Environmental Management

, Volume 44, Issue 3, pp 395–407 | Cite as

Balancing Conservation and Economic Sustainability: The Future of the Amazon Timber Industry

Article

Abstract

Logging has been a much maligned feature of frontier development in the Amazon. Most discussions ignore the fact that logging can be part of a renewable, environmentally benign, and broadly equitable economic activity in these remote places. We estimate there to be some 4.5 ± 1.35 billion m3 of commercial timber volume in the Brazilian Amazon today, of which 1.2 billion m3 is currently profitable to harvest, with a total potential stumpage value of $15.4 billion. A successful forest sector in the Brazilian Amazon will integrate timber harvesting on private lands and on unprotected and unsettled government lands with timber concessions on public lands. If a legal, productive, timber industry can be established outside of protected areas, it will deliver environmental benefits in synergy with those provided by the region’s network of protected areas, the latter of which we estimate to have an opportunity cost from lost timber revenues of $2.3 billion over 30 years. Indeed, on all land accessible to harvesting, the timber industry could produce an average of more than 16 million m3 per year over a 30-year harvest cycle—entirely outside of current protected areas—providing $4.8 billion in returns to landowners and generating $1.8 billion in sawnwood sales tax revenue. This level of harvest could be profitably complemented with an additional 10% from logging concessions on National Forests. This advance, however, should be realized only through widespread adoption of reduced impact logging techniques.

Keywords

Brazilian Amazon Timber industry Economic model Forest policy Logging 

References

  1. Alston L, Libecap G, Schneider R (1996) The determinants and impact of property rights: land titles on the Brazilian frontier. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 12:25–61Google Scholar
  2. Asner G, Knapp D, Broadbent E, Oliveira P, Keller M, Silva J (2005) Selective logging in the Brazilian Amazon. Science 310:480–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Asner G, Broadbent E, Oliveira P, Keller M, Knapp D, Silva J (2006) Condition and fate of logged forests in the Brazilian Amazon. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 103:12947–12950Google Scholar
  4. Azevedo-Ramos C, de Carvalho O, do Amaral B-D (2006) Short-term effects of reduced-impact logging on eastern Amazon fauna. Forest Ecology & Management 232:26–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barreto P, Amaral P, Vidal E, Uhl C (1998) Costs and benefits of forest management for timber production in eastern Amazônia. Forest Ecology & Management 108:9–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barros G (2002) The economics of beef production in northern Brazil (translated from Portuguese). Indicadores Pecuários, Centro de Estudos Avançados em Economia Aplicada Piracicaba, SPGoogle Scholar
  7. Bauch SC, Amacher GS, Merry FD (2006) Cost of harvest, transport, and milling in the Brazilian Amazon: estimation and policy implications. Forest Policy and Economics 9:903–915CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Campos M, Nepstad D (2006) Smallholders, the Amazon’s new conservationists. Conservation Biology 20:1553–1556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chenery HB (1949) Engineering production functions. Quarterly Journal of Economics 63:507–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Costanza R, d’Arge R, de Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O’Neill RV, Paruelo J (1997) The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387:253–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gullison RE, Frumhoff PC, Canadell JG, Field CB, Nepstad DC, Hayhoe K, Avissar R, Curran LM, Friedlingstein P, Jones CD, Nobre C (2007) Tropical forests and climate policy. Science 316:985–986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Holdsworth A, Uhl C (1997) Fire in Amazonian selectively logged forests and the potential for fire reduction. Ecol Appl 7:713–725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Holmes TP, Blate G, Zweede J, Pereira R Jr, Barreto P, Boltz F, Bauch R (2002) Financial and ecological indicators of reduced impact logging performance in the Eastern Amazon. For Ecol Manag 163:93–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Houghton R (2005) Aboveground forest biomass and the global carbon balance. Global Change Biology 11:945–958CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Houghton R, Lawrence K, Hackler J, Brown S (2001) The spatial distribution of forest biomass in the Brazilian Amazon: a comparison of estimates. Global Change Biology 7:731–746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hyde WF (1980) Timber supply, land allocation, and economic efficiency. Resources for the Future, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  17. Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Naturais Renováveis (IBAMA) (2002) Commercialization of wood products from the Amazon (translated from Portuguese) 1999–2000. IBAMA, BrasíliaGoogle Scholar
  18. Lentini M, Pereira D, Celentano D, Pereira R (2005) Fatos Florestais da Amazônia. IMAZON, Belém, BrazilGoogle Scholar
  19. Lima E, Merry F, Nepstad D, Amacher G, Azevedo-Ramos C, Resque F, Lefebvre P (2006) Searching for sustainability: forest policies, smallholders, and the Trans-Amazon highway. Environment 48:26–37Google Scholar
  20. Mattos M, Uhl C (1994) Economic and ecological perspectives on ranching in the eastern Amazon. World Dev 22:145–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McCauley D-J (2006) Selling out on nature. Nature 443:27–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Merry F, Amacher G-S (2005) Forest taxes, timber concessions, and policy choices in the Amazon. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 20(2):15–44Google Scholar
  23. Merry F, Amacher G, Nepstad D, Lefebvre P, Lima E, Bauch S (2006) Industrial development on logging frontiers in the Brazilian Amazon. International Journal of Sustainable Development 9:277–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. MME (Ministério das Minas e Energia) (1973) Projeto Radam—Levantamento de Recursos Naturais. Departamento Nacional de Produção Mineral, Rio de JaneiroGoogle Scholar
  25. Morton DC, DeFries RS, Shimabukuro YE, Anderson LO, Arai E, del Bon Espirito-Santo F, Freitas R, Morisette J (2006) Cropland expansion changes deforestation dynamics in the southern Brazilian Amazon. Proceedings of National Academy of Science USA 103:14637–14641Google Scholar
  26. Nepstad DC, Schwartzman S, Bamberger B, Santilli M, Ray D, Schlesinger P, Lefebvre P, Alencar A, Prinz E, Fiske G, Rolla A (2006) Inhibition of Amazon deforestation and fire by parks and indigenous reserves. Conservation Biology 20:65–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nepstad D, McGrath D, Alencar A, Barros AC, Carvalho G, Santilli M, Vera Diaz M (2002) Frontier governance in Amazônia. Science 295:629–630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nepstad DC, Verissimo A, Alencar A, Nobre C, Lima E, Lefebvre P, Schlesinger P, Potter C, Moutinho P, Mendoza E, Cochrane M, Brooks V (1999) Large-scale impoverishment of Amazonian forests by logging and fire. Nature 398:505–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Oliveira P, Asner G, Knapp D, Almeyda A, Galván-Gildemeister R, Keene S, Raybin R, Smith R (2007) Land-use allocation protects the Peruvian Amazon. Science 317:1233–1236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Phillips OL, Aragão LEOC, Lewis SL, Fisher JB, Lloyd J, López-González G, Malhi Y and others (2009) Drought sensitivity of the Amazon rainforest. Science 323:1344–1347Google Scholar
  31. Pimm S (1997) The value of everything. Nature 387:231–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pontius RG, Schneider L (2001) Land-use change model validation by a ROC method for the Ipswich watershed, Massachusetts. Agriculture Ecology & Environment 85:239–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Putz FE, Zuidema PA, Pinard MA, Boot RGA, Sayer JA (2008) Improved tropical forest management for carbon retention. PLoS Biology 6(7):e166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Putz F, Pinard M (1993) Reduced-impact logging as a carbon-offset method. Conservation Biology 7:755–757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Reid WV, Mooney HA, Capistrano D, Carpenter SR, Chopra K, Cropper A, Dasgupta P, Hassan R, Leemans R, May RM, Pingali P, Samper C, Scholes RJ, Watson RT, Zakri AH, Shidong Z (2006) Nature: the many benefits of ecosystem services. Nature 443:749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Saatchi S, Houghton R, dos Santos Alvala R, Soares J, Yu Y (2007) Distribution of aboveground live biomass in the Amazon basin. Global Change Biology 13:816–837Google Scholar
  37. Silva J, de Carvalho J, Lopes J, de Almeida B, Costa D, de Oliveira L, Vanclay J, Skovsgaard J (1995) Growth and yield of a tropical rain forest in the Brazilian Amazon 13 years after logging. Forest Ecology and Management 71:267–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Smith VK (1986) Another view of the state of engineering production functions. Economica 53:529–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Soares-Filho BS, Nepstad D, Curran L, Voll E, Cerqueira G, Garcia RA, Ramos CA, Mcdonald A, Lefebvre P, Schlesinger P (2006) Modeling conservation in the Amazon basin. Nature 440:520–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Soares-Filho BS, Dietzsch L, Moutinho P, Suarez A, Rodrigues H, Pinto E, Maretti C, Suassuna K, Scaramuzza C, Vascocelos F (2008) Reducing carbon emissions from deforestation: the role of ARPA’s protected areas in the Brazilian Amazon. IPAM, Brasília. Available at: http://www.climaedesmatamento.org.br/biblioteca
  41. Stone S (1998) Using GIS for applied economic policy modeling: a case study in the Brazilian Amazon. Ecological Economics 27:43–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Terborgh J (1999) Requiem for nature. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  43. Veríssimo A, Souza C, Stone S, Uhl C (1998) Priority areas for establishing national forests in the Brazilian Amazon. Conservation Biology 12:128–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Verissimo A, Cochrane M, Souza C Jr (2002) National forests in the Amazon. Science 297(5586):1478CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Woods Hole Research CenterFalmouthUSA
  2. 2.Instituto de Pesquisa Ambiental da Amazônia (IPAM)BelémBrazil
  3. 3.Centro de Sensoriamento RemotoUniversidade Federal de Minas GeraisMinas GeraisBrazil
  4. 4.Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityBlacksburgUSA

Personalised recommendations