Environmental Management

, 47:525 | Cite as

Global Marine Protection Targets: How S.M.A.R.T are They?

Article

Abstract

Global marine protection targets have been criticised for being ecologically irrelevant and often inadequate. However, they may also provide motivation for conservation action. However, no such targets have yet been met, and the health of the marine environment has continued to deteriorate. The Tenth Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) recently adopted a new marine protection target, in October, 2010. As such, it is timely to critically assess the potential role of this and other global marine protection targets in conservation and marine resource management. Three targets adopted in the past ten years were assessed using the SMART (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Realistic, and Timebound) framework. This assessment showed that the targets appear to have evolved to have become ‘SMARTer’ over time, particularly more Specific. The most recent CBD target also appears to be more Achievable than earlier targets. Three broad issues emerged that can inform the potential role, limitations, and challenges associated with global-scale marine protection targets: (i) that SMART target formulation, implementation, monitoring, and revision, is critically underpinned by relevant data and information; (ii) that perceived irrelevance of global targets may be at least partly due to a mismatch between the scale at which the targets were intended to operate, and the scale at which they have sometimes been assessed; and (iii) the primary role of global-scale targets may indeed be psychological rather than ecological. Recent progress indicates some success in this role, which could be built on with further ‘SMARTening’ of targets.

Keywords

Targets Convention on Biological Diversity Marine protected area Marine protection SMART Networks 

References

  1. Agardy T (2005) Global marine conservation policy versus site-level implementation: the mismatch of scale and its implications. Marine Ecology Progress Series 300:242–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agardy T, Bridgewater P, Crosby MP, Day J, Dayton PK, Kenchington R, Laffoley D, McConney P, Murray PA, Parks JE, Peau L (2003) Dangerous targets? Unresolved issues and ideological clashes around marine protected areas. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 13(4):353–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Agrawal A, Ostrom E (2006) political science and conservation biology: a dialog of the deaf. Conservation Biology 20(3):681–682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alder J (1996) Have tropical marine protected areas worked? An initial anaysis of their success. Coastal Management 24(2):97–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ballantine WJ (1995) Networks of marine reserves are practical and necessary. Science and Management of Protected Areas Association, Halifax, Nova Scotia, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  6. Boersma PD, Parrish JK (1999) Limiting abuse: marine protected areas, a limited solution. Ecological Economics 31(2):287–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Broadhead L (2002) International environmental politics: the limits of green diplomacy. Lynne Reinner Publishers Inc, Boulder, Colorado, USAGoogle Scholar
  8. Busse R, Wismar M (2002) Health target programmes and health care services—any link? A comparative and conceptual study (Part 1). Health Policy 59:209–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Butchart SHM, Walpole M, Collen B, van Strien A, Scharlemann JPW, Almond REA, Baillie JEM, Bomhard B, Brown C, Bruno J, Carpenter K, Carr GM, Chanson J, Chenery AM, Csirke J, Davidson N, Dentener F, Foster M, Galli A, Galloway JN, Genovesi P, Gregory RD, Hockings M, Kapos V, Lamarque J-F, Leverington F, Loh J, McGeoch MA, McRae L, Minasyan A, Hernández Morcillo M, Oldfield TEE, Pauly D, Quader S, Revenga C, Sauer JR, Skolnik B, Spear D, Stanwell-Smith D, Stuart S, Symes A, Tierney M, Tyrrell TD, Vié J-C, Watson R (2010) Global biodiversity: indicators of recent declines. Science 328(5982):1164–1168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. CBD (2002) Global strategy for plant conservation—follow-up on SBSTTA Recommendation VII/8 Paragraph 2 on the refinement of the 16 draft targets included in the proposed strategy. Convention on Biological Diversity, Las Palmas de Gran CanariaGoogle Scholar
  11. CBD (2003) Marine and coastal biodiversity: review further elaboration and refinement of the programme of work. Report of the Ad Hoc Technical Expert Group on Marine and Coastal Protected Areas. Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  12. CBD (2004) Decisions adopted by the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity at its seventh meeting (Decision VII/30). Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  13. CBD (2005) Draft global outcome-oriented targets for the programme of work on marine and coastal biological diversity. Convention on Biological Diversity, Bangkok, ThailandGoogle Scholar
  14. CBD (2006) Decisions adopted by the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity at its eighth meeting (Decision VIII/15, Annex IV). CBD, Curitiba, BrazilGoogle Scholar
  15. CBD (2007) Decision adopted by the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity at its Seventh Meeting (Decision VII/28: Protected Areas (Articles 8 (a) to (e))). CBD, Kuala Lumpur, MalaysiaGoogle Scholar
  16. CBD (2010) Decision X/2: the strategic plan for biodiversity 2011–2020 and the Aichi biodiversity targets. CBD, Nagoya, JapanGoogle Scholar
  17. CBD (2011) Island Biodiversity Commitments, CBD. Accessed 28 Feb 2011 (online): http://www.cbd.int/island/Commitments.shtml
  18. Chape S, Harrison J, Spalding M, Lysenko I (2005) Measuring the extent and effectiveness of protected areas as an indicator for meeting global biodiversity targets. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences 360:443–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Day, J., Hockings, M. & Jones, G. (2002) Measuring effectiveness in marine protected areas—principles and practices. Keynote presentation in Aquatic Protected Areas. What works best and how do we know? World Congress on Aquatic Protected Areas, Cairns, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  20. Department for Environment and Heritage (2006) No species loss: a biodiversity strategy for South Australia 2006–2016: draft for public review. Department for Environment and Heritage, Victoria, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  21. Elliott L (1998) Global politics of the environment. Macmillan Press Ltd, London, UKGoogle Scholar
  22. Erez M (2005) Goal-setting. In: Nicholson N, Audia P, Pillutla M (eds) Blackwell encyclopedic dictionary of organizational behavior, 2. Blackwell, Oxford, UK, pp 138–141Google Scholar
  23. Gaines SD, Gaylord B, Largier JL (2003) Avoiding current oversights in marine reserve design. Ecological Applications 13(1):S32–S46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Halpern BS, Warner RR (2003) Matching marine reserve design to reserve objectives. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 270(1527):1871–1878CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hastings A, Botsford LW (2003) Comparing designs of marine reserves for fisheries and for biodiversity. Ecological Applications 13(1):S65–S70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hockings M, Stolton S, Dudley N (2000) Evaluating effectiveness: a framework for assessing the management of protected areas. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  27. Hockings M, Stolton S, Dudley N, Parrish J (2004) The World Heritage Management Effectiveness Workbook: revised edition. UNESCO & IUCN, Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
  28. IUCN (2003) WPC Recommendation 5.22: building a global system of marine and coastal protected area networks. IUCN, Durban, South AfricaGoogle Scholar
  29. Jameson S, Tupper MH, Ridley JM (2002) The three screen doors: can marine “protected” areas be effective? Marine Pollution Bulletin 44(11):1177–1183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jones, G. (2000) Outcomes-based evaluation of management for protected areas—a methodology for incorporating evaluation into management plans. The design and management of forest protected areas: papers presented at the Beyond the Trees conference. 8–11 May 2000, Bangkok, Thailand, WWF SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  31. Jones PJS (2002) Marine protected area strategies: issues, divergences and the search for middle ground. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 11(3):197–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kawohl W, Temple-Bird C, Lenel A, Kaur M (2003) How to manage the finances of your healthcare technology management teams. World Health Organisation, Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  33. Kelleher G, Bleakey C, Wells S (1995) Introduction. In: Kelleher G, Bleakey C, Wells S (eds) A global representative system of marine protected areas, The Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority. The World Bank, The World Conservation Union, Washington, DC, USAGoogle Scholar
  34. Kenchington R (2010) Strategic roles of marine protected areas in ecosystem scale conservation. Bulletin of Marine Science 86(2):303–313Google Scholar
  35. Latham GP, Locke EA (1991) Self-regulation through goal setting. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50:212–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Latham GP, Pinder CC (2005) Work motivation theory and research at the dawn of the twenty-first century. Annual Review of Psychology 56:485–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Latham GP, Yukl GA (1975) A review of research on the application of goal setting in organisations. The Academy of Management Journal 18(4):824–845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Leslie H, Ruckelshaus M, Ball IR, Andelman S, Possingham HP (2003) Using siting algorithms in the design of marine reserve networks. Ecological Applications 13(1):S185–S198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Locke EA, Latham GP (2002) Building a practically useful theroy of goal setting and task motivation. American Psychologist 57(9):705–717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lubchenco J, Palumbi SR, Gaines SD, Andelman SJ (2003) Plugging a hole in the ocean: the emerging science of marine reserves. Ecological Applications 13(1):S3–S7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lumb CM, Fowler SL, Atkins SM, Gilliland PM, Vincent MA (2004) The Irish Sea Pilot: developing marine nature conservation objectives for the Irish Sea. DEFRA, Peterborough, UKGoogle Scholar
  42. Manghubai S (2001) Interim guidelines for the assessment of management effectiveness of marine protected areas in the western Indian Ocean. IUCN, Gland, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  43. Margules CR, Pressey RL (2000) Systematic conservation planning. Nature 405:243–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. McClanahan TR (1999) Is there a future for coral reef parks in poor tropical countries? Coral Reefs 18:321–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mintzberg H (1992) The rise and fall of strategic planning: reconceiving roles for planning, plans, planners. The Free Press, New York, USAGoogle Scholar
  46. Muncey J, McGinty J (1998) Target setting in special schools. British Journal of Special Education 25(4):173–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Norse EA, Crowder LB (eds) (2005) Marine conservation biology. Island Press, Washington DC, USAGoogle Scholar
  48. Palumbi SR (2003) Population genetics, demographic connectivity, and the design of marine reserves. Ecological Applications 13(1):S146–S158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Plummer N, Lipa W, Palmer S, Prank G, Shortridge J, Stuber D (2005) Guidelines on climate data management version 5.0. Australian Government Bureau of Meteorology, Melbourne, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  50. Pollnac RB, Cawford BR, Gorospe MLG (2001) Discovering factors that influence the success of community-based marine protected areas in the Visayas, Philippines. Ocean & Coastal Management 44:683–710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pomeroy RS, Parks JE, Watson LM (2004) How is your MPA doing? A guidebook of natural and social indicators for evaluating marine protected area management effectiveness. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pressey RL, Humphries CJ, Margules CR, Vane-Wright RI, Williams PH (1993) Beyond opportunism: key principles for systematic reserve selection. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 8(4):124–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pressey RL, Cowling RM, Rouget M (2003) Formulating conservation targets for biodiversity pattern and process in the Cape Floristic Region, South Africa. Biological Conservation 112(1–2):99–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rice J, Trujillo V, Jennings S, Hylland K, Hagstrom O, Astudillo A, Jensen JN (2005) Guidance on the application of the ecosystem approach to management of human activities in the European Human Environment. ICES, Copenhagen, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
