Environmental Management

, Volume 49, Issue 5, pp 929–941 | Cite as

Conservation and Management of the Endangered Fiji Sago Palm, Metroxylon vitiense, in Fiji

  • Clare MorrisonEmail author
  • Isaac Rounds
  • Dick Watling


Recovery planning is a key component of many threatened species conservation initiatives and can be a powerful awareness raising tool. One of the largest impediments to conservation efforts in the Pacific region however, is the lack of ecological data and its subsequent effects on the development of feasible and useful recovery plans for threatened species. Without these plans, the understaffed, underfunded and often technically ill-equipped conservation agencies face huge difficulties in planning, prioritizing and conducting conservation activities to adequately protect biodiversity. The Fiji sago palm, Metroxylon vitiense, is an endemic endangered palm species whose survival is heavily dependent on a feasible species recovery plan. It is geographically restricted and threatened by habitat destruction and overexploitation for thatch for the tourism industry and palm heart consumption by local consumers. Despite its threatened status, M. vitiense is not currently protected by national or international legislation. Recent field surveys and extensive stakeholder consultation have resulted in the production of a species recovery plan highlighting the importance of the species and advocating sustainable harvesting rather than complete bans to promote conservation. This article summarizes the recovery plan and its current effects on the status of M. vitiense in Fiji. We also discuss the role of different stakeholders in the conservation of M. vitiense, including the absence of significant behavioral changes by the largest consumer - the tourism industry, and the importance of recovery plans for biodiversity conservation in the Pacific.


Soga Sago Palm Sustainable tourism Threats Management Conservation Local communities 



NatureFiji-MareqetiViti (NFMV) wishes to thank its project officers and assistants, Kolinio Moce, Laisiasa Waqairatu and Vilititati Seru who have been at the forefront of the work with the Soga communities. NFMV is extremely grateful to the Pacific Development and Conservation Trust and the British High Commission for funding over several years which has enabled the Soga project to progress steadily with far reaching potential benefits both for the conservation of the endangered Soga and rural landowners and thatch harvesting communities. Guy Castley and two anonymous reviewers provided valuable comments on an earlier draft of this manuscript.

Supplementary material

(MPG 79450 kb)


  1. Baines G, Hviding E (1992) Traditional environmental knowledge from the Marovo area of the Solomon Islands. In: Johnson M (ed) Lore. Capturing traditional environmental knowledge. Dene Cultural Institute and the International Development Institute, Ottawa, pp 91–110Google Scholar
  2. Boersma PD, Kareira P, Fagan WF, Clark JA, Hoekstra JM (2001) How good are endangered species recovery plans. Bioscience 51:643–649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bottrill MC, Walsh JC, Watson JEM, Joseph LN, Ortega-Argueta A, Possingham HP (2011) Does recovery planning improve the status of threatened species? Biological Conservation 144:1595–1601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Clark JA, Hoekstra JM, Boersma PD, Kareiva P (2002) Improving U.S. Endangered Species Act recovery plans: key findings and recommendations of the SCB Recovery Plan Project. Conservation Biology 16:1510–1519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cox PA, Elmqvist T (1991) Indigenous control of tropical rainforest reserves: an alternative strategy for conservation. Ambio 20:317–321Google Scholar
  6. Geddes WR (2000) Deuba: a study of a Fijian village. Institute of Pacific Studies, University of the South Pacific, SuvaGoogle Scholar
  7. GoF (1993) The National Environment Strategy: Fiji. Government of Fiji and the World Conservation Union, Suva, p 102Google Scholar
  8. Gruber JS (2010) Key principles of community-based natural resource management: a synthesis and interpretation of identified approaches for managing the commons. Environmental Management 45:52–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hunnam P (2002) Lessons in conservation for people and projects in the Pacific Islands region. United Nations Development Programme, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Kier G, Kreft H, Lee TM, Jetz W, Ibisch PL, Nowicki C, Mutke J, Barthlott W (2009) A global assessment of endemism and species richness across island and mainland regions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Natural Sciences USA 106:9322–9327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kingsford RT, Watson JEM, Lundquist CJ, Venter O, Hughes L, Johnston EL, Atherton J, Gawelm M, Keith DA, Mackey BG, Morley C, Possingham HP, Raynor B, Recher HF, Wilson KA (2009) Major conservation policy issues for biodiversity in Oceania. Conservation Biology 23:834–840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kueffer C, Daehler CC, Torres-Santana CW, Lavergne C, Meyer J-Y, Otto R, Silva L (2010) A global comparison of plant invasions on oceanic islands. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 12:145–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lees A, Siwatibau S (2009) Strategies for effective and just conservation: the Austral Foundation’s review of conservation in Fiji. Current Conservation 4:21–23Google Scholar
  14. McClatchey WC, Cox PA (1992) Use of Sago Palm Metroxylon warburgii in the Polynesian Island, Rotuma. Economic Botany 46:305–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. McClatchey W, Manner HI, Elevitch CR (2005) Metroxylon amicarum, M. paulcoxii, M. sagu, M. salomonense, M. vitiense, and M. warburgii (sago palm). In: Elevitch CR (ed) Species profiles for Pacific Island agroforestry. Permanent Agriculture Resources (PAR), HolualoaGoogle Scholar
  16. Mittermeier RA, Gil PR, Hoffman M, Pilgrim J, Brooks T, Mittermeier CG, Lamoreux J, da Fonseca GAB (2004) Hotspots revisited: earth’s biologically richest and most threatened terrestrial ecoregions. Agrupación Sierra Madre, Mexico CityGoogle Scholar
  17. Morrison C, Buckley R (2010) Oceania. In: Buckley R (ed) Conservation tourism. CABI Publishing, Cambridge, pp 78–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Morrison C (in press) Impacts of tourism on threatened species in the Pacific: a review. Pacific Conservation BiologyGoogle Scholar
  19. NFMV (2008a) Notes on the Threatened Status of Soga, the Fiji Sago Palm Metroxylon vitiense. NatureFiji-MareqetiViti, Unpublished Report available from NatureFiji-MareqetiVitiGoogle Scholar
  20. NFMV (2008b) Fiji Sago Palm Conservation and Sustainable Utilisation Project—Report on Phase 1. NatureFiji-MareqetiViti, Unpublished Report available from NatureFiji-MareqetiVitiGoogle Scholar
  21. NFMV (2008c) A Report on the Edible Palm Heart Trade of the Fiji Sago Palm Metroxylon vitiense. NatureFiji-MareqetiViti. Unpublished Report available from NatureFiji-MareqetiVitiGoogle Scholar
  22. NFMV (2008d) Guidelines for the Sustainable Harvesting of the Fiji Sago Palm. NatureFiji-MareqetiViti, Unpublished Report available from NatureFiji-MareqetiVitiGoogle Scholar
  23. NFMV (2010) Soga: Fiji Sago Palm Metroxylon vitiense Recovery Plan 2010-2015. NatureFiji-MareqetiViti Report Number 2010/06Google Scholar
  24. Raynor B, Kostka M (2003) Back to the future: using traditional knowledge to strengthen biodiversity conservation in Pohnpei, Federated States of Micronesia. Ethnobotany Reasearch and Applications 1:55–63Google Scholar
  25. Rounds I (2007) Conservation, management and ethnobotany of Sago (Metroxylon vitiense) in South East Viti Levu, Fiji Islands. MSc Thesis, University of the South Pacific, FijiGoogle Scholar
  26. Schwartz MW (2008) The performance of the Endangered Species Act. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics 39:279–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Seeman B (1862) Viti: an account of a government mission to Vitian or Fijian Islands in the years 1860–61. Cambridge. (Reprinted in 1973), Colonial History Series No. 85Google Scholar
  28. Shearman PL, Ash J, Mackey B, Bryan JE, Lokes B (2009) Forest conversion and degradation in Papua New Guinea 1972–2002. Biotropica 41:379–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Southern W (1986) The late Quaternary environmental history of Fiji. PhD. Thesis Australian National University, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  30. Taylor MFJ, Suckling KF, Rachlinski JJ (2005) The effectiveness of the Endangered Species Act: a quantitative analysis. Bioscience 55:360–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ward RG (2000) Land tenure in Pacific Islands: changing patterns and implications for land acquisition. In: Resettlement policy and practice in South East Asia and the Pacific. Asia Development Bank, Sydney, pp 75–87Google Scholar
  32. Wardell-Johnson GW, Sander J, Keppel G (2011) Climate change impacts on the terrestrial biodiversity and carbon stocks of Oceania. Pacific Conservation Biology 17:220–240Google Scholar
  33. Watling D (2005) Palms of the Fiji Islands. Environmental Consultants Fiji Ltd, Suva, FijiGoogle Scholar
  34. Woinarski JCZ (2010) Biodiversity conservation in tropical forest landscapes of Oceania. Biological Conservation 143:2385–2394CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.International Centre for Ecotourism ResearchGriffith UniversityGold CoastAustralia
  2. 2.Conservation InternationalSuvaFiji
  3. 3.NatureFiji-MareqetiVitiSuvaFiji

Personalised recommendations