Abstract
The land management of US Army installations requires information on land conditions and their history for planning future military training activities and allocation of land repair. There is thus a strong need for methodology development to estimate the land conditions and cumulative military training impacts for the purpose of repair and restoration. In this study, we simulated at Fort Riley, USA, spatial patterns and temporal dynamics of military training impacts on land conditions quantified as percent ground cover using an image-aided spatial conditional co-simulation algorithm. Moreover, we estimated the historical percent ground cover as a measure of the cumulative impacts, and then calculated the allocation of land repair and restoration based on both current and historical land conditions. In addition, we developed a loss function method for allocation of land repair and restoration. The results showed: (1) this co-simulation algorithm reproduced spatial and temporal variability of percent ground cover and provided estimates of uncertainties with the correlation coefficients and root mean square errors between the simulated and observed values varying from 0.63 to 0.88 and from 23% to 78%, respectively; (2) with and without the cumulative impacts, the obtained spatial patterns of the land repair categories were similar, but their land areas differed by 5% to 40% in some years; (3) the combination of the loss function with the co-simulation made it possible to estimate and computationally propagate the uncertainties of land conditions into the uncertainties of expected cost loss for misallocation of land repair and restoration; and (4) the loss function, physical threshold, and probability threshold methods led to similar spatial patterns and temporal dynamics of the land repair categories, however, the loss function increased the land area by 5% to 30% for intense and moderate repairs and decreased the area by 5% to 30% for no repairs and light repairs for most of the years. This approach provided the potential to improve and automate the existing land rehabilitation and maintenance (LRAM) system used for the land management of the U.S. Army installations, and it can be applied to the management of other civil lands and environments. In conclusion, this study overcame the important gaps that exist in the methodological development and application for simulating land conditions and cumulative impacts due to human activities, and also in the methods for the allocation of land for repair and restoration.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abele G, Brown J, Brewer MC (1984) Long-term effects of off-road vehicle traffic on tundra terrain. Journal of Terramechanics 21:283–294
Almeida AS, Journel AG (1994) Joint simulation of multiple variables with a Markov-Type coregionalization model. Mathematical Geology 26:565–588
Althoff DP, Pontius JS, Gipson P, Woodford PB (2005) A comprehensive approach to identifying monitoring priorities of small land birds on military installations. Environmental Management 34:887–902
Althoff DP, Thien S (2005) Impact of M1A1 main battle tank disturbance on soil quality, invertebrates, and vegetation characteristics. Journal of Terramechanics 42:159–176
Anderson AB, Ayers P, Palazzo A, Fehmi J, Shoop S, Sullivan P (2005a) Assessing the impacts of military vehicle traffic on natural areas: introduction to a special issue of the Journal of Terramechanics and Review of the Relevant Military Vehicle Impact Literature. Journal of Terramechanics 42:143–158
Anderson AB, Wang G, Fang S, Gertner GZ, Güneralp B, Jones D (2005b) Assessing and predicting changes in vegetation cover associated with military land use activities using field monitoring data at Fort Hood, Texas. Journal of Terramechanics 42:207–229
Atkinson PM, Lewis P (2000) Geostatistical classification for remote sensing: an introduction. Computers and Geosciences 26:361–371
Ayers P (1994) Environmental damage from tracked vehicle operation. Journal of Terramechanics 31:173–183
Bailey RG (1976) Ecoregions of the United States (map). USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Region, Ogden
Braunack MV (1986) The residual effects of tracked vehicles on soil surface properties. Journal of Terramechanics 23:37–50
Braunack MV, Williams BG (1993) The effect of initial soil water content and vegetation cover on surface soil disturbance by tracked vehicles. Journal of Terramechanics 30:299–311
Carr JR, de Miranda FP (1998) The semivariogram in comparison to the co-occurrence matrix for classification of image texture. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 36:1945–1952
Chica-Olmo M, Abarca-Hernandez F (2000) Computing geostatistical image texture for remotely sensed data classification. Computer and Geosciences 26:373–383
Daigle J, Hudnall W, Gabriel W, Mersiovsky E, Nielson R (2005) The National Soil Information System (NASIS): designing soil interpretation classes for land-use predictions. Journal of Terramechanics 42:304–320
Defense Environmental Programs (DEP) (2007) Annual report to congress, 2007. http://www.acq.osd.mil/ie/
Deutsch CV, Journel AG (1998) Geostatistical software library and user’s guide, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Inc, New York
Diersing V, Shaw R, Tazik D (1992) US Army land condition-trend analysis (LCTA) program. Environmental Management 16:405–414
Dungan JL (2002) Conditional simulation: an alternative to estimation for achieving mapping objective. In: Stein A, Meer FVD, Gorte B (eds) Spatial statistics for remote sensing. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 135–152
Gertner GZ, Wang G, Anderson A (2006) Determination of frequency for re-measuring ground and vegetation cover factor needed for soil erosion modeling. Environmental Management 37(1):84–97
Goovaerts P (1997) Geostatistics for natural resources evaluation. Oxford University Press, Inc, New York
Greene TA (1996) Effects of long-term military training traffic on forest vegetation in central Minnesota. Northern Journal of Applied Forest 13:157–163
Güneralp B, Gertner GZ, Mendoza G, Anderson A (2003) Spatial simulation and fuzzy threshold analyses for allocating restoration areas. Transactions in GIS 7:325–343
Hall FG, Strebel DE, Nickeson JE, Goetz SJ (1991) Radiometric rectification: toward a common radiometric response among multidate, multisensor images. Remote Sensing of Environment 35:11–27
Haralick RM, Shanmugan K, Dinstein I (1973) Textural features for image classification. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 3:610–621
Johnson FLE (1982) Effects of tank training activities on botanical features at Fort Hood, Texas. Southwestern Naturalist 27:309–314
Jones R, Horner D, Sullivan P, Ahlvin R (2005) A methodology for quantitatively assessing vehicular rutting on terrains. Journal of Terramechanics 42:245–257
Pannatier Y (1996) VARIOWIN software for spatial data analysis in 2D. Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., New York
Pawlowsky-Glahn V, Olea RA (2004) Geostatistical analysis of compositional data. Oxford University Press, New York
Public Land Law Review Commission (1970) “One third of the Nation’s Land” a report to the president and to the congress. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC
Sample LJ, Steichen J, Kelley JR (1998) Water quality impacts from low water fords on military training lands. Journal of American Water Resource Association 34:939–949
Tazik D, Warren S, Diersing V, Shaw R, Brozka R, Bagley C, Whitworth W (1992) US Army land condition trend analysis (LCTA) plot inventory field methods. USACERL, Tech Rep N-92/03. Construction Engineering Research Laboratories, Champaign
Tucker JL, Rideout DB, Shaw RB (1998) Using linear programming to optimize rehabilitation and restoration of injured land: an application to US army training sites. Journal of Environmental Management 52:173–182
US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) (2005) Regional cost estimates for rehabilitation and maintenance practices on Army training lands. Public works technical bulletin 200-3-33, 1 June 2005. US Army Corps of Engineers, Washington, DC
Van Horne B, Sharpe PB (1998) Effects of tracking by armored vehicles on Townsend ground squirrels in the Orchard Training Area, Idaho, USA. Environmental Management 22:617–623
Wang G, Poso S, Waite M, Holopainen M (1998) Use of digitized aerial photographs and local operation for classification of stand development classes. Silva Fennica 32:215–225
Wang G, Wente S, Gertner GZ, Anderson AB (2002) Improvement in mapping vegetation cover factor for universal soil loss equation by geostatistical methods with Landsat TM images. International Journal of Remote Sensing 23:3649–3667
Wang G, Gertner GZ, Anderson AB, Howard H, Gebhart D, Althoff D, Davis T, Woodford P (2007) Spatial variability and temporal dynamics analysis of soil erosion due to military land use activities: uncertainty and implications for land management. Land Degradation and Development 18:519–542
Webb RH, Wilshire HG (1983) Environmental effects of off-road vehicles: impacts and management in arid lands. Springer-Verlag, Berlin
Wilson S (1988) The effects of military tank traffic on prairies: a management model. Environmental Management 12:397–403
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to US Army Corps of Engineers, Construction Engineering Research Laboratory (USA-CERL) for providing support (CERL W9132T-06-2-0001) and data sets for this study; and to the editors and reviewers for their helpful comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, G., Gertner, G., Anderson, A. et al. Simulating Spatial Pattern and Dynamics of Military Training Impacts for Allocation of Land Repair Using Images. Environmental Management 44, 810–823 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-009-9363-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-009-9363-z