Skip to main content

By-Catch Impacts in Fisheries: Utilizing the IUCN Red List Categories for Enhanced Product Level Assessment in Seafood LCAs

Abstract

Overexploitation of fish stocks causes concern not only to fisheries managers and conservation biologists, but also engages seafood consumers; more integrated product perspectives would be useful. This could be provided by life cycle assessment (LCA); however, further complements of present LCA methodology are needed to assess seafood production, one being by-catch impacts. We studied the scientific rationale behind using the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ for assessment of impacts relating to fish species’ vulnerability. For this purpose, the current Red List status of marine fish in Sweden was compared to the advice given in fisheries as well as key life history traits known to indicate sensitivity to high fishing pressure. Further, we quantified the amount of threatened fish (vulnerable, endangered, or critically endangered) that was discarded in demersal trawl fisheries on the Swedish west coast. The results showed that not only did the national Red List of marine fish have a high consistency with advice given in fisheries and indices of vulnerability, the different fishing practices studied were also found to have vastly different amounts of threatened fish discarded per kilo landing. The suggested approach is therefore promising as a carrier of aggregated information on the extent to which seafood production interferes with conservation priorities, in particular for species lacking adequate stock assessment. To enable extensive product comparisons, it is important to increase coverage of fish species by the global IUCN Red List, and to reconsider the appropriate assessment unit (species or stocks) in order to avoid false alarms.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  • Biodiversity Indicators Partnership (2010) Biodiversity indicators and the 2010 Target: Experiences and lessons learnt from the 2010 Biodiversity Indicators Partnership. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal, Canada. Technical Series No. 53, pp 196

  • Brander K (1981) Disappearance of common skate Raia batis from Irish Sea. Nature 290:48–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks T, Kennedy E (2004) Conservation biology: biodiversity barometers. Nature 431:1046–1047

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bubb PJ, Butchart SHM, Collen B, Dublin H, Kapos V, Pollock C, Stuart SN, Vié J-C (2009) IUCN Red List index—guidance for national and regional use. Gland, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Butchart SHM, Stattersfield AJ, Baillie J, Bennun LA, Stuart SN, Akçakaya HR, Hilton-Taylor C, Mace GM (2005) Using Red List indices to measure progress towards the 2010 target and beyond. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 360:255–268

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casey JM, Myers RA (1998) Near extinction of a large, widely distributed fish. Science 281:690–692

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • CBD (2010) Target 12: By 2020 the extinction of known threatened species has been prevented and their conservation status, particularly of those most in decline, has been improved and sustained.” Aichi Biodiversity Targets, available at http://www.cbd.int/sp/targets/

  • Christensen V, Guenette S, Heymans J, Walters C, Watson R, Zeller D, Pauly D (2003) Hundred-year decline of North Atlantic predatory fishes. Fish Fish 4:1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collette BB, Carpenter KE, Polidoro BA, Juan-Jordá MJ, Boustany A, Die DJ, Elfes C, Fox W, Graves J, Harrison LR et al (2011) High value and long life—double jeopardy for tunas and billfishes. Science 333:291–292

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collette BB, Polidoro B, Carpenter K (2013) Corrected numbers for fish on Red List. Nature 495:47

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costello C, Ovando D, Hilborn R, Gaines SD, Deschenes O, Lester SE (2012) Status and solutions for the world’s unassessed fisheries. Science 338:517–520

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies RWD, Cripps SJ, Nickson A, Porter G (2009) Defining and estimating global marine fisheries bycatch. Mar Policy 33:661–672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devine JA, Baker KD, Haedrich RL (2006) Fisheries: deep-sea fishes qualify as endangered. Nature 439:29

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dulvy NK, Metcalfe JD, Glanville J, Pawson MG, Reynolds JD (2000) Fishery stability, local extinctions and shifts in community structure in skates. Conserv Biol 14:283–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dulvy NK, Jennings S, Goodwin NB, Grant A, Reynolds JD (2005) Comparison of threat and exploitation status in North-East Atlantic marine populations. J Appl Ecol 42:883–891

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2010) State of the world’s fisheries and aquaculture. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiskeriverket (2010) Fiskbestånd och miljö i hav och sötvatten-Resursöversikt 2010 (in Swedish)

  • Ford JS, Pelletier NL, Ziegler F, Scholz AJ, Tyedmers PH, Sonesson U, Kruse SA, Silverman H (2012) Proposed local ecological impact categories and indicators for life cycle assessment of aquaculture. J Ind Ecol 16:254–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gärdenfors U (2001) Classifying threatened species at national versus global levels. Trends Ecol Evol 16:511–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gärdenfors U (ed) (2010) Rödlistade Arter i Sverige 2010—the 2010 Red List of Swedish species. ArtDatabanken, SLU, Uppsala (In Swedish)

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenstreet SPR, Rogers SI (2006) Indicators of the health of the North Sea fish community: identifying reference levels for an ecosystem approach to management. ICES J Mar Sci 63:573–593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann M, Hilton-Taylor C, Angulo A, Böhm M, Brooks TM, Butchart SHM, Carpenter KE, Chanson J, Collen B, Cox NA et al (2010) The impact of conservation on the status of the world’s vertebrates. Science 330:1503–1509

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hornborg S, Nilsson P, Valentinsson D, Ziegler F (2012) Integrated environmental assessment of fisheries management: Swedish Nephrops trawl fisheries evaluated using a life cycle approach. Mar Policy 36:1193–1201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howell DC (2007) University of Vermont, www.uvm.edu/~dhowell/StatPages/Resampling/Resampling.html. Accessed 15 March 2012

  • Hutchings J (2000) Collapse and recovery of marine fishes. Nature 406:882–885

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchings JA, Myers RA, García VB, Lucifora LO, Kuparinen A (2012) Life-history correlates of extinction risk and recovery potential. Ecol Appl 22:1061–1067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huxley TH (1883) Inaugural meeting of the fishery congress. W Clowes and sons, limited, London, p 22

    Google Scholar 

  • ICES (2008a) Report of the ICES Advisory Committee 2008. ICES Advice, 2008. Book 6, pp 326

  • ICES (2008b). Report of the Working Group on Fish Ecology (WGFE), 3–7 March 2008, ICES, Copenhagen, Denmark. ICES CM 2008/LRC:04

  • ICES (2009a) Report of the ICES Advisory Committee 2009. ICES Advice, 2009. Book 6, pp 236

  • ICES (2009b) Report of the ICES Advisory Committee 2009. ICES Advice, 2009. Book 8, pp 132

  • ICES (2009c) Report of the Workshop on analytical methods for evaluation of extinction risk of stocks in poor condition (WKPOOR1), 18–20 May 2009, Copenhagen, Denmark. ICES CM 2009\ACOM:29

  • ICES (2009d) Workshop for the Exploration of the dynamics of fish socks in poor conditions (WKPOOR2), 24–27 August 2009, Bergen, Norway. ICES CM 2009\ACOM:49

  • ICES (2012) ICES’ Implementation of RGLIFE advice on Data Limited Stocks (DLS). ICES Report, 2012. ICES Advisory Committee. ICES CM 2012, ACOM:68. Draft report. 26 pp

  • ISO (2006a) Environmental labels and declarations-Type III environmental declarations-Principles and procedures. ISO 14025:2006

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO (2006b) Environmental management—life cycle assessment—principles and framework. ISO 14040:2006(E). International Organization of Standardization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO (2006c) Environmental management—life cycle assessment—requirements and guidelines. ISO 14044:2006(E). International Organization of Standardization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • IUCN (2012) IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2011.2. http://www.iucnredlist.org. Accessed 31 March 2012

  • IUCN Standards and Petitions Subcommittee (2010). Guidelines for Using the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria. Version 8.1. Prepared by the Standards and Petitions Subcommittee in March 2010. http://intranet.iucn.org/webfiles/doc/SSC/RedList/RedListGuidelines.pdf. Accessed 31 March 2011

  • Jennings S, Reynolds JD, Mills SC (1998) Life history correlates of responses to fisheries exploitation. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 265:333–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johannes RE (1998) The case for data-less marine resource management: examples from tropical nearshore finfisheries. Trends Ecol Evol 13:243–246

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelleher K (2005) Discards in world’s marine fisheries, an update. FAO. Fisheries Technical Paper (No 470). FAO, Rome, pp 131

  • Klöpffer W (2003) Life-cycle based methods for sustainable product development. Int J Life Cycle Assess 8:157–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruse SA, Flysjö A, Kasperczyk N, Scholz AJ (2009) Socioeconomic indicators as complement to life cycle assessment—an application to salmon production systems. Int J Life Cycle Assess 14:8–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenzen M, Moran D, Kanemoto K, Foran B, Lobefaro L, Geschke A (2012) International trade drives biodiversity threats in developing nations. Nature 486:109–112

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mace GH, Hudson EJ (1999) Attitudes toward sustainability and extinction. Conserv Biol 13:242–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MSC (2011) Amendments to the fisheries assessment methodology. TAB D-032 v1. Date of issue 19th of January 2011, Effective date 7th of February 2011

  • Myers RA, Worm B (2003) Rapid worldwide depletion of predatory fish communities. Nature 423:280–283

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ottosson L (2008) By-catches of non-commercial invertebrate taxa in Skagerrak and Kattegat, generated by demersal otter trawling. Master Thesis in Marine Ecology, Department of Marine Ecology, Gothenburg University, Sweden. Contribution no. 374

  • Pelletier N, Tyedmers P (2008) Life cycle considerations for improving sustainability assessments in seafood awareness campaigns. Environ Manage 42:918–931

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelletier NL, Ayer N, Tyedmers P, Kruse S, Flysjo A, Robillard G, Ziegler F, Scholz A, Sonesson U (2006) Impact categories for life cycle assessment research of seafood production systems: review and prospectus. Int J Life Cycle Assess 12:414–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piet GJ, Jennings S (2005) Response of potential fish community indicators to fishing. ICES J Mar Sci 62:214–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pikitch EK, Santora C, Babcock EA, Bakun A, Bonfil R, Conover DO, Dayton P, Doukakis P, Fluharty D, Heneman B et al (2004) Ecosystem-based fishery management. Science 305:346–347

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinsky ML, Jensen OP, Ricard D, Palumbi SR (2011) Unexpected patterns of fisheries collapse in the world’s oceans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:8317–8322

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Possingham HP, Andelman SJ, Burgman MA, Medellin RA, Master LL, Keith DA (2002) Limits to the use of threatened species lists. Trends Ecol Evol 17:503–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reap J, Roman F, Duncan S, Bras B (2008) A survey of unresolved problems in life cycle assessment, part 2: impact assessment and interpretation. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13:374–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds JD, Dulvy NK, Goodwin NB, Hutchings JA (2005) Biology of extinction risk in marine fishes. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 272:2337–2344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts CM, Hawkins JP (1999) Extinction risk in the sea. Trends Ecol Evol 14:241–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts JM, Wheeler AJ, Freiwald A (2006) Reefs of the deep: the biology and geology of cold-water coral ecosystems. Science 312:543–547

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues ASL, Pilgrim JD, Lamoreux JF, Hoffmann M, Brooks TM (2006) The value of the IUCN Red List for conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 21:71–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadovy de Mitcheson Y, Craig MT, Bertoncini AA, Carpenter KE, Cheung WWL, Choat JH, Cornish AS, Fennessy ST, Ferreira BP, Heemstra PC et al (2012) Fishing groupers towards extinction: a global assessment of threats and extinction risks in a billion dollar fishery. Fish Fish. doi:10.1111/j.1467-2979.2011.00455.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Suuronen P (2005) Mortality of fish escaping trawl gears. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper. No. 478. FAO, Rome, p 72

  • Thrane M, Ziegler F, Sonesson U (2009) Eco-labelling of wild-caught seafood products. J Clean Prod 17:416–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vázquez-Rowe I, Moreira MT, Feijoo G (2012a) Inclusion of discard assessment indicators in fisheries life cycle assessment studies. Expanding the use of fishery-specific impact categories. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17:535–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vázquez-Rowe I, Hospido A, Moreira MT, Feijoo G (2012b) Best practices in life cycle assessment implementation in fisheries. Improving and broadening environmental assessment for seafood production systems. Trends Food Sci Technol 28:116–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank Katja Ringdahl for contributing with data, Daniel Valentinsson and Andreas Emanuelsson for interesting discussions. The Swedish Research Council Formas and the European Commission (LC-IMPACT FP7 Grant Agreement 243827) is acknowledged for financing the work.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sara Hornborg.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hornborg, S., Svensson, M., Nilsson, P. et al. By-Catch Impacts in Fisheries: Utilizing the IUCN Red List Categories for Enhanced Product Level Assessment in Seafood LCAs. Environmental Management 52, 1239–1248 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-013-0096-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-013-0096-7

Keywords

  • Conservation
  • Discards
  • Fisheries management
  • IUCN Red List
  • LCA
  • Seafood