Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Simulating Spatial Pattern and Dynamics of Military Training Impacts for Allocation of Land Repair Using Images

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The land management of US Army installations requires information on land conditions and their history for planning future military training activities and allocation of land repair. There is thus a strong need for methodology development to estimate the land conditions and cumulative military training impacts for the purpose of repair and restoration. In this study, we simulated at Fort Riley, USA, spatial patterns and temporal dynamics of military training impacts on land conditions quantified as percent ground cover using an image-aided spatial conditional co-simulation algorithm. Moreover, we estimated the historical percent ground cover as a measure of the cumulative impacts, and then calculated the allocation of land repair and restoration based on both current and historical land conditions. In addition, we developed a loss function method for allocation of land repair and restoration. The results showed: (1) this co-simulation algorithm reproduced spatial and temporal variability of percent ground cover and provided estimates of uncertainties with the correlation coefficients and root mean square errors between the simulated and observed values varying from 0.63 to 0.88 and from 23% to 78%, respectively; (2) with and without the cumulative impacts, the obtained spatial patterns of the land repair categories were similar, but their land areas differed by 5% to 40% in some years; (3) the combination of the loss function with the co-simulation made it possible to estimate and computationally propagate the uncertainties of land conditions into the uncertainties of expected cost loss for misallocation of land repair and restoration; and (4) the loss function, physical threshold, and probability threshold methods led to similar spatial patterns and temporal dynamics of the land repair categories, however, the loss function increased the land area by 5% to 30% for intense and moderate repairs and decreased the area by 5% to 30% for no repairs and light repairs for most of the years. This approach provided the potential to improve and automate the existing land rehabilitation and maintenance (LRAM) system used for the land management of the U.S. Army installations, and it can be applied to the management of other civil lands and environments. In conclusion, this study overcame the important gaps that exist in the methodological development and application for simulating land conditions and cumulative impacts due to human activities, and also in the methods for the allocation of land for repair and restoration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abele G, Brown J, Brewer MC (1984) Long-term effects of off-road vehicle traffic on tundra terrain. Journal of Terramechanics 21:283–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almeida AS, Journel AG (1994) Joint simulation of multiple variables with a Markov-Type coregionalization model. Mathematical Geology 26:565–588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Althoff DP, Pontius JS, Gipson P, Woodford PB (2005) A comprehensive approach to identifying monitoring priorities of small land birds on military installations. Environmental Management 34:887–902

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Althoff DP, Thien S (2005) Impact of M1A1 main battle tank disturbance on soil quality, invertebrates, and vegetation characteristics. Journal of Terramechanics 42:159–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson AB, Ayers P, Palazzo A, Fehmi J, Shoop S, Sullivan P (2005a) Assessing the impacts of military vehicle traffic on natural areas: introduction to a special issue of the Journal of Terramechanics and Review of the Relevant Military Vehicle Impact Literature. Journal of Terramechanics 42:143–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson AB, Wang G, Fang S, Gertner GZ, Güneralp B, Jones D (2005b) Assessing and predicting changes in vegetation cover associated with military land use activities using field monitoring data at Fort Hood, Texas. Journal of Terramechanics 42:207–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson PM, Lewis P (2000) Geostatistical classification for remote sensing: an introduction. Computers and Geosciences 26:361–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayers P (1994) Environmental damage from tracked vehicle operation. Journal of Terramechanics 31:173–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey RG (1976) Ecoregions of the United States (map). USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Region, Ogden

    Google Scholar 

  • Braunack MV (1986) The residual effects of tracked vehicles on soil surface properties. Journal of Terramechanics 23:37–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braunack MV, Williams BG (1993) The effect of initial soil water content and vegetation cover on surface soil disturbance by tracked vehicles. Journal of Terramechanics 30:299–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr JR, de Miranda FP (1998) The semivariogram in comparison to the co-occurrence matrix for classification of image texture. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 36:1945–1952

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chica-Olmo M, Abarca-Hernandez F (2000) Computing geostatistical image texture for remotely sensed data classification. Computer and Geosciences 26:373–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daigle J, Hudnall W, Gabriel W, Mersiovsky E, Nielson R (2005) The National Soil Information System (NASIS): designing soil interpretation classes for land-use predictions. Journal of Terramechanics 42:304–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Defense Environmental Programs (DEP) (2007) Annual report to congress, 2007. http://www.acq.osd.mil/ie/

  • Deutsch CV, Journel AG (1998) Geostatistical software library and user’s guide, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Inc, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Diersing V, Shaw R, Tazik D (1992) US Army land condition-trend analysis (LCTA) program. Environmental Management 16:405–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dungan JL (2002) Conditional simulation: an alternative to estimation for achieving mapping objective. In: Stein A, Meer FVD, Gorte B (eds) Spatial statistics for remote sensing. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 135–152

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gertner GZ, Wang G, Anderson A (2006) Determination of frequency for re-measuring ground and vegetation cover factor needed for soil erosion modeling. Environmental Management 37(1):84–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goovaerts P (1997) Geostatistics for natural resources evaluation. Oxford University Press, Inc, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene TA (1996) Effects of long-term military training traffic on forest vegetation in central Minnesota. Northern Journal of Applied Forest 13:157–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Güneralp B, Gertner GZ, Mendoza G, Anderson A (2003) Spatial simulation and fuzzy threshold analyses for allocating restoration areas. Transactions in GIS 7:325–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall FG, Strebel DE, Nickeson JE, Goetz SJ (1991) Radiometric rectification: toward a common radiometric response among multidate, multisensor images. Remote Sensing of Environment 35:11–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haralick RM, Shanmugan K, Dinstein I (1973) Textural features for image classification. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 3:610–621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson FLE (1982) Effects of tank training activities on botanical features at Fort Hood, Texas. Southwestern Naturalist 27:309–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones R, Horner D, Sullivan P, Ahlvin R (2005) A methodology for quantitatively assessing vehicular rutting on terrains. Journal of Terramechanics 42:245–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pannatier Y (1996) VARIOWIN software for spatial data analysis in 2D. Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawlowsky-Glahn V, Olea RA (2004) Geostatistical analysis of compositional data. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Public Land Law Review Commission (1970) “One third of the Nation’s Land” a report to the president and to the congress. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC

  • Sample LJ, Steichen J, Kelley JR (1998) Water quality impacts from low water fords on military training lands. Journal of American Water Resource Association 34:939–949

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tazik D, Warren S, Diersing V, Shaw R, Brozka R, Bagley C, Whitworth W (1992) US Army land condition trend analysis (LCTA) plot inventory field methods. USACERL, Tech Rep N-92/03. Construction Engineering Research Laboratories, Champaign

  • Tucker JL, Rideout DB, Shaw RB (1998) Using linear programming to optimize rehabilitation and restoration of injured land: an application to US army training sites. Journal of Environmental Management 52:173–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) (2005) Regional cost estimates for rehabilitation and maintenance practices on Army training lands. Public works technical bulletin 200-3-33, 1 June 2005. US Army Corps of Engineers, Washington, DC

  • Van Horne B, Sharpe PB (1998) Effects of tracking by armored vehicles on Townsend ground squirrels in the Orchard Training Area, Idaho, USA. Environmental Management 22:617–623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang G, Poso S, Waite M, Holopainen M (1998) Use of digitized aerial photographs and local operation for classification of stand development classes. Silva Fennica 32:215–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang G, Wente S, Gertner GZ, Anderson AB (2002) Improvement in mapping vegetation cover factor for universal soil loss equation by geostatistical methods with Landsat TM images. International Journal of Remote Sensing 23:3649–3667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang G, Gertner GZ, Anderson AB, Howard H, Gebhart D, Althoff D, Davis T, Woodford P (2007) Spatial variability and temporal dynamics analysis of soil erosion due to military land use activities: uncertainty and implications for land management. Land Degradation and Development 18:519–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb RH, Wilshire HG (1983) Environmental effects of off-road vehicles: impacts and management in arid lands. Springer-Verlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson S (1988) The effects of military tank traffic on prairies: a management model. Environmental Management 12:397–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to US Army Corps of Engineers, Construction Engineering Research Laboratory (USA-CERL) for providing support (CERL W9132T-06-2-0001) and data sets for this study; and to the editors and reviewers for their helpful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to George Gertner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, G., Gertner, G., Anderson, A. et al. Simulating Spatial Pattern and Dynamics of Military Training Impacts for Allocation of Land Repair Using Images. Environmental Management 44, 810–823 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-009-9363-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-009-9363-z

Keywords

Navigation