Advertisement

Environmental Management

, Volume 52, Issue 1, pp 179–195 | Cite as

Vulnerability of Water Systems to the Effects of Climate Change and Urbanization: A Comparison of Phoenix, Arizona and Portland, Oregon (USA)

  • Kelli L. LarsonEmail author
  • Colin Polsky
  • Patricia Gober
  • Heejun Chang
  • Vivek Shandas
Article

Abstract

The coupled processes of climate change and urbanization pose challenges for water resource management in cities worldwide. Comparing the vulnerabilities of water systems in Phoenix, Arizona and Portland, Oregon, this paper examines (1) exposures to these stressors, (2) sensitivities to the associated impacts, and (3) adaptive capacities for responding to realized or anticipated impacts. Based on a case study and survey-based approach, common points of vulnerability include: rising exposures to drier, warmer summers, and suburban growth; increasing sensitivities based on demand hardening; and limited capacities due to institutional and pro-growth pressures. Yet each region also exhibits unique vulnerabilities. Comparatively, Portland shows: amplified exposures to seasonal climatic extremes, heightened sensitivity based on less diversified municipal water sources and policies that favor more trees and other irrigated vegetation, and diminished adaptive capacities because of limited attention to demand management and climate planning for water resources. Phoenix exhibits elevated exposure from rapid growth, heightened sensitivities due to high water demands and widespread increases in residential and commercial uses, and limited adaptive capacities due to weak land use planning and “smart growth” strategies. Unique points of vulnerability suggest pathways for adapting to urban-environmental change, whether through water management or land planning. Greater coordination between the land and water sectors would substantially reduce vulnerabilities in the study regions and beyond.

Keywords

Water management Vulnerability Climate change Adaptive capacity Urban sustainability 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Financial assistance for this Sector Applications Research Program (SARP) project was provided by the Climate Program Office of the U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, pursuant to NOAA Award No. NA09OAR4310140. Supplementary support was also provided by: National Science Foundation (NSF) under Grant SES-0345945, Decision Center for a Desert City I and SES-0951366, DCDC II: Urban Climate Adaptation, at Arizona State University; NSF awards OCE-0423565 and OCE-1026859, the Plum Island Ecosystems Long Term Ecological Research (PIE LTER) program, and BCS-0709685, BCS-0948984 and SES-0849985 at Clark University; and by a sustainability grant from the James F. and Marion L. Miller Foundation at Portland State. The Portland Water Bureau provided in-kind support as well. Finally, the authors thank Ray Quay and Lorna Stickel for their insights and contributions to this project, in addition to the water and land use planners who participated in our survey and/or attended our workshops. Barbara Trapido-Lurie and Benjamin Lobato also deserve thanks for their assistance with graphics. Note, however, the statements, findings, and recommendations herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of NOAA, NSF, or other project supporters and contributors.

References

  1. ADA (2013) 2012–2050 State and county population projections. Office of Employment and Population Statistics, Arizona Department of Administration. http://www.workforce.az.gov/population-projections.aspx. Accessed 17 Jan 2013
  2. Adger WN (2000) Social and ecological resilience: are they related? Prog Hum Geogr 24(3):347–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adger WN (2006) Vulnerability. Global Environ Change 16:268–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baker LA, Brazel AJ, Selover N et al (2002) Urbanization and warming of Phoenix (Arizona, USA): impacts, feedbacks and mitigation. Urban Ecosyst 6(3):183–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Balling RC, Gober P (2007) Climate variability and residential water use in the city of Phoenix, Arizona. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 46:1130–1137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bates S (2011) Bridging the governance gap: strategies to integrate water and land use planning, 2nd edn. Center for Natural Resources and Environmental Policy, University of Montana, MissoulaGoogle Scholar
  7. Bolin B, Seetharam M, Pompeii B (2010) Water resources, climate change and urban vulnerability: a case study of Phoenix, Arizona. Local Environ 15(3):261–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brazel AJ, Gober P, Lee SJ et al (2007) Dynamics and determinants of urban heat island change (1990–2004) in Phoenix, Arizona USA. Clim Res 33:171–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Breyer B, Chang H, Parandvash H (2012) Land-use, temperature and single family residential water use patterns in Portland, Oregon and Phoenix, Arizona. Appl Geogr 35:142–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chang H (2007) Streamflow characteristics in urbanizing basins in the Portland metropolitan area, OR, USA. Hydrol Process 21(2):211–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chang H, Parandvash H, Shandas V (2010a) Spatial variations of single-family residential water consumption in Portland, Oregon. Urban Geogr 31(7):953–972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chang H, Lafrenz M, Jung I-W et al (2010b) Potential impacts of climate change on flood-induced travel disruption: a case study of Portland in Oregon, USA. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 100(4):938–952CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. DeOreo WB (2006) The role of water conservation in a long-range drought plan. J Am Water Works Assoc 98(2):94–101Google Scholar
  14. Dow K, O’Connor RE, Yarnal B et al (2007) Why worry? Community water system managers’ perceptions of climate variability. Global Environ Change 17:228–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ellis AW, Hawkins TW, Balling RC, Gober P (2008) Estimating future runoff levels for a semi-arid fluvial system in central Arizona, USA. Clim Res 35(3):227–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Farley KA, Tague C, Grant GE (2011) Vulnerability of water supply from the Oregon Cascades to changing climate: linking science to users and policy. Global Environ Change 21:110–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gleick PH (2002) Soft water paths. Nature 25:373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gober P (2006) Metropolitan Phoenix: place making and community building in the desert. University of Pennsylvania Press, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  19. Gober P, Brazel AJ, Quay R et al (2010) Using watered landscapes to manipulate urban heat island effects: how much water will it take to cool Phoenix? J Am Plan Assoc 76(1):109–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gober P, Larson K, Quay R, et al (2012a) Why land planners and water managers don’t talk to one another and why they should! Soc Nat Res. doi: 10.1080/08941920.2012.713448
  21. Gober P, Middel A, Brazel A et al (2012b) Tradeoffs between water conservation and temperature amelioration in Phoenix and Portland: implications for urban sustainability. Urban Geogr 33(7):1030–1054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gober P, White D, Quay R et al (2013) Socio-hydrology for an uncertain future, with examples from the USA and Canada. Model fusion, Geophysical Society, London (forthcoming)Google Scholar
  23. Graves D, Chang H (2007) Hydrologic impacts of climate change in the Upper Clackamas basin of Oregon. Clim Res 33(2):143–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Guha A (2009) Adapting to suburbanization-induced water stress in eastern Massachusetts: opportunities and constraints for integrated land-use and water resource management. Master’s Thesis, Graduate School of Geography, Clark University, Worcester, MAGoogle Scholar
  25. Guhathakurta S, Gober P (2007) The impact of the Phoenix urban heat island on residential water use. J Am Plan Assoc 73(3):317–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hart M, Sailor DJ (2008) Quantifying the influence of land-use and surface characteristics on spatial variability in the urban heat island. J Theor Appl Climatol 95:397–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hirt P, Gustafson A, Larson K (2008) The mirage in the valley of the sun. Environ History 13:482–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. House-Peters L, Chang H (2011) Modeling the impact of land use and climate change on neighborhood-scale evaporation and nighttime cooling: a surface energy balance approach. Landsc Urban 103:139–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. House-Peters L, Pratt B, Chang H (2010) Effects of urban spatial structure, sociodemographics, and climate on residential water consumption in Hillsboro, Oregon. J Am Water Resour Assoc 46(3):461–472Google Scholar
  30. Howe CW, Goemans C (2007) The simple analytics of demand hardening. J Am Water Works Assoc 99(10):24–25Google Scholar
