Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Life Cycle Considerations for Improving Sustainability Assessments in Seafood Awareness Campaigns

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is widely accepted that improving the sustainability of seafood production requires efforts to reverse declines in global fisheries due to overfishing and to reduce the impacts to host ecosystems from fishing and aquaculture production technologies. Reflective of on-going dialogue amongst participants in an international research project applying Life Cycle Assessment to better understand and manage global salmon production systems, we argue here that such efforts must also address the wider range of biophysical, ecological, and socioeconomic impacts stemming from the material and energetic throughput associated with these industries. This is of particular relevance given the interconnectivity of global environmental change, ocean health, and the viability of seafood production in both fisheries and aquaculture. Although the growing popularity of numerous ecolabeling, certification, and consumer education programs may be making headway in influencing Western consumer perceptions of the relative sustainability of alternative seafood products, we also posit that the efficacy of these initiatives in furthering sustainability objectives is compromised by the use of incomplete criteria. An emerging body of Life Cycle Assessment research of fisheries and aquaculture provides valuable insights into the biophysical dimensions of environmental performance in alternative seafood production and consumption systems, and should be used to inform a more holistic approach to labeling, certifying, and educating for sustainability in seafood production. More research, however, must be undertaken to develop novel techniques for incorporating other critical dimensions, in particular, socioeconomic considerations, into our sustainability decision-making.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alverson D, Freeberg M, Murawski S, Pope J (1994) A global assessment of fisheries bycatch and discards. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper no. 339. FAO, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen O (2002) Transport of fish from Norway: energy analysis using industrial ecology as the framework. Journal of Cleaner Production 10:581–588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aquaculture Certification Council (2006) Available at: http://www.aquaculturecertification.org. Accessed February 2006

  • Aubin J, Papatryphon E, Van der Werf H, Petit J, Morvan Y (2006) Characterization of the environmental impact of a turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) re-circulating production system using Life Cycle Assessment. Aquaculture 261(4):1259–1268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayer N, Tyedmers P (2008) Assessing alternative aquaculture technologies. Life Cycle Assessment of salmonid culture systems in Canada. Journal of Cleaner Production (in press)

  • Baldo G, Rollino S, Stimmeder G, Fieschi M (2002) The use of LCA to develop eco-label criteria for hard floor coverings on behalf of the European Flower. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 7(5):269–275

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baumman H, Tillman A (2004) The hitch hiker’s guide to LCA: an orientation in life cycle assessment methodology and application. Studentlitteratur, Lund, Sweden

    Google Scholar 

  • Borregaard N, Dufey A (2005) Challenging preconceptions about trade in sustainable products. Towards win-win-win for developing countries. International Institute for Environment and Development, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouwman A, Van Vuuren D, Derwent R, Posch M (2002) A global analysis of acidification an eutrophication of terrestrial ecosystems. Water Air and Soil Pollution 141(1–4):349–382

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brander K (2007) Global fish production and climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 104(50):19709–19714

  • Chaffee C (2006) Wal-Mart backs the MSC. Fish4Thought, Marine Stewardship Council. Available at: http://www.msc.org. Accessed March 2006

  • Christensen V, Guenette S, Heymans J, Walters C, Watson R, Zeller D, Pauly D (2003) Hundred-year decline of North Atlantic predatory fishes. Fish and Fisheries 4(1):1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chuenpagdee R, Morgan L, Maxwell S, Norse E, Pauly D (2003) Shifting gears: assessing collateral impacts of fishing methods in US waters. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 1(10):517–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Consoli F, Allen D, Boustead I, Fava J, Franklin W, Jensen A, de Oude N, Parrish R, Perriman R, Postlethwaite D, Quay B, Sequin J, Vignon B (1993) Guidelines for life-cycle assessment: a “code of practice.” Society for Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Brussels, Belgium, and Pensacola, FL

    Google Scholar 

  • Crutzen P (1992) Ozone depletion—ultraviolet radiation on the increase. Nature 356(6365):104–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DAAS (2000) Farmed trout. Report 91. Available at: http://www.lcafood.dk/. Accessed February 2006

  • Deere C (1999) Eco-labeling and sustainable fisheries. International Union for the Conservation of Nature, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Derraik J (2002) The pollution of the marine environment by plastic debris: a review Marine Pollution Bulletin 44(9):842–852

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dreyer L, Hauschild M, Schierbeck J (2005) A framework for social life cycle impact assessment. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment (Online First):1–10

  • El-Hage Scialabba N, Hattam C (eds) (2002) Organic agriculture, environment and food security. Environment and Natural Resources Service Sustainable Development Department, UNFAO, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellingsen H, Aanondsen S (2006) Environmental impacts of wild caught cod and farmed salmon—a comparison with chicken. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 1(1):60–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EPA (1998) Environmental labeling issues, policies and practices worldwide. Pollution Prevention Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2004) The state of world fisheries and aquaculture 2004. FAO Fisheries Department, Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2006) The state of world fisheries and aquaculture 2006. FAO Fisheries Department, Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Ficke A, Myrick C, Hansen L (2007) Potential impacts of global climate change on freshwater fisheries. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 17:581–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Findlay R, Watling R, Mayer L (1995) Environmental impact of salmon net-pen culture on marine benthic communities in Maine—a case study. Estuaries 18(1A):145–179

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fleming I, Hindar K, Mjolnerod I B Jonsson T Balstad, Lamberg A (2000) Lifetime success and interactions of farm salmon invading a native population. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B—Biological Sciences 267:1517–1523

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Folke C (1988) Energy economy of salmon aquaculture in the Baltic Sea. Environmental Studies 12(4):525–537

    Google Scholar 

  • Folke C, Kautsky N, Troell M (1992) The cost of eutrophication from salmon farming: implications for policy. Journal of Environmental Management 40:173–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GAA (2006) Global Aquaculture Alliance. Available at: http://www.gaalliance.org/. Accessed January 2006

  • Galloway J, Dentener F, Capone D, Boyer E, Howarth R, Seitzinger S, Asner G, Cleveland C, Green P, Holland E, Karl D, Michaels A, Porter J, Townsend A, Vorosmarty C (2004) Nitrogen cycles: past, present and future. Biogeochemistry 70(2):153–226

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gardiner R, Viswanathan K (2004) Eco-labeling and fisheries management. WorldFish Center Studies and Reviews 27, WorldFish Center, Malaysia

    Google Scholar 

  • Glass C (2000) Conservation of fish stocks through bycatch reduction: a review. Northeast Naturalist 7(4):395–410

    Google Scholar 

  • Global Eco-labeling Network (2004) Introduction to Eco-labeling. Global Eco-labeling Network, Ontario, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Gronroos J, Seppala J, Silvenius F, Makinen T (2006) Life cycle assessment of Finnish cultivated rainbow trout. Boreal Environmental Research 11(5):401–414

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haberl H, Erb H, Krausmann F, Gaube V, Bondeau A, Plutzar C, Gingrich S, Lucht W, Fischer-Kowalski M (2007) Quantifying and mapping the human appropriation of net primary production in earth’s terrestrial ecosystems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 104(31):12942–12945

  • Hastein T (1995) Disease problems, use of drugs, resistance problems and preventive measures in fish farming world wide. In: Reinertsen H, Haaland H (eds) Sustainable fish farming: Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Sustainable Fish Farming, Oslo, Norway, 28–31 August 1994. A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 183–194

  • Hayman B, Dogliani M, Kvale I, Fet A (2000) Technologies for reduced environmental impact from ships—ship building, maintenance and dismantling aspects. ENSUS-2000, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoegh-Guldberg O, Mumby P, Hooten A, Steneck R, Greenfield P, Gomez E, Harvell C, Sale P, Edwards A, Caldeira K, Knowlton N, Eakin C, Iglesias-Prieto R, Muthiga N, Bradbury R, Dubi A, Hatziolos M (2008) Coral reefs under rapid climate change and ocean acidification. Science 318(5857):1737–1742

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hospido A, Tyedmers P (2005) Life cycle environmental impacts of Spanish tuna fisheries. Fisheries Research 76:174–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes L (2000) Biological consequence of global warming: is the signal already apparent? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 15(2):56–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IFOAM (2005) Principles of organic agriculture. International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements. Available at: http://www.ifoam.org/organic_facts/Principles_Organic_Agriculture.pdf. Accessed November 2005

  • ISO (2003) ISO 14041, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland. Available at: http://www.iso.org. Accessed 19 October 2005

  • IUCN (1991) World conservation strategy. Living resource conservation for sustainable development. International Union for the Conservation of Nature, United Nations Environment Program and World Wildlife Fund, Gland, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson J, Kirby M, Berger W, Bjorndal K, Botsford L, Bourque B, Bradbury R, Cooke R, Erlandson J, Estes J, Hughes T, Kidwell S, Lange C, Warner R (2001) Historical overfishing and the recent collapse of coastal ecosystems. Science 293:629–638

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson K (2002) Review of national and international literature on the effects of fishing on benthic habitats. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS F/SPO. No. 57. NOAA, Washington, DC

  • Karlsen H, Angelfoos A (2000) Transport of frozen fish between Ålensund and Paris—a case study. Technical report no. HiÅ 20 20/B101/R-00/020/00. Ålensund College, Ålensund, Norway

  • Krkosek M, Lewis M, Volpe J, Morton A (2006) Fish farms and sea lice infestations of wild juvenile salmon in the Broughton Archipelago—a rebuttal to Brooks (2005). Reviews in Fisheries Science 14(1–1):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krkosek M, Ford J, Morton A, Lele S, Myers R, Lewis M (2007) Declining wild salmon populations in relations to parasites from farm salmon. Science 318:1772–1775

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lambrecht Haland B, Esmark M (2002) Clean conscience consumption of seafood: a summary of eco-labels and environmental management systems for fisheries and aquaculture products. WWF Norway

  • Lavallee S, Plouffe S (2004) The eco-label and sustainable development. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 9(6):349–354

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitus S, Antonov J, Wang J, Delworth T, Dixon K, Broccoli A (2001) Anthropogenic warming of the Earth’s climate system. Science 292(5515):267–270

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Likens G, Driscoll C, Buso D (1996) Long-term effects of acid rain: response and recovery of a forest ecosystem. Science 272(5259):244–246

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Llorenc M, Domenech X, Rieradevall J, Puig R, Fullana P (2002) Use of life cycle assessment in the procedure for the establishment of environmental criteria in the Catalan eco-label of leather. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 7(1):39–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Madronich S, McKenzie R, Caldwell M, Bjorn L (1995) Changes in ultraviolet-radiation reaching the earth’s surface. Ambio 24(3):143–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Marine Stewardship Council (2006) Available at: http://www.msc.org/. Accessed February 2006

  • MEA (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being, vol 1, Current state and trends. Findings of the Conditions and Trends Working Group. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Mungkung R (2005) Shrimp aquaculture in Thailand: application of life cycle assessment to support sustainable development. Ph.D. thesis. Center for Environmental Strategy, School of Engineering, University of Surrey, Surrey, UK

  • Mungkung R, Udo H de Haes, Clift R (2006) Potentials and limitations of life cycle assessment in setting eco-labeling criteria: a case study of Thai shrimp aquaculture product. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 11(1):55–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers R, Worm B (2003) Rapid worldwide depletion of predatory fish communities. Nature 423:280–283

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Naturland (2005) Naturland standards for organic aquaculture. Naturland—Association for Organic Agriculture, Kleinhaderner Weg 1, 82166 Gräfelfing, Germany. Available at: http://www.naturland.de/englisch/n2/NL-Stand-Aquaculture_01–(2005)pdf. Accessed January 2006

  • Naylor R, Goldburg R, Mooney H, Beveridge M, Clay J, Folke C, Kautsky N, Lubchenco J, Primavera J, Williams M (1998) Nature’s subsidies to shrimp and salmon farming. Science 282(5390):83–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naylor R, Burke M (2005) Aquaculture and ocean resources: raising tigers of the sea. Annual Review of Environmental Resources 30:185–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naylor R, Goldburg R, Primavera J, Kautsky N, Beveridge M, Clay J, Folke C, Lubchenco J, Mooney H, Troell M (2000) Effect of aquaculture on world fish supplies. Nature 405:1017–1024

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien M, Doig A, Clift R (1996) Social and environmental life cycle assessment (SELCA): approach and methodological development. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 1(4):231–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Paez-Osuna F (2001) The environmental impact of shrimp aquaculture: a global perspective. Environmental Pollution 112(2):229–231

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Papatryphon E, Petit J, Van H der Werf, Kaushik S (2003) Life Cycle Assessment of trout farming in France: a farm level approach. Life Cycle Assessment in the agri-food sector. Proceedings from the 4th International Conference Dias Report 61:71–77

  • Papatryphon E, Petit J, Kaushik S, Van der Werf H (2004) Environmental impact assessment of salmonid feeds using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). Ambio 33(6):316–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pauly D, Christensen V, Dalsgaard J, Froese R, Torres F (1998) Fishing down marine food webs. Science 279:860–863

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pauly D, Christensen V, Guénette S, Pitcher T, Sumaila U, Walters C, Watson R, Weller D (2002) Towards sustainability in world fisheries. Nature 418:689–695

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pelletier N (2003) Understanding proposed organic certification standards for farmed salmon. BC Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Fisheries, Victoria, BC

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelletier N, Tyedmers P (2007) Feeding farmed salmon: is organic better? Aquaculture 272:399–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelletier N, Ayer N, Tyedmers P, Kruse S, Flysjo A, Robillard G, Ziegler F, Scholz A, Sonesson U (2007) Impact categories for Life Cycle Assessment research of seafood production: review and prospectus. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 12(6):414–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preiss E (1997) An eco-label for shrimp: minimizing potential trade barriers. International Environmental Law Clinic, NYU School of Law, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson G, Paul E, Harwood R (2000) Greenhouse gases in intensive agriculture: contributions of individual gases to radiative forcing of the atmosphere. Science 289:1922–1925

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roessig J, Woodley C, Cech J, Hansen L (2004) Effects of global climate change on marine and estuarine fishes and fisheries. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 14(2):251–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seafood Watch (2006a) Available at: http://www.mbayaq.org/cr/seafoodwatch.asp. Accessed February 2006

  • Seafood Watch (2006b) Available at: http://www.mbayaq.org/cr/cr_seafoodwatch/content/media/MBA_SeafoodWatch_AquacultureCriteraMethodology.pdf. Accessed June 2007

  • Smil V (1999) Nitrogen in crop production: an account of global flows. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 13(2):647–662

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Soil Association. (2005) Organic aquaculture standards. Soil Association Certification Ltd., Bristol, UK. Can be purchased at: http://www.soilassociation.org. Accessed September 2005

  • Standal D, Utne I (2007) Can cod farming affect cod fishing? A system evaluation of sustainability. Marine Policy 31:527–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thrane M (2004a) Energy consumption in the Danish fishery. Identification of key factors. Journal of Industrial Ecology 8(1–2):223–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thrane M (2004b) Environmental impacts from Danish fish products—hot spots and environmental policies. Ph.D. dissertation. Department of Development and Planning, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark

  • Thrane M (2006) LCA of Danish fish products: new methods and insights. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 11(1):66–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Troell M, Tyedmers P, Kautsky N, Ronnback P (2004) Aquaculture and energy use. In: Cleveland C (ed) The encyclopedia of energy, vol 1. Elsevier, St. Louis, MO

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyedmers P (2000) Salmon and sustainability: the biophysical cost of producing salmon through the commercial salmon fishery and the intensive salmon culture industry. Ph.D. thesis. University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada

  • Tyedmers P (2004) Fisheries and energy use. In: Cleveland C (ed) Encyclopedia of energy, vol 2. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, pp 683–693

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyedmers P, Watson R, Pauly D (2005) Fueling global fishing fleets. Ambio 34(8):635–638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Utne I (2006) Systems engineering principles in fisheries management. Marine Policy 30:624–634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Utne I (2007) System evaluation of sustainability in the Norwegian cod fisheries. Marine Policy 31:390–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Berkel R, Willems E, Lafleur M (1997) Development of an industrial ecology toolbox for the introduction of industrial ecology enterprises. Journal of Cleaner Production 5(1–2):11–26

    Google Scholar 

  • van Berkel R, van Kampen M, Kortman J (1999) Opportunities and constraints for product-oriented environmental management systems (P-EMS). Journal of Cleaner Production 7:447–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitousek P, Ehrlich P, Ehrlich A, Matson P (1986) Human appropriation of the products of photosynthesis. BioScience 36(6):368–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walther G, Post E, Convey P, Menzel A, Parmesan C, Beebee T, Fromentin J, Hoegh-Guldberg O, Bairlein F (2002) Ecological responses to recent climate change. Nature 416(6879):389–395

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe H, Okubo M (1989) Energy input in marine fisheries of Japan. Bulletin of the Japanese Society of Scientific Fisheries/Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi 53(9):1525–1531

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson R, Pauly D (2001) Systematic distortions in world fisheries catch trends. Nature 414(6863):534–536

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Worm B, Myers R (2004) Managing fisheries in a changing climate—no need to wait for more information: industrialized fishing is already wiping out stocks. Nature 429(6987):15

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler F, Hansson P (2003) Emissions from fuel combustion in the Swedish cod fishery. Journal of Cleaner Production 11:303–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler F, Nilsson P, Mattsson B, Walther Y (2003) Life Cycle Assessment of frozen cod fillets including fishery-specific environmental impacts. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 8(1):39–47

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Lenfest Ocean Program of the Pew Charitable Trusts, the Social Science and Humanities Research Council of Canada and the Killam Trust. The insights discussed are reflective of on-going dialogue amongst participants in an international research project examining the life cycle biophysical, ecological and socioeconomic impacts of global salmon production systems. Participants other than the authors include, but are not limited to, Astrid Scholz, Ulf Sonesson, Sarah Kruse, Anna Flysjo, Friederike Zeigler and Nathan Ayer.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nathan Pelletier.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pelletier, N., Tyedmers, P. Life Cycle Considerations for Improving Sustainability Assessments in Seafood Awareness Campaigns. Environmental Management 42, 918–931 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-008-9148-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-008-9148-9

Keywords

Navigation