Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Biodiversity Monitoring at the Tonle Sap Lake of Cambodia: A Comparative Assessment of Local Methods

Environmental Management volume 50, pages 707–720 (2012)Cite this article

Abstract

This paper assesses local biodiversity monitoring methods practiced in the Tonle Sap Lake of Cambodia. For the assessment we used the following criteria: methodological rigor, perceived cost, ease of use (user friendliness), compatibility with existing activities, and effectiveness of intervention. Constraints and opportunities for execution of the methods were also considered. Information was collected by use of: (1) key informant interview, (2) focus group discussion, and (3) researcher’s observation. The monitoring methods for fish, birds, reptiles, mammals and vegetation practiced in the research area have their unique characteristics of generating data on biodiversity and biological resources. Most of the methods, however, serve the purpose of monitoring biological resources rather than biodiversity. There is potential that the information gained through local monitoring methods can provide input for long-term management and strategic planning. In order to realize this potential, the local monitoring methods should be better integrated with each other, adjusted to existing norms and regulations, and institutionalized within community-based organization structures.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

39,95 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)

Fig. 1

References

  • Alzinga CL, Salzer DW, Willoughby JW, Gibbs JP (2001) Monitoring plant and animal populations. Blackwell Science, Inc., Malden

    Google Scholar 

  • Bani L, Massimino D, Bottoni L, Massa R (2006) Multiscale method for selecting indicator species and priority conservation areas: a case study for broadleaved forests in Lombardy, Italy. Conservation Biology 20:512–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell IC, Poole C, Giesen W, Jorgensen JV (2006) Species diversity and ecology of Tonle Sap Great Lake, Cambodia. Aquatic Science 68:355–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danielsen F, Balete DS, Poulsen MK, Enghoff M, Nozawa CM, Jensen AE (2000) A simple system for monitoring biodiversity in protected areas of a developing country. Biodiversity and Conservation 9:1671–1705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danielsen F, Mendoza MM, Alviola P, Balete DS, Enghoff M, Poulsen MK, Jensen AE (2003) Biodiversity monitoring in developing countries: what are we trying to achieve? Oryx 37:1–3

    Google Scholar 

  • Danielsen F, Burgess ND, Balmford A (2005a) Monitoring matters: examining the potential of locally-based approaches. Biodiversity and Conservation 14:2507–2542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danielsen F, Jensen AE, Alviola PA, Balete DS, Mendoza M, Tagtag A (2005b) Does monitoring matter? A quantitative assessment of management decisions from locally-based monitoring of protected areas. Biodiversity and Conservation 14:2633–2652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danielsen F, Burgess ND, Balmford A, Donald PF, Funder M, Jones JPG, Alviola P, Balete DS, Blomley T, Brashares J, Child B, Enghoff M, Fjeldsa J, Holt S, Hubertz H, Jensen AE, Jensen PM, Massao J, Mendoza MM, Ngaga Y, Poulsen MK, Rueda R, Sam M, Skielboe T, Stuart-Hill G, Topp-Jørgensen E, Yonten D (2008) Local participation in natural resource monitoring: a characterization of approaches. Conservation Biology 23(1):31–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danielsen F, Burgess ND, Jensen PM, Pirhofer-Walzl K (2010) Environmental monitoring: the scale and speed of implementation varies according to the degree of people’s involvement. Journal of Applied Ecology 47:1166–1168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards P (2008) Cambodian Government ban on snakehead farming enforced. Aquaculture Asia Magazine 13(1):40–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinsinger P (2001) Designing field studies for biodiversity conservation. Island Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaidet N, Fritz H, Nyahuma C (2003) A participatory counting method to monitor populations of large mammals in non-protected areas: a case study of bicycle counts in the Zambezi Valley, Zimbabwe. Biodiversity and Conservation 12:1571–1585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaidet-Drapier N, Fritz H, Bourgarel M, Renaud PC, Poilecot P, Chardonnet (2006) Cost and efficiency of large mammal census techniques: comparison of methods for a participatory approach in a communal area, Zimbabwe. Biodiversity and Conservation 15:735–754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilchrist G, Mallory M, Merkel F (2005) Can local ecological knowledge contribute to wildlife management? Case study of migratory birds. Ecology and Society 10(1):1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray M, Kalpers J (2005) Ranger based monitoring in the Virunga–Bwindi region of East-Central Africa: a simple data collection tool for park management. Biodiversity and Conservation 14:2723–2741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray TNE, Hong C, Ro B, Collar NJ, Dolman PM (2007) Habitat preferences of a globally threatened bustard provide support for community-based conservation in Cambodia. Biological Conservation 138:341–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartanto H, Lorenzo CMB, Frio AL (2002) Collective action and learning in developing a local monitoring system. International Forest Review 4(3):184–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joseph LN, Field SA, Wilcox C, Possingham HP (2006) Presence–absence versus abundance data for monitoring threatened species. Conservation Biology 20:1679–1687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katzner T, Milner-Gulland EJ, Bragin E (2007) Using modelling to improve monitoring of structured populations: are we collecting the right data? Conservation Biology 21:241–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kéry M, Schmidt H (2004) Monitoring programs need to take into account imperfect species detectability. Basic and Applied Ecology 5:65–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamberts D (2001) Tonle Sap fisheries: a case study on floodplain gillnet fisheries in Siem Reap, Cambodia. FAO Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific, Bangkok, Thailand. RAP Publication 2001/11

  • Lamberts D (2006) The Tonle Sap Lake as a productive ecosystem. Water Resources Development 22:481–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence A, Paudel K (2006) Adaptive value of participatory biodiversity monitoring in community forestry. Environmental Conservation 33:325–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim S, Sour V, Sirita U (2004) The Mimosa pigra report: Issue paper No. 1, State of Environment Report. National Capacity Development Project, Royal Government of Cambodia. Phnom Penh, Cambodia

  • Lindenmayer DB, Likens GE (2010) The science and application of ecological monitoring. Biological Conservation 143:1317–1328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margoluis R, Salafsky N (1998) Measures of success: designing, managing, and monitoring conservation and development project. Island Press, Washington, p 362

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsui S, Kesinen M, Pech S, Nakamura M (2005) Tonle Sap: experience and lessons learned brief. http://www.iwlearn.net/publications/ll/laketonlesap_2005.pdf. Accessed 31 July 2009

  • McDonald A, Pech B, Phauk V, Leev B (1997) Plant communities of the Tonle Sap flood plain. Contribution to the nomination of the Tonle Sap as Biosphere Reserve for UNESCO’s “Man in the biosphere program”. UNESCO, Phnom Penh, Cambodia

  • McGeoch MA, Chown SL, Kalwij J (2006) A global indicator for biodiversity invasion. Conservation Biology 20:1635–1646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MOE [Ministry of Environment] (2008) Law on protected area management. Phnom Penh, Cambodia

    Google Scholar 

  • MOE, DoF [Department of Fisheries], Wetlands International (2002) Management plan for the Boeng Chhmar Ramsar Site in Cambodia. Final draft, Phnom Penh, Cambodia

  • Mortensen LO, Jensen MB (2012) Methods in sustainable monitoring: plot sampling versus interviews. Biodiversity and Conservation 21:145–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neou B, Lane BD (2002) Natural resources management for human security in Cambodia’s Tonle Sap biosphere reserve. Environmental Science and Policy 5:33–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NORDECO [Nordic Agency for Development and Ecology], DENR [Department of Environment and Natural Resources] (2001) Biodiversity monitoring system manual for protected areas, 2nd edn. DENR, Minila, and NORDECO, Copenhagen

  • Noss AJ, Oetting I, Cuellar RL (2005) Hunter self-monitoring by the Isoseno-Guaran in the Bolivian Chaco. Biodiversity and Conservation 14:2679–2693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obura DO, Wells S, Church J, Horrill C (2002) Monitoring of fish and fish catches by local fishers in Kenya and Tanzania. Marine and Freshwater Research 53:215–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oldekop JA, Bebbington AJ, Berdel F, Truelove NK, Wiersberg T, Preziosi RF (2011) Testing the accuracy of non-experts in biodiversity monitoring exercises using fern species richness in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Biodiversity and Conservation 20:2615–2626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rijsoort JV, Jinfeng Z (2005) Participatory resource monitoring as a means for promoting social change in Yunnan, China. Biodiversity and Conservation 14:2543–2573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Royal Government of Cambodia (RGC) (2012) Sub-decree 37 dated March 7, 2012 on cancelation of commercial fishing concession in Tonle Sap Lake. Phnom Penh, Cambodia

