Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of Mowing Artemisia tridentata ssp. wyomingensis on Winter Habitat for Wildlife

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mowing is commonly implemented to Artemisia tridentata ssp. wyomingensis (Beetle & A. Young) S.L. Welsh (Wyoming big sagebrush) plant communities to improve wildlife habitat, increase forage production for livestock, and create fuel breaks for fire suppression. However, information detailing the influence of mowing on winter habitat for wildlife is lacking. This information is crucial because many wildlife species depended on A. tridentata spp. wyomingensis plant communities for winter habitat and consume significant quantities of Artemisia during this time. Furthermore, information is generally limited describing the recovery of A. tridentata spp. wyomingensis to mowing and the impacts of mowing on stand structure. Stand characteristics and Artemisia leaf tissue crude protein (CP), acid detergent fiber (ADF), and neutral detergent fiber (NDF) concentrations were measured in midwinter on 0-, 2-, 4-, and 6-year-old fall-applied mechanical (mowed at 20 cm height) treatments and compared to adjacent untreated (control) areas. Mowing compared to the control decreased Artemisia cover, density, canopy volume, canopy elliptical area, and height (P < 0.05), but all characteristics were recovering (P < 0.05). Mowing A. tridentata spp. wyomingensis plant communities slightly increases the nutritional quality of Artemisia leaves (P < 0.05), but it simultaneously results in up to 20 years of decrease in Artemisia structural characteristics. Because of the large reduction in A. tridentata spp. wyomingensis for potentially 20 years following mowing, mowing should not be applied in Artemisia facultative and obligate wildlife winter habitat. Considering the decline in A. tridentata spp. wyomingensis-dominated landscapes, we caution against mowing these communities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson EW, Borman MM, Krueger WC (1998) The ecological provinces of Oregon: a treatise on the basic ecological geography of the state. Oregon Agricultural Experiment Station, Corvallis

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin DD, Urness PJ (1983) Overwinter forage selection by mule deer on a seeded big sagebrush-grass range. Journal of Wildlife Management 47:1203–1207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck JL, Connelly JW, Reese KP (in press) Recovery of greater sage-grouse habitat features in Wyoming big sagebrush following prescribed fire. Restoration Ecology

  • Beck JL, Mitchell DL (2000) Influences of livestock grazing on sage grouse habitat. Wildlife Society Bulletin 28:993–1002

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke IC, Reiners WA, Olson RK (1989) Togographic control in a mountain big sagebrush steppe. Vegetation 84:77–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canfield RH (1941) Application of the line interception methods in sampling range vegetation. Journal of Forestry 39:388–394

    Google Scholar 

  • Connelly JW, Schroeder MA, Sands AR, Braun CE (2000) Guidelines to manage sage grouse populations and their habitats. Wildlife Society Bulletin 28:967–985

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford JA, Olson RA, West NE et al (2004) Ecology and management of sage-grouse and sage-grouse habitat. Journal of Range Management 57:2–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlgren DK, Chi R, Messmer TA (2006) Greater sage-grouse response to sagebrush management in Utah. Wildlife Society Bulletin 34:975–985

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies KW, Bates JD, Miller RF (2007) Short-term effects of burning Wyoming big sagebrush steppe in southeast Oregon. Rangeland Ecology and Management 60:515–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies KW, Sheley RL, Bates JD (2008) Does fall prescribed burning Artemisia tridentata steppe promote invasion or resistance to invasion? Journal of Arid Environments 72:1076–1085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goering HK, Van Soest PJ (1970) Forage fiber analyses (apparatus, reagents, procedures, and some applications). Agricultural handbook no. 379. United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Washington, DC

  • Green JS, Flinders JT (1980) Habitat and dietary relationships of pygmy rabbits. Journal of Range Management 33:136–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedrick DW, Hyder DN, Sneva FA, Poulton CE (1966) Ecological response of sagebrush-grass range in central Oregon to mechanical and chemical removal of Artemisia. Ecology 47:432–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Homer CG, Edwards TC, Ramsey RD, Price KP (1993) Use of remote sensing methods in modeling sage grouse winter habitat. Journal of Wildlife Management 57:78–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Küchler AW (1970) Potential natural vegetation. In: Gerlach AC (ed) The national atlas of U.S.A. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, pp 90–91

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCracken JG, Hansen RM (1981) Diets of domestic sheep and other large herbivores in southcentral Colorado. Journal of Range Management 34:242–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marschner H (1998) Mineral nutrition of higher plants, 2nd edn. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason E (1952) Food habitats and measurements of Hart Mountain antelope. Journal of Wildlife Management 16:387–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller RF, Eddleman LL (2000) Spatial and temporal changes of sage grouse habitat in the sagebrush biome. Technical bulletin 151. Oregon State University, Corvallis

  • Miller R, Heyerdahl EK (2008) Fine-scale variation of historical fire regimes in sagebrush-steppe and juniper woodland: an example from California, USA. International Journal of Wildland Fire 17:245–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller RF, Rose JA (1999) Fire history and western juniper encroachment in sagebrush steppe. Journal of Range Management 52:550–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller RF, Shultz LM (1987) Development and longevity of ephemeral and perennial leaves on Artemisia tridentata Nutt. ssp. wyomingensis. Great Basin Naturalist 47:227–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller RF, Svejcar TJ, West NE (1994) Implications of livestock grazing in the Intermountain sagebrush region: plant composition. In: Vavra M, Laycock WA, Pleper RD (eds) Ecological implications of livestock herbivory in the West. Society of Range Management, Denver, pp 101–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueggler WF, Blaisdell JP (1958) Effects on associated species of burning, rotobeating, spraying and railing sagebrush. Journal of Range Management 11:61–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oregon Climatic Service (2007) Climate data. http://www.ocs.oregonstate.edu/index.html. Accessed 27 Feb 2007

  • Patterson RL (1952) The sage grouse in Wyoming. Sage Books, Denver

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid RL, Jung GA, Thayne WV (1988) Relationships between nutritive quality and fiber components of cool season and warm season forages: a retrospective study. Journal of Animal Science 66:1275–1291

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rittenhouse LR, Sneva FA (1977) A technique for estimating big sagebrush production. Journal of Range Management 30:68–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson JB, Van Soest PJ (1981) The detergent system of analyses and its application to human foods. In: James WPT, Theander O (eds) The analysis of dietary fiber. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 123–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiflet TN (1994) Rangeland cover types of the Unites States. Society for Range Management, Denver

    Google Scholar 

  • Shipley LA, Davila TB, Thines NJ, Elias BA (2006) Nutritional requirements and diet choices of the pygmy rabbit (Bachylagus idahoensis): a sagebrush specialist. Journal of Chemical Ecology 32:2455–2474

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens R, Monson SB (2004) Guidelines for restoration and rehabilitation of principal plant communities. In Monson SB, Stevens R, Shaw NL (comps) Restoring western ranges and wildlands. General technical report RMRS-GTR-136-vol-1. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. Ft. Collins, pp 199–258

  • Urness PJ (1979) Wildlife habitat manipulation in sagebrush ecosystems. In: The sagebrush ecosystem: a symposium, April 1978. College of Natural Resources, Utah State University, Logan, pp 169–178

  • Wallestead RO, Peterson JG, Eng RL (1975) Foods of adult sage grouse in central Montana. Journal of Wildlife Management 39:628–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wambolt CL (1996) Mule deer and elk foraging preference for 4 sagebrush taxa. Journal of Range Management 49:499–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wambolt CL (2004) Browsing and plant age relationships to winter protein and fiber of big sagebrush subspecies. Journal of Range Management 57:620–623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wambolt CL, Payne GF (1986) An 18-year comparison of control methods for Wyoming big sagebrush in southwestern Montana. Journal of Range Management 39:314–319

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Watts MJ, Wambolt CL (1996) Long-term recovery of Wyoming big sagebrush after four treatments. Journal of Environmental Management 46:95–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welch BL, McArthur ED (1979) Variation in winter levels of crude protein among Artemisia tridentata subspecies grown in a uniform garden. Journal of Range Management 32:467–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West NE (1983) Great Basin–Colorado Plateau sagebrush semi-desert and Western intermountain sagebrush stepp. In: West NE (ed) Ecosystems of the world: temperate deserts and semi-deserts, vol 5. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, pp 331–374

    Google Scholar 

  • West NE (2000) Synecology and disturbance regimes of sagebrush steppe ecosystems. In: Entwistle PG, DeBolt AM, Kaltenecker JH, Steenhof K (eds) (comps) Proceedings: sagebrush steppe ecosystem symposium. BLM/ID/PT-001001+1150. USDI Bureau of Land Management, Boise, pp 15–26

  • West NE, Young JA (2000) Intermountain valleys and lower mountain slopes. In: Barbour MG, Billing WD (eds) North American terrestrial vegetation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 255–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright HA, Bailey AW (1982) Fire ecology: United States and southern Canada. Wiley, New York, pp 159–160

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Research was supported by the Agricultural Research Service and treatments were applied by the Bureau of Land Management. The authors are grateful to Kristen Munday and Georjanna Pokorney for assisting with collecting data. The authors also appreciate the assistance that Mike McGee, Nick Miller, and Matt Obradovich (Bureau of Land Management Wildlife Biologists) provided in locating all of the treatment areas. Thoughtful reviews were provided by Dr. Chad Boyd, Mitch Willis, and anonymous reviewers. Mention of a proprietary product does not constitute a guarantee or warranty of the product by USDA, Oregon State University, or the authors and does not imply its approval to the exclusion of other products.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kirk W. Davies.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Davies, K.W., Bates, J.D., Johnson, D.D. et al. Influence of Mowing Artemisia tridentata ssp. wyomingensis on Winter Habitat for Wildlife. Environmental Management 44, 84–92 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-008-9258-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-008-9258-4

Keywords

Navigation