Abstract
With increasing water scarcity and competing uses and users, water use efficiency is becoming increasingly important in many parts of developing countries. The lake Naivasha basin has an array of different water users and uses ranging from large scale export market agriculture, urban domestic water users to small holder farmers. The small scale farmers are located in the upper catchment areas and form the bulk of the users in terms of area and population. This study used farm household data to explore the overall technical efficiency, irrigation water use efficiency and establish the factors influencing water use efficiency among small scale farmers in the Lake Naivasha basin in Kenya. Data envelopment analysis, general algebraic and modeling system, and Tobit regression methods were used in analyzing cross sectional data from a sample of 201 small scale irrigation farmers in the lake Naivasha basin. The results showed that on average, the farmers achieved only 63 % technical efficiency and 31 % water use efficiency. This revealed that substantial inefficiencies occurred in farming operations among the sampled farmers. To improve water use efficiency, the study recommends that more emphasis be put on orienting farmers toward appropriate choice of irrigation technologies, appropriate choice of crop combinations in their farms, and the attainment of desirable levels of farm fragmentation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adger NW, Luttrell C (2000) Property rights and the utilization of wetlands. J Ecol Econ 35:75–89. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00169-5
Akwany L (2011) PhD proposal. http://google.com/site/eoianaivasha/project-definition/water-governance. Accessed 14 June 2012
Alene AD, Zeller M (2005) Technology adoption and farmer efficiency in multiple crops production in eastern Ethiopia: a comparison of parametric and nonparametric distance functions. J Agric Econ 6:5–17
Arega DA, Manyong MV, Gockowski J (2006) The production efficiency of intercropping annual and perennial crops in southern Ethiopia: a comparison of distance functions and production frontiers. J Agric Syst 91:51–70. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2006.01.007
Ball VE, Lovell CAK, Nehring RF, Somwaru A (1994) Incorporating Undesirable Outputs into Models of Production: an Application to US Agriculture. Cah d’Econ et Soc Rural 31:59–73
Banker RD, Charnes A, Cooper WW (1984) Some models for estimating technical and scale Inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. J Manag Sci 30:1078–1092
Coelli T, Rao PDS, Battese GE (1998) An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis. Kluwer, Boston
Coelli T, Rahman S, Thirtle C (2002) Technical, allocative, cost and scale efficiencies in Bangladesh rice cultivation: a non-parametric approach. J Agric Econ 53(3):607–627
Díaz RJA, Camacho Poyato E, López Luque R (2004a) Applying benchmarking and data envelopment analysis (DEA) techniques to irrigation districts in Spain. J Irrig Drain 53:135–143. doi:10.1002/ird.128
Díaz RJA, Camacho Poyato E, López Luque R (2004b) Application of data envelopment analysis to studies of irrigation efficiency in Andalusia. J Irrig Drain Eng 130:175–183. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2004)130:3(175)
Färe R, Grosskopf S, Lovell CAK (1994) Production frontiers. Cambridge University, Cambridge
Farrell MJ (1957) The measurement of productive efficiency. J Roy Stat Soc 120:253–281
Fraser I, Cordina D (1999) An application of data envelopment analysis to irrigated dairy farms in Northern Victoria, Australia. J Agric Syst 59:267–282
Frija A, Chebil A, Speelman S, Buysse J, Huylenbroeck VG (2009) Water use and technical efficiencies in horticultural greenhouses in Tunisia. J Agric Water Manag 96:1509–1516. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2009.05.006
Haji J (2006) Production efficiency of smallholders’ vegetable-dominated mixed farming system in Eastern Ethiopia: a non-parametric approach. J Afr Econ 16(1):1–27. doi:10.1093/jae/ejl044
Harper DM, Mavuti KM (2004) Managing protected areas in the face of ecosystem change and anthropogenic stress, lake Naivasha Kenya. J Hydrobiol 4:287–305
Harper DM, Boar RR, Everard M, Hickley P (2002) Towards an understanding of human impact upon the hydrology of Lake Naivasha, Kenya. J Hydrobiol 488:1–11
Jacomia P. de Regt (2005) Paper presented at the International workshop on African water laws: plural legislative frameworks for rural water management in Africa. Johannesburg South Africa
Malano MH, Burton M, Makin I (2004) Benchmarking performance in the irrigation and drainage sector: a tool for change. J Irrig drain 53:119–133
Mireri C (2005) Challenges facing the conservation of Lake Naivasha, Kenya. Msc thesis, Kenyatta University
Mulwa R (2006) Economic and environmental performance of sugarcane production in Kenya: non-parametric frontier approaches. PhD dissertation, University of Giessen
Mwakubo SM, Obare GM, Birungi P, Rono PK, Karamagi I (2004) Status and challenges of wetlands management towards livelihood improvement: the case of Lake Victoria wetlands. https://www.google.de/#bav=on.2,or.r_qf.&fp=383762b388ad7c71&q. Accessed 20 Sept 2012
Nsanzugwanko MD, Battese GE, Fleming EM (1996) The technical efficiency of small agricultural producers in Central Ethiopia. Centre for Efficiency and Productivity analysis working papers No. 5/96. University of New England, Armidale
Oude-Lansink A, Reinhard S (2004) Investigating technical efficiency and potential technological change in Dutch pig farming. J Agric Syst 79:353–367. doi:10.1016/S0308-521X(03)00091-X
Oude-Lansink A, Silva E (2004) Non-parametric production analysis of pesticides use in the Netherlands. J Product Anal 21:49–65
Oude-Lansink A, Pietola K, Bäckman S (2002) Efficiency and productivity of conventional and organic farms in Finland. Eur Rev Agric Econ 29(1):51–65
Raju SK, Kumar ND (2006) Ranking irrigation planning alternatives using data envelopment analysis. J Water Resour Manag 20:553–566
Reba P (2003) Sectoral trends in the water sector (technology, policy, and poverty) in south Asia. In: South Asia conference on technologies for poverty reduction, New Delhi
Reig-Martinez E, Picazo-Tadeo AJ (2004) Analysing farming systems with data envelopment analysis: citrus farming in Spain. J Agric Syst 82:17–30
Reinhard S, Lovell CAK, Thijssen G (1999) Econometric estimation of technical and environmental efficiency: an application to Dutch dairy farms. Am J Agric Econ 81:44–60
Republic of Kenya (2002) National development plan. Government Printer, Nairobi
Siebert S, Burke J, Faures K, Frenken J, Hoogeveen PD, Portmann FT (2010) Groundwater use for irrigation–a global inventory. J Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 14:1863–1880. doi:10.5194/hess-14-1863-2010
Speelman S, D’Haese M, Buysse J (2008) A measure for the efficiency of water use and its determinants, a case study of small-scale irrigation schemes in North-West Province, South Africa. J Agric syst 98:31–39. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2008.03.006
Thiam A, Bravo-Ureta BE, Rivas TE (2001) Technical efficiency in developing country agriculture: a meta analysis. J Agric Econ 25:235–243
Wadud A, White B (2000) Farm household efficiency in Bangladesh: a comparison of stochastic frontier and DEA methods. J Appl Econ 32:1665–1673
Wallace JS (2000) Increasing agricultural water use efficiency to meet future food production. J Agric Ecosyst Environ 82:105–119
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge funding for this study from the African Economic Research Consortium and the University of Bonn.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Njiraini, G.W., Guthiga, P.M. Are Small-Scale Irrigators Water Use Efficient? Evidence from Lake Naivasha Basin, Kenya. Environmental Management 52, 1192–1201 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-013-0146-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-013-0146-1