Skip to main content

Scenario Modeling Potential Eco-Efficiency Gains from a Transition to Organic Agriculture: Life Cycle Perspectives on Canadian Canola, Corn, Soy, and Wheat Production


We used Life Cycle Assessment to scenario model the potential reductions in cumulative energy demand (both fossil and renewable) and global warming, acidifying, and ozone-depleting emissions associated with a hypothetical national transition from conventional to organic production of four major field crops [canola (Brassica rapa), corn (Zea mays), soy (Glycine max), and wheat (Triticum aestivum)] in Canada. Models of these systems were constructed using a combination of census data, published values, and the requirements for organic production described in the Canadian National Organic Standards in order to be broadly representative of the similarities and differences that characterize these disparate production technologies. Our results indicate that organic crop production would consume, on average, 39% as much energy and generate 77% of the global warming emissions, 17% of the ozone-depleting emissions, and 96% of the acidifying emissions associated with current national production of these crops. These differences were almost exclusively due to the differences in fertilizers used in conventional and organic farming and were most strongly influenced by the higher cumulative energy demand and emissions associated with producing conventional nitrogen fertilizers compared to the green manure production used for biological nitrogen fixation in organic agriculture. Overall, we estimate that a total transition to organic production of these crops in Canada would reduce national energy consumption by 0.8%, global warming emissions by 0.6%, and acidifying emissions by 1.0% but have a negligible influence on reducing ozone-depleting emissions.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2


  1. Alexandratos N (1999) World food and agriculture: outlook for the medium and longer term. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 96:5908–5914

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Badgley C, Moghtader J, Quintero E et al (2007) Organic agriculture and the global food supply. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 22:86–108

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bhat M, English B, Turhollow A et al (1994) Energy in synthetic fertilizers and pesticides: revisited. NRNL/Sub/90-99732/2. National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brentrup F, Kusters J, Kuhlman H et al (2001) Application of the Life Cycle Assessment methodology to agricultural production: An example of sugar beet production with different forms of nitrogen fertilizers. European Journal of Agronomy 14:221–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Canadian General Standards Board (2006) Canada organic production systems permitted substances lists. Retrieved May, 2006, from

  6. Canadian Council of Ministers (2001) National action plan for the environmental control of ozone-depleting substances and their halocarbon alternatives: May 2001 update. Retrieved January, 2007, from

  7. CANSIM (2007) Average yield of principal field crops in Canada. Retrieved January, 2007, from

  8. Carpenter S, Caraco N, Correl D et al (1998) Non-point pollution of surface waters with phosphorus and nitrogen. Ecological Applications 8(3):559–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Carvalho F (2006) Agriculture, pesticides, food security and food safety. Environmental Science and Policy 9(7–8):685–692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cassman K (1999) Ecological intensification of cereal production systems: yield potential, soil quality, and precision agriculture. Proceedings of the National Academy of ScienceUSA 96:5952–5959

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. CML (2001) CML 2 Baseline Method 2000. Centre for Environmental Studies, University of Leiden, Netherlands

  12. Cox T, Glover J, Van Tassel D et al (2006) Prospects for developing perennial grain crops. BioScience 56(8):649–659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Crews T, Peoples M (2004) Legume versus fertilizer sources of nitrogen: ecological tradeoffs and human needs. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 102:279–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dobbie K, McTaggart I, Smith K (1999) Nitrous oxide emissions from intensive agricultural systems: variations between crops and seasons, key driving variables, and mean emission factors. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 105(21):26891–26899

    Google Scholar 

  15. EcoInvent (2007) Swiss centre for life cycle inventories. Available at

  16. El-Hage Scialabba N, Hattam C (eds) (2002) Organic agriculture, environment and food security. Environment and Natural Resources Service Sustainable Development Department, UNFAO, Rome. Retrieved September, 2005, from

  17. Environment Canada (2006) National Inventory Report 1990–2004: greenhouse gas sources and sinks in Canada. Retrieved January, 2007, from

  18. Environment Canada (2007) Acid rain and the facts. Retrieved January, 2007, from

  19. Ess D, Vaughan D, Luna J et al (1994) Energy and economic savings from the use of legume cover crops in Virginia corn production. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 9(4):178–185

    Google Scholar 

  20. Fournier J (1999) Pesticides: are they pests or blessing? Actualite Chimique 11:34–39

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gerhardt R (1997) A comparative analysis of the effects of organic and conventional farming systems on soil structure. Biological Agriculture and Horticulture 14:139–157

    Google Scholar 

  22. Guinee J, Gorree M, Heijungs R et al (2001) Life cycle assessment: an operational guide to the ISO Standards Part 2. Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and Environment, The Hague, Netherlands. Retrieved January, 2006, from

  23. Hall C, Klitgaard K (2006) The need for a new, biophysical-based paradigm in economics for the second half of the age of oil. International Journal of Transdisciplinary Research 1(1):4–22

    Google Scholar 

  24. Haas G, Wetterich F, Köpke U (2001) Comparing intensive, extensified and organic grassland farming in southern Germany by process life cycle assessment. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 83:43–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hoeppner J (2001) The effects of legume green manures, perennial forages, and cover crops on non-renewable energy use in western Canadian cropping systems. Master’s thesis, Department of Plant Science, University of Winnipeg, Canada

  26. Hoeppner J, Entz M, McConkey B et al (2006) Energy use and efficiency in two Canadian organic and conventional crop production systems. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 21:60–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. IPCC (2006) Guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. Intergovernmental panel on climate change. Retrieved September, 2006, from

