Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Capacity to Detect Change Stream Fish Communities Characteristics at the Site-Level in the Lake Ontario Basin

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We investigate natural inter-annual variability of fish community measures within streams of the Lake Ontario basin. Given this variability, we examined coefficients of variation (CV) among the community measures and three scenarios pertaining to the capacity of biologists to detect changes in the fish community at the stream site level. Results indicate that Ontario’s stream fish communities are highly variable in time. Young-of-the-year rainbow trout growth was the least variable whereas biomass density scored the highest CV of 0.50 among streams (range 0.22–0.99). Given the CVs and relatively equal sample sizes, our measures of the fish community can be ranked from least to most powerful: biomass, density, richness, diversity, and growth of young-of-the-year rainbow trout. Only large changes in measures can typically be detected. For instance, it would take 4–6 years of monitoring before and after a pulse perturbation to detect a 50 % change in species richness or diversity. We suggest that monitoring abundance is unlikely to result in the detection of small impacts within a short period of time and that large effects can be masked by low statistical power. This evidence voices the need for more research into better sampling methods, experimental designs, and choice of indicators to support monitoring programs for flowing waters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Casselman HK, MA Henderson, Schaner T (1985) Fish sampling techniques: natural and observational variability. Prepared for: National Resources Council of Canada Environmental Secretariat, Working group instructed to review “Detecting change in fish populations.” Contribution No. 85-00 of the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Fisheries Branch, Research Section, Maple, Ontario, Canada

  • Casselman JM, Hilborn R, Lloyd KM, Roberts J (1986) Detecting change in fish populations. Publ. No. NRCC24375 Environment Secretariat, National Research Council, Ottawa, Ontario

  • Chapman LJ, Putnam DF (1966) The physiography of southern Ontario, 2nd edn. University of Toronto Press, Toronto, p 386

    Google Scholar 

  • Coker GA, Portt CB, Minns CK (2001) Morphological and ecological characteristics of Canadian freshwater fishes. Canadian Data Reports of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 2554(iv):89

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale VH, Beyeler SC (2001) Challenges in the development and use of ecological indicators. Ecological Indicators 1:3–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dauwalter DC, Rahel FJ, Gerow KG (2009) Temporal variation in trout populations: implications for monitoring and trend detection. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 138:38–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies PE, Sloane RD, Andrew J (1988) Effects of hydrological change and the cessation of stocking on a stream population of Salmo trutta L. Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 39:337–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunham JB, Vinyard GL (1997) Relationships between body mass, population density, and the self-thinning rule in stream-living salmonids. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 54:1025–1030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott JM (1993) The self-thinning rule applied to juvenile sea-trout, Salmo trutta. Journal of Animal Ecology 62:71–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falke JA, Bestgen KR, Fausch KD (2010) Streamflow reductions and habitat drying affect growth, survival, and recruitment of brassy minnow across a Great Plains riverscape. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 139:1566–1583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fausch KD, Hawkes CL, Parsons MG (1988) Models that predict standing crop of stream fish from habitat variables: 1950–85. U. S. D. A. Forest Service, General Technical Report PNW-GTR-213, Portland, OR, p 52

  • Frimpong EA, Angermeier PL (2009) FishTraits: a database of ecological and life-history traits of freshwater fishes of the United States. Fisheries (Bethesda) 34:487–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs JP, Droege S, Eagle P (1998) Monitoring populations of plants and animals. BioScience 48:935–940

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant JWA (1993) Self-thinning in stream-dwelling salmonids. Canadian Special Publication of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 118:99–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman G, Dowd J, Crawford M (1990) Assemblage stability in stream fishes: a review. Environmental Management 14:661–671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hakala JP, Hartman KJ (2004) Drought effect on stream morphology and brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) populations in forested headwater streams. Hydrobiologia 515:203–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ham KD, Pearsons TN (2000) Can reduced salmonid population abundance be detected in time to limit management impacts? Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 57:17–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartman GF, Scrivener JC (1990) Impacts of forestry practices on a coastal stream ecosystem, Carnation Creek, British Columbia. Canadian Bulletin of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 223, p 148

  • Jones ML, Stockwell JD (1995) A rapid assessment procedure for the enumeration of salmonine populations in streams. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 15:551–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones NE, Tonn WM, Scrimgeour GJ, Katopodis C (2003) Productive capacity of an artificial stream in the Canadian Arctic: assessing the effectiveness of fish habitat compensation. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 60:849–863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karr JR (1981) Assessment of biotic integrity using fish communities. Fisheries 6:21–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruse CG, Hubert WA, Rahel FJ (1998) Single-pass electrofishing predicts trout abundance in mountain streams with sparse habitat. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 18:940–946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamouroux N, Poff NL, Angermeier PL (2002) Convergence of stream fish community traits in France and Virginia (USA) streams along hydraulic and geomorphic gradients. Ecology 83:1792–1807

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legendre P, Borcard D (2007) Statistical comparison of univariate tests of homogeneity of variances. Methods, submitted (514). Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.92.2458&rep=rep1&type=pdf

  • Lester NP, Dunlop WI, Willox CC (1996) Detecting changes in the nearshore fish community. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 53(Suppl 1):391–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manly BFJ (2007) Randomization, bootstrap and Monte Carlo methods in biology, 3rd edn. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh DM, Trenham PC (2008) Current trends in plant and animal population monitoring. Conservation Biology 22:647–655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neff BP, Day SM, Piggott AR, Fuller LM (2005) Base flow in the Great Lakes Basin. U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2005-5217, Washington, DC

  • Nislow KH, Magilligan FJ, Folt CL, Kennedy BP (2002) Within-basin variation in the short-term effects of a major flood on stream fishes and invertebrates. Journal of Freshwater Ecology 17:305–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearsons TN, Li HW, Lamberti GA (1992) Influence of habitat complexity on resistance to flooding and resilience of stream fish assemblages. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 121:427–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterman RM (1990) Statistical power analysis can improve fisheries research and management. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 47:2–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poff NL, Allan JD (1995) Functional organization of stream fish assemblages in relation to hydrologic variability. Ecology 76:606–627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seamons TR, Quinn TP (2010) Sex-specific patterns of lifetime reproductive success in single and repeat breeding steelhead trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 64:505–513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shannon CE (1948) A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Systems Technical Journal 27:379–423, 623–656

  • Vaughan DS, Van Winkle W (1982) Corrected analysis of the ability to detect reductions in year·class strength of the Hudson River white perch (Marone americana) populations. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 39:782–785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venturelli PA, Lester NP, Marshall TR, Shuter BJ (2010) Consistent patterns of maturity and density-dependent growth among populations of walleye (Sander vitreus): application of the growing-degree-day metric. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 67:1057–1067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zar JH (1999) Biostatistical Analysis, 4th edn. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are indebted to the many technicians that collected the stream fish data, in particular Lake Ontario management biologist Jim Bowlby. We also thank Nigel Lester for helpful criticisms and the reviews of anonymous reviewers.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicholas Edward Jones.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jones, N.E., Petreman, I.C. The Capacity to Detect Change Stream Fish Communities Characteristics at the Site-Level in the Lake Ontario Basin. Environmental Management 50, 77–88 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-012-9859-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-012-9859-9

Keywords