Environmental Management

, Volume 42, Issue 3, pp 426–443 | Cite as

Bottom-Up Risk Regulation? How Nanotechnology Risk Knowledge Gaps Challenge Federal and State Environmental Agencies

  • Maria C. Powell
  • Martin P.A. Griffin
  • Stephanie Tai
Article

Abstract

Nanotechnologies have been called the “Next Industrial Revolution.” At the same time, scientists are raising concerns about the potential health and environmental risks related to the nano-sized materials used in nanotechnologies. Analyses suggest that current U.S. federal regulatory structures are not likely to adequately address these risks in a proactive manner. Given these trends, the premise of this paper is that state and local-level agencies will likely deal with many “end-of-pipe” issues as nanomaterials enter environmental media without prior toxicity testing, federal standards, or emissions controls. In this paper we (1) briefly describe potential environmental risks and benefits related to emerging nanotechnologies; (2) outline the capacities of the Toxic Substances Control Act, the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act, and the Resources Conservation and Recovery Act to address potential nanotechnology risks, and how risk data gaps challenge these regulations; (3) outline some of the key data gaps that challenge state-level regulatory capacities to address nanotechnologies’ potential risks, using Wisconsin as a case study; and (4) discuss advantages and disadvantages of state versus federal approaches to nanotechnology risk regulation. In summary, we suggest some ways government agencies can be better prepared to address nanotechnology risk knowledge gaps and risk management.

Keywords

Nanotechnology Risk assessment Government regulation Data gaps 

References

  1. Aitken RJ, Creely KS, Tran CL (2004) Nanoparticles: an occupational hygiene review. Health & Safety Executive, Suffolk, UKGoogle Scholar
  2. ASTM International (2006) ASTM E 2456–06. Terminology for nanotechnology. Available at: http://www.astm.org
  3. Barker PE, Butler T, Dawley JM, Herran P, King B, Nathanson KL, Patel K, Wedeking J, Weiss H, Wubinger J, Ziesmann S. (2006) Nanotechnology briefing paper, Clean Water Act. American Bar Association, Section of Environment, Energy, and ResourcesGoogle Scholar
  4. Baun A, Sørensen SN et al (2008) Toxicity and bioaccumulation of xenobiotic organic compounds in the presence of aqueous suspensions of aggregates of nano-C60. Aquatic Toxicology 86(3):379–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. BCC Research (2007) Market research reports and technical publications. BCC Research, Wellesley, MAGoogle Scholar
  6. Bell CL, Austin S, Duvall MN, Cheng JC, Votaw J (2006) Regulation of nanoscale materials under the Toxic Substances Control Act. American Bar Association, Section of Environment, Energy, and ResourcesGoogle Scholar
  7. Berglund LA (2004) Cellulose nanocomposites. In Mohanty M (ed) Natural fibers, biopolymers and their biocomposites. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FLGoogle Scholar
  8. Bermudez E, Mangum JB, Asgharian B, Wong BA, Reverdy EE, Janszen DB, Hext P, Warheit DB, Everitt JI (2002) Long-term pulmonary responses of three laboratory rodent species to subchronic inhalation of pigmentary titanium dioxide particles. Toxicological Sciences 70:86–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bermudez E, Mangum JS, Wong BA, Asgharian B, Hext PM, Warheit DB, Everitt JI (2004) Pulmonary responses of mice, rats, and hamsters to subchronic inhalation of ultrafine titanium dioxide particles. Toxicological Sciences 77:347–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Blaser SA, Scheringer M, MacLeoda M, Hungerbühler K (2007) Estimation of cumulative aquatic exposure and risk due to silver: contribution of nano-functionalized plastics and textiles. Science of the Total Environment 390:396–409Google Scholar
  11. Boxall AB, Tiede K, Chaudhry Q (2007) Engineered nanomaterials in soils and water: how do they behave and could they pose a risk to human health? Nanomedicine 2(6):919–927CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brayner R, Ferrari-Iliou R, Brivois N, Djediat S, Benedetti MF, Fievet F (2006) Toxicological impact studies based on Escherichia coli bacteria in ultrafine ZnO nanoparticles colloidal medium. Nano Letters 6(4):866–870CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brown DM, Wilson MR, MacNee W, Stone V, Donaldson K (2001) Size-dependent proinflammatory effects of ultrafine polystyrene particles: a role for surface area and oxidative stress in the enhanced activity of ultrafines. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology 175:191–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brumfiel G (2003) Nanotechnology: a little knowledge. Nature 424:246–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cheng J, Flahaut E, Cheng SH (2007) Effect of carbon nanotubes on developing zebrafish embryos. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 26(4):708–716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cheng X, Kan AT, Tomson MB (2005) Study of C60 transport in porous media and the effect of sorbed C60 on naphthalene transport. Journal of Material Research 20:3244–3254Google Scholar
  17. Cui Y, Wei Q, Park H, Lieber CM (2001) Nanowire nanosensors for highly selective detection of biological and chemical species. Science 293:1289–1292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Davies JC (2006) Managing the effects of nanotechnology. A Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies report. Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  19. Davis JM (2007) How to assess the risks of nanotechnology: learning from past experience. Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology 7(2):402–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Denison R (2008) EPA’s voluntary program for nanomaterials still too little, too late. Nanowerk News, January 28Google Scholar
  21. Donaldson K, Aitken R, Tran L, Stone V, Duffin R, Forrest G, Alexander A (2006) Carbon nanotubes: a review of their properties in relation to pulmonary toxicological and workplace safety. Toxicological Sciences 92(1):5–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Duncan LK, Jinschek JR, Vikesland PJ (2008) C60 colloid formation in aqueous systems: effects of preparation method on size, structure, and surface charge. Environmental Science and Technology 42(1):173–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Federici G, Shaw BJ, Handy RD (2007) Toxicity of titanium dioxide nanoparticles to rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss): gill injury, oxidative stress, and other physiological effects. Aquatic Toxicology 84(4):415–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fortner J, Lyon DY, Sayes CM, Boyd AM, Falkner JC, Hotze EM, Aleman LB, Tao YJ, Guo W, Ausman KD, Colvin VL, Hughes JB (2005) C60 in water: nanocrystal formation and microbial response. Environmental Science and Technology 39:4307–4316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gardner K, Aulisio D, Spear JM (2004) In-situ dechlorination of polychlorinated biphenyls in sediments using zero-valent iron. PowerPoint presentation at the RTDF Sediments Meeting, February 18–19. (Reference taken from Mikszewski 2004)Google Scholar
