Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A Method and Rationale for Deriving Nutrient Criteria for Small Rivers and Streams in Ohio

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A mechanistic understanding of the effects of nutrient enrichment in lotic systems has been advanced over the last two decades such that identification of management thresholds for the prevention of eutrophication is now possible. This study describes relationships among primary nutrients (phosphorus and nitrogen), benthic chlorophyll a concentrations, daily dissolved oxygen (DO) concentrations, and the condition of macroinvertebrate and fish communities in small rivers and streams in Ohio, USA. Clear associations between nutrients, secondary response indicators (i.e., benthic chlorophyll and DO), and biological condition were found, and change points between the various indicators were identified for use in water quality criteria for nutrients in small rivers and streams (<1300 km2). A change point in benthic chlorophyll a density was detected at an inorganic nitrogen concentration of 0.435 mg/l (±0.599 SD), and a total phosphorus (TP) concentration of 0.038 mg/l (±0.085 SD). Daily variation in DO concentration was significantly related to benthic chlorophyll concentration and canopy cover, and a change point in 24-h DO concentration range was detected at a benthic chlorophyll level of 182 mg/m2. The condition of macroinvertebrate communities was related to benthic chlorophyll concentration and both minimum and 24-h range of DO concentration. The condition of fish communities was best explained by habitat quality. The thresholds found in relationships between the stressor and the response variables, when interpreted in light of the uncertainty surrounding individual change points, may now serve as a framework for nutrient criteria in water quality standards.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • APHA (1992) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 18th edn. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs BJF (2000) Eutrophication of streams and rivers: dissolved nutrient–chlorophyll relationships for benthic algae. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 19:17–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bothwell ML (1989) Phosphorus-limited growth dynamics of lotic periphytic diatom communities: areal biomass and cellular growth grate responses. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 46:1293–1301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowman MF, Chambers PA, Schindler DW (2007) Constraints on benthic algal response to nutrient addition in oligotrophic mountain rivers. River Research and Applications 23:858–876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camargo JA, Alonso A, de la Puente M (2004) Multimetric assessment of nutrient enrichment in impounded rivers based on benthic macroinvertebrates. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 96:233–249

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Camargo JA, Alonso A, de la Puente M (2005) Eutrophication downstream from small reservoirs in mountain rivers of Central Spain. Water Research 39:3376–3384

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carlisle DM, Meador MR, Moulton SR II, Ruhl PM (2007) Estimation and application of indicator values for common macroinvertebrate genera and families of the United States. Ecological Indicators 7:22–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cattaneo A, Kerimian T, Roberge M, Marty J (1997) Periphyton distribution and abundance on substrata of different size along a gradient of stream trophy. Hydrobiologia 354:101–110

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers PA, Dale AR, Scrimgeour GJ, Bothwell ML (2000) Nutrient enrichment of northern rivers in response to pulp mill and municipal discharges. Journal of Aquatic Ecosystem Stress and Recovery 8:53–66

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clark D, Gu AZ, Neethling JB (2005) Achieving extremely low effluent phosphorus in wastewater treatment. Waterscapes 16(3) (Water Group of HDR)

  • Cross WF, Wallace JB, Rosemond AD, Eggert SL (2006) Whole-system nutrient enrichment increases secondary production in a detritus-based ecosystem. Ecology 87:1556–1565

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Deegan LA, Peterson BJ (1992) Whole-river fertilization stimulates fish production in an arctic tundra river. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 49:1890–1901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeShon JE (1995) Development and application of the Invertebrate Community Index (ICI). In: Davis WS, Simon TP (eds) Biological assessment and criteria, tools for water resource planning. Lewis, Boca Raton, FL, pp 217–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodds WK, Smith VH, Zander B (1997) Developing nutrient targets to control benthic chlorophyll levels in streams: a case study of the Clark Fork River. Water Resources 31:1738–1750

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dodds WK, Jones JR, Welch EB (1998) Suggested criteria for stream trophic state: distributions of temperate stream types by chlorophyll, total nitrogen and phosphorus. Water Research 32:1455–1462

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dodds WK, Smith VH, Lohman K (2002) Nitrogen and phosphorus relationships to benthic algal biomass in temperate streams. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 59:865–874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodds WK, Smith VH, Lohman K (2006) Erratum: nitrogen and phosphorus relationships to benthic algal biomass in temperate streams. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 63:1190–1191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donohuea I, McGarrigle ML, Mills P (2006) Linking catchment characteristics and water chemistry with the ecological status of Irish rivers. Water Research 40:91–98

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Graham MH (2003) Confronting multicollinearity in ecological multiple regression. Ecology 84:2809–2815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haase R, Nolte U (2008) The invertebrate species index (ISI) for streams in southeast Queensland, Australia. Ecological Indicators 8:599–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hadi AS (1994) A modification of a method for the detection of outliers in multivariate samples. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series (B) 56:393–396

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiskary S, Markus H (2003) Establishing relationships among in-stream nutrient concentrations, phytoplankton and periphyton abundance and composition, fish and macroinvertebrate indices, and biochemical oxygen demand in Minnesota USA rivers. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Environmental Outcomes Division, St. Paul, MN

  • Hering D, Johnson RK, Kramm S, Schmutz S, Szoszkiewicz K, Verdonschot PFM (2006) Assessment of European streams with diatoms, macrophytes, macroinvertebrates and fish: a comparative metric-based analysis of organism response to stress. Freshwater Biology 51:1757–1785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hester FE, Dendy JS (1962) A multiple-plate sampler for aquatic macroinvertebrates. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 91:420–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang F, Beck MB, Cummings RG, Rowles K, Russell D (2004) Estimation of costs of phosphorus removal in wastewater treatment facilities: construction de novo. Water Policy Working Paper 2004-010. Georgia Water Planning and Policy Center

  • Karr JR (1981) Assessment of biotic integrity using fish communities. Fisheries 6:21–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karr JR, Chu EW (1999) Restoring life in running waters—better biological monitoring. Island Press, Covelo, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Karr JR, Fausch KD, Angermeier P, Yant R, Schlosser IJ (1986) Assessing biological integrity in running waters: a method and its rationale. Illinois Natural History Survey Special Publication 5, Champaign

  • Kim D, Kim KY, Ryu HD, Min KK, Lee SI (2009) Long term operation of pilot-scale biological nutrient removal process in treating municipal wastewater. Bioresource Technology 100:3180–3184

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lohman K, Jones JR, Perkins BD (1992) Effects of nutrient enrichment and flood frequency on periphyton biomass in northern Ozark streams. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 49:1198–1205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyons J, Wang L, Simonson TD (1996) Development and validation of an index of biotic integrity for coldwater streams in Wisconsin. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 16:241–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mainstone CP, Parr W (2002) Phosphorus in rivers—ecology and management. Science of the Total Environment 282–283:25–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall HL, Geider RJ, Flynn KJ (2000) A mechanistic model of photoinhibition. New Phytologist 145:347–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazeika S, Sullivan P, Watzin MC, Hession WC (2006) Influence of stream geomorphic condition on fish communities in Vermont, U.S.A Freshwater Biology 51:1811–1826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meador MR, Carlisle DM (2007) Quantifying tolerance indicator values for common stream fish species of the United States. Ecological Indicators 7:329–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miltner RL, Rankin E (1998) Primary nutrients and the biotic integrity of rivers and streams. Freshwater Biology 40:145–158

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moulton SR II, Kennen JG, Goldstein RM, Hambrook JA (2002) Revised protocols for sampling algal, invertebrate, and fish communities as part of the National Water-Quality Assessment Program. U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA

    Google Scholar 

  • Neter J, Wasserman W, Kutner MH (1990) Applied linear statistical models: regression, analysis of variance, and experimental designs. Irwin, Homewood, IL

    Google Scholar 

  • Niyogi DK, Koren M, Arbuckle CJ, Townsend CR (2007) Stream communities along a catchment land-use gradient: subsidy-stress responses to pastoral development. Environmental Management 39:213–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norton SB, Cormier SM, Smith M, Jones RC (2000) Can biological assessments discriminate among types of stress? A case study from the Eastern Corn Belt Plains ecoregion. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 19:1113–1119

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ohio EPA (1987) Users manual for biological field assessment of Ohio surface waters, vol II. Division of Water Quality Monitoring and Assessment, Surface Water Section, Columbus, OH

  • Ohio EPA (1989a) The qualitative habitat evaluation index: rationale, methods, application. Division of Surface Water, Columbus, OH

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohio EPA (1989b) Manual of Ohio EPA surveillance methods and quality assurance practices. Division of Environmental Services, Columbus, OH

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohio EPA (1995) 1994 Ohio water resource inventory: summary, conclusions, and recommendations. Ohio EPA Technical Bulletin MAS/1995-7-2

  • Ohio EPA (2006) Ohio 2006 integrated water quality monitoring and assessment report. Division of Surface Water, Columbus, OH

    Google Scholar 

  • Passy SI, Bode RW, Carlson DM, Novak MA (2004) Comparative environmental assessment in the studies of benthic diatom, macroinvertebrate, and fish communities. International Review of Hydrobiology 89:121–138

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson B, Fry B, Deegan L, Hershey A (1993) The trophic significance of epilithic algal production in a fertilized tundra river ecosystem. Limnology and Oceanography 38:872–878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poff NL, Allan JD (1995) Functional organization of stream fish assemblages in relation to hydrologic variability. Ecology 76:606–627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ponader KC, Charles DF, Belton TJ (2007) Diatom-based TP and TN inference models and indices for monitoring nutrient enrichment of New Jersey streams. Ecological Indicators 7:79–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qian SS, King RS, Richardson CJ (2003) Two statistical methods for the detection of environmental thresholds. Ecological Modeling 166:87–97

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rankin ET (1995) Habitat indices in water resource quality assessments. In: Davis S, Simon TP (eds) Biological assessment and criteria, tools for water resource planning. Lewis, Boca Raton, FL, pp 181–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Riva-Murray K, Bode RW, Phillips PJ, Wall GL (2002) Impact source determination with biomonitoring data in New York State: concordance with environmental data. Northeastern Naturalist 9:127–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabater S, Armengol J, Comas E, Sabater F, Urrizalqui I, Urrutia I (2000) Algal biomass in a disturbed Atlantic river: water quality relationships and environmental implications. Science of the Total Environment 263:185–195

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scrimgeour GJ, Chambers PA (2000) Cumulative effects of pulp mill and municipal effluents on epilithic biomass and nutrient limitation in a large northern river ecosystem. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 57:1342–1354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheeder SA, Evans BM (2004) Estimating nutrient and sediment threshold criteria for biological impairment in Pennsylvania watersheds. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 40:881–888

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Skoulikidis NT, Gritzalis KC, Kouvarda T, Buffagni A (2004) The development of an ecological quality assessment and classification system for Greek running waters based on benthic macroinvertebrates. Hydrobiologia 516:149–160

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith VH, Tilman GD, Nekola JC (1999) Eutrophication: impacts of excess nutrient inputs on freshwater, marine, and terrestrial ecosystems. Environmental Pollution 100:179–196

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith AJ, Bode RW, Kleppel GS (2007) A nutrient biotic index (NBI) for use with benthic macroinvertebrate communities. Ecological Indicators 7:371–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soranno PA, Cheruvelil KS, Stevenson RJ, Rollins SL, Holden SW, Heaton S, Torng E (2008) A framework for developing ecosystem-specific nutrient criteria: integrating biological thresholds with predictive modeling. Limnology and Oceanography 53:773–787

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson RJ, Hill BH, Herlihy AT, Yuan LL, Norton SB (2008) Algae–P relationships, thresholds, and frequency distributions guide nutrient criterion development. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 27:783–799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. EPA (1996) National water quality inventory: 1996 report to Congress. U.S. EPA, Washington, DC

  • U.S. EPA (1997) Method 445.0: in vitro determination of chlorophyll a and pheophytin a in marine and freshwater algae by fluorescence. National Exposure Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, USEPA, Cincinnati, OH

  • U.S. EPA (2001a) Federal register: January 9, 2001 (Vol. 66, No. 6). http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-WATER/2001/January/Day-09/w569.htm. Accessed 19 May 2008

  • U.S. EPA (2001b) http://www.epa.gov/waterscience/criteria/nutrient/policy.html. Accessed 19 May 2008

  • U.S. EPA (2007) National water quality inventory: report to Congress, 2002 Reporting Cycle. EPA 841-R-07-001. U.S. EPA, Washington, DC

  • Walters DM, Leigh DS, Freeman MC, Freeman BJ, Pringle CM (2003) Geomorphology and fish assemblages in a Piedmont river basin, USA. Freshwater Biology 48:1950–1970

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang L, Robertson DM, Garrison PM (2007) Linkages between nutrients and assemblages of macroinvertebrates and fish in wadeable streams: implication to nutrient criteria development. Environmental Management 39:194–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Water Framework Directive (2000) Common implementation strategy for the water framework directive (2000/60/EC). http://europa.eu.int/comm/environment/water/water-framework/implementation.html. Accessed 23 May 2008

  • Yoder CO, Smith MA (1999) Using fish assemblages in a state biological assessment and criteria program: essential concepts and considerations. In: Simon TP (ed) Assessing the sustainability and biological integrity of water resources using fish communities. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp 17–56

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by grants from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and with the help of the U.S. Geological Service, especially Julie Berkman, John Tertuliani, and Alex Covert. Jon McLaughlin worked tirelessly analyzing the chlorophyll filters. Chris Selbe and Joe Bishop helped with the deployment of automated data loggers. Too numerous to mention individually, but essential all the same, are the dedicated field staff of the Division of Surface Water who helped with the data collections. Josh Smith, Katherine Ludwig, Nick Carmean, Kyle Kirker, and Andrew Farber survived a summer or two as my intern during this study. I extend a special thanks to the three anonymous reviewers who each provided refreshingly constructive comments, thereby improving the manuscript greatly.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, 4675 Homer-Ohio Lane, Groveport, OH, 43125, USA

    Robert J. Miltner

Authors
  1. Robert J. Miltner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert J. Miltner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Miltner, R.J. A Method and Rationale for Deriving Nutrient Criteria for Small Rivers and Streams in Ohio. Environmental Management 45, 842–855 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-010-9439-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-010-9439-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation