Abstract
Benton County, in north-central Indiana, USA has successfully sited more than 500 turbines. To understand Benton County’s acceptance of wind farms, a holistic case study was conducted that included a document review, a survey of local residents and interviews with key stakeholders. Survey questionnaires were sent to 750 residents asking questions about attitudes toward the wind farms, perceived benefits and impacts from the wind farms, environmental attitudes, and demographic information. Key stakeholders were also interviewed for a deeper understanding of the historical timeline and community acceptance of the wind farm development. While there is limited opposition to the turbines, on the whole the community presents a front of acceptance. Financial, rather than environmental, benefits are the main reason for the acceptance. Although significant in other case studies, transparency and participation do not play a large role in Benton County’s acceptance. Most residents are not concerned with either visual impacts or noise from the wind turbines. More concrete benefits to the community, such as reduced energy bills for county residents, could help to extend acceptance even further within the community. Although there are concerns about the acceptance of wind farms and the impacts of those farms on local residents in both peer-reviewed literature and popular media, we found little evidence of those concerns in Benton County. Instead, we found Benton County to be a community largely accepting of wind farms.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbott JA (2010) The localized and scaled discourse of conservation for wind power in Kittitas County, Washington. Soc Nat Resour 23:969–985
Agterbosch S, Meertens RM, Vermuelen WJV (2009) The relative importance of social and institutional conditions in the planning of wind power projects. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 13:393–405
Aitken M (2010) Why we still don’t understand the social aspects of wind power: a critique of key assumptions within the literature. Energy Policy 38:1834–1841
AWEA (American Wind Energy Association) (2011) Wind energy facts: Indiana. http://www.awea.org/learnabout/publications/upload/1Q-11-Indiana.pdf. Accessed: 5 July 2011
Bell D, Gray T, Haggett C (2005) The ‘social gap’ in wind farm citing decisions: explanations and policy responses. Environ Pollut 14:460–477
Benton County (2011a) Benton County website: “Wind farms.” http://www.bentoncounty.in.gov/bentoncountywindfarm.php. Accessed: 6 January 2011
Benton County (2011b) Benton County website: “Wind Farms Facts.” http://www.bentoncounty.in.gov/windfacts.php. Accessed: 5 July 2011
Breukers S, Wolsink M (2007) Wind power implementation in changing institutional landscapes: an international comparison. Energ Policy 35:2737–2750
Brittan GG Jr (2001) Wind, energy, landscape: reconciling nature and technology. Philos Geogr 4:169–184
Dalili N, Edrisy A, Carriveau R (2009) A review of surface engineering issues critical to wind turbine performance. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 13:428–438
Devine-Wright P (2005) Local aspects of UK renewable energy development: exploring public beliefs and policy implications. Local Environ 10:57–69
Dillman DA, Smyth JD, Christian LM (2008) Internet, mail and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method. Wiley, Hoboken
DSIRE database of state incentives for renewables & efficiency 2012. Indiana incentives/policies for renewables & efficiency. Available online: http://www.dsireusa.org/incentives/incentive.cfm?Incentive_Code=IN12R&re=1&ee=1. Accessed: April 20, 2012
Firestone J, Kempton W (2007) Public opinion about large offshore wind power: underlying factors. Energ Policy 35:1584–1598
GEC (Global Energy Concepts) (2005) Indiana energy group tall towers wind study final project report. October 2005. Prepared for Indiana energy group http://www.in.gov/oed/files/Indiana_Final_Project_Report.pdf. Accessed: 5 July 2011
Halliday JA (1993) Wind energy: an option for the UK? IEE Proceedings A 140:53–62
Hinshelwood E (2001) Power to the people: community-led wind energy-obstacles and opportunities in a South Wales Valley. Comm Dev J 36:95–110
Hoen B, Wiser R, Cappers P, Thayer M, Sethi G (2011) Wind energy facilities and residential properties: the effect of proximity and view on sales prices. J Real Estate Res 33:279–316
Kempton W, Firestone J, Lilley J, Rouleau T, Whitaker P (2005) The offshore wind power debate: views from cape cod. Coast Manag 33:119–149
Krohn S, Damborg S (1999) On public attitudes towards wind power. Renew Energy 16:954–960
Leininger K (2010) Whitley wind-farm idea stirs up worry. The news-sentinel http://www.news-sentinel.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/SE/20101111/NEWS/11110336. Accessed: 23 July 2011
Loring JM (2007) Wind energy planning in England, Wales and Denmark: factors influencing project success. Energy Policy 35:2648–2660
Martin, CL (2010) Your guide to wind turbine syndrome… a roadmap to this complicated subject. http://docs.wind-watch.org/WTSguide.pdf. Accessed: 3 November 2011
Martin C, Ileleji K, Bricker J (2010) The wind energy ordinance process for local government. Purdue University Extension Publication. http://www.extension.purdue.edu/extmedia/ABE/RE-1-W.pdf. Accessed: 7 July 2011
Mulvaney KK, Woodson P, Prokopy L (in press) A tale of three counties: understanding wind development in the rural midwestern United States. Energy Policy
Munday M, Bristow G, Cowell R (2011) Wind farms in rural areas: how far do community benefits from wind farms represent a local economic development opportunity? J Rural Stud 27:1–12
Osten M (2008) WindConnect® selected as balance-of-plant general contractor for the Fowler Ridge Wind Farm. WindConnect® press release February 25, 2008. Available online: http://www.rmtinc.com/pdf/News_FowlerRidge_FINAL.pdf. Accessed: April 25, 2012
Pasqualetti MJ (2001) Wind energy landscape: society and technology in the California desert. Soc Nat Resour 14:689–699
Patton MQ (2002) Qualitative interviewing. In: Patton MQ (ed) Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 339–418
Phadke R (2010) Steel forests or smoke stacks: the politics of visualisation in the Cape Wind controversy. Environ Polit 19:11–20
Purdue University Extension (2011) Wind Energy Ordinance Library. Purdue University Extension Website. http://www.extension.purdue.edu/renewable-energy/wind-energy-library.shtml. Accessed: 7 July 2011
Robertson T (2009) County leaders take close look at wind power. Times-Union March 5, 2009. http://www.timesuniononline.com/main.asp?SectionID=2&SubSectionID=224&ArticleID=38817&TM=46224.88. Accessed: 3 November 2011
Swiatek J (2009) 2 wind projects targeting Boone County kick up debate. Indianapolis Star July 15, 2009
Thayer RL, Freeman CM (1987) Altamont: public perceptions of a wind energy landscape. Landsc Urban Plan 14:379–398
U.S. Census (2011) Benton County, Indiana State & County Quick Facts. http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/18/18007.html. Accessed: 5 July 2011
U.S. Census (2012) Indiana State & County QuickFacts. http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/18000.html. Accessed: 23 April 2012
U.S. DOE (United States Department of Energy) (2008) 20% Wind Energy by 2030: Increasing Wind Energy’s Contribution to U.S. Electricity Supply. DOE/GO-102008-2567 http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy08osti/41869.pdf. Accessed: 11 October 2011
U.S. DOE (United States Department of Energy) (2011a) States with renewable portfolio standards. http://apps1.eere.energy.gov/states/maps/renewable_portfolio_states.cfm. Accessed: 5 July 5 2011
U.S. DOE (United States Department of Energy) (2011b) U.S. Department of Energy, energy efficiency & renewable energy “wind & water program.” http://www1.eere.energy.gov/windandhydro/wind_ad.html. Accessed: 20 July 2011
USDA (United State Department of Agriculture) (2010) County estimates, statistics by state-Indiana http://www.nass.usda.gov/Statistics_by_State/Indiana/Publications/County_Estimates/. Accessed: 20 December 2011
Warren CR, Lumsden C, O’Dowd S, Birnie RV (2005) ‘Green on green’: public perceptions of wind power in Scotland and Ireland. J Environ Plann Man 48:853–875
Wolsink M (2000) Wind power and the NIMBY-myth: institutional capacity and the limited significance of public support. Renew Energ 21:49–64
Wolsink M (2006) Invalid theory impedes our understanding: a critique on the persistence of the language of NIMBY. T I Brit Geogr 31:85–91
Wolsink M (2007) Planning of renewables schemes: deliberative and fair decision-making on landscape issues instead of reproachful accusations of non-cooperation. Energ Policy 35:2692–2704
Woods M (2003) Conflicting environmental visions of the rural: windfarm development in Mid Wales. Sociol Ruralis 43:271–288
Wüstenhagen R, Wolsink M, Bürer MJ (2007) Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: an introduction to the concept. Energ Policy 35:2683–2691
Yin RK (2009) Case study research: design and methods, 4th edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Chad Martin, John Lee, and the four key informants for their advice and insights on wind energy development in Benton County. We would also like to thank Purdue University’s Natural Resources Social Science Lab for their methodological assistance and guidance. Finally, we would like to thank Purdue University’s College of Agriculture for funding this research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mulvaney, K.K., Woodson, P. & Prokopy, L.S. Different Shades of Green: A Case Study of Support for Wind Farms in the Rural Midwest. Environmental Management 51, 1012–1024 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-013-0026-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-013-0026-8