Advertisement

Environmental Management

, Volume 52, Issue 5, pp 1041–1045 | Cite as

Indigenous Studies Speaks to Environmental Management

  • Laurie RichmondEmail author
  • Beth Rose Middleton
  • Robert Gilmer
  • Zoltán Grossman
  • Terry Janis
  • Stephanie Lucero
  • Tukoroirangi Morgan
  • Annette Watson
Article

Abstract

This article describes the increasing connections between the fields of Indigenous studies and environmental management and examines some of the ways that an Indigenous studies perspective can guide thinking about environmental management. Indigenous groups have been involved in the management of environmental and natural resources on their lands since time immemorial. Indigenous groups have also become increasingly involved in Western practices of environmental management with the advent of co-management institutions, subsistence boards, traditional ecological knowledge forums, and environmental issues affecting Indigenous resources. Thus, it is an important time for scholarship that explores how Indigenous groups are both shaping and being affected by processes of environmental management. This article summarizes key findings and themes from eight papers situated at the intersection of these two fields of study and identify means by which environmental managers can better accommodate Indigenous rights and perspectives. It is the authors’ hope that increased dialog between Indigenous studies and environmental management can contribute to the building of sustainable and socially just environmental management practices.

Keywords

Indigenous Native American studies Co-management Traditional ecological knowledge 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study emerged out of the collective contributions and collaborations of panelists and audience members who attended the two panel series “Indigenous studies speaks to environmental policy” at the 2011 Annual Meeting at the Native American Indigenous Studies Association. The authors would like to thank the audience members and the conference organizers for helping to establish a venue for such fruitful discussion. The authors also thank Jean O’Brien, President of NAISA from 2010 to 2011, and other NAISA councilors for their work organizing the 2011 annual meeting. No external funding was provided to support the development of this study.

References

  1. Castro AP, Nielsen E (2001) Indigenous people and co-management: implications for conflict management. Env Sci Pol 4:229–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Champagne D (2013) UNDRIP (United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples): human, civil, and Indigenous rights. Wicazo Sa Rev 28:9–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Fall JA (1990) The division of subsistence of the Alaska Department of Fish and Game: an overview of its research program and findings: 1980–1990. Arctic Anthro 27:68–92Google Scholar
  4. Grossman Z (2005) Unlikely alliances: treaty conflicts and environmental cooperation between Native American and rural white communities. Am In Culture Research J 29(4):21–43Google Scholar
  5. Guardians Establishment Committee (2011) Restoring and protecting the health and wellbeing of the Waikato River: vision and strategy for the Waikato River. www.waikatoriver.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Vision-and-Strategy.pdf. Accessed 24 June 2013
  6. Lomawaima K T (2007) Remarks for friday morning plenary session, Indigenous and native studies meeting. University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma. http://www.naisa.org/sites/default/files/Lomawaima%20Plenary%20Remarks%20OU_0.pdf. Accessed 24 June 2013
  7. Nadasdy P (2005) The anti-politics of TEK: the institutionalization of co-management discourse and practice. Anthropologica 47:215–232Google Scholar
  8. Nesper L (2002) The walleye war: the struggle for Ojibwe spearfishing and treaty rights. University of Nebraska Press, LincolnGoogle Scholar
  9. Rosales H (2011, November 28) A sea of change for tribal-state relations—Indian country todayGoogle Scholar
  10. Sayce K, Shuman C, Connor D, Reisewitz A, Pope E, Miller-Henson, Poncelet E, Monié D, Owens B (2012) Beyond traditional stakeholder engagement: public participation roles in California’s statewide marine protected area planning process. Ocean Coast Manage 74:57–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Tsosie R (2007) Indigenous people and environmental justice: the impact of climate change. Univ CO Law Rev 78:1625–1677Google Scholar
  12. United Nations (2008) United Nations Declaration on the rights of Indigenous peoples. Adopted 107th Plenary Meeting, 13 September 2007. http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/unpfii/documents/DRIPS_en.pdf. Accessed 24 June 2013
  13. Wilkins D, Lomawaima K (2002) Uneven ground: American Indian sovereignty and federal law. University of Oklahoma Press, NormanGoogle Scholar
  14. Wilkinson C (2000) Messages from Frank’s landing: a story of salmon, treaties, and the Indian way. University of Washington Press, SeattleGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Laurie Richmond
    • 1
    Email author
  • Beth Rose Middleton
    • 2
  • Robert Gilmer
    • 3
  • Zoltán Grossman
    • 4
  • Terry Janis
    • 5
  • Stephanie Lucero
    • 6
  • Tukoroirangi Morgan
    • 7
  • Annette Watson
    • 8
  1. 1.Department of Environmental Science and ManagementHumboldt State UniversityArcataUSA
  2. 2.Native American Studies DepartmentUniversity of CaliforniaDavisUSA
  3. 3.History DepartmentUniversity of South CarolinaColumbiaUSA
  4. 4.Geography and Native StudiesThe Evergreen State CollegeOlympiaUSA
  5. 5.White Earth Nation Constitution Reform ManagerWhite EarthUSA
  6. 6.National Indian Justice CenterSanta RosaUSA
  7. 7.Te Arataura, Waikato-Tainui Te Kauhanganui Inc.WaikatoNew Zealand
  8. 8.Department of Political ScienceCollege of CharlestonCharlestonUSA

Personalised recommendations