Abstract
Since wetland construction projects are becoming more commonplace, meaningful follow-up studies are needed to evaluate how these systems change over time. To that end, the objective of our study was to examine the temporal changes in plant community composition and water chemistry in two constructed wetlands. We investigated two wetland sites that were constructed in 2003 in northern Otsego County, NY, a county that is largely dominated by agriculture. Site 1 was previously an active cow pasture and site 2 was previously a wet meadow surrounded by agricultural fields. No active plant introduction was made during the construction; however, both sites were located in areas with many remnant wetlands and were connected to through-flowing streams. In 2004 (Year 1) and 2010 (Year 7), the plant community composition and nitrogen retention were assessed. We found that both sites experienced site-wide declines in plant species richness, including the loss of upland and facultative upland species and the unanticipated loss of facultative wetland and some obligate species. We propose that high water levels, which, at their maximum depth were >1.5 m deeper than in Year 1, maintained by landowners in the years after the initial survey, may have been responsible for the unexpected loss of wetland species. We also found that site 1 exhibited considerable nitrogen retention in both Year 1 and Year 7; however, N concentrations were low at site 2 in both years.








Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.References
APHA, AWWA, WPCF (1992) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. American Public Health Association, Washington
Balcombe C, Anderson J, Fortney R, Rentch J, Grafton W, Kordek W (2005) A comparison of plant communities in mitigation and reference wetlands in the Mid-Appalachians. Wetlands 25:130–142
Brown SC, Veneman PLM (2001) Effectiveness of compensatory wetland mitigation in Massachusetts, USA. Wetlands 21:508–518
Campbell DA, Cole CA, Brooks RP (2002) A comparison of created and natural wetlands in Pennsylvania, USA. Wetl Ecol Manag 10:41–49
Casanova MT, Brock MA (2000) How do depth, duration and frequency of flooding influence the establishment of wetland plant communities? Plant Ecol 147:237–250
Cole CA, Brooks RP (2000) A comparison of the hydrologic characteristics of natural and created mainstem floodplain wetlands in Pennsylvania. Ecol Eng 14:221–231
Cole CA, Shafer D (2002) Section 404 wetland mitigation and permit success criteria in Pennsylvania, USA, 1986–1999. Environ Manag 30:508–515
Cole C, Urban C, Russo P, Murray J, Hoyt D, Brooks R (2006) Comparison of the long-term water levels of created and natural reference wetlands in northern New York, USA. Ecol Eng 27:166–172
Hammer Ø, Harper DAT, Ryan PD (2001) PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaenotol Electron 4:1–9
Hoeltje S, Cole C (2009) Comparison of function of created wetlands of two age classes in central Pennsylvania. Environ Manag 43:597–608
Hooper DU, Vitousek PM (1997) The effects of plant composition and diversity on ecosystem processes. Science 277:1302–1305
Hutcheson K (1970) A test for comparing diversities based on the Shannon formula. J Theor Biol 29:151–154
Lewis WMJ (2001) Wetlands explained: wetland science, policy, and politics in America. Oxford University Press, New York
Matthews JW, Endress AG (2008) Performance criteria, compliance success, and vegetation development in compensatory mitigation wetlands. Environ Manag 41:130–141
Mitsch WJ, Gosselink JG (2007) Wetlands. Wiley, New York
Mitsch WJ, Wilson RF (1996) Improving the success of wetland creation and restoration with know-how, time, and self-design. Ecolog Appl 6:77–83
Moreno-Mateos D, Power ME, Comın FA, Yockteng R (2012) Structural and functional loss in restored wetland ecosystems. PLoS Biol 10:1–8
Naeem S, Thompson LJ, Lawler SP, Lawton JH, Woodfin RM (1994) Declining biodiversity can alter the performance of ecosystems. Nature 368:734–737
Naeem S, Knops JMH, Tilman D, Howe KM, Kennedy T, Gale S (2000) Plant diversity increases resistance to invasion in the absence of covarying extrinsic factors. Oikos 91:97–108
Parikh A, Gale N (1998) Vegetation monitoring on created dune swale wetlands, Vandenberg air force base, California. Restor Ecol 6:83–93
Poulin M, Andersen R, Rochefort L (2012) A new approach for tracking vegetation change after restoration: a case study with peatlands. Restor Ecol. doi:10.1111/j.1526-100X.2012.00889.x
Seabloom EW, van der Valk AG (2003) Plant diversity, composition, and invasion of restored and natural prairie pothole wetlands: implications for restoration. Wetlands 23:1–12
Siemann E, Tilman D, Haarstad J, Ritchie M (1998) Experimental tests of the dependence of arthropod diversity on plant diversity. Am Nat 152:738–750
Spieles DJ (2005) Vegetation development in created, restored, and enhanced mitigation banks of the United States. Wetlands 25:51–63
Tews J, Brose U, Grimm V, Tielborger K, Wichmann MC, Schwager M, Jeltsch F (2004) Animal species diversity driven by habitat heterogeneity/diversity: the importance of keystone structures. J Biogeogr 31:79–92
Tilman D (1996) Biodiversity: population versus ecosystem stability. Ecology 77:350–363
Tilman D, Lehman CL, Thomson KT (1997) Plant diversity and ecosystem productivity: theoretical considerations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:1857–1861
US Army Corps of Engineers (1996) National list of vascular plant species that occur in wetlands: 1996 national summary. Washington
US Department of Agriculture (2011) The plants database, national plant data team, Greensboro, NC 27401-4901 USA, National Plant Data Center. http://plants.usda.gov
Weiher E, Wisheu IC, Keddy PA, Moore DRJ (1996) Establishment, persistence, and management implications of experimental wetland plant communities. Wetlands 16:208–218
Wilcox DA, Nichols SJ (2008) The effects of water-level fluctuations on vegetation in a lake Huron wetland. Wetlands 28:487–501
Zar J (1999) Biostatistical analysis. In: Ryu T, Snavely SL (eds), Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River
Zhang T and Zhu W (2005) Nitrogen pollution from the upper Susquehanna river watersheds: effects of land use. In Zhu W, Minami K, Xing G (eds) Proceedings of the 3rd International Nitrogen Conference. Science Press USA, New York p 440–449
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Marley Urdanick, Keith Murphy, Rebecca Heintzman, Megan Larson-Liebner, Meaghan Petix, Dr. John Titus, and Dr. Julian Shepherd for their invaluable assistance with the vegetation survey. Critical comments from reviewers and the editors have helped to improve the quality and the clarity of the paper. This study was supported in part by the initial ACE mandate of wetland survey post-construction, and an EPA watershed Grant (EPA-R3CBP-09) subcontracted to Binghamton University through the Upper Susquehanna Coalition. The views presented in this paper do not necessarily reflect the views of ACE or EPA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kearney, M.A., Fickbohm, S. & Zhu, W. Loss of Plant Biodiversity Over a Seven-Year Period in Two Constructed Wetlands in Central New York. Environmental Management 51, 1067–1076 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-013-0035-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-013-0035-7


