Environmental Management

, Volume 52, Issue 6, pp 1547–1561 | Cite as

The Best Laid Plans: Community-Based Natural Resource Management (CBNRM) Group Capacity and Planning Success

  • Natalie J. Mountjoy
  • Erin Seekamp
  • Mae A. Davenport
  • Matt R. Whiles
Article

Abstract

As community-based natural resource management (CBNRM) increases in popularity, the question of the capacity of such groups to successfully manage natural resources becomes increasingly relevant. However, few studies have quantifiably analyzed how the amount or type of capacity in a CBNRM organization directly affects the outputs or the environmental outcomes produced. This paucity of research exists in part due to the diversity of indicators for CBNRM group capacity, as well as the ensuing debate over how to best define and measure success in CBNRM initiatives. Although concrete outputs vary widely, many efforts center on creating natural resource management plans (RMPs). The primary objective of our research was to explore the link between capacity and RMP implementation success, as perceived by practitioners among CBNRM groups across Illinois. A short online survey was constructed, utilizing findings from focus groups in combination with an extensive literature review, to measure CBNRM participants’ (n = 190) perceptions of 10 key capacity indicators and RMP implementation success. Results show that capacity perceptions varied significantly among respondents in low, moderate, and high RMP implementation success groups, and that group capacity was predictive of the degree of perceived RMP implementation success. Further, our findings suggest that bonding social capital and outreach are crucial in predicting low versus moderate RMP success, while leadership, motivation, and vision best distinguish the moderately successful and highly successful groups.

Keywords

Community-based natural resource management Capacity Resource management planning Quantitative surveys Human capital Social capital 

References

  1. Armitage D (2005) Adaptive capacity and community-based natural resource management. Environ Manage 35(6):703–715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aslin HJ, Collier N, Garnett ST (2009) Community-based natural resource management and environmental impact assessment. Report to the Environmental Protection Authority, Northern Territory Government. Available at http://www.epa.nt.gov.au/sites/default/files/our%20work/environemental%20assessment%20review/related/07%20--%20epa_cbnrm_report.pdf. Accessed 11 May 2012
  3. Beckley TM, Martz D, Nadeau S, Wall B, Reimer E (2008) Multiple capacities multiple outcomes: delving deeper into the meaning of community capacity. JRCD 3:56–75Google Scholar
  4. Belton LR, Jackson-Smith D (2010) Factors influencing success among collaborative sage grouse management groups in the western United States. Environ Conserv 37:250–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berg N (2002) Non-response bias. University of Texas at Dallas. Available at http://www.utdallas.edu/~nberg/Berg_ARTICLES/BergNon-ResponseBiasMay2002.pdf. Accessed 27 November 2013
  6. Berkes F (2009) Evolution of co-management: role of knowledge generation bridging organizations and social learning. J Environ Manage 90:1692–1702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bonnell JE, Koontz TM (2007) Stumbling forward: the organizational challenges of building and sustaining collaborative watershed management. Soc Nat Resour 20:153–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burns RP, Burns R (2009) Business research methods and statistics using SPSS. Discriminant analysis, chap 25. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  9. Chambliss DF, Schutt RK (2010) Making sense of the social world: methods of investigation, 3rd edn. Pine Forge Press, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  10. Chaskin RJ, Brown P, Venkatesh S, Vidal A (2001) Building community capacity. Aldine Transaction, New BrunswickGoogle Scholar
  11. Collins J (2005) Good to great and the social sectors: a monograph to accompany good to great. Harper, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Conley A, Moote MA (2003) Evaluating collaborative natural resource management. Soc Nat Resour 16:371–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cook C, Heath F, Thompson RL (2000) A meta-analysis of response rates in web- or internet-based surveys. Educ Psychol Meas 60:821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Côté S (2001) The contribution of human and social capital. ISUMA. Spring 29–35Google Scholar
  15. Craig G (2007) Community capacity-building: something old something new. Crit Soc Policy Ltd 27:335–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Delbecq AL, VandeVen AH (1971) A group process model for problem identification and program planning. JAB 7:466–491Google Scholar
  17. Dietz JM et al (2004) Defining leadership in conservation: a view from the top. Conserv Biol 18:274–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dillman DA (2007) Mail & Internet surveys: the tailored design method, 2nd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Donoghue EM, Sturtevant VE (2007) Social science constructs in ecosystem assessments: revisiting community capacity and community resiliency. Soc Nat Resour 20:899–912CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fabricius C, Folke C, Cundill G, Schultz L (2007) Powerless spectators coping actors and adaptive co-managers: a synthesis of the role of communities in ecosystem management. Ecol Soc 12. Available at http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss1/art29. Accessed 11 March 2011
  21. Fiszbien A (1997) The emergence of local capacity: lessons from Colombia. World Dev 25:1029–1043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Flora CB, Flora JL (2007) Rural communities: legacy and change, 3rd edn. Westview Press, BoulderGoogle Scholar
  23. Folke C, Hahn T, Olsson P, Norberg J (2005) Adaptive governance of socialecological systems. Annu Rev Energ Environ 30:441–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Foster-Fishman PG, Berkowitz SL, Lounsbury SJ, Allen NA (2001) Building collaborative capacity in community coalitions: a review and integrative framework. Am J Community Psychol 29:241–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gittell R, Vidal A (1998) Community organizing: building social capital as a development strategy. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  26. Goodman RM, Speers MA, McElroy K, Fawecett M, Parker E, Smith SR, Sterling TD, Wallerstein N (1998) Identifying and defining the dimensions of community capacity to provide a basis for measurement. Health Educ Behav 25:258–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gruber JS (2010) Key principles of community-based natural resource management: a synthesis and interpretation of identified effective approaches for managing the commons. Environ Manage 45:52–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hein L, van Koppen K, de Groot RS, van Ierland EC (2006) Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services. Ecol Econ 57:209–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ilbery B, Maye D (2006) Marketing sustainable food production in Europe: case study evidence from two Dutch labeling schemes. Royal Dutch Geogr Soc 98:507–518Google Scholar
  30. Illinois Department of Natural Resources [IDNR] (2005) The Illinois comprehensive wildlife conservation plan and strategy. Available at  http://dnr.state.il.us/orc/wildliferesources/theplan/final/Illinois_final_report.pdf. Accessed 7 November 2010
  31. Kaplowitz MD, Hadlock TD, Levine R (2010) A comparison of web and mail survey response rates. Public Opin Quart 68:94–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kenney D (2000) Are community watershed groups effective? Confronting the thorny issue of measuring success. In: Brick P, Snow D, Van de Wetering S (eds) Across the great divide: explorations in conservation & the American West. Island Press, Washignton DC, pp 188–193Google Scholar
  33. Koontz TM, Thomas CW (2006) What do we know & need to know about the environmental outcomes of collaborative management? Public Admin Rev 66:111–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Leach WD, Sabatier PA (2005) Are trust and social capital the keys to success? In: Sabatier PA (ed) Swimming upstream: collaborative approaches to watershed management. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 233–258Google Scholar
  35. Leach WD, Pelkey NW, Sabatier PA (2002) Stakeholder partnerships as collaborative policymaking: evaluation criteria applied to watershed management in California & Washington. J Pol Anal Manage 21:645–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lubell M, Richard F, Edgar R (2005) Political institutions and conservation by local governments. Urban Aff Rev 40:706–729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lynch WD, Gardner HH, Melkonian A, Kleinman N (2007) Human capital, motivation and productivity. Report from the Health as Human Capital Foundation. Available at http://www.hhefoundation.org/hhef/pdfBrief1.pdf. Accessed 10 January 2010
  38. Manolis JC, Chan K, Finkelstein ME, Stephens S, Nelson CR, Grant JB, Dombeck MP (2009) Leadership: a new frontier in conservation science. Conserv Biol 23:879–886CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Margerum RD (2007) Overcoming locally based collaboration constraints. Soc Nat Resour 20:135–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Marks S, Dunn OJ (1974) Discriminant functions when covariance matrices are unequal. J Am Stat Assoc 69:555–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Martilla JA, James JC (1977) Importance-performance analysis. J Marketing 41:77–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. McGinnis MV, Woolley J, Gamman J (1999) Bioregional conflict resolution: rebuilding community in watershed planning and organizing. Environ Manage 24:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. McKinsey and Company (2001) Effective capacity building in nonprofit organizations. Washington DC Venture Philanthropy Partners. Available at http://www.vppartners.org/sites/default/files/reports/full_rpt.pdf. Accessed 1 February 2011
  44. Mendis-Millard S, Reed MG (2007) Understanding community capacity using adaptive and reflexive research practices: lessons from two Canadian biosphere reserves. Soc Nat Resour 20:543–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Moore EA, Koontz TM (2003) Research note a typology of collaborative watershed groups: citizen-based, agency-based, and mixed partnerships. Soc Nat Resour 16:451–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Moore SA, Severn RC, Millar R (2006) A conceptual model of community capacity for biodiversity conservation outcomes. Geogr Res 44:361–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mountjoy NJ, Davenport MA, Meyers DJ, Whiles MR (2010) An assessment of Illinois Conservation Opportunity Areas: stakeholders’ perspectives on conservation planning, implementation, and threats. Illinois Department of Natural Resources. Available at http://www.dnr.illinois.gov/conservation/IWAP/Documents/T-55%20SWG%20project/1-%20Original%20COA%20Survey.pdf. Accessed 5 February 2012
  48. Mountjoy NJ, Seekamp E, Davenport MA, Whiles MR (2013) Identifying capacity indicators for community-based natural resource management. J Environ Plann Manag. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2012.743880. Accessed 27 November 2013
  49. Newton K (2001) Trust social capital civil society and democracy. Int Polit Sci Rev 22:201–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Olsson P, Folke C, Hahn T (2004) Socio-ecological transformation for ecosystem management: the development of adaptive co-management of a wetland landscape in southern Sweden. Ecol Soc 9(4). Available at http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss4/art2. Accessed 11 March 2011
  51. Pavey JL, Muth AB, Ostermeier D, Steiner DM (2007) Building capacity for local governance: an application of interactional theory to developing a community of interest. Rural Sociol 72(1):90–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Putnam RD (1993) The prosperous community: social capital and public life. Am Prospect 4(13):65–78Google Scholar
  53. Raymond C, Cleary J, Cosgrove K (2006) A community capacity assessment tool and process for natural resource management DWLBC Report No 2006/35 Adelaide: Government of South Australia Department of Water Land and Biodiversity ConservationGoogle Scholar
  54. Saegert S, Thompson P, Warren MR (eds) (2001) Social capital and poor communities. Russel Sage Foundation, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  55. Schutt RK (2012) Investigating the social world: the practice and process of research. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  56. Sheehan-Holt JK (1998) MANOVA simultaneous test procedures: the power and robustness of restricted multivariate contrasts. Educ Psychol Meas 58:861–881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wondolleck JM, Yaffee SL (2000) Making collaboration work: lessons from innovation in natural resource management. Island Press, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  58. Woolcock M, Narayan D (2000) Social capital: implications for development theory, research, and policy. World Bank Res Obser 15(2):225–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Natalie J. Mountjoy
    • 1
  • Erin Seekamp
    • 2
  • Mae A. Davenport
    • 3
  • Matt R. Whiles
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Zoology and Center for EcologySouthern Illinois University CarbondaleCarbondaleUSA
  2. 2.Department of Parks, Recreation and Tourism ManagementNorth Carolina State UniversityRaleighUSA
  3. 3.Department of Forest ResourcesUniversity of MinnesotaSt. PaulUSA

Personalised recommendations