  55. Roberts J (2005) Millennium development goals: are international targets now more credible? Journal of International Development 17(1):113–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rodrigues ASL, Andelman SJ, Bakarr MI, Boitani L, Brooks TM, Cowling RM, Fishpool LDC, da Fonseca GAB, Gaston KJ, Hoffman M, Long JS, Marquet PA, Pilgrim JD, Pressey RL, Schipper J, Sechrest W, Stuart SN, Underhill LG, Waller RW, Watts MEJ, Yan X (2004) Effectiveness of the global protected area network in representing species diversity. Nature 428:640–643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Rondinelli DA (1976) Public planning and political strategy. Long Range Planning IX(2):75–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Routhe AS, Jones RE, Feldman DL (2005) Using theory to understand public support for collective actions that impact the environment: alleviating water supply problems in a nonarid biome. Social Science Quarterly 86(4):874–897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sarkar S (2005) Biodiversity and environmental philosophy: an introduction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sarkar S, Pressey RL, Faith DP, Margules CR, Fuller T, Stoms DM, Moffett A, Wilson KA, Williams KJ, Williams PH, Andelman S (2006) Biodiversity conservation planning tools: present status and challenges for the future. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 31:123–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Saunders CD, Brook AT, Myers OE Jr (2006) Using psychology to save biodiversity and human well-being. Conservation Biology 20(3):702–705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Solomon M, Van Jaarsveld AS, Biggs HC, Knight MH (2003) Conservation targets for viable species assemblages? Biodiversity and Conservation 12(12):2435–2441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Soulé ME, Sanjayan MA (1998) Conservation targets: do they help? Science 279(5359):2060–2061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Spalding M, Wood L, Fitzgerald C, Gjerde KM (2010) The 10% target: where do we stand? In: Toropova C, Meliane I, Laffoley D, Matthews E, Spalding M (eds) Global ocean protection: present status and future possibilities. Agence des Aires Marines Protégées, Brest, France; IUCN WCPA, Gland, Switzerland, Washington, DC and New York, USA; UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, UK; TNC, Arlington, USA; UNU, Tokyo, Japan; WCS, New York, USA, pp 25–40Google Scholar
  65. Stark, J. (2004) Implementing marine protected areas policy: lessons from Canada and Australia. MSc thesis, School of Resource and Environmental Management, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  66. Staub F, Hatziolos M (2004) Score card to assess progress in achieving management effectiveness goals for marine protected areas. The World Bank, Washington, DC, USAGoogle Scholar
  67. Sumaila UR, Armstrong CW (2006) Distributional and efficiency effects of marine protected areas: a study of the Northeast Atlantic cod fishery. Land Economics 82(3):321–332Google Scholar
  68. Sumaila UR, Guénette S, Alder J, Chuenpagdee R (2000) Addressing ecosystem effects of fishing using marine protected areas. ICES Journal of Marine Science 57(3):752–760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Svancara LK, Brannon R, Scott JM, Groves CR, Noss RF, Pressey B (2005) Policy-driven vs. evidence-based conservation: a review of political targets and biological needs. Bioscience 55:989–995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Taylor RN (1976) Psychological aspects of planning. Long Range Planning IX(2):66–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Thomas RK (2003) Health services planning. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York, USACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Treasury HM (2003) The Green Book: appraisal and evaluation in central government. The Stationary Office, London, UKGoogle Scholar
  73. Tucker G (2005) A review of biodiversity conservation performance measures. Earthwatch Institute, Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  74. United Nations (2002) Report of the World Summit on Sustainable Development, Johannesburg, South Africa, 26 August–4th September 2002. United Nations, New York, USAGoogle Scholar
  75. United Nations (2006) The Millennium Development Goals Report 2006. United Nations, New York, USAGoogle Scholar
  76. van Herten LM, Gunning-Schepers LJ (2000) Targets as a tool in health policy Part I: lessons learned. Health Policy 52:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Wagner LD, Ross JV, Possingham H (2006) Catastrophe management and inter-reserve distance for marine reserve networks. Ecological Modelling 201(1):82–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Walmsley SF, White AT (2003) Influence of social, management and enforcement factors on the long-term ecological effects of marine sanctuaries. Environmental Conservation 30(4):388–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Walters C (2000) Impacts of dispersal, ecological interactions, and fishing effort dynamics on efficacy of marine protected areas: how large should protected areas be? Bulletin of Marine Science 66(3):745–757Google Scholar
  80. Wells S, Mangubhai S (2004) A workbook for assessing management effectiveness of marine protected areas in the Western Indian Ocean. IUCN Eastern African Regional Programme, Nairobi, KenyaGoogle Scholar
  81. Wiersma YF, Nudds TD (2006) Conservation targets for viable species assemblages in Canada: are percentage targets appropriate? Biodiversity and Conservation 15(14):4555–4567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Wood, L.J. (2007) The global network of marine protected areas: developing baselines and identifying priorities. PhD thesis, Department of Geography, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  83. Wood LJ, Fish L, Laughren J, Pauly D (2008) Assessing progress towards global marine protection targets: shortfalls in information and action. Oryx 42(3):340–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.UNEP World Conservation Monitoring CentreCambridgeUK
  2. 2.UBC Fisheries Centre, Aquatic Ecosystems Research Laboratory (AERL), The University of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations