Abstract
This article draws on three separate research and monitoring studies to describe 20-year trends in the number and condition of campsites in the backcountry of Grand Canyon National Park. Results are used to assess the effectiveness of a complex and innovative management program, adopted in 1983, that sought to concentrate use on designated campsites in popular places and disperse camping in more remote places. In 1984, conditions on 12 high-use campsites and 12 low-use campsites were carefully assessed. Conditions on 22 of these campsites were reassessed in 2005. In addition, campsite-monitoring surveys were conducted between 1985 and 1992 and again in 2003 and 2004. In these surveys, all campsites were located and their condition rapidly assessed. The detailed assessment of a sample of sites suggests relatively little change in condition during the 20-year period. The high-use sites were more highly disturbed than the low-use sites, but they did not change more during the study period. In contrast, changes at larger scales were dramatic. The total number of campsites more than doubled during the study period. Surprisingly, the proliferation of new campsites was greater in places where camping was only allowed on designated campsites than in places where camping was allowed anywhere. Concern that concentration of use on designated sites would cause unacceptable impact was unfounded. Management implications for other internationally significant protected areas that allow backcountry camping are explored.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Buckley R (ed.) (2004) Environmental impacts of ecotourism. CABI, Wallingford, UK
Cole DN (1986) Recreational impacts on backcountry campsites in Grand Canyon National Park, Arizona, USA. Environmental Management 10:651–659
Cole DN (1989) Area of vegetation loss: a new index of campsite impact. Research Note INT-389. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Ogden, UT
Cole DN (1993) Campsites in three western wildernesses: proliferation and changes in condition over 12 to 16 years. Research Paper INT-463. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Ogden, UT
Cole DN (1989) Visitor and recreation impact monitoring: is it lost in the gulf between science and management? The George Wright Forum 23(2):11–16
Hampton B, Cole D (2003) Soft paths. Stackpole, Harrisburg, PA
Leung Y, Marion JL (2000) Recreation impact and management in wilderness: a state-of-knowledge review. In: Wilderness science in a time of change conference. Volume 5. Wilderness ecosystems, threats and management. Proceedings RMRS-P-15-VOL-5. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Ogden, UT. Pages 23–48
Marion JL (1995) Capabilities and management utility of recreation impact monitoring programs. Environmental Management 19:763–771
Marion JL, Farrell T. (2002) Management practices that concentrate visitor activities: camping impact management at Isle Royale National Park, USA. Journal of Environmental Management 66:201–212
Marion JL, Sober T (1987) Environmental impact management in a wilderness area. Northern Journal of Applied Forestry 4:7–10
Reid SE, Marion LJ (2004) Effectiveness of a confinement strategy for reducing campsite impacts in Shenandoah National Park. Environmental Conservation 31:274–282
Stewart WP (1989) Fixed itinerary systems in backcountry management. Journal of Environmental Management 29:163–171
Acknowledgments
Support for this research, financial and in-kind, was provided by the National Park Service, Grand Canyon National Park, the Forest Service, Aldo Leopold Wilderness Research Institute, and Northern Arizona University. We also appreciate the assistance of many field employees.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cole, D.N., Foti, P. & Brown, M. Twenty Years of Change on Campsites in the Backcountry of Grand Canyon National Park. Environmental Management 41, 959–970 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-008-9087-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-008-9087-5