  31. Hurd B, Leary N, Jones R, Smith J (1999) Relative regional vulnerability of water resources to climate change. J Am Water Resour Assoc 35(6):1399–1409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jefferson A, Nolin A, Lewis S, Tague C (2008) Hydrogeologic controls on streamflow sensitivity to climate variation. Hydrol Process 22:4371–4385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jung I-W, Chang H (2011) Assessment of future runoff trends under multiple climate change scenarios in the Willamette River Basin, Oregon, USA. Hydrol Process 25(2):258–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Larson KL, Brumand J (2013) Paradoxes in landscape management and water conservation: examining neighborhood norms and institutional forces. Working paper in reviewGoogle Scholar
  35. Larson KL, White D, Gober P et al (2009a) Divergent perspectives on water resource sustainability in a public–policy–science context. Environ Sci Policy 12:1012–1023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Larson KL, Gustafson A, Hirt P (2009b) Insatiable thirst and a finite supply: assessing municipal water conservation policy in greater Phoenix, Arizona, 1980–2007. J Policy History 21(2):107–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Larson KL, Wiek A, Withycombe-Keller L (2013) A comprehensive sustainability appraisal of water governance in Phoenix, AZ. J Environ Manag 116:58–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. MAG (2007) Socioeconomic Projections. Maricopa Association of Governments. Population Technical Advisory Committee. Presented on 24 April 2007. www.azmag.gov. Accessed 23 Jan 2013
  39. Maguire RP (2007) Patching the holes in the bucket: safe yield and the future of water management in Arizona. Arizona Water Law 49:1–23Google Scholar
  40. Metro (2009) Metro Council release updated 20- and 50-year population, employment forecasts. Metro News Release 19 March 2009. Portland, Oregon. http://www.oregonmetro.gov/index.cfm/go/by.web/id/29837/. Accessed 23 Jan 2013
  41. Middel A, Brazel AJ, Gober P et al (2012) Land cover, climate, and the summer surface energy balance in Phoenix, AZ and Portland, OR. Int J Climatol 32(13):2020–2032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mitchell B (2005) Integrated water resource management, institutional arrangements, and land-use planning. Environ Plan A 37:1335–1352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mote PW, Salathe EP (2010) Future climate in the Pacific Northwest. Clim Change 102(1/2):29–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. National Research Council (2007) Colorado River Basin water management: evaluating and adjusting to hydroclimatic variability. National Academies Press, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  45. O’Connor RE, Yarnal B, Neff R et al (1999) Weather and climate extremes, climate change, and planning: views of community water system managers in Pennsylvania’s Susquehanna River Basin. J Am Water Resour Assoc 35(6):1411–1419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. OEA (2013) Long time county forecasts, State and county population forecasts, 2000 to 2040. Oregon Office of Economic Analysis. http://www.oregon.gov/DAS/OEA/Pages/demographic.aspx. Accessed 17 Jan 2013
  47. Ozawa C (2004) The Portland edge: challenges and successes in growing communities. Island Press, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  48. Palmer RN, Hahn M (2002) The impacts of climate change on Portland’s water supply. Portland Water Bureau, PortlandGoogle Scholar
  49. Polsky C, Neff R, Yarnal B (2007) Building comparable global change vulnerability assessments: the vulnerability scoping diagram. Global Environ Change 17:472–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Purkey DR, Huber-Lee A, Yates DN et al (2007) Integrating a climate change assessment tool into stakeholder-driven water management decision-making processes in California. Water Resour Manag 21(1):315–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Quay R, Larson KL, White DD (2013) Enhancing water sustainability through university–policy collaborations: experiences and lessons from researchers and decision-makers. Water Resour Impact 15(2):17–19Google Scholar
  52. Robbins P (2007) Lawn people: how grasses, weeds, and chemicals make us who we are. Temple University Press, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  53. Rossi S, Quay R (2009) Phoenix demand management plan—a shifting paradigm. Southwest Hydrol 29Google Scholar
  54. Runfola DM, Polsky C, Nicolson C et al (2013) Projecting suburban droughts using high-resolution patterns of lawns and water consumption: the case of Ipswich, Massachusetts in 2030. Landsc Urban Plan (in press)Google Scholar
  55. Seager R, Ting M, Held I et al (2007) Model projections of an imminent transition to a more arid climate in southwestern North America. Science 316(5828):1181–1184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Slovic B (2011) Portland’s $1.4 billion Big Pipe project comes to an end after 20 years. Oregon Live. http://www.oregonlive.com/portland/index.ssf/2011/11/portlands_14_billion_big_pipe.html. Accessed 19 Feb 2013
  57. Tague C, Grant GE (2009) Groundwater dynamics mediate low-flow response to global warming in snow-dominated alpine regions. Water Resour Res 45:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Turner BL, Kasperson RE, Matson P et al (2003) A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. Proc Natl Acad Sci 100(14):8074–8079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Vörösmarty CI, Green P, Saisbury J, Lammers RB (2000) Global water resources: vulnerability from climate change and population growth. Science 289(5477):284CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kelli L. Larson
    • 1
    Email author
  • Colin Polsky
    • 2
  • Patricia Gober
    • 3
  • Heejun Chang
    • 4
  • Vivek Shandas
    • 5
  1. 1.Schools of Geographical Sciences and Urban Planning and SustainabilityArizona State UniversityTempeUSA
  2. 2.Graduate School of GeographyClark UniversityWorcesterUSA
  3. 3.University of SaskatchewanSaskatoonCanada
  4. 4.Department of GeographyPortland State UniversityPortlandUSA
  5. 5.School of Urban Studies and PlanningPortland State UniversityPortlandUSA

Personalised recommendations