  28. Jordan N, Boody G, Broussard W et al (2007) Environment: sustainable development of the agricultural bio-economy. Science 316(5831):1570–1571

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Killpack S, Buchholz D (1993) Nitrogen replacement value of legumes. University of Missouri Extension. Retrieved September, 2006, from

  30. Korol M (2002) Canadian fertilizer consumption shipments and trade 2001/2002. Agriculture and Agri-food Canada. Retrieved January, 2006, from

  31. Leikem D, Lamond R, Bonczkowski L et al (2007) Using legumes in crop rotations. Kansas State University. Retrieved January, 2008, from

  32. Levelton Engineering Ltd., (S&T)2 Consultants Inc (1999) Assessment of net emissions of greenhouse gases from ethanol-gasoline blends in southern Ontario. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Policy Branch, Ottawa. Retrieved January, 2006, from

  33. Lockeretz W, Shearer G, Sweeney S et al (1980) Maize yields and soil nutrient levels with and without pesticides and standards commercial fertilizers. Agronomy Journal 72:65–72

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Mattsson B (1999) LCA of carrot puree: case studies of organic and integrated production. Swedish Institute for Food and Biotechnology Report No. 653, Gothenburg, Sweden

    Google Scholar 

  35. MEA (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being. Volume 1. Current state and trends. Findings of the Conditions and Trends Working Group. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  36. Offerman F, Nieberg H (2000) Economic performance of organic farms in Europe. Organic Farming In Europe: Economics and Policy 5, University of Hohenheim, Germany

  37. Pelletier N, Tyedmers P (2007) Feeding farmed salmon: is organic better? Aquaculture 272:399–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Pelletier N, Ayer N, Tyedmers P et al (2007) Impact categories for life cycle assessment research of seafood production: review and prospectus. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 12(6):414–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Pennington D, Potting J, Finnveden G et al (2004) Life cycle assessment part 2: current impact assessment practice. Environment International 30:721–739

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Pimentel D, Pimentel M (2006) Global environmental resources versus world population growth. Ecological Economics 59:195–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Pimentel D, Hepperly P, Hanson J et al (2005) Environmental, energetic and economics comparisons of organic and conventional farming systems. Bioscience 55(7):573–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. PRé (2006) SimaPro 7.0. PRe consultants, Netherlands. Retrieved January, 2006, from

  43. Rhem G, Schmitt M, Eliason R (2002) Fertilizer recommendations for edible beans in Minnesota. University of Minnesota Extension. Retrieved September, 2006, from http://www.

  44. Robertson G, Paul E, Harwood R (2000) Greenhouse gases in intensive agriculture: contributions of individual gases to radiative forcing of the atmosphere. Science 289:1922–1925

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Shelley K (2004) Nitrogen fertilizer rates and application timing for winter wheat in Wisconsin—What are the economic optimums? University of Wisconsin Extension Services. Retrieved September, 2006, from

  46. Smil V (2001) Feeding the world. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  47. Smolik J, Dobbs T, Rickerl D (1995) The relative sustainability of alternative, conventional, and reduced-till farming systems. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 10(1):25–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Stanhill G (1990) The comparative productivity of organic agriculture. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 30:1–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. State J, Posner J (1995) Legume cover crops as a nitrogen source for corn in an oat–corn rotation. Journal of Production Agriculture 8(3):385–390

    Google Scholar 

  50. Statistics Canada (2007) Seeded area of field and speciality crops in Canada. Retrieved January, 2007, from

  51. Stolze M, Priorr A, Haring A et al (2000) The environmental impacts of organic farming in Europe. Organic farming in Europe: economics and policy 6. University of Hohenheim, Germany. Retrieved February, 2006, from

  52. (S&T)2 Consultants Inc (2003) The addition of ethanol from wheat to GHGenius. Natural Resources Canada, Office of Energy Efficiency, Ottawa. Retrieved February, 2006, from

  53. (S&T)2 Consultants Inc (2005) Biodiesel GHG emissions using GHGenius: An update. Natural Resources Canada, Office of Energy Efficiency, Ottawa. Retrieved January, 2006, from

  54. Thomassen M, van Calker K, Smits M et al (2008) Life cycle assessment of conventional and organic milk production in the Netherlands. Agricultural Systems 96:95–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. VDI (1997) Cumulative energy demand: terms, definitions, methods of calculation. VDI-Richtlinien (4600) Verein Deutscher Ingenieure, Düsseldorf

    Google Scholar 

  56. Williams A, Audsley E, Sandars D (2006) Determining the environmental burdens and resource use in the production of agricultural and horticultural commodities. Main Report. DEFRA Research Project IS0205, Cranfield University. Retrieved January, 2007 from

  57. Wood R, Lenzen M, Lundie S (2006) A comparative study of some environmental impacts of conventional and organic farming in Australia. Agricultural Systems 89:324–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work was generously supported by the Social Science and Humanities Research Council of Canada, the Killam Trust, and the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada. We also acknowledge the thoughtful and constructive input of three reviewers. Any errors are, of course, the sole responsibility of the authors.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. Pelletier.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pelletier, N., Arsenault, N. & Tyedmers, P. Scenario Modeling Potential Eco-Efficiency Gains from a Transition to Organic Agriculture: Life Cycle Perspectives on Canadian Canola, Corn, Soy, and Wheat Production. Environmental Management 42, 989–1001 (2008).

Download citation


  • Life cycle assessment
  • Organic
  • Conventional
  • Efficiency
  • Nitrogen
  • Green manure
  • Agriculture