Environmental Management

, Volume 51, Issue 3, pp 750–758 | Cite as

Effects of Logged and Unlogged Forest Patches on Avifaunal Diversity

  • Maryam Ghadiri Khanaposhtani
  • Mohammad Kaboli
  • Mahmoud Karami
  • Vahid Etemad
  • Saeedeh Baniasadi
Article

Abstract

In the Hyrcanian forests of northern Iran, reduced-impact silviculture systems, (single-tree and group-tree selection) were applied over a large area, which generated different local habitat structures. The aim of this study was to assess the differences between treated and untreated areas of forest and their effect on avian richness, abundance and diversity (R.A.D). Birds were surveyed during the breeding season in 2009 by 100-point counts, equally distributed in the treated and untreated area. Avian R.A.D was significantly different and higher in the untreated area. Generally, forestry practices cause noticeable changes in canopy percentage, tree composition, snags and shrub number. Treated forest habitats in the area of study had a much more developed understory, fewer snags and fewer large diameter trees. The results highlighted the importance of forest maturity and showed that preventing silvicultural disturbances may not be the best solution for conserving and enhancing biodiversity. Rather, methods such as selective cutting seem an appropriate and sustainable way of forest management. It is suggested that forests should be managed to conserve structural elements which create favorable habitat for bird species, preventing future species losses due to logging practices.

Keywords

Forest structure Bird community Richness Abundance Diversity Silvicultural treatment 

References

  1. Augenfeld KH, Franklin SB, Snyder DH (2008) Breeding bird communities of upland hardwood forest 12 years after shelter wood logging. For Ecol Manag 255:1271–1282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bibby CJ, Nd Burgess, Hill DA, Mustoe S (1992) Bird census techniques. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. Buckland ST, Elston DA (1993) Empirical models for the spatial distribution of wildlife. J Appl Ecol 30:478–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Diaz L (2006) Influences of forest type and forest structure on bird communities in oak and pine woodlands in Spain. For Ecol Manag 223:54–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Diaz I, Armesto JJ, Reid S, Sieving KE, Willson MF (2005) Linking forest structure and composition: avian diversity in successional forests of Chiloe Island, Chile. Biol Conserv 123:91–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Doyon F, Gagnon D, Giroux JF (2005) Effects of strip and single-tree selection cutting on birds and their habitat in a southwestern Quebec northern hardwood forest. For Ecol Manag 209:101–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Etemad V (1994) Estimating of quantity and quality of conclusion forestry project, MSc Thesis. University of Tehran, pp 174Google Scholar
  8. Etemad V (2002) Quantitative and qualitative investigation pf seed production of Oriental Beech (Fagus orientalis lipsky) in Mazandaran forests (Iran), PhD Thesis. University of Tehran, pp 260Google Scholar
  9. Ghadiri Khanaposhtani M, Kaboli M, Karami M, Etemad V (2012a) Effect of habitat complexity on richness, abundance and distributional pattern of forest birds. Environ Manag Springer 50(2):296–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ghadiri Khanaposhtani M, Shariati Najafabadi M, Kaboli M, Farashi A, Spiering D (2012b) Habitat requirement of Black Woodpecker (Dryocopus martius) in hyrcanoian forests, Iran. Zool Middle East 55:19–25Google Scholar
  11. Holmes S, Pitt D (2007) Response of bird communities to selection harvesting in a northern tolerant hardwood forest. For Ecol Manag 238:280–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Johnson MD (2007) Measuring habitat quality: a review. Condor 109:489–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kaboli M, Guillaumet A, Prodon R (2006) Avifaunal gradients in two arid zones of central Iran in relation to vegetation, climate, topography and altitude. J Biogeogr 33:133–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kilgo JC (2005) Harvest-related edge effects on prey availability and foraging of hooded warblers in a bottomland hardwood forest. Condor 107:627–636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kuchler AW (1967) Vegetation mapping. The Ronald Press Company Net Work, New York, p 472Google Scholar
  16. Kuuluvainen T, Penttinen A, Leinonen K, Nygren M (1996) Statistical opportunities for comparing stand structural heterogeneity in managed and primeval forests: an example from boreal spruce forest in southern Finland. Silva Fennica 30(2–3):315–328Google Scholar
  17. Laiolo P (2002) Effects of habitat structure, floral composition and diversity on a forest bird community in north-western Italy. Folia Zoologica 51(2):121–128Google Scholar
  18. Laiolo P, Caprio E, Rolando A (2003) Effects of logging and non-native tree proliferation on the birds overwintering in the upland forests of north-western Italy. For Ecol Manag 179(1–3):441–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Legendre p, Legendre L (1998) Numerical ecology. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  20. Lohr SM, Gauthreaux GA, Kilgo JC (2002) Importance of coarse woody debris to avian communities in Loblolly pine forests. Conserv Biol 16(3):767–777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. MacArthur RH, MacArthur JW (1961) On bird species diversity. Ecology 42:594–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Machtans C, Latour P (2003) Boreal forest songbird communities of the Liard valley, northeast territories, Canada. Condor 105:27–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mitchell MS, Lancia RA, Gerwin JA (2001) Using land scape—level data to predict the distribution of birds on a managed forest effect of scale. Ecol Model 11(6):1692–1708Google Scholar
  24. Moran PA (1950) Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena. Biometrika 37:17–22Google Scholar
  25. Morrison ML, Marcot BG, Mannan RW (1992) Wildlife-habitat relationships. University of Wisconsin Press, MadisonGoogle Scholar
  26. Nadkarni NM, Matelson TJ (1989) Bird use of epiphyte resources in neotropical trees. Condor 91:891–907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pribil S, Picman J (1997) The importance of using the proper methodology and spatial scale in the study of habitat selection by birds. Can J Zool 75:1835–1844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Salehi Shanjani P, Paule L, Khavari-Nejad RA, Gomory D, Sagheb-Talebi K (2002) Genetic diversity of oriental beech (fagus orientalis lipsky) forests over the hyrcanian zone. For Genet 9(4):297–308Google Scholar
  29. Sarmadiyan F, Jafari M (2001) The survey of soil of the Kheyrud Forest Research Station University of Tehran, Iran. Nat Resour J 291:33–89Google Scholar
  30. Shannon CE, Wiener W (1949) The Mathematical Theory of Communication. University of Illinois Press, UrbanaGoogle Scholar
  31. Shariati M (2009) Avifaunal distribution pattern and abundance in northern Alborz (case study Kheirod forest), MSc Thesis. pp 100Google Scholar
  32. Shochat E, Abramsky Z, Pinshow B (2001) Breeding bird species diversity in the Negev: effects of scrub fragmentation by planted forests. Appl Ecol 38:1135–1147Google Scholar
  33. Sillett TS (1994) Foraging ecology of epiphyte-searching insectivorous birds in Costa Rica. Condor 96:863–877CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Thinh VT (2006) Bird species richness and diversity in relation to vegetation in Bavi National Park, Vietnam. J Ornithol 5:121–125Google Scholar
  35. Thompson ID, Hogan HA, Montevecchi WA (1999) Avian communities of mature balsam fir forests in Newfoundland: age-dependence and implications for timber harvesting. Condor 101:311–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tozer DC, Burke DM, Nol E, Elliott KA (2010) Short-term effects of group-selection harvesting on breeding birds in a northern hardwood forest. For Ecol Manag 259:1522–1529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Vergara PM, Schlatter RP (2006) Aggragate retention in two Tierra del Fuego Nothofagus forests: Short-term effects on bird abundance. For Ecol Manag 222:213–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zurita GA, Zuleta GA (2008) Bird use of logging gaps in a subtropical mountain forest: the influence of habitat structure and resource abundance in the Yungas of Argentina. For Ecol Manag 257:271–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maryam Ghadiri Khanaposhtani
    • 1
  • Mohammad Kaboli
    • 1
  • Mahmoud Karami
    • 1
  • Vahid Etemad
    • 1
  • Saeedeh Baniasadi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Natural ResourcesUniversity of TehranKarajIran

Personalised recommendations