  • Seak S, Schmidt-Vogt D, Thapa GB (2011) A comparison between biodiversity monitoring systems to improve natural resource management in Tonle Sap Biosphere Reserve, Cambodia. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management 7(4):258–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sekercioglu CH (2011) Promoting community-based bird monitoring in the tropics: conservation, research, environmental education, capacity-building, and local incomes. Biological Conservation. doi:10.1016/j.biocon2011.10.024

  • Steinmetz R (2000) Ecological surveys, monitoring and the involvement of local people in protected areas of Lao P.D.R. Evaluating Eden Series, Discussion paper No 13. IIED

  • Steinmetz R, Chutipong W, Seuaturien N (2006) Collaborating to conserve large mammals in Southeast Asia. Conservation Biology 20(5):1391–1401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stork NE, Samways MJ, Eeley HAC (1996) Inventorying and monitoring biodiversity. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11:39–40

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland W (1996) In: Sutherland WJ (ed) Ecological census techniques: a handbook. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  • Teder T, Moora M, Roosaluste E, Zobel K, Pärtel M, Kõljalg U (2006) Monitoring of biological diversity: a common-ground approach. Conservation Biology 21:313–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uychiaoco AJ, Arceo1 HO, Green SJ, Cruz MTDL, Gaite PA, Alino PM (2005) Monitoring and evaluation of reef protected areas by local fishers in the Philippines: tightening the adaptive management cycle. Biodiversity and Conservation 14:2775–2794

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Zalinge N (2002) Update on the status of the Cambodian inland capture fisheries sector with special reference to the Tonle Sap Great Lake. Catch and Culture 8:1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Vreugdenhil D, Terborgh J, Cleef AM, Sinitsyn M, Boere GD, Archaga VL (2003) Comprehensive protected areas system composition and monitoring. WICE, Shepherdstown

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoccoz NG, Nichols JD, Boulinier T (2003) Monitoring of biological diversity—a response to Danielsen et al. Oryx 37:410

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the funding support from USEPAM/DANIDA. We are also grateful; to Mekong Program on Water, Environment and Resilience (M-POWER) for an additional grant to support the field work; to Dr. Rajendra Shrestha and Prof. Henning Schroll for giving continuous advice while writing this paper; and to Dr. Ram Baskakoti, Dr. Richard Friend, Dr. Robert Arthur (World Fish Centre), and Dr. Robert Steinmetz (biologist of WWF Thailand) for providing valuable comments on the research methodology. Special thanks go to local community people in the study site, rangers, fishery officers and relevant stakeholders who have provided information and facilitation process during the fieldwork. We thank three anonymous peer-reviewers for giving excellent and concise comments to make this paper publishable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Environmental Science, Royal University of Phnom Penh, Room 112, Building A, Campus I Toul Kok, Phnom Penh, Cambodia

    Sophat Seak

  2. Natural Resource Management, Asian Institute of Technology, Km 41, Paholyothin Road, Klang Luang, Bangkok, Pathumthani, 12120, Thailand

    Sophat Seak

  3. Centre for Mountain Ecosystem Studies, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, China

    Dietrich Schmidt-Vogt

  4. Regional and Rural Development Planning, Asian Institute of Technology, Bangkok, Pathumthani, Thailand

    Gopal B. Thapa

Authors
  1. Sophat Seak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dietrich Schmidt-Vogt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gopal B. Thapa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sophat Seak.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Seak, S., Schmidt-Vogt, D. & Thapa, G.B. Biodiversity Monitoring at the Tonle Sap Lake of Cambodia: A Comparative Assessment of Local Methods. Environmental Management 50, 707–720 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-012-9909-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-012-9909-3

Keywords

  • Local biodiversity monitoring
  • Community-based monitoring
  • Biological resource monitoring
  • Biodiversity monitoring
  • Tonle Sap

Search

Navigation