Skip to main content
Log in

Recreational Value of an Oasis in Oman

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Increasing demand for water to develop non-agricultural activities is causing water to be diverted to high-value uses at the expense of irrigation. However, agriculture provides a flow of amenities in the desert environment which are not either accounted or paid. Oases are spread all over the globe and are threatened for various reasons among which is the high pressure of demand for fresh water. This paper estimates the recreation use value of an oasis. The paper is based on the Misfat Al-Abryeen oasis in Oman, a man-made area of streams and woodland. The travel cost method is used through an on-site questionnaire distributed to 230 visitors. Around 75% of visitors to the oasis also visited other historical or ecological sites during the same day-trip. The econometric model is estimated using negative binomial regression with endogenous stratification. The average consumer surplus, or benefit, from visiting Misfat Al-Abryeen is estimated at US$ 104.74 per individual per trip. The total social benefit from this oasis is estimated at $366,590 per year. These results underscore the importance of the role played by irrigated agriculture in the provision of amenity services for the tourism sector in a desert environment. The sustainability of the irrigation activity depends on the recognition of the recreation role of oases and the transfer of part of these benefits to the farmers who maintain the irrigation system. The implementation of an entrance fee to the oasis might increase farmers’ profit by 6–21%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bhat MG (2003) Application of non-market valuation to the Florida keys marine reserve management. Journal of Environmental Management 67:315–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birol E, Karousakis K, Koundouri P (2006) Using economic methods and tools to inform water management policies: a survey and critical appraisal of available methods and an application. Science of the Total Environment 365:105–122

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Creel M, Loomis JB (1990) Theoretical and empirical advantages of truncated count data estimators for analysis of deer hunting in California. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 72:434–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Englin J, Shonkwiler JS (1995) Estimating social welfare using count data models: an application to long-run recreation demand under conditions of endogenous stratification and truncation. The Review of Economics and Statistics 77:104–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleisher A, Tsur Y (2000) Measuring the recreational value of agricultural landscape. European Review of Agricultural Economics 27:385–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman AM III (1993) The measurement of environmental and resource values: theory and methods. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Grogger JT, Carson RT (1991) Models for truncated counts. Journal of Applied Economics 6:225–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurluk S, Rehber E (2008) A travel cost study to estimate recreational value for a bird refuge at Lake Manyas, Turkey. Journal of Environmental Management 88:1350–1360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanley N, Spash CL (1993) Cost-benefit analysis and the environment. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Haspel AE, Johnson FR (1982) Multiple destination trip bias in recreation benefit estimation. Land Economics 58:364–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hotelling H (1949) Letter. In: An economic study of the monetary evaluation of recreation in the National Parks. National Park Service, Washington, DC

  • Hynes S, Hanley N, O’Donoghue C (2009) Alternative treatments of the cost of time in recreational demand models: an application to whitewater kayaking in Ireland. Journal of Environmental Management 90:1014–1021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuosmanen T, Nillesen E, Wesseler J (2004) Does ignoring multidestination trips in the travel cost method cause a systematic bias? Australian Journal of Agricultural Resource Economics 48:629–651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liston-Heyes C, Heyes A (1999) Recreational benefits from the Dartmoor National Park. Journal of Environmental Management 55:69–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loomis J (2003) Travel cost demand model based river recreation benefit estimates with on-site and household surveys: comparative results and a correction procedure. Water Resources Research 39:1105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loomis J (2006) A comparison of the effect of multiple destination trips on recreation benefits as estimated by travel cost and contingent valuation methods. Journal of Leisure Research 38:46–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Loomis JB, Yorizane S, Larson D (2000) Testing significance of multi-destination and multi-purpose trips effects in a travel cost method demand model for whale watching trips. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 2912:183–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Espineira R, Amoako-Tuffour J (2008) Recreation demand analysis under truncation, overdispersion, and endogenous stratification: an application to Gros Morne National Park. Journal of Environmental Management 88:1320–1332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Espineira R, Amoako-Tuffour J (2009) Multi-destination and multi-purpose trip effects in the analysis of the demand for trips to a remote recreational site. Environmental Management 43:1146–1161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin-Lopez B, Gómez-Baggethun E, Lomas PL, Montes C (2009) Effects of spatial and temporal scales on cultural services valuation. Journal of Environmental Management 90:1050–1059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendelsohn R, Hof J, Peterson G, Johnson R (1992) Measuring recreation values with multiple destination trips. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 74:926–933

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of National Economy (2005) Seventh five-year development plan 2006–2010. Ministry of National Economy, Sultanate of Oman

  • Ministry of National Economy (2007) Statistical year book 2007. Ministry of National Economy, Sultanate of Oman

  • Ministry of National Economy (2008) Statistical year book 2008. Ministry of National Economy, Sultanate of Oman

  • MRMEWR (2001) Aflaj inventory project: summary report. Ministry of Regional Municipalities and Water Resources, Sultanate of Oman

  • Oh C, Ditton RB, Anderson DK, Scott D, Stoll JR (2005) Understanding differences in nonmarket valuation by Angler specialization level. Leisure Science 27:263–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons G, Wilson A (1997) Incidental and joint consumption in recreation demand. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 24:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • RADDO (2002) The voice of oases at the world summit for durable development in Johannesburg

  • Shaw D (1988) Onsite sample’s regression: problems of non-negative integers, truncation, and endogenous stratification. Journal of Econometrics 37:211–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrestha RK, Seidl A, Moraes AS (2002) Value of recreational fishing in the Brazilian Pantanal: a travel cost analysis using count data models. Ecological Economics 42:289–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith VK, Kaoru Y (1990) What have we learned since Hotelling’s letter? A meta-analysis. Economics Letters 32:267–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor RG, Woodall S, Wandschneider P, Foltz J (2004) The demand for wine tourism in Canyon County, Idaho. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review 7:58–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward F, Beal D (2000) Valuing nature with travel cost models: a manual. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • World Heritage Committee (2006) Decision - 31COM 7B.68 - Aflaj Irrigation Systems of Oman (Oman). UNESCO, p 92

  • Zekri S (2009) You will never miss the water till your Falaj runs dry. Paper presented in the seminar series: sustaining agricultural and marine environments. Sultan Qaboos University, 23 March 2009

  • Zekri S, Al-Marshudi A (2008) A millenarian water rights system and water markets in Oman. Water International 33:350–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the financial support from Sultan Qaboos University through the Internal Grant# IG/AGR/ECON/08/01. The logistic support from the Ministry of Regional Municipalities and Water Resources is highly appreciated. Special thanks to Mr. Ali Naifer who did an excellent job administering the survey. Our thanks also go to three anonymous reviewers and the editor for their useful comments on previous draft.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Slim Zekri.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zekri, S., Mbaga, M., Fouzai, A. et al. Recreational Value of an Oasis in Oman. Environmental Management 48, 81–88 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-011-9678-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-011-9678-4

Keywords

Navigation