  26. Gimbert LJ, Hamon RE, Casey PS et al (2007) Partitioning and stability of engineered ZnO nanoparticles in soil suspensions using flow field-flow fractionation. Environmental Chemistry 4(1):8–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Global Industry Analysts, Inc. (2008) Nanotechnology: a global strategic industry report. Global Industry Analysts, Inc., San Jose, CAGoogle Scholar
  28. Grassian VH, O’Shaughnessy PT, Adamcakova Q-Dodd, Pettibone JM, Thorne PS (2007) Inhalation exposure study of titanium dioxide nanoparticles with a primary particle size of 2 to 5 nm. Environmental Health Perspectives 115(3):397–402Google Scholar
  29. Griffin MPA, Edelstein G, Myers J, Schrank C, Sukup L, Wheat G (2006) Nanotechnology and natural resources: preparing the Department for the present and the future. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, MadisonGoogle Scholar
  30. Griffitt RJ, Weil R, Hyndman KA (2007) Exposure to copper nanoparticles causes gill injury and acute lethality in zebrafish (Danio rerio). Environmental Science and Technology 41:8178–8186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hansen SF, Tickner JA (2007) The challenges of adopting voluntary health, safety and environment measures for manufactured nanomaterials: lessons from the past for more effective adoption in the future. Nanotechnology Law & Business Fall. Available at: http://www.nanolabweb.com
  32. Hardman R (2005) A toxicological review of quantum dots: toxicity depends on physico-chemical and environmental factors. Environmental Health Perspectives 114(2):165–172Google Scholar
  33. Hester T (2006) RCRA regulation of wastes from the production, use, and disposal of nanomaterials. American Bar Association, Section of Environment, Energy, and ResourcesGoogle Scholar
  34. Hyung H, Fortner JD, Hughes JB, Kim JH (2007) Natural organic matter stabilizes carbon nanotubes in the aqueous phase. Environmental Science and Technology 41(1):179–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jefferson DA (2000) The surface activity of ultrafine particles. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A358:2683–(2691)Google Scholar
  36. Kamat PV, Huehn R, Nicolaescu RA (2002) ‘‘Sense and shoot’’ approach for photocatalytic degradation of organic contaminants in water. Journal of Physical Chemistry B 106:788–794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kanel SR, Manning B, Charlet L, Choi H (2005) Removal of arsenic(III) from groundwater by nanoscale zero-valent iron. Environmental Science and Technology 39(5):1291–1298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kofinas P, Kioussis D (2003) Reactive phosphorus removal from aquaculture and poultry productions systems using polymeric hydrogels. Environmental Science and Technology 37(2):423–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kong J, Franklin NR, Zhou C, Chapline MG, Peng S, Cho K, Dai H (2000) Nanotube molecular wires as chemical sensors. Science 287:622–625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lee KJ, Nallathamby PD, Browning LM, Osgood CJ, Xu XH (2007) In vivo imaging of transport and biocompatibility of single silver nanoparticles in early development of zebrafish embryos. ACS Nano 1(2):133–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lin DH, Xing BS (2007) Phytotoxicity of nanoparticles: inhibition of seed germination and root growth. Environmental Pollution 150(2):243–250Google Scholar
  42. Long TC, Tajuba J, Sama P et al (2007) Nanosize titanium dioxide stimulates reactive oxygen species in brain microglia and damages neurons in vitro. Environmental Health Perspectives 115(11):1631–1637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lovern SB, Klaper R (2006) Daphnia magna mortality when exposed to titanium dioxide and fullerene (C60) nanoparticles. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 25(4):1132–1137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Luo J (2007) Toxicity and bioaccumulation of nanomaterial in aquatic species. Journal of the U.S. SJWP. Available at: http://www.wef.org/NR/rdonlyres/8A1DD51F-BD1F-4769-A22C-D27DC552400F/0/AZLuoRevised.pdf. Accessed 22 March 2008
  45. Manzoor K, Aditya V, Vadera SR, Kumar N, Kutty TRM (2007) A single-source solid-precursor method for making eco-friendly doped semiconductor nanoparticles emitting multi-color luminescence. Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology 7(3):463–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Maynard AD, Aitken RJ, Butz T, Colvin V, Donaldson K, Oberdorster G, Philbert MA, Ryan J, Seaton A, Stone V, Tinkle SS, Tran L, Walker NJ, Warheit DB (2006) Safe handling of nanotechnology. Nature 444:267–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mikszewski A (2004) Emerging technologies for the in situ remediation of PCB contaminated soils and sediments: bioremediation and nanoscale zero-valent iron. Available at: http://www.clu-in.org/download/studentpapers/bio_of_pcbs_paper.pdf
  48. Monica JC Jr, Heintz ME, Lewis PT (2007) The perils of pre-emptive regulation. Nature 2:68–70Google Scholar
  49. Muller J, Huaux F, Lison D (2006) Respiratory toxicity of carbon nanotubes: how worried should we be? Carbon 44:1048–1056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Nagappa B, Chandrappa GT (2007) Nanocrystalline CaO as adsorbent to remove COD from paper mill effluent. Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology 7(3):1039–1042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. National Nanotechnology Initiative Funding. Available at: http://www.nano.gov/html/about/funding.html. Accessed 5 January 2008
  52. Nel A, Xia T, Madler L, Li N (2006) Toxic potential of materials at the nanolevel. Science 311(5761):622–627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Nowack B, Bucheli TD (2007) Occurrence, behavior and effects of nanoparticles in the environment. Environmental Pollution 150:5–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Nutt MO, Hughes JB, Wong MS (2005) Designing Pd-on-Au bimetallic catalysts for trichloroethene hydrodechlorination. Environmental Science and Technology 39(5):1346–1353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Oberdorster E (2004) Manufactured nanomaterials (fullerenes, C60) induce oxidative stress in the brain of juvenile largemouth bass. Environmental Health Perspectives 112(10):1058–1062Google Scholar
  56. Oberdorster G, Stone V, Donaldson K (2007) Toxicology of nanoparticles: a historical perspective. Nanotoxicology 1(1):2–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Preining O (1998) The physical nature of very, very small particles and its impact on their behavior. Journal of Aerosol Science 29:481–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies, Consumer Products Inventory (2008) A project of the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. Available at: http://www.nanotechproject.org/44. Accessed: January 7, 2008
  59. Roberts AP, Mount AS, Seda B, Souther J, Qiao R, Lin S, Ke PC, Rao AM, Klaine SJ (2007) In vivo biomodification of lipid-coated carbon nanotubes by Daphnia magna. Environmental Science and Technology 41(8):3025–3029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Roco MC (2005) The emergence and policy implications of converging new technologies integrated from the nanoscale. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 7:129–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Rosenbaum WA (2005) Environmental politics and policy. CQ Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  62. Savage N, Thomas TA, Duncan JS (2007) Nanotechnology applications and implications research supported by the US Environmental Protection Agency STAR grants program. Journal of Environmental Monitoring 9(10):1046–1054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sayes CM, Gobin AM, Ausman KD, Mendez J, West JL, Colvin VL (2005) Nano-C60 cytotoxicity is due to lipid peroxidation. Biomaterials 26:7587–7595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Schrick B, Blough J, Danile A Jones, Mallouk TE (2002) Hydroechlorination of trichloroethylene to hydrocarbons using bimetallic nickel-iron nanoparticles. Chemical Materials 14:140–5147Google Scholar
  65. Shih WY, Campbell G, Yi JW, Mutharasan R, Shih WH (2004) Ultrasensitive pathogen quantification in drinking water using highly piezoelectric microcantilevers. In Karn B, Masciangioli T, Zhang W-X, Colvin V, Alivasatos P (eds) Nanotechnology and the environment—applications and implications, Sect. 5. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  66. Simms P (2007) Regulation of nano materials under the CAA’s mobile source provisions. American Bar Association Nanotechnology Teleconference Series, January 16Google Scholar
  67. Smith CJ, Shaw BJ, Handy RD (2007) Toxicity of single walled carbon nanotubes to rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss): respiratory toxicity, organ pathologies, and other physiological effects. Aquatic Toxicology 82(2):94–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Terashima M, Nagao S (2007) Solubilization of [60]fullerene in water by aquatic humic substances. Chemistry Letters 36(2):302–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Ternes ME (2006) ABA SEER CAA nanotechnology briefing paper. American Bar Association, Section of Environment, Energy, and ResourcesGoogle Scholar
  70. Tungittiplakorn W, Cohen C, Lion LW (2004) Engineered polymeric nanoparticles for bioremediation of hydrophobic contaminants. Environmental Science and Technology 39(5):534–1538Google Scholar
  71. Wardak A, Gorman ME (2006) Using trading zones and life cycle analysis to understand nanotechnology regulation. Nanotechnology Winter 695–703Google Scholar
  72. Wu P, Xu Z (2005) Silanation of nanostructured mesoporous magnetic particles for heavy metal recovery. Industrial Engineering and Chemistry Research 44:816–824CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Zhang W (2003) Nanoscale iron particles for environmental remediation: an overview. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 5:323–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Zhu S, Oberdorster E, Haasch ML (2006) Toxicity of an engineered nanoparticle (fullerene, C60) in two aquatic species, Daphnia and fathead minnow. Marine Environmental Research 62:S5–S9CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maria C. Powell
    • 1
  • Martin P.A. Griffin
    • 2
  • Stephanie Tai
    • 3
  1. 1.Nanoscale Science and Engineering Center, Nelson Institute for Environmental StudiesUniversity of WisconsinMadisonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Natural ResourcesMadisonUSA
  3. 3.UW-Madison Law SchoolMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations