Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Integrating Conservation and Development at the National Marine Park of Alonissos, Northern Sporades, Greece: Perception and Practice

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Available information on the socioeconomic implications of marine protected areas (MPAs) for the socioculturally diverse Mediterranean region is scant. The National Marine Park of Alonissos, Northern Sporades (NMPANS), Greece was established in 1992 as a foundation for the conservation of the endangered Mediterranean monk seal Monachus monachus. The evolution of the degree of acceptance of and satisfaction from the NMPANS by involved stakeholder groups (fishermen, tourism operators, hoteliers and owners of rooms to let, governmental bodies, nongovernmental bodies, students, domestic and foreign tourists) were investigated 13 years after its establishment using written questionnaires delivered during personal interviews. The initial positive attitude of local professionals for the NMPANS has eroded due to the unsatisfactory fulfillment of expectations for socioeconomic development. Fishermen expressed dissatisfaction with, mistrust toward, and a reluctancy to communicate with the NMPANS’s management body. They believe that the fishery areas have decreased in actual geographic area because of the prohibitive measures; fish stocks are declining; compensation for damage to fishery equipment by the Mediterranean monk seal and for the prohibitive measures should be provided; and stricter enforcement of regulations should take place. On the other hand, tourism operators, who organize trips for tourists to the NMPANS, unanimously reported direct economic benefits. Furthermore, there was a disparity in the perception of socioeconomic benefits derived from the NMPANS between governmental bodies and local stakeholders. The governmental bodies and the nongovernmental organization MOm-Hellenic Society for the Study and Protection of the Monk Seal postulated that there had been considerable socioeconomic benefits for the local community of Alonissos due to the establishment of the NMPANS, whereas the local nongovernmental organization Ecological and Cultural Movement of Alonissos claimed benefits were scant. Tourists (domestic and foreign) believe that the NMPANS is not the main attraction to Alonissos Island but is part of a composite, including serenity, aesthetic beauty, and small-scale tourism development, which can turn Alonissos Island into an ideal eco-tourism destination; a common aspiration for both the tourists and the local community by general consensus. The aim of the NMPANS to integrate conservation and development lies in (1) the effectiveness of the NMPANS management body in formulating a strategic management plan that would accommodate stakeholders’ interests and aspirations and (2) a national policy of conservation and enhancement of natural resources with consistency and continuity. Quantitative assessment of the socioeconomic effectiveness of the Mediterranean MPAs using a common methodology would facilitate the identification of intraregional variation and better planning for the network of MPAs in the Mediterranean.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agardy T (2000) Information needs for marine protected areas: scientific and societal. Bulletin of Marine Science 66(3):875–888

    Google Scholar 

  • Agardy T, Bridgewater P, Crosby MP et al (2003) Dangerous targets? Unresolved issues and ideological clashes around marine protected areas. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 13(4):353–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alban F, Appéré G, Boncoeur J (2006) Economic analysis of marine protected Areas. A literature review. EMPAFISH Project, Booklet No. 3. Available from http://www.um.es/empafish/files/EMPAFISH%20Booklet%20WP3.pdf

  • Alder J (1996) Have tropical marine protected areas worked? An initial analysis of their success. Coastal Management 24:97–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson JEC, Ngazi Z (1995) Marine resource use and the establishment of a marine park: Mafia island, Tanzania. Ambio 24(7–8):475–481

    Google Scholar 

  • Androukaki E, Chatzispyrou A, Adamantopoulou S et al (2006) Investigating the causes of death in monk seals, stranded in coastal Greece (1986–2005). Poster presented at the 20th European Cetacean Society Conference, Gdynia, Poland, 2–6 April 2006. Available from http://www.monachus-guardian.org/library/androu06a.pdf

  • Appeldoorn RS, Lindeman KC (2003) A Caribbean-wide survey of no-take marine reserves: spatial coverage and attributes of effectiveness. Gulf and Caribbean Research 14(2):139–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Badalamenti F, Ramos AA, Voultsiadou E et al (2000) Cultural and socio-economic impact of Mediterranean marine protected areas. Environmental Conservation 27(2):110–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Botetzagias I (2001) Nobody does it better: intra-movement conflict concerning species conservation in Greece. ECPR Joint Sessions, Workshop 10 “Environmental Politics at the Local Level.” Grenoble, France

  • Brown NA (1997) Devolution of authority over the management of rersources: the Soufriere Marine Management Area, St. Lucia. CARICAD and CANARI. CANARI Technical Report No. 243

  • Brown K (2002) Innovations for conservation and development. Geographical Journal 168(1):6–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Βrunckhorst DJ, Bridgwater PB (1995) Marine bioregional planning: a strategic framework for identifying marine reserve networks, and planning sustainable use and management. Proceedings of the symposium on marine protected areas and sustainable fisheries conducted at the second international conference on science and the management of protected areas. Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

  • Burke L, Selig L, Spalding M (2002) Reefs at risk in Southeast Asia. The World Resources Institute, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldecott J (1996) Designing conservation projects. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • CANARI (2001) Review of Jamaica’s protected areas system and recommendations on the way forward. Caribbean Natural Resources Institute in collaboration with the Negril Area Environmental Protection Trust. CANARI Technical Report No. 296

  • Carter DW (2003) Protected areas in marine resource management: another look at the economics and research issues. Ocean and Coastal Management 46:439–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chape S (2005) Systematic assignment of protected area management categories: an opportunity for achieving a measurable framework. Parks 14(3):51–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Cognetti G (1990) Conservation of marine environments in the Mediterranean. Marine Pollution Bulletin 21(3):115–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Da Silva PP (2004) From common property to co-management: lessons from Brazil’s maritime extractive reserve. Marine Policy 28:419–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dikou A (1995) National marine parks in Greece. MSc dissertation. University of Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon JA (1993) Economic benefits of marine protected areas. Oceanus 36(3):35–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon JA, Scura LF, van’t Hof T (1993) Meeting ecological and economic goals: marine parks in the Caribbean. Ambio 22(2/3):117–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrow S (1996) Marine protected areas emerging economics. Marine Policy 20(6):439–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandes L (1995) Integrating economic, environmental and social issues in an evaluation of Saba Marine Park, Netherlands Antilles, Caribbean Sea. Report to Saba Marine Park, Saba Conservation Foundation, and Saba Executive Council

  • Fiske SJ (1992) Sociocultural aspects of establishing marine protected areas. Ocean and Coastal Management 18:25–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • General Secretariat of National Statistical Service of Greece (2001). Search engine (in Greek). Available from http://www.statistics.gr

  • Geoghegan T, Renard Y (2002) Beyond community involvement: lessons from the insular Caribbean. Parks 12(2):16–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Geoghegan T, Smith AH, Thacker K (2001) Characterization of Caribbean marine protected areas: an analysis of ecological, organisational and socio-economic factors. CANARI Technical Report No. 287

  • GESAMP (2001) Protecting the oceans from land-based activities: land-based sources and activities affecting the quality and uses of the marine, coastal and associated freshwater environment. Rep. Stud. No. 71. Available from http://www.gesamp.imo.org/no71/index.htm

  • Goodwin H (1996) In pursuit of ecotourism. Biodiversity and Conservation 5(3):277–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greek Community Support Framework (2006) North Aegean Regional Operational Programme 2000–2006. Retrieved July 2, 2006, from http://www.hellaskps.gr/Details2_en.asp?L1=8&L2=1&L3=1&L4=2&L5=11

  • Hassan R, Scholes R, Ash N (eds) (2005) Millennium ecosystem assessment, Island Press, Washington DC. Available from http://www.millenniumassessment.org/en/Condition.aspx

  • Herwijnen M, van Janssen R, Nijkamp P (1993) A multi-criteria decision support model and geo-graphic information system for sustainable development planning of the Greek Islands. Project Appraisal 8:9–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilton-Taylor C (compiler) (2000) IUCN red list of threatened species. International Union for the Conservation of Nature, Cambridge

  • Himes AH (2003) Opinions of artisanal fishers and sociocultural effects in two MPA case studies. Coastal Management 31:389–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hjort J (1914) Fluctuations in the great fisheries of northern Europe. Rapp. P.-V. Reun. Conseil Permanent pour l’Exploration de la Mer 20 pp 1–227

  • Jameson SC, Tupper MH, Ridley JM (2002) The three screen doors: can marine protected areas be effective? Marine Pollution Bulletin 44(11):1177–1183

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • van den Bergh JCJM, Nijkamp P (1994) An integrated dynamic model for economic development and natural environment: an application to the Greek Sporades Islands. Annals of Operations Research 54:143–174

  • Johnson WM (ed) (2000) The numbers game. The Monachus Guardian 3:5

  • Karamanlidis AA, Dendrinos P, Tounta E, Kotomatas S (2004) Monitoring Human activity in an area dedicated to the protection of the endangered Mediterranean monk seal. Coastal Management 32:293–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelleher GC, Bleakley C, Wells SA (1995) Global representative system of marine protected areas, vol 1. Antarctic, Arctic, Mediterranean, Northwest Atlantic and Baltic. The World Bank, Washington, DC

  • Ladakis M, Skoullos, M. Dassenakis M (2003) Water quality in a Mediterranean marine protected area (North Sporades Islands, Greece). Chemistry and Ecology 19(1):47–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Mascia MB (1999) Governance of marine protected areas in the wider Caribbean: preliminary results of an international mail survey. Coastal Management 27(4):391–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClanahan TR (1999) Is there a future for coral reef parks in poor tropical countries? Coral Reefs 18:321–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClanahan TR, Davies J, Maina J (2005a) Factors influencing resource users and managers’ perceptions towards marine protected area management in Kenya. Environmental Conservation 32(1):42–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClanahan TR, Maina J, Davies J (2005b) Perceptions of resource users and managers towards fisheries management options in Kenyan corals reefs. Fisheries Management and Ecology 12:105–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClanahan TR, Mangi S (2000) Spillover of exploitable fishes from a marine park and its effect on the adjacent fishery. Ecological Applications 10:1792–1805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McField M (2000) Evaluation of management effectiveness: Belize marine protected areas system. Report to the Coastal Zone Management Authority and Institute, Belize

  • MedPan (2005) The Directory of Mediterranean marine protected areas by country. Available from http://www.medpan.org/?arbo=aires-marines-protegees-par-pays

  • MOm (2007) Status of the population of the Mediterranean monk seal Monachus monachus in Greece. January 2007, pp 40 (in Greek)

  • Ministry of Environment and Public Works (2002) Special environmental study of the Protected Area of the National Marine Park of Alonissos, Northern Sporades. Ministry of Environment and Public Works, Athens

  • Μundet L, Ribera L (2001) Characteristics of divers at a Spanish resort. Tourism Management 22:501–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray GD (2005) Multifaceted measures of success in two Mexican marine protected areas. Society and Natural Resources 18:889–905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norse EA (ed) (1993) Global marine biological diversity: a strategy for building conservation into decision making. Island Press, Washington, DC

  • Ogden JC (1997) Marine managers look upstream for connections. Science 278:1414–1415

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oracion EG, Miller ML, Christie P (2005) Marine protected areas for whom? Fisheries, tourism and solidarity in a Philippine community. Ocean and Coastal Management 48:393–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papageorgiou K, Vogiatzakis IN (2006) Nature protection in Greece: an appraisal of the factors shaping integrative conservation and policy effectiveness. Environmental Science and Policy 9:476–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollnac RB, Crawford BR, Gorospe MLG (2002) Discovering factors that influence the success of community-based marine protected areas in the Visayas, Philippines. Ocean and Coastal Management 44:683–710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pomeroy RS (1995) Community-based and co-management institutions for sustainable coastal fisheries management in Southeast Asia. Ocean and Coastal Management 27:143–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pomeroy RS, Mascia MB, Pollnac RB (2006) Marine protected areas: the social dimension. FAO Expert Workshop on Marine Protected Areas and Fisheries Management: Review of issues and considerations, 12–14 June 2006, pp 149–181. Avaialble from ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/010/a1061e/a1061e03.pdf

  • Pomeroy RS, Parks JE, Watson LM (2004) How is your MPA doing? A guidebook of natural and social indicators for evaluating marine protected area management effectiveness. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland. Available from http://www.effectivempa.noaa.gov/guidebook/guidebook/html

  • Post JC (1992) The economic feasibility and ecological sustainability of the Bonaire marine park. Paper prepared for the World Parks Congress Organized by the IUCN, Caracas, 10–21 February 1992

  • Post JC (1994) The economic feasibility and ecological sustainability of the Bonaire Marine Park, Dutch Antilles. In: Munasinghe M, McNeely J (eds) Protected area economics and policy: linking conservation and sustainable development. World Bank and World Conservation Union, Washington, DC, pp 333–338

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts CM (1997) Connectivity and management of Caribbean coral reefs. Science 278(5342):1454–1457

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts CM, Bohnsack JA, Gell F, Hawkins JP, Goodridge R (2001) Effects of marine reserves on adjacent fisheries. Science 294:1920–1923

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rudd MA, Danylchuk AJ, Gore SA, Tupper MH (2001) Are marine protected areas in the Turks and Caicos Islands ecologically and economically valuable? Proceedings of the International Conference on the Economics of Marine Protected Areas Fisheries Center Research Reports 9(8):198–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Russ GR, Alcala AC (1996) Do marine reserves export adult fish biomass? Evidence from Apo Island, Central Philippines. Marine Ecology Progress Series 132:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russ GR, Alcala AC (1999) Management histories of Sumilon and Apo Marine Reserves, Philippines, and their influence on national marine resource policy. Coral Reefs 18:307–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchirico JN, Cochran KA, Emerson PM (2002) Marine protected areas: economic and social implications. Discussion Paper, Resources for the Future, Washington DC, pp 2–26

  • Scoullos M, Mantzara M, Constantianos V (1994) The book-directory for the mediterranean monk seal (Monachus monachus) in Greece. Contract with the CEU DGXI, 4-3010(92)7829, Athens

  • Sheppard CRC (2000) Seas at the millennium: an environmental evaluation, vol I–III. Elsevier Science, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Suman D, Shivlani M, Milon JW (1999) Perceptions and attitudes regarding marine reserves: a comparison of stakeholder groups in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. Ocean and Coastal Management 42:1019–1040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor N, Buckenham B (2003) Social impacts of marine reserves in New Zealand. Science for Conservation No. 217. Department of Conservation, New Zealand

    Google Scholar 

  • Trakolis D (2001a) Local people’s perceptions of planning and management issues in Prespes Lakes National Park, Greece. Journal of Environmental Management 61:227–241

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Trakolis D (2001b) Perceptions, preferences, and reactions of local inhabitants in Vikos-Aoos National Park, Greece. Environmental Management 28(5):665–676

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Trivourea M (2001) Socio-economic impacts of national parks on local human communities. M.Sc. dissertation, Institute of Ecology and Resource Management and the Scottish Agricultural College, University of Edinburgh

  • United Nations (2002) World summit on sustainable development. General Assembly. Available from http://www.earthsummit2002.org/resolution.pdf

  • van’t Hof T (1998) Social and economic impacts of marine protected areas: a study and analysis of selected cases in the Caribbean. CANARI Technical Report No. 252

  • Walpole MJ, Goodwin HJ (2001) Local attitudes towards conservation and tourism around Komodo National Park, Indonesia. Environmental Conservation 28(2):160–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walpole MJ, Goodwin HJ (2000) Local economic impacts of dragon tourism in Indonesia. Annals of Tourism Research 27:559–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver DB (2002) The evolving concept of ecotourism and its potential impacts. International Journal of Sustainable Development 5(3):251–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank all respondents, who dedicated time, experience, and information during the interviews. We also thank Spyros Kotomatas (MOm), Giannis Vlaikos (OIPOKA), Tundi Agardy, and three anonymous reviewers for valuable comments on the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Environment, University of the Aegean, Mytilene, 81100, Greece

    Zoi-Sylvia Oikonomou & Angela Dikou

Authors
  1. Zoi-Sylvia Oikonomou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Angela Dikou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Angela Dikou.

Appendix

Appendix

The demographic profile of respondents and responses to selected questions addressed during face-to-face interviews are presented in tabular format.

Table 1 Percent frequency distribution of respondents within stakeholder and age group categories
Full size table
Table 2 Percentage distribution of responses to questions pertaining to long-term acceptance of the NMPANS
Full size table
Table 3 Percentage distribution of responses to questions pertaining to satisfaction from the NMPANS
Full size table
Table 4 Percentage distribution of responses to questions pertaining to perceived social and environmental benefits derived from the NMPANS
Full size table
Table 5 Percentage distribution of responses to questions pertaining to perceived economic benefits derived from the NMPANS
Full size table
Table 6 Percentage distribution of responses to questions pertaining to tourism and the NMPANS
Full size table
Table 7 Percentage distribution of responses to questions pertaining to tourists’ perception of the NMPANS
Full size table
Table 8 Percentage distribution of responses to questions pertaining to management of the NMPANS
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Oikonomou, ZS., Dikou, A. Integrating Conservation and Development at the National Marine Park of Alonissos, Northern Sporades, Greece: Perception and Practice. Environmental Management 42, 847–866 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-008-9163-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-008-9163-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation