Abstract
This study analysed the environmental follow-up of a public organisation from a systems thinking approach, including follow-up within different phases of operation and with different environmental management tools. The Swedish Rail Administration (SRA), a public authority responsible for Swedish rail infrastructure, was used as a case organisation. The main aim was to identify different follow-up activities during planning, construction and operation of rail infrastructure. Additional aims were to identify limiting factors for effective environmental follow-up and to provide suggestions on how SRA follow-up can better be used as an organisational learning tool. The follow-up proved to be highly influenced by Environmental Management System and was mainly used for showing compliance with legal regulations or contract requirements. Use of environmental monitoring data was limited to the specific project in which the follow-up was carried out, possibly because of the project-based structure of the organisation following rail deregulation. Theory on organisational learning was applied in the study to discuss how to improve the distribution and use of follow-up data. A more complete ‘organisational memory’ seems to be required for learning from experience and adapting to change.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Argyris C, Schön D (1978) Organizational learning: a theory of action perspective. Addison Wesley cop, Reading, MA, 344 pp
Arts J (1998) EIA follow-up: on the role of ex post evaluation in environmental impact assessment. GeoPress, Groningen, The Netherlands
Baker J (2004) A practical framework for EIA follow-up. In: Morrison-Saunders A, Arts J (eds) A practical framework for EIA follow-up. Earthscan Publications Ltd, London, pp 42–62
Betts J, Holden R (2003) Organisational learning in a public sector organisation: a case study of muddled thinking. Journal of Workplace Learning 15:280–287
Brouwer MAC, Kv KoppenCSA (2008) The soul of the machine: continual improvement in ISO 14001. Journal of Cleaner Production 16(4):450–457
Burström von Malmborg F (2002) Environmental management systems, communicative action and organizational learning. Business Strategy and the Environment 11:312–323
Carroll KA (2004) Property rights and managerial decisions in for-profit, nonprofit and public organizations: comparative theory and policy. Palgrave Macmillan, Gordonville, VA, 231 pp
Cherp A (2008) The role of environmental management system in enforcing standards and thresholds in the context of EIA follow-up. In: Schmidt M, Glasson J, Emmelin L, Helbron H (eds) The role of environmental management system in enforcing standards and thresholds in the context of EIA follow-up. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 433–446
Eccleston C, Smythe R (2002) Integrating environmental impact assessment with environmental management system. Environmental Quality Management 11:1–13
Emilsson S (2005) Local authorities’ approaches to standardised environmental management system. Dissertation, Environmental Technology and Management, Department of Management and Engineering, Linköpings Universitet, Linköping
Espling U (2007) Maintenance strategy for a railway infrastructure in a regulated environment. Dissertation, Division of Operation and Maintenance Engineering, Luleå Railway Research Center, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå
Faith-Ell C (2005) The application of environmental requirements in procurement of road maintenance in Sweden. Dissertation, Department of Land and Water Resources Engineering, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm
Glasson J, Therivel R, Chadwick A (2005) Introduction to environmental impact assessment, 3rd edn. University College London Press, London
Gluch P (2005) Building green: Perspectives on environmental management in construction. Doctoral thesis, Building Economics and Management, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg
Gontier M (2008) Spatial prediction tools for biodiversity in environmental assessment. Dissertation, Land and Water Resources Engineering, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm
Government Bill (2001) Infrastruktur för ett långsiktigt hållbart transportsystem (Infrastructure for a long-term sustainable transportation system), Proposition 2001/02:20, Stockholm
Government Bill (2005) Svenska miljömål—ett gemensamt uppdrag (Swedish environmental objective—a shared responsibility), 2004/05:150, Ministry of the Environment
Government Bill (2006) Moderna transporter (Modern transportation) 2005/06:160, Ministry of Industry, Employment and Communications
Hanusch M, Glasson J (2008) Much ado about SEA/SA monitoring: the performance of English Regional Spatial Strategies, and some German comparisons. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 28:601–617
Hobday M (2000) The project-based organisation: an ideal form for managing complex products and systems? Research Policy 29:871–893
Holling CS (1978) Adaptive environmental assessment and management. Wiley, Chichester, 377 pp
Jacobsen D, Thorsvik J (1998) Hur moderna organisationer fungerar (Function of modern organisations). Studentlitteratur, Lund, 518 pp
Keen M, Sullivan M (2005) Aiding the environment: the Australian Development Agency’s experience of implementing an environmental management system. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 25:628–649
Kvale S (1996) Interviews—an introduction to qualitative research interviewing. SAGE cop, Thousand Oaks, 306 pp
Lundberg K (2007) Banverkets miljömålsstyrning—resultat av fokusgruppsintervjuer (Environmental management of objectives in the Swedish Rail Administration—results from focus group interviews). Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm
Lundberg K, Balfors B, Folkeson L (2005) Environmental management systems in rail operation and maintenance: current practice and potential improvements. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management 7:433–456
Lundberg K, Balfors B, Folkeson L (2007) Identification of environmental aspects in an EMS context: a methodological framework for the Swedish National Rail Administration. Journal of Cleaner Production 15:385–394
Lundberg K, Balfors B, Folkeson L (2009) Framework for environmental performance measurement in a Swedish public sector organization. Journal of Cleaner Production 17:1017–1024
Marshall R (2002) Developing environmental management systems to deliver mitigation and protect the EIA process during follow up. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 20:286–292
Mathiasen DG (1999) The new public management and its critics. International Public Management Journal 2:90–111
Miles MS, Huberman AM (1994) Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook, 2nd edn. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA, 338 pp
Morrison-Saunders A, Arts J (2004) Assessing impact. Handbook of EIA and SEA follow-up. Earthscan Publications Ltd, London, 272 pp
Partidário MR, Arts J (2005) Exploring the concept of strategic environmental assessment follow-up. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 23:246–257
Poister TH (2003) Measuring performance in public and nonprofit organizations. Jossey-Bass cop, San Francisco, 289 pp
Ramos TB, Alves I, Subtil R, Melo JJd (2007) Environmental performance policy indicators for the public sector: the case of the defence sector. Journal of Environmental Management 82:410–432
Ridgeway B (1999) The project cycle and the role of EIA and EMS. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management 1:393–405
Ridgeway B (2005) Environmental management system provides tools for delivering on environmental impact assessment commitments. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 23:325–331
Satapathy DR, Katpatal YB, Wate SR (2008) Application of geospatial technologies for environmental impact assessment: an Indian Scenario. International Journal of Remote Sensing 29:355–386
Schmidtbauer Crona J, Brokking P, Balfors B (2005) Integrerad miljöhänsyn i planering av regionala transportsystem—förstudie. TRITA-INFRA 05-005, Department of Infrastructure, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm
Scholz RW, Tietje O (2002) Embedded case study methods. Sage Publication Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA, 392 pp
Senge P (1990) The fifth discipline: the art and practice of the learning organization. Currency Doubleday, New York, 424 pp
Smith KD, Taylor WGK (2000) The learning organisation ideal in civil service organisations: deriving a measure. The Learning Organization 7:194–205
Stankey GH, Clark RN, Bormann BT (2005) Adaptive management of natural resources: theory concepts and management institutions. USDA Forest Service, Seattle
Stein EW (1995) Organization memory: review of concepts and recommendations for management. International Journal of Information Management 15:17–32
Svensson N, Eklund M (2007) Screening of environmental pressure from products in the Swedish railway infrastructure: implications for strategic environmental management. Resources. Conservation and Recycling 52(2):248–265
Swedish Environmental Protection Agency (2004) Environmental management in central government agencies—Sweden’s experience, Report no. 5358. Naturvårdsverket, Stockholm
Swedish Rail Administration (2007) Vägledning till Banverkets underhållsstrategi (Guidance to SRA’s maintenance strategy), Report no. BVH 800, Borlänge
Swedish Rail Administration (2008a) Banverket’s annual report 2007. http://www.banverket.se/pages/1493/bv_2007_eng_webb-x.pdf. Accessed 3 Dec 2008
Swedish Rail Administration (2008b) Framtidsplanen (Future plan for the railway). http://www.banverket.se/sv/Amnen/Jarnvagen/Undersida-1-Jarnvagen/Framtidsplanen.aspx. Accessed 31 Oct 2008
Yin RK (2003) Case study research: design and methods, 3rd edn. Sage publication, Thousands Oaks, CA, 181 pp
Acknowledgments
This study was financed by the Swedish Rail Administration through the Centre for Research and Education in Operation and Maintenance of Infrastructure (CDU). The author thanks all those individuals at the Swedish Rail Administration who took part in the study and the anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on a previous version of this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lundberg, K. A Systems Thinking Approach to Environmental Follow-Up in a Swedish Central Public Authority: Hindrances and Possibilities for Learning from Experience. Environmental Management 48, 123–133 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-010-9600-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-010-9600-5