Skip to main content
Log in

Using Newspaper Coverage Analysis to Evaluate Public Perception of Management in River-Floodplain Systems

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Traditional natural resource management approaches often focus on a specific natural resource and ignore social components other than economic value. In contrast, new approaches to resource management, such as those employing ecosystem management strategies, recognize and strive to incorporate other social components of the managed system. This study uses a content analysis of regional newspaper coverage of two relatively new reserves in river-floodplain systems, the Lower Wisconsin State Riverway and the Middle Elbe Biosphere Reserve, to analyze each reserve’s success in managing the social components of its resources during each reserve’s first ten years. The results suggest that positive coverage of both reserves has increased, as has the perceived authority of the reserve staff, as measured by trends in the quantity of direct quotes. The Middle Elbe Biosphere Reserve received approximately three times more coverage than its Wisconsin counterpart, suggesting that the more extensive public outreach program of the former is an important tool in dealing with social issues within a conservation reserve.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ansell C, Gash A (2007) Collaborative governance in theory and practice. J Public Adm Res Theory. doi:10.1093/jopart/mum032

  • Arvai JL, Mascarenhas MJ (2001) Print media framing of the environmental movement in a Canadian forestry debate. Environ Manag 27:705–714

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Batisse M (1997) Biosphere reserves: a challenge for biodiversity conservation and regional development. Environment 39(8–15):31–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Bengston DN, Xu G, Fan DP (2001) Attitudes toward ecosystem management in the United States, 1992–1998. Soc Nat Res 14:471–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benke AC (1990) A perspective on America’s vanishing streams. J North Am Bentholog Soc 9:77–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger AA (2000) Media and communication research methods: an introduction to qualitative and quantitative methods. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA 293 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Bräuer G, Lozán JL (1996) Schutzgebiete im Flußbereichen mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der “Mittleren Elbe.” (Protected areas in riverine areas with special focus on the “Middle Elbe”). In: Lozán JL, Kausch H (eds) Warnsignale aus Flüssen und Ästuaren. Parey Buchverlag, Berlin, pp 342–344

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll CR, Meffe GK (1997) Management to meet conservation goals: general principles. In: Principles of conservation biology, Second edn. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA, pp 305–344

  • Cortner HJ, Moote MA (1999) The politics of ecosystem management. Island Press, Washington, DC 179 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Costanza R, dArge R, deGroot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, Oneill RV, Paruelo J, Raskin RG, Sutton P, vandenBelt M (1997) The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387:253–260

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cupp ME (1999) Aesthetic protection pioneers: the lower Wisconsin State Riverway Board. http://lwr.state.wi.us/projhist.htm. Accessed 10 Apr 1999

  • Dornbusch M (1991) Die geschichtliche Entwicklung des Biosphärenreservats (The historical development of the biosphere reserve). Naturschutz im Land Sachsen-Anhalt 28:7–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs A (1972) Up and down with ecology: the issue-attenuation cycle. Public Interest 28:38–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamson WA, Modigliani A (1989) Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: a constructionist approach. Am J Sociol 95:1–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grumbine RE (1994) What is ecosystem management? Conserv Biol 8:27–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hale B, Adams MS (2006) Ecosystem management and the conservation of river–floodplain systems. Landsc Urban Plan 80:23–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hentschel P (1995) Biosphärenreservat Mittlere Elbe. In: Biosphärenreservate in Deutschland. Springer Verlag, Berlin, pp 213–239

  • Jüngel K (1993) Die Elbe: Geschichte um einen Fluß. Anita Tykve Verlag, Böblingen, p 223

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennamer JD (1992) Public opinion, the press, and public policy: an introduction. In: Kennamer JD (ed) Public opinion the press and public policy. Praeger, Westport, CT, pp 1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacy S, Riffe D, Stoddard S, Martin H, Chang K-K (2001) Sample size for newspaper content analysis in multi-year studies. Journalism Mass Commun Q 78:836–845

    Google Scholar 

  • Lower Wisconsin State Riverway Board (1993) Strategic plan. Lower Wisconsin State Riverway, Muscoda, WI

    Google Scholar 

  • Mascarenhas M, Scarce R (2004) ‘The intention was good’’: legitimacy, consensus-based decision making, and the case of forest planning in British Columbia, Canada. Soc Nat Resour 17:17–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazur A, Lee J (1993) Sounding the global alarm: environmental issues in the U.S. national news. Soc Stud Sci 23:681–720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCombs ME, Shaw DL (1972) The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opin Q 36:176–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meffe GK, Nielsen LA, Knight RL, Schenborn DA (2002) Ecosystem management: adaptive. Community-based conservation. Island Press, Washington, p 313

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitteldeutsche Zeitung (2003) Werbung/Anzeigen. http://www.mz-web.de

  • Naiman RJ, Décamps H (1997) The ecology of interfaces: riparian zones. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 28:621–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newspapers Capital (2003) Media Kit 2003. Capital Newspapers, Madison, WI

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer T (1986) Endangered Rivers and the conservation movement. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA 316 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Postel S, Carpenter S (1997) Freshwater ecosystem services. In: Daily GC (ed) Nature’s services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 195–214

  • Reichhoff L (1991) Flora und vegetation. Naturschutz im Land Sachsen-Anhalt 28:36–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Riffe D, Lacy S, Fico FG (1998) Analyzing media messages: using quantitative content analysis in research. Lawerence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ 208 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafer CL (1999) National park and reserve planning to protect biological diversity: some basic elements. Landscape Urban Plan 44:123–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SPSS Inc (2001) SPSS for Windows 11.0.1, Standard Version. SPSS Inc

  • Tockner K, Stanford JA (2002) Riverine flood plains: present state and future trends. Environ Conserv 29:308–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Trumbo C (1996) Constructing climate change: claims and frames in U.S. coverage of an environmental issue. Public Understand. Science 5:269–283

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Interior (1979) The lower Wisconsin: a wild and scenic river study. U.S. Department of Interior, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (1988) Final environmental impact statement: proposed lower Wisconsin State Riverway. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Madison, WI

    Google Scholar 

  • Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (1994) Lower Wisconsin state riverway visitor. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Madison, WI

    Google Scholar 

  • Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (2002) The state of the lower Wisconsin river basin. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Madison, WI

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu Z, Bengston DN (1997) Trends in national forest values among forestry professionals, environmentalists, and the news media, 1982–1993. Soc Nat Resour 10:43–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yaffee SL (1996) Ecosystem management in practice: the importance of human institutions. Ecol Appl 6:724–727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yaffee SL (2002) Ecosystem management in policy and practice. In: Ecosystem management: adaptive, community-based conservation. Island Press, Washington, pp 89–94

Download references

Acknowledgments

As this study derives from the author’s doctoral work at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, he gratefully acknowledges feedback from his major professor, MS Adams, and his committee, D. Field, N. Langston, E. Stanley, and P. Zedler. He also thanks D. Fisher and A. Vogelaar for their comments on the previous versions of the manuscript and L. Harvey for her assistance with the preparation of the final manuscript. Lastly, he would like to thank the staffs of the Lower Wisconsin State Riverway and the Middle Elbe Biosphere Reserve for their cooperation and assistance during this project. Portions of this work was supported by the NSF IGERT Grant 9870703 (Human Dimensions of Social and Aquatic System Interactions); by NSF Grant INT-9901214; by a research fellowship from the DAAD (German Foreign Exchange Service), and by travel grants from the UW German Department, The Graduate School of UW-Madison (Vilas Fellowship), and the Gaylord Nelson Institute for Environmental Studies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brack W. Hale.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hale, B.W. Using Newspaper Coverage Analysis to Evaluate Public Perception of Management in River-Floodplain Systems. Environmental Management 45, 1155–1163 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-010-9456-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-010-9456-8

Keywords

Navigation