcast Corporation website. http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/many-new-brunswickers-concerned-about-uranium-exploration-1.708077. Accessed 12 Nov 2013
Beckley TM (1999) Forest community sustainability: introduction to the theme. For Chron 75(5):745–746
Bliss CJ (2003) Sustaining family forests in rural landscapes: rationale, challenges, and an illustration from Oregon, USA. Small-Scale For 2(1):1–8
Brighton D (2003) Land and livelihoods in the northern forest. In: Boyce JK, Shelley BG (eds) Natural assets: democratizing environmental ownership. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 227–241
Brockett DC, Gebhard L (1999) NIPF tax incentives: do they make a difference. J For 97(4):16–21
Brunnette V, Germain RH (2003) Forest management in the New York City watershed. Submitted to the XII World Forestry Congress, 2003, Quebec City, Canada. http://www.fao.org/docrep/article/wfc/xii/0649-b3.htm
Butler B (2008) Family forest owners of the United States, 2006. Gen. Tech. Rep. NRS-27. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Newton Square, PA
Cubbage FW, Newman DH (2006) Forest policy reformed: a United States perspective. For Policy Econ 9(3):261–273
De Geest G, Dari-Mattiacci G (2009) Carrots versus sticks. Amsterdam Center for Law & Economics, Working Paper No. 2009-13. http://law.wustl.edu/faculty/workshops/DeGeestcarrotsvssticks.pdf. Accessed 20 Feb 2012
Ellefson PV, Kilgore MA, Granskog JE (2006) State government regulation of forestry practices applied to nonfederal forests: extent and intensity of agency involvement. J For 104(8):401–406
Freyfogle ET (2003) Private property for an ecological age. The land we share: private property and the common good. Island Press, Washington, pp 203–227
Freyfogle ET (2007) Correcting the half-truths. On private property: finding common ground on the ownership of land. Beacon Press, Boston, pp 1–28
Geisler CC (2000) Property pluralism. In: Geisler CC, Daneker G (eds) Property and values: alternatives to public and private ownership. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 65–87
Haley D, Nelson H (2007) Has the time come to rethink Canada’s Crown forest tenure systems? For Chron 83(5):630–641
Harrington W, Morgenstern (2004) Economic incentives versus command and control: what’s the best approach for solving environmental problems? In: Visgilio GR, Whitelaw DM (eds) Acid in the environment: lessons learned and future prospects. Springer, New York, pp 233–240
Hibbard MC, Kilgore AM, Ellefson VP (2003) Property taxation of private forests in the United States: a national review. J For 101(3):44–49
Jacobs MH (2003) The future of an American ideal. In: Jacobs MH (ed) Private property in the 21st century. Edward Elgar, Northampton, pp 171–184
Janota JJ, Broussard RS (2008) Examining private forest policy preferences. For Policy Econ 10(3):89–97
Karp PJ (1993) A private property duty of stewardship: changing our land ethic. Environ Law 23:735–762
Kilgore AM, Blinn RC (2004) Policy tools to encourage the application of sustainable timber harvesting practices in the United States and Canada. For Policy Econ 6:111–127
Kilgore AM, Greene LJ, Jacobson GM, Straka JT, Daniels SE (2007) The influence of financial incentive programs in promoting sustainable forestry on the nation’s family forests. J For 105(4):184–191
Kilgore MA, Snyder SA, Schertz J, Taff SJ (2008) What does it take to get family forest owners to enroll in a forest stewardship-type program? For Policy Econ 10(7–8):507–514
Krueckeberg AD (1995) The difficult character of property. J Am Plan Assoc 61(3):301–310
Little RS (2005) Comparing laws and regulations between private land and Crown land in New Brunswick. Unpublished Undergraduate thesis, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton
Macpherson CB (1978) The meaning of property. In: Macpherson CB (ed) Property: mainstream and critical positions. University of Toronto Press, Toronto, pp 1–15
Maine Forest Service (2011). Maine’s tree growth tax program: the basics. Department of Conservation, Maine Forest Service. http://www.maine.gov/doc/mfs/fpm/tgtl/docs/tgtl_basics_presentation_2011.pdf. Accessed 17 Dec 2012
McEvoy JT (1998) Legal aspects of owning and managing woodlands. Island Press, Washington, DC
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC
Nadeau S, Beckley TM, Kennedy EH, McFarlane BL, Wyatt S (2008) Public views on forest management in New Brunswick: report from a provincial survey. Nat Res Canada, Can For Ser, Atl For Cent, Info Rep M-X-222E p 77
Nadeau S, Beckley T, McKendy M, Keess H (2012) A snapshot of New Brunswick non-industrial forest owners in 2011: attitudes, behaviour, stewardship and future prospects. New Brunswick Department of Natural Resources, Fredericton. ISBN 978-1-55471-964-8
New Brunswick Department of Natural Resources (2009). New Brunswick Private Woodlot Silviculture Manual 2009. http://www2.gnb.ca/content/dam/gnb/Departments/nr-rn/pdf/en/CrownLandsForests/WoodlotSilvicultureManual.pdf. Accessed 17 Dec 2012
New Brunswick Forest Products Commission. (2011). Annual report submitted to the Minister of Natural Resources, pp 29. http://www.gnb.ca/legis/business/currentsession/57/57-2/LegDocs/2/en/NBFPC-AnnualReport2010-2011.pdf. Accessed 20 Feb 2012
Ribot CJ, Peluso LN (2003) A theory of access. Rur Soc 68(2):153–175
Stein SM, McRoberts RE, Alig RJ, Nelson MD, Theobald DM, Eley M et al. (2005) Forests on the edge: housing development on America’s private forests. (PNW-GTR-636). http://www.fs.fed.us/openspace/fote/fote-6-9-05.pdf. Accessed 1 Jan 2013
Vonhoff S (2001) Of sticks and seesaws: private property and the stewardship of America’s lands and forests. Doctoral Dissertation, State University of New York, 2–300
Walker D, Myrick F (2006) Grounded theory: an exploration of process and procedure. Qual Health Res 16(4):547–559
Wiebe DK, Meinzen-Dick R (1998) Property rights as policy tools for sustainable development. Land Use Policy 15(3):203–215
Acknowledgments
This research was funded by a grant from the Social Science and Humanities Research Council of the federal government of Canada. We would also like to thank our generous research participants, Drs. Solange Nadeau and Don Floyd, and Tom Doak of the Small Woodlot Owners of Maine.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Quartuch, M.R., Beckley, T.M. Carrots and Sticks: New Brunswick and Maine Forest Landowner Perceptions Toward Incentives and Regulations. Environmental Management 53, 202–218 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-013-0200-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-013-0200-z