Abstract
Agreement on the criteria for granting the right to use water resources between governing bodies represents a significant advance in the process of sharing water use. To aid water resource management agencies in optimizing water use, the impact of using different criteria for permitting water use in the Paracatu river basin, Brazil, was evaluated in this study. The streamflow criteria corresponding to 30 % of the annual Q7,10 (used by the governing body of Minas Gerais), 70 % of the annual Q95 (used by the governing body of the union), 30 % of the monthly Q7,10, and 70 % of the monthly Q95 were evaluated. The use of criteria based on the monthly streamflow allows for better management of water use because it allows for greater utilization of this resource in times when there is high water availability and imposes a more realistic restriction during critical periods. Substitution of the annual Q7,10 for the monthly Q7,10 significantly increases the streamflow permitted in some months, for example, from December to May. Use of the criterion of 70 % of the annual Q95 involves a high risk of drought in critical months, while the criterion of 70 % of the monthly Q95 minimizes this risk.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alcano J, Petra D, Henrichs T, Kaspar F, Lehner B, Roesch T, Siebert S (2003) Global estimates of water withdrawals and availability under current and future “business-as-usual” conditions. Hydrol Sci J. doi:10.1623/hysj.48.3.339.45278
Alves ECRF, Silvino ANdeO, Andrade NLRde, Silveira A (2009) Gestão dos recursos hídricos no Estado de Mato Grosso. Revista Brasileira de Recursos Hídricos 14(3):69–80
ANA (Agência Nacional de Águas) (2009) Diagnóstico da outorga de direito de uso de recursos hídricos no país. Diretrizes e prioridades. http://www.ana.gov.br/pnrh_novo/documentos/07%20Outorgas/VF%20Outorga.pdf. Accessed 20 out. 2009
Bof LHN, Pruski FF, Souza WAM (2009) Impacto do uso de diversos critérios para a concessão de outorga. In: XVIII Simpósio Brasileiro de Recursos Hídricos, 2009, Campo Grande, MS. Anais…. Associação Brasileira de Recursos Hídricos, Campo Grande, 1 CD
Brodie RS, Hosteler S, Slatter E (2008) Comparison of daily percentiles of streamflow and rainfall to investigate stream–aquifer connectivity. J Hydrol 349:56–67
Fry C (2008) The impact of climate change: the world’s greatest challenge in the twenty-first century. New Holland Publishers Ltd., London
Gunther F, Tubiello FN, van Velthuizen H, Wilberg DA (2007) Climate change impacts on irrigation water requirements: effects of mitigation, 1990–2080. Technol Forecast Soc Change 74(7):1083–1107
Kite GW (1988) Frequency and risk analyses in hydrology, 5th edn. Water Resources Publications, Highlands Ranch
Li M, Shao Q, Zhang L, Chiew FHS (2010) A new regionalization approach and its application to predict streamflow duration curve in ungauged basin. J Hydrol 389:137–145
Manabe S, Milly PCD, Wetherald R (2004) Simulated long-term changes in river discharge and soil moisture due to global warming. Hydrol Sci J 49(4):624–625
Masih I, Uhlenbrook S, Maskey S, Ahmad MD (2010) Regionalization of a conceptual rainfall–runoff model based on similarity of the streamflow duration curve: a case study from the semi-arid Karkheh basin, Iran. J Hydrol 391:188–201
Melbourne Water (2007) Drought response plan: licensed water users. Melbourne Water Corporation, Yarra Glen Vic. http://www.melbournewater.com.au/content/library/rivers_and_creeks/waterway_diverters/waterway_diversion_status/Drought_Response_Plan_for_Licensed_Water_Diverters.pdf. Accessed 18 Nov 2012
Milly PCD, Dunne KA, Vecchia AV (2005) Global pattern of trends in streamflow and water availability in a changing climate. Nature 438:347–350. doi:10.1038/nature04312
Novaes LF, Pruski FF, Queiroz DOde, Rodriguez RdelG, Silva DD, Ramos MM (2009) Modelo para a quantificação da disponibilidade hídrica: parte 1—obtenção da equação de recessão. Revista Brasileira de Recursos Hídricos 14(1):15–26
Pereira SB, Pruski FF, Silva DD, Ramos MM (2007) Estudo do comportamento hidrológico do rio São Francisco e seus principais afluentes. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental 11(6):615–622
Plate EJ (2002) Flood risk and flood management. J Hydrol 267:2–11
Pruski FF, Pruski PL (2011) Technology and innovation in the face the water resources management. In: Medeiros SdeS, Gheyi HR, Galvão CdeO, Paz VPS (eds) Water resources in arid and semiarid regions. Instituto Nacional do Semiárido, Campina Grande, pp 27–58 (in Portuguese)
Pruski FF, Rodriguez RdelG, Novaes LF, Silva DD, Ramos MM, Teixeiraa F (2007) Impacto das vazões demandadas pela irrigação e pelos abastecimentos animal e humano, na bacia do Paracatu. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental 11(2):199–210
Raymond PA, Oh NH, Turner RE, Broussard W (2008) Anthropogenically enhanced fluxes of water and carbon from the Mississipi River. Nature 451:449–452
Rodriguez RdelG, Pruski FF, Novaes LF, Silva DD, Ramos MM, Teixeira AF (2006) Vazões consumidas pela irrigação e pelos abastecimentos animal e humano (urbano e rural) na bacia do Paracatu no período de 1970 a 1996. Revista Brasileira de Recursos Hídricos 11(3):223–233
Rodriguez RdelG, Pruski FF, Novaes LF, Ramos MM, Silva DD, Teixeira AF (2007) Estimativa da demanda de água nas áreas irrigadas da bacia do rio Paracatu. Engenharia Agrícola 27(1):172–179
Sivapalan M, Takeuchi K, Franks SW, Gupta VK, Karambiri H, Lakshmi V, Liang X, Mcdonnell JJ, Mendiondo EM, O’Connell PE, Oki T, Pomeroy JW, Schertzer D, Uhlenbrook S, Zehe E (2003) IAHS decade on predictions in ungauged basin (PUB), 2003–2012: shaping an exciting future for the hydrological sciences. Hydrol Sci J 48(6):857–880
Sousa HT, Pruski FF, Bof LHN, Cecon PR, Souza JRC (2009) SisCAH: Sistema computacional para análises hidrológicas. Agência Nacional de Águas, Brasília
Tian F, Li H, Sivaplan M (2011) Model diagnostic analysis of seasonal switching of runoff generation mechanisms in the Blue river basin, Oklahoma. J Hydrol. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.03.011
Tomer MD, Schilling KE (2009) A simple approach to distinguish land-use and climate-change effects on watershed hydrology. J Hydrol 376:24–33
Vera C, Silvestri G, Liebmann B, González P (2006) Climate change scenarios for seasonal precipitation in South America from IPCC-AR4 models. Geophys Res Lett 33:L13707. doi:10.1029/2006GL025759
Wagener T, Wheater HS (2006) Parameter estimation and regionalization for continuous rainfall–runoff models including uncertainty. J Hydrol 320:132–154
Yin XA, Yang ZF (2012) Morphology and associated environmental streamflow prescriptions for rivers for water supply. Procedia Environ Sci 13:2414–2416
Young AR, Gustard A, Bullock A, Sekulin AE, Croker KM (2000) A river network based hydrological model for predicting natural and influenced streamflow statistics at ungauged sites: micro low streamflows. Sci Total Environ 251–252:293–304. doi:10.1016/S0048-9697(00)00391-0
Zhang Y, Yang ZF, Wang XQ (2006) Methodology to determine regional water demand for in streamflow and its application in the Yellow river basin. J Environ Sci 18(5):1031–1039
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge the National Council for Technological Development (CNPq) and the Rede Clima—Recursos hídricos for their financial support, as well as FAPEMIG (Grant PPM-00020-11).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bof, L.H.N., Pruski, F.F., da Silva, L.M.C. et al. Analysis of Appropriate Timescales for Water Diversion Permits in Brazil. Environmental Management 51, 492–500 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-012-9982-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-012-9982-7