Environmental Management

, Volume 52, Issue 5, pp 1046–1056 | Cite as

Snail Darters and Sacred Places: Creative Application of the Endangered Species Act



Rather than exploring how indigenous people have been alienated from resources by environmental policies, this paper explores how indigenous peoples have worked with environmental organizations to use the broad protections provided by environmental laws to protect cultural resources. The Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians, along with other concerned groups, partnered with environmentalists in opposing the destruction of the endangered snail darter’s critical habitat by the Tennessee Valley Authority’s Tellico Dam. The dam had been opposed by a shifting alliance of Cherokees, local farmers, trout fisherman, and environmentalists since it was announced in 1963. A previous lawsuit by this coalition delayed the project from 1972 to 1974 under the National Environmental Policy Act. The Endangered Species Act provided this coalition with a powerful tool for opposing the destruction of burial grounds and sacred village sites throughout the lower Little Tennessee River valley. The coalition of environmental organizations, Cherokees, and others was ultimately unsuccessful in stopping the dam from being built, but was successful in establishing a strict precedent for the enforcement of the Endangered Species Act. The lawsuit also created a space for the Eastern Band to negotiate for the return of Cherokee remains and halt the removal of any additional burials. In this situation, the strategic support of environmental regulation enabled the Eastern Band to exert some degree of control over the fate of cultural resources in the valley, and also demonstrates the significant role American Indian peoples played in one of the seminal events of the environmental movement during the 1970s.


Cherokee Indians Tellico Dam Snail darter Tennessee Valley Authority Red Power movement Environmental movement 


  1. American Indian Religious Freedom Act (1978) Public Law No. 95-341Google Scholar
  2. Ammoneta Sequoyah, Richard Crowe, et al., and the United Keetoowah Band of Cherokee Indians v Tennessee Valley Authority (1980) United States Court of Appeals, 6th Circuit, 620 F.2d 1159 Google Scholar
  3. Awiakta M (1993) Selu: seeking the Corn-Mother’s wisdom. Fulcrum Publishing, Golden, COGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown JT (1972) The second trail of tears. Histor Preserv 24:40–41Google Scholar
  5. Cain LP, Kaiser BA (2003) Public goods provision: lessons from the Tellico Dam controversy. Nat Resour J 43:979–1007Google Scholar
  6. Carson R (1962) Silent spring. Houghton Mifflin, BostonGoogle Scholar
  7. Cowdrey AE (1983) This land, this South: an environmental history. University Press of Kentucky, Lexington, KentuckyGoogle Scholar
  8. Creese WL (1990) TVA’s public planning: the vision, the reality. The University of Tennessee Press, KnoxvilleGoogle Scholar
  9. Environmental Defense Fund et al., v. Tennessee Valley Authority, Aubrey Wagner, Chairman, Tennessee Valley Authority (1972) 339 F. Supp. 806 Google Scholar
  10. Endangered Species Act of 1973 (1973) 16 USCS § 1531-1544Google Scholar
  11. Environmental Defense Fund, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Tennessee Valley Authority et al. (1974) Defendants-Appellees, 492 F.2d 466 Google Scholar
  12. Fine-Dare KS (2002) Grave injustice: the American Indian repatriation movement and NAGPRA. University of Nebraska Press, LincolnGoogle Scholar
  13. Finger J (1991) Cherokee Americans: the Eastern Band of Cherokees in the twentieth-century. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln and LondonGoogle Scholar
  14. Hill v. Tennessee Valley Authority, 549 F.2d 1064 (1977)Google Scholar
  15. Hill v. Tennessee Valley Authority, 419 F. Supp. 753 (1976)Google Scholar
  16. Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act of 1975 (1975) Public Law 93-638Google Scholar
  17. Mathiessen P (1984) Indian country. Viking Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Murchison KM (2007) The snail darter case: TVA versus the endangered species act. University of Kansas Press, LawrenceGoogle Scholar
  19. Nabokov P (2006) Where the lightening strikes: the lives of American Indian sacred places. Penguin Books, LondonGoogle Scholar
  20. National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (1969) Public Law. 91-190Google Scholar
  21. Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (1990) Public Law 101-601Google Scholar
  22. Plater ZJB (1982) Reflected in a river: agency accountability and the TVA-Tellico Dam case. Tenn Law Rev 49:747–787Google Scholar
  23. Plater, ZJB (1986) In the wake of the snail darter: an environmental law paradigm and its consequences. Univ of Michigan J. of Law Reform 19:805-862Google Scholar
  24. Plater ZJB (2004) Endangered species act lessons over 30 years, and the legacy of the snail darter, a small fish in a pork barrel. Environ Law 34:290–308Google Scholar
  25. Reagan, R (2004) Reagan’s path to victory: the shaping of Ronald Reagan’s vision: selected writings. Edited by Skinner, KK., et al. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. Scheele PE (1978) President carter and the water projects: a case study in presidential and congressional decision-making. Pres Stud Q 4:348–364Google Scholar
  27. Smith PC, Warrior R (1996) Like a hurricane: the Indian movement from Alcatraz to Wounded Knee. The New Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. Tennessee Valley Authority v. Hill, 437 US 153 (1978)Google Scholar
  29. Thompson J, Brooks C (1991) Tellico dam and the snail darter. Spectrum Communications, KnoxvilleGoogle Scholar
  30. Wheeler WB, McDonald MJ (1986) TVA and the Tellico Dam 1936–1979: a bureaucratic crisis in post-industrial America. The University of Tennessee Press, KnoxvilleGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Southern Studies, University of South CarolinaElginUSA

Personalised recommendations