Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

“My Husband Usually Makes Those Decisions”: Gender, Behavior, and Attitudes Toward the Marine Environment

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Human behavior impacts the environment we live in. In order to better understand how one group, boat owners, in three Nordic countries adjacent to the Baltic Sea; Sweden, Finland and Denmark, viewed the relationship between the marine environment, leisure boats and issues of responsibility, a survey study was conducted (n = 1701). The results show that there are differences between gender in many areas and those women in general are more environmentally friendly than men in their views and behavior. Men and women seek information about boating by different channels and this knowledge may be used in future information campaigns. Both men and women ranked boat owners as having the lowest impact on the marine environment and perceived these to be responsible for addressing environmental issues caused by leisure boat activities. The results also show that it is important to prove the effectiveness of an environmentally safe product since this factor is ranked higher than price when considering buying a product. The results suggest that once environmentally friendly behavior is established, such as recycling, this behavior continues. One implication of this study is that small changes in human behavior are seen as acceptable but larger commitments are more difficult to achieve. If individuals do not feel responsible for causing environmental damage, this aspect needs to be addressed in information aimed at this group. Novel approaches on framing the information and new ways of disseminating information are needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andermyr J, Johansson L (2008) What goes around comes around (Att få igen för gammal ost), candidate project, Malmö Högskola. http://hdl.handle.net/2043/6564

  • Attari SZ, Schoen M, Davidson CI, Dekay ML, de Bruin WB, Dawes R, Small MJ (2009) Preferences for change: do individuals prefer voluntary actions, sift regulations, or hard regulations to decrease fossil fuel consumption? Ecological Economy 68:1701–1710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barr s, Gilg AW (2007) A conceptual framework for understanding and analysing attitudes towards house-hold waste management. Environment and Planning A 33:2025–2048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batte MT, Hooker NH, Haab TC, Beaverson J (2007) Putting their money where their mouths are: consumer willingness to pay for multi-ingredient, processed organic food products. Food Policy 32:205–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BPD (1998) Directive 98/8/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 1998 concerning the placing of biocidal products on the market, Official Journal of the European Communities no. L123 of 24 April 1998, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg

  • Burger J, Sanchez J, McMahon M, Leonard J, Lord CG, Ramos R, Gochfield M (1999) Resources and estuarine health: perceptions of elected officials and recreational fishers. Journal of Toxicology and environmental Health A 58:245–260

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cottrell SP (2003) Influence of sociodemographics and environmental attitudes on general responsible environmental behavior among recreational boaters. Environment and Behavior 35:347–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietz T, Stern PC, Guagnano GA (1998) Social structural and social psychological bases of environmental concern. Environment and Behavior 30:450–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eklund B (2008) Ekotoxikologiska tester på avgasvatten från en ‘gammal’ tvåtakts utombordsmotor. In: Cerne O, Strandberg J, Fridell, E, Peterson k, Allard A-S, Rydberg T, Vaske B, Jagersten C, Ostman N, Eklund B (eds) 2008 Rena Turen—Utvärdering av miljöanpassade bränslen i fritidsbåtar. IVL report B1770 (in Swedish)

  • Eklund B, Elfström M, Borg H (2008) Tributylin originates from pleasure boats in Sweden in spite of firm restrictions. Open Environmental Science 2:124–132

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson BK, Sandström A, Isaeus M, Schreiber H, Karås P (2004) Effects of boating activities on aquatic vegetation in the Stockholm archipelago, Baltic Sea. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Sciences 61:339–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferree MM (1990) Beyond separate spheres: feminism and family research. Journal of Marriage and Family 52:866–884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finucane M, Slovic P, Mertz CK, Flynn J, Satterfield T (2000) Gender, race, and perceived risk: the ‘white male’ effect. Health Risk & Society 2:159–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner GT, Stern P (2002) Environmental problems and human behavior. 2nd edn. Pearson Custom Publishing, Boston

  • Grothmann T, Patt A (2005) Adaptive capacity and human cognition: the process of individual adaptation to climate change. Global Environmental Change 15:199–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gustafson PE (1998) Gender differences in risk perception: theoretical and methodological perspectives. Risk Analysis 18:805–811

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haila Y (2008) Unity versus disunity of environmental governance in the Baltic Sea region. In: Joas M, Jahn D, Kern K (eds) Governing a common sea. Earthscan, Sterling, pp 193–212

  • Jackson EL, Henderson KA (1995) Gender-based analysis of leisure constraints. Leisure Science 17:31–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson-Stenman O, Martinsson P (2006) Honestly, why are you driving a BMW? Journal of Economic Behavior and Organisation 60:129–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lotze HK, Lenihan HS, Bourque BJ, Bradbury RH, Cooke RG, Kay MC, Kidwell SM, Kirby MX, Peterson CH, Jackson BC (2006) Depletion, degradation, and recovery potential of estuaries and coastal seas. Science 312:1806–1809

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mainier T, Barnett EG, Valdero TR, Unipan JB, Oskamp S (1997) Green buying: the influence of environmental concern on consumer behavior. Journal of Social Psychology 137:189–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor R, Bord R, Fisher A (1999) Risk perception, general environmental beliefs, and willingness to address climate change. Risk Analysis 19(3):461–471

    Google Scholar 

  • Pe’er S, Goldman D, Yavetz B (2007) Environmental literacy in teacher training: attitudes, knowledge and environmental behavior of beginning students. The Journal of Environmental Education 39:45–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pihl L, Isaksson I, Wennhage H, Moksnes P-O (1995) Recent increase of filamentous algae in shallow Swedish bays: effects on the community structure of epibenthic fauna and fish. Netherlands Journal of Aquatic Ecology 29:249–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandström A, Eriksson BK, Karås P, Isæus M, Schreiber H (2005) Boating and Navigation activities influence the recruitment of fish in a Baltic Sea archipelago area. Ambio 34:125–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiewer U, Schernewski G (2002) Baltic coastal ecosystem dynamics and integrated coastal zone management. In: Veloso-Gomez F, Taveira Pinto F, Das Neves L (eds) Littoral 2002. The changing coast. Eurocoast/EUCC, Porto, pp 115–123

  • Schultz PW, Gouveia VV, Cameron LD, Tankha G, Schmuck P, Franěk M (2005) Values and their relationship to environmental concern and conservation behavior. Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology 36:457–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegrist M, Gutscher H, Earle TC (2005) Perception of risk: the influence of general trust, and general confidence. Journal of Risk Research 8:145–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statistics Sweden (2004) Båtlivsundersökningen: en undersökning om svenska fritidsbåtar och hur de används [A study of Swedish leisure boats and their use]

  • Steg L, Vlek C (2009) Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: an integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology 29:309–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern PC (2000) Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues 56:407–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern PC, Dietz T (1994) The value basis of environmental concern. Journal of Social Issues 50:65–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stranlund JK (1995) Public mechanisms to support compliance to an environmental norm. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 28:205–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swedish Chemicals Agency (1998) In: Eriksson U, Lindgren P, Olsson B, Unger C (eds) Anti-foulingproducts. Pleasure boats. Decision 1998-02-24 (in Swedish)

  • Swedish Institute for Transportation and Communication Analysis (SIKA statistics) (2007) RES 2005–2006. The National Travel Survey, vol 19

  • Torgler B, Garcia-Valiñas MA, Macintyre A (2008) Differences in preferences towards the environment: the impact of gender, age and parental effect. Working paper 1, CREMA, Basel

  • Wester-Herber M, Warg L-E (2000) Gender and regional differences in risk perceptions: results from implementing the Seveso II directive in Sweden. Journal of Risk Research 5:69–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zelezny L (1999) Educational interventions that improve environmental behaviors: a meta-analysis. The Journal of Environmental Education 31:5–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was commissioned by the foundation Keep Sweden Tidy and funded by the Nordic Council of Ministers and FORMAS under grant number 209-2006-1370. We are grateful for the constructive and helpful comments by three anonymous reviewers.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Philosophy, The Royal Institute of Technology, Teknikringen 78B, 100 44, Stockholm, Sweden

    Misse Wester

  2. Department of Applied Environmental Science, Stockholm University, Svante Arrhenius väg 8, 114 18, Stockholm, Sweden

    Britta Eklund

Authors
  1. Misse Wester
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Britta Eklund
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Misse Wester.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wester, M., Eklund, B. “My Husband Usually Makes Those Decisions”: Gender, Behavior, and Attitudes Toward the Marine Environment. Environmental Management 48, 70–80 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-011-9676-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-011-9676-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation