Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Making Capacity Building Meaningful: A Framework for Strategic Action

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper aims to give practical meaning to ‘capacity building’ through (a) identifying a suite of practical measures, such as mentoring or best practice guidelines, that have been shown to or are considered to build human, social, institutional, and economic capital; (b) placing these measures within a broader systems framework; and (c) exploring stakeholder feedback on specific measures to inform framework implementation. The 29 measures described provide actors, whether government or nongovernment, with a suite of practical investment choices for building capacity. These measures are then clustered into eight groups according to their primary purpose and placed within a systems framework. The framework provides a tool for actors with responsibilities for or an interest in capacity building to inform more holistic and strategic targeting of effort and investment. Stakeholder feedback gathered through surveys and workshops is subsequently reported to further inform implementation of specific measures within the framework’s eight groupings. The framework presented may be built upon through the identification and inclusion of further capacity building measures. The research is conducted within the context of decentralized governance arrangements for natural resource management (NRM), with specific focus on Australia’s recently formalized 56 NRM regions and their community-based governing boards as an informative arena of learning. Application of the framework is explored in the Australian setting through the identification and comparison of measures supported and most preferred by four major stakeholder groups, namely board members, regional NRM organization staff, policy/research interests, and Indigenous interests. The research also examines stakeholder perceptions of capacity issues, and whether these issues are likely to be addressed through implementing their preferred measures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Notes

  1. An additional five reports were provided to or requested by other regional NRM organization staff.

  2. Seven members of Southern Rivers CMA (New South Wales) provided one aggregated survey response (n=1).

References

  • ACIL Tasman (2005) Institutional arrangements in the Australian water sector. National Water Commission, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Agriculture and Food Policy Reference Group (2006) Creating our future: agriculture and food policy for the next generation. ABARE, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Armitage D (2005) Adaptive capacity and community-based natural resource management. Environmental Management 35:703–715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Australian Government (2008) Caring for our country. Available at: http://www.nrm.gov.au/publications/factsheets/pubs/cfoc-general.pdf. Accessed May 2, 2008

  • Australian Government (no date) Natural resource management facilitator network: helping communities work with governments. Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry and Department of Environment and Heritage, Canberra

  • Bakker K (2007) Commons or commodity? In: Bakker K (ed) Eau Canada: the future of Canada’s water. UBC Press, Vancouver, pp 359–368

    Google Scholar 

  • Barg S, Oborne B (2006) Adaptive poilcy case study: analysis of Manitoba's conservation district policy. In: Designing policies in a world of uncertainty, change, and surprise: adaptive policy-making for agriculture and water resources in the face of climate change: phase 1 research report, pp 117–150. International Institute for Sustainable Development and the Energy and Resources Institute, Winnipeg, Manitoba, and New Delhi, India. Available at: http://www.iisd.org/climate/vulnerability/policy.asp. Accessed May 25, 2008

  • Blomquist W, Calbick KS, Dinar A (2007) Canada: Fraser Basin. In: Kemper KE, Blomquist W, Dinar A (eds) Integrated river basin management through decentralization. Springer, Heidelberg, Germany, pp 131–147

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw B (2003) Questioning the credibility and capacity of community-based resource management. Canadian Geographer 47:137–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broderick K (2005) Communities in catchments: implications for natural resource management. Geographical Research 43:286–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commonwealth of Australia (2001) National action plan for salinity and water quality. Agriculture, Fisheries & Forestry Australia, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Commonwealth of Australia (2002) National natural resource management capacity building framework. Departments of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, and Environment and Heritage, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Connor R, Dovers S (2004) Institutional change for sustainable development. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Australian Governments (2000) Our vital resources: a national action plan for salinity & water quality. Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson J, Lockwood M, Curtis A, Stratford E, Griffith R (2007) NRM governance in Australia: NRM programs and governance structures. School of Geography & Environmental Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart

    Google Scholar 

  • de Loe R, Kreutzwiser R (2007) Challenging the status quo. In: Bakker K (ed) Eau Canada: the future of Canada’s water. UBC Press, Vancouver, pp 85–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Dore J, Woodhill J (1999) Sustainable regional development: final report: an Australia-wide study of regionalism highlighting efforts to improve the community, economy and environment. Greening Australia, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekins P (1992) A four-capital model of wealth creation. In: Edkins P, Max-Neef M (eds) Real-life economics: understanding wealth creation. Routledge, London, pp 147–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrelly M (2005) Regionalisation of environmental management: a case study of the natural heritage trust, South Australia. Geographical Research 43:393–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flora CB, Flora JL (2008) Rural communities: legacy and change, 3rd edn. Westview Press, Boulder, CO

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooper BP, Lant C (2007) Integrated, adaptive watershed management. In: Hanna KS, Slocombe DS (eds) Integrated resource and environmental management: concepts and practice. Oxford University Press, Toronto, pp 97–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchcroft PD (2001) Centralization and decentralization in administration and politics: assesing territorial dimensions of power and authority. Governance: An International Journal of Environmental Policy and Administration 14:23–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Ison R, Watson D (2007) Illuminating the possibilities for social learning in the management of Scotland’s water. Ecology and Society 12:21

