Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Policy Interactions in Human–Landscape Systems

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Given the heightened pace and extent of human interactions with landscapes, there is increasing recognition of the interdependence of hydrogeomorphological, ecological, and human systems in understanding human–landscape interactions. There is also widespread agreement for greater integration across disciplinary boundaries to generate new knowledge urgently needed for theory building to understand, predict, and respond to rapidly changing human–landscape systems. The development of new conceptual frameworks, methods, tools, and collaborations linking across the natural and social sciences are key elements to such integration. In an effort to contribute to a broader conceptual framework for human–landscape systems, this paper describes how environmental policy research has contributed to four integrative themes—thresholds and tipping points; spatial scales and boundaries; feedback loops; and time scales and lags—developed by participants in an NSF-sponsored interdisciplinary workshop. As a broad and heterogeneous body of literature, environmental policy research reflects a diversity of methodological and theoretical approaches around institutions, actors, processes, and ideas. We integrate across multiple subfields and research programs to help identify complementarities in research that may support future interdisciplinary collaborative work. We conclude with a discussion of future research questions to help advance greater interdisciplinary research around human–landscape systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Agrawal A (2002) Common resources and institutional sustainability. In: Ostrom E, Dietz T, Dolšak N, Stern PC, Sonich S, Weber EU (eds) The drama of the commons. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, pp 41–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen PM (2001) A complex systems approach to learning in adaptive networks. Int J Innov Manag 5(2):149–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderies JM, Janssen MA, Ostrom E (2004) A framework to analyze the robustness of social–ecological systems from an institutional perspective. Ecol Soc 9(1):8. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss1/art18. Accessed 10 May 2013

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderies JM, Walker BH, Kinzig AP (2006) Fifteen weddings and a funeral: case studies and resilience-based management. Ecol Soc 11(1):21. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art21/. Accessed 10 May 2013

    Google Scholar 

  • Andonova LB (2010) Public–private partnerships for the earth politics and patterns of hybrid authority in the multilateral system. Glob Environ Politics 10(2):25–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andresen S (2007) The effectiveness of UN environmental institutions. Int Environ Agreem Politics Law Econ 7:317–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ansell C, Gash A (2007) Collaborative governance in theory and practice. J Public Adm Res Theory 18(4):543–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ascher W, Steelman T, Healy R (2010) Knowledge and environmental policy: re-imagining the boundaries of science and politics. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Bäckstrand K (2008) Accountability of networked climate governance: the rise of transnational climate partnerships. Glob Environ Politics 8(3):74–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner F (ed) (2007) By fits and starts: the dynamics of U.S. environmental policy change. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner F, Jones B (1993) Agendas and instability in American politics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett CJ, Howlett M (1992) The lessons of learning: reconciling theories of policy learning and policy change. Policy Sci 25:275–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkes F, Folke C (eds) (1998) Linking social and ecological systems: management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C (2001) Linking social–ecological systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C (eds) (2003) Navigating social–ecological systems: building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Betsill MM, Corell E (eds) (2008) NGO diplomacy the influence of nongovernmental organizations in international environmental negotiations. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Biermann F, Pattberg P (2008) Global environmental governance: What can we learn from experience? Annu Rev Environ Resour 33:213–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biermann F, Zondervan R (2011) The grand challenge of earth system governance. The contributions of the Earth System Governance Project to the ICSU grand challenges. Earth System Governance Project, Lund

    Google Scholar 

  • Biermann F, Betsill M, Gupta J, Kanie N, Lebel L, Liverman D, Schroeder H, Siebenhüner B, Zondervan R (2010) Earth system governance: a research framework. Int Environ Agreem 10:277–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breitmeier H, Young OR, Zürn M (2006) Analyzing international environmental regimes: from case study to database. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunner S (2008) Understanding policy change: multiple steams and emissions trading in Germany. Glob Environ Change 18(3):501–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter SR, Walker BH, Anderies JM, Abel N (2001) From metaphor to measurement: resilience of what to what? Ecosystems 4:765–781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cash DW, Adger WN, Berkes F, Garden P, Lebel L, Olsson P, Pritchard L, Young O (2006) Scale and cross-scale dynamics: governance and information in a multilevel world. Ecol Soc 11(2):8. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss2/art8/. Accessed 10 May 2013

    Google Scholar 

  • Cashore B, Auld G, Newsom D (2004) Governing through markets: forest certification and the emergence of non-state authority. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Chin A, English M, Galvin K, Gerlak A, Harden C, McDowell P, McNamara D, Peterson J, Rosa E, Wohl E et al (2010) Landscapes in the “Anthropocene”: exploring the human connections. In: A NSF workshop held at the University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, 4–6 March 2010, Summary Report. http://clas.ucdenver.edu/ges/landscapes/. Accessed 10 May 2013

  • Costanza R, Low BS, Ostrom E, Wilson J (2001) Institutions, ecosystems, and sustainability. Lewis, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Cumming GS, Cumming DHM, Redman CL (2006) Scale mismatches in social–ecological systems: causes, consequences, and solutions. Ecol Soc 11(1):14. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art14/. Accessed 10 May 2013

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels SE, Walker GB (2001) Working through environmental conflict: the collaborative learning approach. Praeger, Westport

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietz T, Ostrom E, Stern P (2003) The struggle to govern the commons. Science 302:1907–1912

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein C (2006) The making of global environmental norms: endangered species protection. Glob Environ Politics 6(2):32–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fazey I, Fazey JA, Fazey DMA (2005) Learning more effectively from experience. Ecol Soc 10(2):4. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss2/art4/. Accessed 10 May 2013

    Google Scholar 

  • Folke C, Jansson Å, Rockström J, Olsson P, Carpenter SR, Chapin FS III, Crépin A, Daily G, Danell K, Ebbesson J, Elmqvist T, Galaz V, Moberg F, Nilsson M, Österblom H, Ostrom E, Persson Å, Peterson G, Polasky S, Steffen W, Walker B, Westley F (2001) Reconnecting to the biosphere. AMBIO J Hum Environ 40(7):719–738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folke C, Colding J, Berkes F (2003) Synthesis: building resilience and adaptive capacity in social–ecological systems. In: Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C (eds) Navigating social–ecological systems: building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 352–387

    Google Scholar 

  • Folke C, Hahn T, Olsson P, Norberg J (2005) Adaptive governance of social–ecological knowledge. Annu Rev Environ Resour 30:441–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folke C, Pritchard L, Berkes F, Colding J, Svedin U (2007) The problem of fit between ecosystems and institutions: ten years later. Ecol Soc 12(1):30. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss1/art30/. Accessed 10 May 2013

    Google Scholar 

  • Folke C, Carpenter SR, Walker B, Scheffer M, Chapin T, Rockstrom J (2010) Resilience thinking: integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability. Ecol Soc 15(4):20. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/art20/. Accessed 10 May 2013

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabler M (2010) Norms, institutions and social learning: an explanation for weak policy integration in the WTO’s committee on trade and environment. Glob Environ Politics 10(2):80–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galaz V (2006) The Ronne and Em Rivers, Sweden: resilience, networks and bargaining power in water management. In: Falleth E, Rydin Y (eds) Networks and institutions in natural resource management. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Galaz V, Olsson P, Hahn T, Folke C, Svedin U (2008) The problem of fit among biophysical systems, environmental and resource regimes, and broader governance systems: insights and emerging challenges. In: Young O, King LA, Schroeder H (eds) Institutions and environmental change: principal findings, applications, and research frontiers. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 147–186

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Galaz V, Duit A, Eckerbereg K, Ebbesson J (2010a) Governance, complexity, and resilience. Glob Environ Change 20:363–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galaz V, Moberg F, Olsson EK, Paglia E, Parker C (2010b) Institutional and political leadership dimensions of cascading ecological crises. Public Adm 89(2):361–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerlak A, Heikkila T (2011) Building a theory of learning in collaborative institutions: evidence from the Everglades Restoration Program. J Public Adm Res Theory 21(4):619–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson CC, Ostrom E, Ahn TK (2000) The concept of scale and the human dimensions of global change: a survey. Ecol Econ 32:217–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gladwell M (2000) Tipping points: how little things can make a big difference. Little Brown, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein BE (2011) Collaborative resilience: moving through crisis to opportunity. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson L, Holling CS (eds) (2002) Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson LH, Holling CS, Light SS (eds) (1995) Barriers and bridges to the renewal of ecosystems and institutions. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta J (2008) Global change: analyzing scale and scaling in environmental governance. In: Young O, King LZ, Schroeder H (eds) Institutions and environmental change: principal findings, applications, and research frontiers. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 225–258

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Guston DH (2001) Boundary organizations in environmental policy and science: an introduction. Sci Technol Hum Values 26(4):399–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haas PM (2000) International institutions and social learning in the management of global environmental risks. Policy Stud J 28(3):558–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henry AD (2009) The challenge of learning for sustainability: a prolegomenon to theory. Hum Ecol Rev 16(2):131–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann MJ (2005) Ozone depletion and climate change: constructing a global response. State University of New York Press, Albany

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS (1986) Resilience of ecosystems; local surprise and global change. In: Clark WC, Munn RE (eds) Sustainable development of the biosphere. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 292–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS (2001) Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological, and social systems. Ecosystems 4:390–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS, Gunderson LH, Peterson GD (2002) Sustainability and panarchies. In: Gunderson LH, Holling CS (eds) Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 63–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasanoff S, Wynee B (1998) Science and decisionmaking. In Rayner S, Malone E (eds) Human choice and climate change. Vol. 1. The societal framework. Battelle Press, Columbus, pp 1–87

  • Kamieniecki S, Kraft ME (eds) (2013) The oxford handbook of U.S. environmental policy. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingdon JW (1995) Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. 2nd edn. Harper Collins, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lafferty W, Meadowcroft J (2000) Implementing sustainable development. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lebel L, Anderies JM, Campbell B, Folke C, Hatfield-Dodds S, Hughes TP, Wilson J (2006) Governance and the capacity to manage resilience in regional social–ecological systems. Ecol Soc 11(1):19. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art19/. Accessed 10 May 2013

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebel L, Grothmann T, Siebenhuner B (2010) The role of social learning in adaptiveness: insights from water management. Int Environ Agreem Politics Law Econ 10(4):333–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lejano RP, Ingram H (2008) Collaborative networks and new ways of knowing. Environ Sci Policy 12(6):653–662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemos MC, Agrawal A (2006) Environmental governance. Annu Rev Environ Resour 31:297–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy DL, Newell PJ (2005) The business of global environmental governance. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Litfin KT (1994) Ozone discourse: science and politics in global environmental cooperation. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazmanian DA, Kraft ME (eds) (2009) Toward sustainable communities: transition and transformations in environmental policy. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles EL, Underdal A, Andresen S, Wettestad J, Birger J, Skjaerseth (2001) Environmental regime effectiveness confronting theory with evidence. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Mostert E, Pahl-Wostl C, Rees Y, Searle B, Tàbara D, Tippett J (2007) Social learning in European river-basin management: barriers and fostering mechanisms from 10 river basins. Ecol Soc 12(1):19. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss1/art19/. Accessed 10 May 2013

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (NRC) (2010) Landscapes on the edge: new horizons for research on earth’s surface. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Nohrstedt D (2008) The politics of crisis policymaking: Chernobyl and Swedish Nuclear Energy Policy. Policy Stud J 36(2):257–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oberthür S, Schram Stokke O (eds) (2011) Managing institutional complexity: regime interplay and global environmental change. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Okereke C (2008) Equity norms in global environmental governance. Glob Environ Politics 8(3):25–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsson P, Folke C, Berkes F (2004) Adaptive comanagement for building resilience in social–ecological systems. Environ Manag 34(1):75–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsson P, Gunderson LH, Carpenter SR, Ryan P, Lebel L, Folke C, Holling CS (2006) Shooting the rapids: navigating transitions to adaptive governance of social–ecological systems. Ecol Soc 11(1):18. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art18/. Accessed 10 May 2013

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsson P, Folke C, Galaz V, Hahn T, Schultz L (2007) Enhancing the fit through adaptive comanagement: creating and maintaining bridging functions for matching scales in the Kristianstads Vattenrike Biosphere Reserve Sweden. Ecol Soc 12(1):28. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss1/art28/. Accessed 10 May 2013

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (1990) Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (1997) Institutional rational choice: an assessment of the institutional analysis and development framework. In: Sabatier PA (ed) Theories of the policy process. Westview Press, Boulder, pp 21–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (2007) A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social–ecological systems. Science 325:419–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pahl-Wostl C, Craps M, Dewulf A, Mostert E, Tabara D, Taillieu T (2007) Social learning and water resources management. Ecol Soc 12(1). http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss2/art5/. Accessed 10 May 2013

  • Park J, Conca K, Finger M (2008) The crisis of global environmental politics: towards a new political economy of sustainability. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Pattberg PH (2008) Private institutions and global governance: the new politics of environmental sustainability. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Pielke R Jr (2007) The honest broker: making sense of science in policy and politics. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Princen T, Finger M (1994) Environmental NGOs in world politics linking the local and the global. Routledge, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Reid WV, Berkes F, Wilbanks T, Capistrano D (eds) (2006) Bridging scales and knowledge systems: linking global science and local knowledge in assessments. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Repetto R (ed) (2006) Punctuated equilibrium and dynamics of U.S. environmental policy. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers E, Weber E (2010) Thinking harder about outcomes for collaborative governance arrangements. Am Rev Public Adm 40(5):546–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum WA (2010) Environmental politics and policy. Congressional Quarterly Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier P, Jenkins-Smith H (1993) Policy change and learning: an advocacy coalition approach. Westview Press, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier P, Jenkins-Smith H (1999) The advocacy coalition framework: an assessment. In: Sabatier P (ed) Theories of the policy process. Westview Press, Boulder, pp 117–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheffer M, Brock W, Westley F (2000) Socioeconomic mechanisms preventing optimum use of ecosystem services. Ecosystems 3:451–471

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scheffer M, Carpenter SR, Foley JA, Folke C, Walker BH (2001) Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems. Nature 413:591–596

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scheffer M, Westley F, Brock WA (2003) Slow response of societies to new problems: causes and costs. Ecosystems 6:493–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlager E (2004) Common-pool resource theory. In: Durant RF, Fiorino DJ, O’Leary R (eds) Environmental governance reconsidered: challenges, choices, and opportunities. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 145–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholz JT, Stiftel B (eds) (2005) Adaptive governance and water conflict—new institutions for collaborative planning. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Termeer CJAM, Dewulf A, van Lieshout M (2010) Disentangling scale approaches in governance research: comparing monocentric, multilevel, and adaptive governance. Ecol Soc 15 (4):29. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/art29/. Accessed 10 May 2013

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Kersbergen K, Van Waarden F (2004) ‘Governance’ as a bridge between disciplines: cross-disciplinary inspiration regarding shifts in governance and problems of governability, accountability and legitimacy. Eur J Political Res 43:143–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker B, Holling CS, Carpenter SR, Kinzig A (2004) Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social–ecological systems. Ecol Soc 9(2):5. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss2/art5/. Accessed 10 May 2013

    Google Scholar 

  • Wapner P (1996) Environmental activism and world civic politics. SUNY Press, Albany

    Google Scholar 

  • Weible C (2007) An advocacy coalition framework approach to stakeholder analysis: understanding the political context of California Marine Protected Area Policy. J Public Adm Res Theory 17:95–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whiteley JM, Ingram H, Perry RW (2008) Water, place and equity. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • World Economic Forum (2011) Water security: the water–food–energy–climate nexus. World Economic Forum, Washington, DC

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Young OR (2002) The institutional dimensions of environmental change: fit, interplay, and scale. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Young OR (2006) Vertical interplay among scale-dependent environmental and resource regimes. Ecol Soc 11(1):27. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art27/. Accessed 10 May 2013

    Google Scholar 

  • Young OR (2010a) Institutional dynamics emergent patterns in international environmental governance. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Young OR (2010b) Institutional dynamics: resilience, vulnerability and adaptation in environmental and resource regimes. Glob Environ Change 20:378–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young OR (2011) Effectiveness of international environmental regimes: existing knowledge, cutting-edge themes, and research strategies. PNAS 108(50):19853–19860

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The NSF sponsored the workshop (Landscapes in the Anthropocene: Exploring the Human Connections EAR 0952354) that led to this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Political Science, University of Arizona—International Studies Association, 324 Social Sciences, Tucson, AZ, 85721, USA

    Andrea K. Gerlak

Authors
  1. Andrea K. Gerlak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrea K. Gerlak.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gerlak, A.K. Policy Interactions in Human–Landscape Systems. Environmental Management 53, 67–75 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-013-0068-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-013-0068-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation