Skip to main content
Log in

Environmental Impact Assessment and Environmental Audit in Large-Scale Public Infrastructure Construction: The Case of the Qinghai–Tibet Railway

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Large-scale public infrastructure projects have featured in China’s modernization course since the early 1980s. During the early stages of China’s rapid economic development, public attention focused on the economic and social impact of high-profile construction projects. In recent years, however, we have seen a shift in public concern toward the environmental and ecological effects of such projects, and today governments are required to provide valid environmental impact assessments prior to allowing large-scale construction. The official requirement for the monitoring of environmental conditions has led to an increased number of debates in recent years regarding the effectiveness of Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs) and Governmental Environmental Audits (GEAs) as environmental safeguards in instances of large-scale construction. Although EIA and GEA are conducted by different institutions and have different goals and enforcement potential, these two practices can be closely related in terms of methodology. This article cites the construction of the Qinghai–Tibet Railway as an instance in which EIA and GEA offer complementary approaches to environmental impact management. This study concludes that the GEA approach can serve as an effective follow-up to the EIA and establishes that the EIA lays a base for conducting future GEAs. The relationship that emerges through a study of the Railway’s construction calls for more deliberate institutional arrangements and cooperation if the two practices are to be used in concert to optimal effect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahammed AKMR, Nixon BM (2006) Environmental impact monitoring in the EIA process of South Australia. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 26(5):426–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arts J (1998) EIA follow-up—on the role of ex-post evaluation in Environmental Impact Assessment. GeoPress, Groningen, Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Arts J, Caldwell P, Morrison-Saunders A (2001) Environmental impact assessment follow-up: good practice and future directions—findings from a workshop at the IAIA 2000 Conference. Impact Assessment Project Appraisal, vol 19, issue 3, pp 175–185

  • Au EWK, Sanvicens GDE (1997) EIA follow up and monitoring. Report of the EIA process strengthening workshop, Canberra, Environmental Protection Agency, Australia, pp 91–107

  • Bohemen HD (1998) Habitat fragmentation, infrastructure and ecological engineering. Ecological Engineering 11(1–4):199–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briffett C (1999) Environmental impact assessment in East Asia. In: Petts J (ed) Handbook of environmental impact assessment, vol 1. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 143–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Byron HJ (1999) Biodiversity issues in road environmental impact assessments: guidance and case studies. In: Evink GL, Garrett P, Zeigler D (eds) Proceedings of the third international conference on wildlife ecology and transportation. Department of Transportation, Tallahassee, FL, pp 211–220

  • Chen H, Li SC, Zhang YL (2003) Impact of road construction on vegetation alongside Qinghai–Xizang highway and railway. Chinese Geographical Science 13(4):340–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • China Internet Information Center (2008) The large-scale programs of China. Available at: http://www.china.com.cn/chinese/zhuanti/gjzdgc/963088.htm. Accessed 30 December 2008

  • China Statistical Yearbook (2006) China Statistics Press, Beijing, China

  • Dalal-Clayton B, Sadler B (2005) Strategic environmental assessment: a sourcebook and reference guide to international experience. London, Earthscan

    Google Scholar 

  • Dipper B, Jones C, Wood C (1998) Monitoring and post-auditing in environmental impact assessment: a review. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 41(6):731–747

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Environmental Agency (2001) Reporting on environmental measures: are we being effective? Environmental issue report No. 25

  • Fernandes JP (2000) Landscape ecology and conservation management—evaluation of alternatives in a highway EIA process. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 20(6):665–680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forman RTT, Alexander LE (1998) Roads and their major ecological effects. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 29:207–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallardo ALCF, Sánchez LE (2004) Follow-up of a road building scheme in a fragile environment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 24:47–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geneletti D (2003) Biodiversity impact assessment of roads: an approach based on ecosystem rarity. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 23(3):343–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George C, Kirkpatrick C (eds) (2007) Impact assessment and sustainable development: European practice and experience. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • He GZ (2007) Theory and methodology of environmental performance auditing. PhD dissertation. Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing (in Chinese)

  • International Organization of Supreme Audit Institutions (2001) Guidance standards and guidelines on environmental auditing. INTOSAI, The Hague, Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • International Organization of Supreme Audit Institutions (2004) Working Group on Environmental Auditing. Results of the third survey on environmental auditing (2003). INTOSAI Working Group on Environmental Auditing, Canada

  • Lee N, George C (eds) (2000) Environmental assessment in developing and transitional countries. Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu DZ, Wang BQ, Chen JX (2002) Current status, development trends and audit techniques of government environmental auditing. Audit Research 6:17–23 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison-Saunders A, Arts J (eds) (2008) Assessing impact: handbook Of EIA and SEA follow-up. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison-Saunders A, Marshall R, Arts J (2007) EIA follow-up international best practice principles. Special Publication Series No. 6. International Association for Impact Assessment, Fargo, ND

  • National Audit Office of People’s Republic of China (2003) Standard of audit institutions on state construction projects audit. Promulgated January 23

  • National Audit Office of People’s Republic of China (2006) Audit report no. 2 of 2006 (General Series No. 14): Audit and investigation findings on the use of funds for environmental protection of the Qinghai-Tibet Railway. Available at: http://www.cnao.gov.cn/main/articleshow_ArtID_921.htm. Accessed 5 June 2009

  • National Development and Reform Commission of People’s Republic of China (2001) The Tenth five-year plan for national economic and social development, Beijing

  • National People’s Congress of People’s Republic of China (2002) Environmental Impact Assessment Law of the People’s Republic of China. Adopted at the 30th Meeting of the Standing Committee of the Ninth National People’s Congress on October 28, 2002; promulgated by Order No. 77 of the President of the People’s Republic of China. English version provided by ACEE/SEPA (10/18/05)

  • Ning D, Wang H, Whitney J (1988) Environmental impact assessment in China: present practice and future developments. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 8(1):85–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Notices of Administrative Office, Ministry of Environmental Protection, China (2007) Available at: http://www.zhb.gov.cn/info/gw/huanban/index_1.htm. Accessed 6 July 2008

  • O’Faircheallaigh C (2007) Environmental agreements, EIA follow-up and aboriginal participation in environmental management: the Canadian experience. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 27(4):319–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oxford Brookes University (2004) Web-based distance-learning training packages on SEA. Available at: http://www.brookes.ac.uk/schools/planning/SEAmicro/ppp%20defs.tml. Accessed 28 September 2004

  • Peng CH, Ouyang H, Gao Q (2007) Building a “green” railway in China. Science 316:546–547

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sadler B (1996) Environmental assessment in a changing world: evaluating practice to improve performance. International Study of the Effectiveness of Environmental Assessment. Final report No. EN106-37/1996E. Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency

  • Sadler B, Verheem R (1996) Strategic environmental assessment: status, challenges and future directions. The International study of effectiveness of environmental assessment. Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment, The Netherlands

  • Shepherd A (1998) Post-project impact assessment and monitoring. In: Porter AL, Fittipaldi JJ (eds) Environmental methods review: retooling impact assessment for the new century. Army Environmental Policy Institute, Atlanta, GA, pp 164–170

    Google Scholar 

  • State Environmental Protection Administration (2003) Technical guidance for environmental impact assessment for plans and programs (interim). State Environmental Protection Administration, Beijing. English version, 11 August 2003. Available at: http://www.sepa.gov.cn/info/gw/huangfa/200308/t20030801_86602.htm

  • Sun YF (2005) Build the first-class plateau railway in the world. Engineering Sciences 3(3):1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun SY (2006) The features of the ecological environment and protective solutions along the Qinghai–Tibet Railway. Protection Engineering Sciences 4(2):35–42 (in Chinese)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tao T, Tan Z, He X (2007) Integrating environment into land-use planning through strategic environmental assessment in China: towards legal frameworks and operational procedures. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 27:243–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Council of the European Union (1997) Council Directive 97/11/EC of 3 March 1997 amending Directive 85/337/EEC of 27 June 1985 on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment

  • The First Railway Survey and Design Institute (2001a) Environmental impact statement of Qinghai–Tibet Railway. Lanzhou City, Gansu Province

  • The First Railway Survey and Design Institute (2001b) Water and soil conservation plan of Qinghai–Tibet Railway. Lanzhou City, Gansu Province

  • The State Council of the People’s Republic of China (1998) Regulations on the Administration of Construction Project Environmental Protection. Decree No. 253 of the State Council. November 29

  • The State Council of the People’s Republic of China (2001) Official reply of the State Council on approving the construction of the Qinghai–Tibet Railway Program from Geermu to Lhasa. No. 72. June 27

  • Treweek JR, Thompson S, Veicht N, Japp C (1993) Ecological assessment of proposed road developments: a review of environmental statements. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 36(3):295–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Environment Program (2002) Environmental Impact Assessment training resource manual. Topic 11: Implementation and follow up, 2nd edn. UN, Geneva, pp 403–430

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Leeuwen S (2004) Developments in environmental auditing by supreme audit institutions. Environmental Management 2:163–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Morgan RK, Cashmore M (2003) Environmental impact assessment of projects in the People’s Republic of China: new law, old problems. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 5(23):543–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood C (1991) EIA of policies, plans and programs. EIA Newsletter 5:2–3

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood CM, Dipper B, Jones C (2000) Auditing the assessments of the environmental impacts of planning projects. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 43(1):23–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu ZB, Zhou YL (2000) Procedures and problems for environmental audit in China. Chongqing Environmental Science 3(9–1):1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang YQ (2002) Negative impact of Qinghai–Tibet Railway construction on ecological environment of Qinghai–Tibet Plateau. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation 22(4):50–53 (in Chinese)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by the National Basic Research Program of China (2007CB407307), the international project between the Netherlands Royal Academy of Arts and Sciences and the Chinese Academy of Sciences (No. 08CDP005), and the Pilot Project of Knowledge Innovation Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (KZCX2-YW-420-5). The contents of this article represent the opinions of the authors, not necessarily those of the National Audit Office of China. The authors thank all interviewers and respondents of this study and the anonymous reviewers for their thoughtful comments on this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yonglong Lu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

He, G., Zhang, L. & Lu, Y. Environmental Impact Assessment and Environmental Audit in Large-Scale Public Infrastructure Construction: The Case of the Qinghai–Tibet Railway. Environmental Management 44, 579–589 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-009-9341-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-009-9341-5

Keywords

Navigation