    Google Scholar 

  • Ison RL, Steyaert P, Roggero PP, Hubert B, Jiggins J (2004) Social learning for the integrated management and sustainable use of water at catchment scale (EVK1-2000-00695SLIM). Final Report. DG Research, Brussels

  • ITS Global (2006) Evaluation of the bilateral agreements for the regional component of the natural heritage trust of Australia: final report. ITS Global, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivey JL, Smithers J, de Loe RC, Kreutzwiser RD (2004) Community capacity for adaptation to climate-induced water shortages: linking institutional complexity and local actors. Environmental Management 33:36–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jennings SF, Moore SA (2000) The rhetoric behind regionalization in Australian natural resource management: myth, reality and moving forward. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 2:177–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kellert SR, Mehta JN, Eddin S, Lichtenfeld LL (2000) Community natural resource management: promise, rhetoric, and reality. Society and Natural Resources 13:705–715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keogh K, Chant D, Frazer B (2006) Review of arrangements for regional delivery of natural resource management programmes: final report. Ministerial Reference Group for Future NRM Programme Delivery, Departments of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry and Environment and Heritage, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane MB, McDonald GT, Morrison TH (2004) Decentralisation and environmental management in Australia: a comment on the prescriptions of The Wentworth Group. Australian Geographical Studies 42:103–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall GR (2007) Nesting, subsidiarity, and community-based environmental governance beyond the local level. Occasional Paper 2007/01. Institute for Rural Futures, University of New England, Armidale, NSW

  • Michaels S, McCarthy D, Goucher NP (2007) Information management for water resources: concepts and practice. In: Hanna KS, Slocombe DS (eds) Integrated resource and environmental management: concepts and practice. Oxford University Press, Toronto, pp 220–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore SA, Rockloff SF (2006) Organizing regionally for natural resource management in Australia: reflections on agency and government. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 8:259–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore SA, Severn RC, Millar R (2006) A conceptual model of community capacity for biodiversity conservation outcomes. Geographical Research 44(4):361–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Natural Resource Management Ministerial Council (2002) Framework for the extension of the natural heritage trust. Environment Australia & Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Australia, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Natural Resources Commission (2005) Standard for quality natural resource management. Natural Resources Commission, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • Paton S, Curtis A, McDonald GT, Woods M (2004) Regional natural resource management: is it sustainable? Australasian Journal of Environmental Management 11(4):259–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Porritt J (2007) Capitalism as if the world matters. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribot JC (2002) Democratic decentralization of natural resources: institutionalizing popular participation. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Robins L (2007a) Major paradigm shifts in NRM in Australia. International Journal of Global Environmental Issues 7:300–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robins L (2007b) Capacity-building for natural resource management: lessons from the health sector. EcoHealth 4:247–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robins L (2007c) Enabling regional NRM Boards: a discussion paper on capacity building options. Centre for Resource and Environmental Studies, Australian National University, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Robins L (2008) An outsider’s view: examining risk and emergency management for lessons on capacity building for the natural resources sector. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management 15:16–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Robins L, Dovers S (2007a) NRM regions in Australia: the ‘haves’ and the ‘have nots.’ Geographical Research 45:273–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robins L, Dovers S (2007b) Community NRM Boards of management: are they up to the task? Australasian Journal of Environmental Management 14:111–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair Knight Merz (2006) Evaluation of salinity outcomes of regional investment: final report. Prepared for department of the environment and heritage and department of agriculture, fisheries and forestry. Sinclair Knight Merz, Bendigo, Victoria

  • Steering Committee to Australian Governments (1999) Managing natural resources in rural Australia for a sustainable future: a discussion paper for developing a national policy. Steering Committee to Australian Governments, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Steering Committee to Australian Governments (2000) Report to Australian Governments on the public response to managing natural resources in rural Australia for a sustainable future: a discussion paper for developing a national policy. Steering Committee to Australian Governments, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • WalterTurnbull (2005) Evaluation of current governance arrangements to support regional investment under the NHT and NAP. Departments of Environment and Heritage and Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I wish to acknowledge and thank respondents to the national survey, and those who participated in workshops, including Mike Williams (Michael Williams & Associates) for his skilled facilitation of the national workshop. I acknowledge and thank Professor Stephen Dovers, Professor Val Brown and Dr. Richard Baker (The Fenner School of Environment and Society, Australian National University) for their advice and guidance. The generous support of the Department of Education, Science and Training (Australian Postgraduate Award), Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation (Postgraduate Research Scholarship), The Wentworth Group of Concerned Scientists (Science Program Scholarship), Land & Water Australia—Knowledge for Regional NRM Project and Social Institutional Research Program (support for consultation processes), and Australian Government NRM Team through the Natural Heritage Trust (support for consultation processes and publication of the discussion paper) is also recognized.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Fenner School of Environment and Society, Australian National University, W. K. Hancock Building (No. 43), Biology Place, Acton, Canberra, 0200, Australia

    Lisa Robins

Authors
  1. Lisa Robins
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lisa Robins.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Robins, L. Making Capacity Building Meaningful: A Framework for Strategic Action. Environmental Management 42, 833–846 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-008-9158-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-008-9158-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation