Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Environmental Condition Assessment of US Military Installations Using GIS Based Spatial Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Environment functions in various aspects including soil and water conservation, biodiversity and habitats, and landscape aesthetics. Comprehensive assessment of environmental condition is thus a great challenge. The issues include how to assess individual environmental components such as landscape aesthetics and integrate them into an indicator that can comprehensively quantify environmental condition. In this study, a geographic information systems based spatial multi-criteria decision analysis was used to integrate environmental variables and create the indicator. This approach was applied to Fort Riley Military installation in which land condition and its dynamics due to military training activities were assessed. The indicator was derived by integrating soil erosion, water quality, landscape fragmentation, landscape aesthetics, and noise based on the weights from the experts by assessing and ranking the environmental variables in terms of their importance. The results showed that landscape level indicator well quantified the overall environmental condition and its dynamics, while the indicator at level of patch that is defined as a homogeneous area that is different from its surroundings detailed the spatiotemporal variability of environmental condition. The environmental condition was mostly determined by soil erosion, then landscape fragmentation, water quality, landscape aesthetics, and noise. Overall, environmental condition at both landscape and patch levels greatly varied depending on the degree of ground and canopy disturbance and their spatial patterns due to military training activities and being related to slope. It was also determined the environment itself could be recovered quickly once military training was halt or reduced. Thus, this study provided an effective tool for the army land managers to monitor environmental dynamics and plan military training activities. Its limitation lies at that the obtained values of the indicator vary and are subjective to the experts’ knowledge and experience. Thus, further advancing this approach is needed by developing a scientific method to derive the weights of environmental variables.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abele G, Brown J, Brewer MC (1984) Long-term effects of off-road vehicle traffic on tundra terrain. Journal of Terramechanics 21:283–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Althoff DP, Thien SJ (2005) Impact of M1A1 main battle tank disturbance on soil quality, invertebrates, and vegetation characteristics. Journal of Terramechanics 42:159–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Althoff DP, Pontius JS, Gipson PS, Woodford PB (2005) A comprehensive approach to identifying monitoring priorities of small landbirds on Military installations. Environmental Management 34:887–902

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Althoff DP, Gipson PS, Pontius JS, Woodford PB (2006) Plant community and bare ground trends on Fort Riley, Kansas: implications for monitoring of a highly disturbed landscape. Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science 109(3/4):101–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Althoff DP, Althoff PS, Lambrecht N, Gipson PS, Pontius JS, Woodford PB (2007) Soil properties and perceived disturbance of grasslands subjected to mechanized military training: evaluation of an index. Land Degradation & Development 18:269–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Althoff PS, Kirkham MB, Todd TC, Thien SJ, Gipson PS (2009a) Influence of Abrams M1A1 main battle tank disturbance on Tallgrass prairie plant community structure. Rangeland Ecology and Management 62:480–490

    Google Scholar 

  • Althoff PS, Todd TC, Thien SJ, Callahan MA (2009b) Response of soil microbial communities to tracked vehicle disturbance in tallgrass prairie. Applied Soil Ecology 43:122–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson AB, Ayers P, Palazzo A, Fehmi J, Shoop S, Sullivan P (2005a) Assessing the impacts of military vehicle traffic on natural areas: introduction to a special issue of the journal of terramechanics and review of the relevant military vehicle impact literature. Journal of Terramechanics 42:143–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson AB, Wang G, Fang S, Gertner GZ, Güneralp B, Jones D (2005b) Assessing and predicting changes in vegetation cover associated with military land use activities using field monitoring data at Fort Hood, Texas. Journal of Terramechanics 42:207–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson AB, Wang G, Gertner GZ (2006) Local variability based sampling for mapping a soil erosion cover factor by co-simulation with Landsat TM images. International Journal of Remote Sensing 18:2423–2447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod DI (1985) Rise of the grassland biome, central North America. Botanical Review 51:163–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayers P (1994) Environmental damage from tracked vehicle operation. Journal of Terramechanics 31:173–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bastian O, Kronert R, Lipsky Z (2006) Landscape diagnosis on different space and time scales—a challenge for landscape planning. Landscape Ecology 21:359–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braunack MV (1986) The residual effects of tracked vehicles on soil surface properties. Journal of Terramechanics 23:37–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braunack MV, Williams BG (1993) The effect of initial soil water content and vegetation cover on surface soil disturbance by tracked vehicles. Journal of Terramechanics 30:299–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diersing V, Shaw R, Tazik D (1992) US Army land condition-trend analysis (LCTA) program. Environmental Management 16:405–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dilks KM, Finney D (1994) US services armed with GRASS GIS. GIS World 7(3):46–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Gertner GZ, Wang G, Fang S, Anderson AB (2002) Mapping and uncertainty of predictions based on multiple primary sources from joint co-simulation with Landsat TM image and polynomial regression. Remote Sensing of Environment 83:498–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gertner GZ, Wang G, Fang S, Anderson AB (2004) Partitioning spatial model uncertainty when inputs are from joint simulations of correlated multiple attributes. Transactions in GIS 8:441–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gertner GZ, Wang G, Anderson AB (2006) Determination of frequency for re-measuring ground and vegetation cover factor for monitoring of soil erosion. Environmental Management 37:84–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene TA (1996) Effects of long-term military training traffic on forest vegetation in central Minnesota. Northern Journal of Applied Forest 13:157–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirzel AH, Arlettaz R (2003) Modeling habitat suitability for complex species distributions by environmental-distance geometric mean. Environmental Management 32(5):614–623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ITAM (Integrated Training Area Management) (2012) http://www.sustainability.army.mil/overview/overview.cfm. Accessed 12 April 2012

  • Johnson FL (1982) Effects of tank training activities on botanical features at Fort Hood, Texas. Southwestern Naturalist 27:309–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson S, Wang G, Howard HR, Anderson AB (2011) Identification of superfluous roads for Fort Riley installation in terms of sustainable military land carrying capacity and environment. Journal of Terramechanics 48:97–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston DM, Timlin D (2000) Spatial data accuracy and quality assessment for environment management. In: Proceedings of the 4th international symposium on spatial accuracy assessment in natural resources and environment sciences. Amsterdam, 12–14 July 2000, pp 325–328

  • Leis SA, Engle DM, Leslie DM Jr, Fehmi JS (2005) Effects of short- and long-term disturbance resulting from military maneuvers on vegetation and soils in a mixed prairie area. Environmental Management 36:849–861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leis SA, Leslie DM Jr, Engle DM, Fehmi JS (2008) Small mammals as indicators of short-term and long-term disturbances in mixed prairie. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 137:75–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Limb RF, Bidwell TG, Althoff DP, Anderson AB, Gipson PS, Howard HR (2010) Replacing natural biopedturbation in grassland with anthropogenic focal disturbance. Plant Ecology 210:331–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malckzewski J (2004) GIS-based land-use suitability analysis: a critical overview. Progress in planning 62:3–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malckzewski J (2006a) Ordered weighted averaging with fuzzy quantifiers: GIS-based multicriteria evalution for land-use suitability analysis. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 8:270–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malckzewski J (2006b) GIS-based multicriteria decision analysis: a survey of the literature. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 20(7):703–726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malczewski J (1999) GIS and multicriteria decision analysis. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ode AS, Tveit MS, Fry G (2008) Capturing landscape visual character using indicators: touching base with landscape aesthetic theory. Landscape Research 33:89–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ormsby T, Napoleon E, Burke R, Groessl C, Feaster L (2008) Getting to know ArcGIS desktop: basics of ArcView, ArcEditor, and ArcInfo. ESRI Press, Redlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Quist MC, Fay PA, Guy CS, Knapp AK, Rubenstein BN (2003) Military training effects on terrestrial and aquatic communities on a grassland military installation. Ecological Applications 13:432–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renard KG, Foster GR, Weesies GA, McCool DK, Yoder DC (1997) Predicting soil erosion by water: a guide to conservation planning with the revised universal soil loss equation (RUSLE). US Department of Agriculture, agriculture handbook number 703. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1980) The analytical hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sample L, Steichen J, Kelley J Jr (1998) Water quality impacts from low water fords on military training lands. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 34:939–949

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Steve S (2010) Assessment of cumulative training impacts for sustainable military land carrying capacity and environment: quantifying quality of environment and landscape. Southern Illinois University at Carbondale, Carbondale

    Google Scholar 

  • Trame A, Harper M (1997) Potential military effects on selected plant communities in the southeastern united states. US Army Corps of Engineers. Construction Engineering Research Laboratories, Champaign

    Google Scholar 

  • Tveit M, Ode A, Fry G (2006) Key concepts in a framework for analyzing visual landscape character. Landscape Research 31:229–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USDA Soil Conservation Service (1975) Soil survey of Riley county and part of Geary county, Kansas. US Dept. Agriculture, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang G, Gertner GZ, Singh V, Shinkareva S, Parysow P, Anderson AB (2002) Spatial and temporal prediction and uncertainty of soil loss using the revised soil loss equation: a case study of the rainfall-runoff erosivity R factor. Ecological Modeling 152:143–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang G, Gertner GZ, Fang S, Anderson AB (2003) Mapping multiple variables for predicting soil loss by geostatistical methods with TM images and a slope map. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 69:889–898

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang G, Gertner GZ, Fang S, Anderson AB (2004) Mapping vegetation cover change using geostatistical methods and bitemporal Landsat TM images. Geoscience and Remote Sensing 42:632–643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang G, Gertner GZ, Anderson AB, Howard HR, Gebhard D, Althoff DP, Davis T, Woodford PB (2007) Spatial variability and temporal dynamics analysis of soil erosion due to military land use activities: uncertainty and implications for land management. Land Degradation and Development 18:519–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang G, Gertner GZ, Anderson AB, Howard HR (2009) Simulating spatial pattern and dynamics of Military training impacts for allocation of land repair using images. Environmental Management 44:810–823

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren SD, Holbrook SW, Dale DA, Whelan NL, Elyn M, Grimm W, Jentsch A (2007) Biodiversity and the heterogeneous disturbance regime on military training lands. Restoration Ecology 15:606–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson S (1988) The effects of military tank traffic on prairie: a management model. Environmental Management 12:397–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wischmeier WH, Smith DD (1978) Predicting rainfall-erosion losses from cropland east of the Rocky Mountains: guide for selection of practices for soil and water conservation. USDA, agriculture handbook no. 282. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

We are grateful to US Army Corps of Engineers, Construction Engineering Research Laboratory (USA-CERL) for providing support (CERL W9132T-08-2-0019) and data sets for this study and also to the editors and reviewers.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Geography and Environmental Resources, Southern Illinois University Carbondale, Faner Hall 4520, 1000 Faner Drive, Carbondale, IL, 62901, USA

    Steve Singer & Guangxing Wang

  2. ERDC-CERL, Champaign, IL, USA

    Heidi Howard & Alan Anderson

Authors
  1. Steve Singer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Guangxing Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Heidi Howard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Alan Anderson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Guangxing Wang or Heidi Howard.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Singer, S., Wang, G., Howard, H. et al. Environmental Condition Assessment of US Military Installations Using GIS Based Spatial Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis. Environmental Management 50, 329–340 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-012-9873-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-012-9873-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation