Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Native Perennial Forb Variation Between Mountain Big Sagebrush and Wyoming Big Sagebrush Plant Communities

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata Nutt.) occupies large portions of the western United States and provides valuable wildlife habitat. However, information is lacking quantifying differences in native perennial forb characteristics between mountain big sagebrush [A. tridentata spp. vaseyana (Rydb.) Beetle] and Wyoming big sagebrush [A. tridentata spp. wyomingensis (Beetle & A. Young) S.L. Welsh] plant communities. This information is critical to accurately evaluate the quality of habitat and forage that these communities can produce because many wildlife species consume large quantities of native perennial forbs and depend on them for hiding cover. To compare native perennial forb characteristics on sites dominated by these two subspecies of big sagebrush, we sampled 106 intact big sagebrush plant communities. Mountain big sagebrush plant communities produced almost 4.5-fold more native perennial forb biomass and had greater native perennial forb species richness and diversity compared to Wyoming big sagebrush plant communities (P < 0.001). Nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMS) and the multiple-response permutation procedure (MRPP) demonstrated that native perennial forb composition varied between these plant communities (P < 0.001). Native perennial forb composition was more similar within plant communities grouped by big sagebrush subspecies than expected by chance (A = 0.112) and composition varied between community groups (P < 0.001). Indicator analysis did not identify any perennial forbs that were completely exclusive and faithful, but did identify several perennial forbs that were relatively good indicators of either mountain big sagebrush or Wyoming big sagebrush plant communities. Our results suggest that management plans and habitat guidelines should recognize differences in native perennial forb characteristics between mountain and Wyoming big sagebrush plant communities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barnett JK, Crawford JA (1994) Pre-laying nutrition of sage grouse hens in Oregon. Journal of Range Management 47:114–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blaisdell JP, Murry RB, McArthur ED (1982) Managing intermountain rangelands: sagebrush-grass ranges. General Technical Report INT-134. USDA Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. Ogden, UT

  • Collins WB, Urness PJ (1983) Feeding behavior and habitat selection of mule deer and elk on northern Utah summer range. Journal of Wildlife Management 47:646–663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connelly JW, Schroeder MA, Sands AR, Braun CE (2000) Guidelines to manage sage grouse populations and their habitats. Wildlife Society Bulletin 28:967–985

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies KW, Bates JD, Miller RF (2006) Vegetation characteristics across part of the Wyoming big sagebrush alliance. Rangeland Ecology & Management 59:567–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies KW, Bates JD, Miller RF (2007) Environmental and vegetation characteristics of the Artemisia tridentata spp. wyomingensis alliance. Journal of Arid Environments 70:478–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies KW, Svejcar TJ, Bates JD (2009) Interaction of historical and non-historical disturbances maintains native plant communities. Ecological Applications 19:1536–1545

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dufrêne M, Legendre P (1997) Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecological Monographs 67:345–366

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregg MA, Barnett JK, Crawford JA (2008) Temporal variation in diet and nutrition of preincubating greater sage-grouse. Rangeland Ecology & Management 61:535–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haddad NM, Tilman D, Haarstad J, Ritchie M, Knops JMH (2001) Contrasting effects of plant richness and composition on insect communities: a field experiment. American Naturalist 158:17–35

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hironaka M (1978) Basic synecological relationships of the Columbia River sagebrush type. In: Gifford GF, Busby FE, Shaw JD (eds) Sagebrush ecosystem symposium. Utah State University Press, Logan, pp 27–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Hironaka MM, Fosberg M, Winward AH (1983) Sagebrush-grass habitat types of southern Idaho. Bulletin 35. University of Idaho. Moscow

  • Johnson GD, Boyce MS (1990) Feeding trials with insects in the diet of sage grouse chicks. Journal of Wildlife Management 54:89–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Julander O, Robinette WL, Jones DA (1961) Relation of summer range condition to mule deer herd productivity. Journal of Wildlife Management 25:54–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knops JMH, Tilman D, Haddad NM, Naeem S, Mitchell CE, Haarstad J, Ritchie ME, Howe KM, Reich PB, Siemann E, Groth J (1999) Effects of plant species richness on invasion dynamics, disease outbreak, insect abundance and diversity. Ecological Letters 2:286–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krebs CJ (1998) Ecological methodology, 2nd edn. Benjamin Cummings, Menlo Park, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Küchler AW (1970) Potential natural vegetation. In: Gerlach AC (ed) The national atlas of U.S.A. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, pp 90–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Kufeld RC (1973) Foods eaten by the Rocky Mountain elk. Journal of Range Management 26:106–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McArthur ED, Plummer AP (1978) Biogeography and management of western native shrubs: a case study, section Tridentatae of Artemisia. Great Basin Naturalist Memoirs 2:229–243

    Google Scholar 

  • McCune B, Grace JB (2002) Analysis of ecological communities. MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach, OR

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller RF, Eddleman LL (2000) Spatial and temporal changes of sage grouse habitat in the sagebrush biome. Technical Bulletin 151. Oregon State University, Corvallis

  • Miller RF, Svejcar TJ, West NE (1994) Implications of livestock grazing in the Intermountain sagebrush region: plant composition. In: Vavra M, Laycock WA, Pieper RD (eds) Ecological implications of livestock herbivory in the West. Society of Range Management, Denver, CO, pp 101–146

  • Morris MS, Kelsey RG, Griggs D (1976) The geographic and ecological distribution of big sagebrush and other woody Artemisia in Montana. Proceeding of the Montana Academy of Science 36:56–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes EC, Bates JD, Sharp RN, Davies KW (2010) Fire effects on cover and dietary resources of sage-grouse habitat. Journal of Wildlife Management 74:755–764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shipley LA, Davila TB, Thines NJ, Elias BA (2006) Nutritional requirements and diet choices of the pygmy rabbit (Bachylagus idahoensis): a sagebrush specialist. Journal of Chemical Ecology 32:2455–2474

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tisdale EW (1994) Wyoming big sagebrush SRM 403. In: Shiflet TN (ed) Rangelands cover types of the United States. Society for Range Management, Denver, CO, pp 42–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallestad RO, Peterson JG, Eng RL (1975) Foods of adult sage grouse in central Montana. Journal of Wildlife Management 39:628–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West NE, Young JA (2000) Intermountain valleys and lower mountain slopes. In: Barbour MG, Billing WD (eds) North American terrestrial vegetation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 255–284

    Google Scholar 

  • West NE, Tausch RJ, Rea KH, Tueller PT (1978) Taxonomic determination, distribution, and ecological indicator values of sagebrush within the pinyon-juniper woodlands of the Great Basin. Journal of Range Management 31:87–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willms W, McLean A, Tucker R, Ritcey R (1979) Interactions between mule deer and cattle on big sagebrush range in British Columbia. Journal of Range Management 32:299–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winward AH (1980) Taxonomy and ecology of sagebrush in Oregon. Oregon Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 642. Oregon State University, Corvallis

  • Winward AH, Tisdale EW (1977) Taxonomy of the Artemisia tridentata complex in Idaho. Forest, Wildlife, and Range Experiment Station Bulletin 15. University of Idaho. Moscow

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the summer field crews for assisting with data collection. The authors were also grateful for data management by Aleta Nafus and Georjanna Pokorney. Reviews of earlier versions of this manuscript by Ed Vasquez and Dave Ganskopp were greatly appreciated. The authors also thank the anonymous reviewers for providing constructive criticism and useful suggestions on this manuscript. The authors also thank Burns- and Lakeview-District Bureau of Land Management and the Hart Mountain National Antelope Refuge for providing land for this research project. Mike Gregg, Gail Collins, and Paul Steblein assistance in accessing intact big sagebrush on Hart Mountain National Antelope Refuge was greatly appreciated. This research was funded by the USDA–Agricultural Research Service at the Eastern Oregon Agricultural Research Center.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kirk W. Davies.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Davies, K.W., Bates, J.D. Native Perennial Forb Variation Between Mountain Big Sagebrush and Wyoming Big Sagebrush Plant Communities. Environmental Management 46, 452–458 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-010-9530-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-010-9530-2

Keywords

Navigation