Skip to main content

Experimental and Ecological Implications of Evening Bird Surveys in Stream-Riparian Ecosystems

Abstract

Stream-riparian ecosystems are dynamic and complex entities that can support high levels of bird assemblage abundance and diversity. The myriad patches (e.g., aquatic, floodplain, riparian) found in the riverscape habitat mosaic attract a unique mixture of aquatic, semiaquatic, riparian, and upland birds, each uniquely utilizing the river corridor. Whereas standard morning bird surveys are widely used across ecosystems, the variety of bird guilds and the temporal habitat partitioning that likely occur in stream-riparian ecosystems argue for the inclusion of evening surveys. At 41 stream reaches in Vermont and Idaho, USA, we surveyed bird assemblages using a combination of morning and evening fixed-width transect counts. Student’s paired t-tests showed that while bird abundance was not significantly different between morning and evening surveys, bird assemblage diversity (as measured by species richness, Shannon-Weiner’s index, and Simpson’s index) was significantly higher in the morning than in the evening. NMS ordinations of bird species and time (i.e., morning, evening) indicated that the structure of morning bird assemblages was different from that of evening assemblages. NMS further showed that a set of species was only found in evening surveys. The inclusion of evening counts in surveying bird assemblages in stream-riparian ecosystems has important experimental and ecological implications. Experimentally, the sole use of morning bird surveys may significantly underestimate the diversity and misrepresent the community composition of bird assemblages in these ecosystems. Ecologically, many of the birds detected in evening surveys were water-associated species that occupy high trophic levels and aerial insectivores that represent unique aquatic-terrestrial energy transfers.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

References

  • Baxter CV, Fausch KD, Saunders WC (2005) Tangled webs: reciprocal flows of invertebrate prey link streams and riparian zones. Freshwater Biology 50:201–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake JG, Loiselle BA (2000) Diversity of birds along an elevational gradient in the Cordillera Central, Costa Rica. Auk 117:663–686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bock CE (1970) The ecology and behavior of the Lewis’s Woodpecker (Asyndesmus lewis). University of California Publications in Zoology 92:1–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollinger EK, Gavin TA, McIntyre DC (1988) Comparison of transects and circular plots for estimating bobolink densities. Journal of Wildlife Management 53:477–486

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryce SA, Hughes RM, Kaufmann PR (2002) Development of a bird integrity index: using bird assemblages as indicators of riparian condition. Environmental Management 30:294–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnham KP (1981) Summarizing remarks: environmental influences. Studies in Avian Biology 6:324–325

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway CJ, Sulzman C, Raulston BE (2004) Factors affecting detection probability of California black rails. Journal of Wildlife Management 68:360–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeSante DF, George TL (1994) Population trends in the landbirds of western North America. In: Jehl JR, Johnson NK (eds) A century of avifaunal change in western North America. Studies in Avian Biology No. 15. Cooper Ornithological Society, Lawrence, KS

  • Diefenbach DR, Brauning DW, Mattice JA (2003) Variability in grassland bird counts related to observer differences and species detection rates. Auk 120:1168–1179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobkin DS, Rich AC (1998) Comparison of line-transect, spot-map, and point-count surveys for birds in riparian habitats of the Great Basin. Journal of Field Ornithology 69:440–443

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobkin DS, Rich AC, Pyle WH (1998) Habitat and avifaunal recovery from livestock grazing in a riparian meadow system of the northern Great Basin. Conservation Biology 12:209–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donovan TM et al (2002) Priority research needs for the conservation of Neotropical migrant landbirds. Journal of Field Ornithology 73:329–339

    Google Scholar 

  • Earnst SL, Ballard JA, Dobkin DS (2005) Riparian songbird abundance a decade after cattle removal on Hart Mountain and Sheldon National Wildlife Refuges. In: Ralph CJ, Rich T (eds) Third international partners in flight conference. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Albany, CA, pp 550–558

  • Finch DM, Yong W (2000) Landbird migration in riparian habitats of the Middle Rio Grande: a case study. Studies in Avian Biology 20:88–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanowski J, Danz N, Lind J, Niemi G (2003) Breeding bird response to riparian forest harvest and harvest equipment. Forest Ecology and Management 174:315–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaccard P (1908) Nouvelle recherches sur la distribution florale. Bulletin de la Société Vaudoise des Sciences Naturelles 44:223–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawaguchi Y, Nakano S, Taniguchi Y (2003) Terrestrial invertebrate inputs determine the local abundance of stream fishes in a forested stream. Ecology 84:701–708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly JF, Smith R, Finch DM, Moore FR, Yong W (1999) Influence of summer biogeography on wood warbler stopover abundance. Condor 101:76–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kingery HE (1996) American Dipper (Cinclus mexicanus). In: Poole A, Gill F (eds) The birds of North America. Vol 229. Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, PA, and American Ornithologists Union, and Washington, DC

  • Knopf FL, Samson FB (1994) Scale perspectives on avian diversity in western riparian ecosystems. Conservation Biology 8:669–676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knopf FL, Johnson RR, Rich T, Samson FB, Szaro RC (1988) Conservation of riparian ecosystems in the United States. Wilson Bulletin 100:272–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruskal JB (1964) Nonmetric multidimensional scaling: a numerical method. Psychometrika 29:115–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krzys G, Waite TA, Stapanian M, Vucetich JA (2002) Assessing avian richness in remnant wetlands: towards an improved methodology. Wetlands 22:186–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latta SC, Rimmer CC, McFarland KP (2003) Winter bird communities in four habitats along an elevational gradient on Hispaniola. Condor 105:179–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linder KA (1994) Habitat utilization and behavior of nesting Lewis’s Woodpeckers (Melanerpes lewis) in the Laramie range, southeast Wyoming. M.S. thesis, University of Wyoming, Laramie

  • Machtans CS, Villard M-A, Hannon SJ (1996) Use of riparian buffer strips as movement corridors by forest birds. Conservation Biology 10:1366–1379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magurran AE (1988) Ecological diversity and its measurement. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Malard F, Tockner K, Ward JV (2000) Physicochemical heterogeneity in a glacial riverscape. Landscape Ecology 15:679–695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manel S, Buckton ST, Ormerod SJ (2000) Testing large-scale hypotheses using surveys: the effects of land use on the habitats, invertebrates and birds of Himalayan rivers. Journal of Applied Ecology 37:756–770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mather PM (1976) Computational methods of multivariate analysis in physical geography. John Wiley & Sons, London

    Google Scholar 

  • McCune B, Grace JB (2002) Analysis of ecological communities. MJM Software Design, Gleneden Beach, OR

    Google Scholar 

  • McCune B, Mefford MJ (2006) PC-ORD. Multivariate analysis of ecological data, version 5.0. MjM Software, Gleneden Beach, OR

    Google Scholar 

  • Meals DW, Budd LF (1998) Lake Champlain Basin nonpoint source phosphorus assessment. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 34:251–265

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meiklejohn BA, Hughes JW (1999) Bird communities in riparian buffer strips of industrial forests. American Midland Naturalist 141:172–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery DR, Buffington JM (1997) Channel-reach morphology in mountain drainage basins. Geological Society of America Bulletin 109:596–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrissey CA, Bendell-Young LI, Elliott JE (2004) Linking contaminant profiles to the diet and breeding location of American dippers using stable isotopes. Journal of Applied Ecology 41:502–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller-Dombois D, Ellenberg H (1974) Aims and methods of vegetation ecology. John Wiley & Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakano S, Murakami M (2001) Reciprocal subsidies: dynamic interdependence between terrestrial and aquatic food webs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 98:166–170

  • Nakano S, Miyasaka H, Kuhura N (1999) Terrestrial-aquatic linkages: riparian arthropod inputs alter trophic cascades in a stream food web. Ecology 80:2435–2441

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell SJ, Nastase AJ (1995) Nocturnal vs. diurnal visitation by insects at pitchers of Sarracenia purpurea. American Journal of Botany 82(Suppl 6):61–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols JD, Hines JE, Sauer JR, Fallon FW, Fallon JE, Heglund PJ (2000) A double-observer approach for estimating detection probability and abundance from point counts. Auk 117:393–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ralph CJ, Guepel GR, Pyle P, Martin TE, DeSante DF (1993) Handbook of field methods for monitoring landbirds. General Technical Report PSW-GTR-144. Pacific Southwest Research Station, U.S. Forest Service, Albany, CA

  • Ralph CJ, Sauer JR, Droege S (1995) Monitoring bird populations by point counts. General Technical Report PSW-GTR-149. Pacific Southwest Research Station, U.S. Forest Service, Albany, CA

  • Robinson DT, Traill BJ (1996) Conserving woodland birds in the wheat and sheep belts of southern Australia. RAOU Conservation Statement No. 10. Royal Australasian Ornithologists Union, Melbourne

  • Robinson RA, Wilson JD, Humphrey QPC (2001) The importance of arable habitat for farmland birds in grassland landscapes. Journal of Applied Ecology 38:1059–1069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenstock SS, Anderson DR, Giesen KM, Leukering T, Carter MF (2002) Landbird counting techniques: current practices and an alternative. Auk 119:46–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rottenborn SC (1999) Predicting the impacts of urbanization on riparian bird communities. Biological Conservation 88:289–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rydell J, Entwistle A, Racey PA (1996) Timing and foraging flights of three species of bats in relation to insect activity and predation risk. Oikos 76:243–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saab V (1999) Importance of spatial scale to habitat use by breeding birds in riparian forests: a hierarchical analysis. Ecological Applications 9:135–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saab VA, Bock CE, Rich TD, Dobkin DS (1995) Livestock grazing effects on migratory landbirds in western North America. In: Martin TE, Finch DM (eds) Ecology and management of neotropical migratory birds: a synthesis and review of critical issues. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 311–353

    Google Scholar 

  • Skagen SK et al (2005) Geography of spring landbird migration through riparian habitats in southwestern North America. Condor 107:212–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skagen SK, Melcher CP, Howe WH, Knopf FL (1998) Comparative use of riparian corridors and oases by migrating birds in southeast Arizona. Conservation Biology 12:869–909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snedecor GW, Cochran WG (1967) Statistical methods. Iowa State University Press, Ames

    Google Scholar 

  • Speakman JR et al (2000) Activity patterns of insectivorous bats and birds in northern Scandinavia (69 N), during continuous midsummer daylight. Oikos 88:75–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinmetz J, Kohler SL, Soluk DA (2003) Birds are overlooked top predators in aquatic food webs. Ecology 84:1324–1328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan SMP, Watzin MC, Keeton WS (2007) A riverscape perspective on habitat associations among riverine bird assemblages in the Lake Champlain Basin, USA. Landscape Ecology 22:1169–1186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson WL (2002) Towards reliable bird surveys: accounting for individuals present but not detected. Auk 119:18–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USDA (2001) A user’s guide: Frank Church ‘River of No Return’ Wilderness. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain and Northern Regions, Salmon, ID

  • Verner J (1985) Assessment of counting techniques. Current Ornithology 2:247–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward JV, Tockner K (2001) Biodiversity: towards a unifying theme in river ecology. Freshwater Biology 46:807–819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weeber RC, McCracken JD, Francis CM (1999) The marsh monitoring program of Bird Studies Canada (Long Point Bird Observatory). In: Ribic CA, Lewis SJ, Melvin S, Bart J, Peterjohn B (eds) Marsh bird monitoring workshop. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Laurel, MD, pp 51–52

  • Woinarski JCZ, Brock C, Armstrong M, Hempel C, Cheal D, Brennan K (2000) Bird distribution in riparian vegetation in the extensive natural landscape of Australia’s tropical savanna: a broad-scale survey and analysis of a distributional data base. Journal of Biogeography 67:843–868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wretenberg J, Lindstrom A, Svensson S, Part T (2007) Linking agricultural policies to population trends of Swedish farmland birds in different agricultural regions. Journal of Applied Ecology 44:993 941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zar JH (1984) Biostatistical analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Funding for this project was provided by National Center for Environmental Research STAR Program, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Grant R83059501-0 (SMPS), by NSF Division of Ecological Biology 0534815 (K.T.V.), and by the University of Idaho (S.M.P.S. and K.T.V.). We thank Dr. Christina Cianfrani, Erin Copeland, Kara Cromwell, Peter Dombrowski, Breezy Jackson, Kelly McCutcheon, and Ryan Mann for their assistance in the field. We additionally thank Jim and Holly Akenson for their assistance at Taylor Ranch Field Station and Drs. Mary Watzin and Colden Baxter for their collaborative efforts.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Mažeika P. Sullivan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sullivan, S.M.P., Vierling, K.T. Experimental and Ecological Implications of Evening Bird Surveys in Stream-Riparian Ecosystems. Environmental Management 44, 789–799 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-009-9318-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-009-9318-4

Keywords

  • Aquatic-terrestrial energy transfers
  • Bird assemblage diversity and composition
  • Guild
  • Riverscape
  • Surveys