Skip to main content
Log in

Landscape-Based Assessment of Human Disturbance for Michigan Lakes

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Assessment of lake impairment status and identification of threats’ type and source is essential for protection of intact, enhancement of modified, and restoration of impaired lakes. For regions in which large numbers of lakes occur, such assessment has usually been done for only small fractions of lakes due to resource and time limitation. This study describes a process for assessing lake impairment status and identifying which human disturbances have the greatest impact on each lake for all lakes that are 2 ha or larger in the state of Michigan using readily available, georeferenced natural and human disturbance databases. In-lake indicators of impairment are available for only a small subset of lakes in Michigan. Using statistical relationships between the in-lake indicators and landscape natural and human-induced measures from the subset lakes, we assessed the likely human impairment condition of lakes for which in-lake indicator data were unavailable using landscape natural and human disturbance measures. Approximately 92% of lakes in Michigan were identified as being least to marginally impacted and about 8% were moderately to heavily impacted by landscape human disturbances. Among lakes that were heavily impacted, more inline lakes (92%) were impacted by human disturbances than disconnected (6%) or headwater lakes (2%). More small lakes were impacted than medium to large lakes. For inline lakes, 90% of the heavily impacted lakes were less than 40 ha, 10% were between 40 and 405 ha, and 1% was greater than 405 ha. For disconnected and headwater lakes, all of the heavily impacted lakes were less than 40 ha. Among the anthropogenic disturbances that contributed the most to lake disturbance index scores, nutrient yields and farm animal density affected the highest number of lakes, agricultural land use affected a moderate number of lakes, and point-source pollution and road measures affected least number of lakes. Our process for assessing lake condition represents a significant advantage over other routinely used methods. It permits the evaluation of lake condition across large regions and yields an overall disturbance index that is a physicochemical and biological indicator weighted sum of multiple disturbance factors. The robustness of our approach can be improved with increased availability of high-resolution disturbance datasets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Borcard D, Legendre P, Drapeau P (1992) Partialling out the spatial component of ecological variation. Ecology 73:1045–1055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breck JE (2004) Compilation of databases on Michigan lakes. Fisheries Technical Report 2004-2, Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Ann Arbor

  • Carlson RE (1977) A trophic state index for lakes. Limnology and Oceanography 22:361–369

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Danz NP, Niemi GJ, Regal RR, Hollenhorst TP, Johnson LB, Hanowski JM, Axler RP, Ciborowski JH, Hrabik T, Brady VJ, Kelly JR, Morrice JA, Brazner JC, Howe RW, Johnston CA, Host GE (2007) Integrated measures of anthropogenic stress in the U.S. Great Lakes basin. Environmental Management 39:631–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixit SS, Smol JP (1994) Diatoms as indicators in the environmental monitoring and assessment program-surface water (EMAP-SW). Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 31:275–306

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Drake MT, Pereira DL (2002) Development of a fish-based index of biotic integrity for small inland lakes in central Minnesota. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 22:1105–1123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drake MT, Valley RD (2005) Validation and application of a fish-based index of biotic integrity for small central Minnesota lakes. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 25:1095–1111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fausch KD, Lyons J, Karr JR, Angermeier PL (1990) Fish communities as indicators of environmental degradation. American Fisheries Society Symposium 8:123–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Halpern BS, Walbridge S, Selkoe KA, Kappel CV, Micheli F, D’Agrosa C, Bruno JF, Casey KS, Ebert C, Fox HE, Fujita R, Heinemann D, Lenihan HS, Madin EMP, Perry MT, Selig ER, Spalding M, Steneck R, Watson R (2008) A global map of human impact on marine ecosystems. Science 319:948–952

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jennings MJ, Bozek MA, Hatzenbeler GR, Emmons E, Staggs MD (1999) Cumulative effects of incremental shoreline habitat modification on fish assemblages in north temperate lakes. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 19:18–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karr JR, Chu EW (1999) Restoring life in running waters, better biological monitoring. Island Press, Covelo, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Laessig RE, Duckett EJ (1979) Canonical correlation analysis: potential for environmental health planning. American Journal of Public Health 69:353–359

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis PA, Klemm DJ, Thoney WT (2001) Perspectives on use of a multimetric lake bioassessment integrity index using benthic macroinvertebrates. Northeastern Naturalist 8:233–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons J, Gutiérrez-Hernández A, Días-Pardo E, Soto-Galera E, Medina-Nava M, Pineda-López R (2000) Development of a preliminary index of biotic integrity (IBI) based on fish assemblages to assess ecosystem condition in the lakes of central Mexico. Hydrobiologia 418:57–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma T, Huang Q, Wang H, Wang Z, Wang C, Huang S (2008) Selection of benthic macroinvertebrate-based multimetrics and preliminary establishment of biocriteria for the bioassessment of the water quality of Taihu Lake, China. Acta Ecologica Sinica 28:1192–1200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin SL, Soranno PA (2006) Lake landscape position: relationships to hydrologic connectivity and landscape features. Limnology and Oceanography 51:801–814

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mattson KM, Angermeier PL (2007) Integrating human impacts and ecological integrity into a risk-based protocol for conservation planning. Environmental Management 39:125–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melzer A (1999) Aquatic macrophytes as tools for lake management. Hydrobiologia 395–396:181–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minns CK, Cairns VW, Randall RG, Moore JE (1994) An index of biotic integrity (IBI) for fish assemblages in the littoral zone of Great Lakes’ area of concern. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 51:1804–1822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols S, Weber S, Shaw B (2000) A proposed aquatic plant community biotic index for Wisconsin lakes. Environmental Management 26:491–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norris RH, Hawkins CP (2000) Monitoring river health. Hydrobiologia 435:5–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novotny V, Bartošová A, O’ Reilly N, Ehlinger T (2005) Unlock the relationship of biotic integrity of impaired waters to anthropogenic stresses. Water Research 39:184–198

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pothoven SA, Vondracek B, Pereira DL (1999) Effects of vegetation removal on bluegill and largemouth bass in two Minnesota lakes. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 19:748–757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RI ES (2002) PC ARC/GIS Version 8.2. Environmental System Research Institute, Redlands, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS (2004) SAS/STAT user’s guide. Version 9.1.2. SAS Institute, Cary, NC

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulz EJ, Hoyer MV, Canfield DE Jr (1999) An index of biotic integrity: a test with limnological and fish data from sixty Florida lakes. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 128:564–577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scopel CO, Harris J, McLellan SL (2006) Influence of nearshore water dynamics and pollution sources on beach monitoring outcomes at two adjacent Lake Michigan beaches. Journal of Great Lakes Research 32:543–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shuter BJ, Schlesinger DA, Zimmerman AP (1983) Empirical predictors of annual surface water temperature cycles in North American lakes. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 40:1838–1845

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith RA, Schwarz GE, Alexander RB (1997) Regional interpretation of water-quality monitoring data. Water Resources Research 33:2781–2798

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stenger-Kovács K, Buczkó K, Hajnal É, Padisák J (2007) Epiphytic, littoral diatoms as bioindicators of shallow lake trophic status: trophic diatom index for lakes (TDIL) developed in Hungary. Hydrobiologia 589:141–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suter GW II, Norton SB, Cormier SM (2002) A methodology for inferring the causes of observed impairments in aquatic ecosystems. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 21:1101–1111

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ter Braak CJF, Smilauer P (1998) CANOCO reference manual and user’s guide to Canoco for Windows: Software for Canonical Community Ordination (version 4). Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency) (2000) Stressor identification guidance document. EPA-822-B-00–025. US EPA, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency) (2003) Elements of a state water monitoring and assessment program. EPA 841-B-03-003. Assessment and Watershed Protection Division, Office of Wetlands, Oceans and Watershed. US EPA, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang L, Lyons J, Rasmussen P, Kanehl P, Seelbach PW, Simon T, Wiley M, Baker E, Niemela S, Stewart M (2003) Influences of landscape- and reach-scale habitat on stream fish communities in the Northern Lakes and Forest ecoregion. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 60:491–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang L, Seelbach PW, Hughes RM (2006a) Introduction to landscape influences on stream habitats and biological assemblages. American Fisheries Society Symposium 48:1–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang L, Seebach PW, Lyons J (2006b) Effects of levels of human disturbance on the influence of watershed, riparian, and reach scale factors on fish assemblages. American Fisheries Society Symposium 48:199–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang L, Brenden T, Seelbach PW, Cooper A, Allan D, Clark R Jr, Wiley M (2008) Landscape based identification of human disturbance gradients and references for streams in Michigan. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 141:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wehrly, KE, Carter GS, Breck JE (2010) Standardized sampling methods for the inland lakes status and trends program. Fisheries Special Report. Michigan Department of Natural Resources and Environment, Ann Arbor

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Paul Seelbach for providing vision and encouragement in the development of the statewide lake database; Patricia Soranno, Mary Bremigan, Kendra Cheruvelil, and Sherry Martin for in-depth discussion in the early phase of the lake database development; Arthur Cooper for assistance with GIS processes; and Minako Edgar for preparation of Michigan maps. We are grateful to Mark Bain and two anonymous reviewers for comments and suggestions that improved the manuscript. This project was financially supported by Federal Aid in Sport Fishery Restoration Program, Project F-80-R through the Fisheries Division of the Michigan Department of Natural Resources and Environment and a federal grant for State Wildlife Action Plan through the University of Michigan.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lizhu Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, L., Wehrly, K., Breck, J.E. et al. Landscape-Based Assessment of Human Disturbance for Michigan Lakes. Environmental Management 46, 471–483 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-010-9525-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-010-9525-z

Keywords

Navigation