Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A GIS Approach to Prioritizing Habitat for Restoration Using Neotropical Migrant Songbird Criteria

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Restoration efforts to increase wildlife habitat quality in agricultural landscapes have limited funding and are typically done on a first come, first serve basis. In order to increase the efficiency of these restoration efforts, a prioritized ranking system is needed to obtain the greatest increase in habitat quality possible for the fewest amount of hectares restored. This project examines the use of a GIS based multi-criteria approach to prioritize lands for reforestation along the Kaskaskia River in Illinois. Loss of forested area and corresponding increase in forest fragmentation has decreased songbird habitat quality across the Midwestern United States. We prioritized areas for reforestation based on nine landscape metrics: available agricultural land, forest cover gaps, edge density, proximity to river, 200 m corridor area, total forest core area, fringe core area, distance to primary core value, and primary core area. The multi-criteria analysis revealed that high priority areas for reforestation were most likely to be close to the riparian corridor and existing large blocks of forest. Analysis of simulated reforestation (0, 0.5, 1.0, 5.0 10.0, 25.0, and 50.0% of highest priority parcels reforested) revealed different responses for multiple landscape metrics used to quantify forest fragmentation following reforestation, but indicated that the study area would get the greatest rate of return on reforestation efforts by reforesting 10.0% of the highest priority areas. This project demonstrates how GIS and a multi-criteria analysis approach can be used to increase the efficiency of restoration projects. This approach should be considered by land managers when attempting to identify the location and quantity of area for restoration within a landscape.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Belisle M, Desrochers A, Fortin MJ (2001) Influence of forest cover on the movements of forest birds: a homing experiment. Ecology 82:1893–1904

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown DJ, Spontak DM, Tibbets MN, Connolly AR, Baccus JT (2009) Enhancing the farm bill’s conservation potential through land prioritization. Journal of Wildlife Management 73:620–625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chalfoun AD, Thompson FR III, Ratnaswamy MJ (2002) Nest predators and fragmentation: a review and meta-analysis. Conservation Biology 16:306–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donovan TM, Flather CH (2002) Relationships among North American songbird trends, habitat fragmentation, and landscape occupancy. Ecological Applications 12:364–374

    Google Scholar 

  • Faaborg J, Brittingham M, Donovan T, Blake J (1993) Effects of land use practices on Neotropical migratory birds in bottomland hardwood forests. In: Finch DM, Stangel PW (eds) Status and management of Neotropical migratory birds. USDA Forest Service GTR RM 229, Fort Collins, CO, pp 315–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford TB, Winslow DE, Whitehead DR, Koukol MA (2001) Reproductive success of forest-dependent songbirds near an agricultural corridor in south-central Indiana. Auk 118:864–873

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • General Services Administration (GSA) (2009) FY 2008 federal real property report

  • Gustafson EJ, Crow TR (1996) Simulating the effects of alternative forest management strategies on landscape structure. Journal of Environmental Management 46:77–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gustafson EJ, Parker GR (1994) Using an index of habitat patch proximity for landscape design. Landscape and Urban Planning 29:117–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagar JC (1999) Influence of riparian buffer width on bird assemblages in western Oregon. Journal of Wildlife Management 63:484–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howell CA, Dijak WD, Thompson FR III (2007) Landscape context and selection for forest edge by breeding brown-headed cowbirds. Landscape Ecology 22:273–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller CME, Robbins CS, Hatfield JS (1993) Avian communities in riparian forests of different widths in Maryland and Deleware. Wetlands 13:137–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilgo JC, Sargent RA, Chapman BR, Miller KV (1998) Effect of stand width and adjacent habitat on breeding bird communities in bottomland hardwoods. Journal of Wildlife Management 62:72–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd P, Martin TE, Redmond RL, Langer U, Hart MM (2005) Linking demographic effects of habitat fragmentation across landscapes to continental source-sink dynamics. Ecological Applications 15:1504–1514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGarigal K, Cushman SA, Neel MC, Ene E (2002) FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for categorical maps. University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA. http://www.umass.edu/landeco/research/fragstats/fragstats.html

  • Phua MH, Minowa M (2005) A GIS-based multi-criteria decision making approach to forest conservation planning at a landscape scale: a case study in the Kinabalu Area, Sabah, Malaysia. Landscape and Urban Planning 71:207–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rittenhouse CD, Thompson FR III, Dijak WD, Millspaugh JJ, Clawson RL (2010) Evaluation of habitat suitability models for forest passerines using demographic data. Journal of Wildlife Management 74:411–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson SK (1997) Biological inventory of the Kaskaskia River Corridor: populations and nesting success of birds, year 1. Unpublished manuscript. Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign, Illinois

  • Robinson SK, Thompson FR III, Donovan TM, Whitehead DR, Faaborg J (1995) Regional forest fragmentation and the nesting success of migratory birds. Science 267:1987–1990

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schumaker NH (1996) Using landscape indices to predict habitat connectivity. Ecology 77:210–1225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Secchi S, Tyndall J, Schulte LA, Asbjornsen H (2008) High crop prices and conservation—raising the stakes. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 63:68–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shifley SR, Sullivan NH (2002) The status of timber resources in the North Central United States. USDA FS GTR-NC-228, St. Paul, MN, p 47

    Google Scholar 

  • Southwestern Illinois Resource Conservation and Development, Inc. (SWI RC&D) (2002) Kaskaskia River watershed: an ecosystem approach to issues and opportunities. Southwestern Illinois RC&D, Mascoutah, IL

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinker DB, Resor CAC, Beauvais GP, Kipfmueller KF, Fernandes CI, Baker WL (1998) Watershed analysis of forest fragmentation by clearcuts and roads in a Wyoming forest. Landscape Ecology 13:149–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Twedt DJ, Somershoe SG, Hazler KR, cooper RJ (2010) Landscape and vegetation effects on avian reproduction on bottomland forest restorations. Journal of Wildlife Management 74:423–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Agriculture—Natural Resource Conservation Service (1999) National land cover dataset. http://datagateway.nrcs.usda.gov/

  • Valiela I, Martinetto P (2007) Changes in bird abundance in eastern North America: urban sprawl and global footprint? BioScience 57:360–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Horst D, Gimona A (2005) Where new farm woodlands support biodiversity action plans: a spatial multi-criteria analysis. Biological Conservation 123:421–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villa F, Tunesi L, Agardy T (2002) Zoning marine protected areas through spacial multiple-criteria analysis: the case of the Asinara island national marine reserve of Italy. Conservation Biology 16:515–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitcomb RF, Robbins CS, Lynch JF, Whitcomb BL, Klimkiewicz MK, Bystrak D (1981) Effects of forest fragmentation on aviafauna on the eastern deciduous forest. In: Burgess RL, Sharpe DM (eds) Forest island dynamics in man-dominated landscapes. Springer, New York, NY, pp 125–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcove DS (1985) Nest predation in forest tracts and the decline of migratory songbirds. Ecology 66:365–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • With KA, Schrott GR, King AW (2006) The implications of metalandscape connectivity for population viabilityin migratory songbirds. Landscape Ecology 21:157–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhalnin AV, Broussard SR, Fransworth RL (2008) Effectiveness of the foreststewardship program in conserving natural resources on private lands in Indiana. In: Jacobs DF, Michler CH (eds) Proceedings of the 16th central hardwood forest conference. USDA FS GTR NRS-P-24, Newtown Square, PA, pp 314–322

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the Southwestern Illinois Resource Conservation and Development, Inc. for their support with this project. We would also like to thank Kevin Davie and the SIU GIS lab for their technical assistance on this project. Critical reviews provided by Drs. Carver, Williard, Zaczek and three anonymous reviewers on an earlier version of this manuscript are appreciated. This project supported in part by USDA CSREES McIntire-Stennis Project No. ILLZ-03-R-001.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eric J. Holzmueller.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Holzmueller, E.J., Gaskins, M.D. & Mangun, J.C. A GIS Approach to Prioritizing Habitat for Restoration Using Neotropical Migrant Songbird Criteria. Environmental Management 48, 150–157 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-011-9660-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-011-9660-1

Keywords

Navigation