Abstract
Participation in conservation projects is key to the success and fair outcome of these initiatives, and perceptions of nature can affect the outcome of the participatory process. It has been argued that women hold different attitudes toward nature. Therefore an understanding of their perceptions and attitudes is vital. A survey was conducted in Castillos, Uruguay in order to assess urban perceptions of nature and surrounding protected areas. Results show that attitudes toward wildlife and reserves vary by gender. Uruguay is in the process of planning its future system of nature reserves. Considering these different perceptions is vital for the successful planning and management of reserves in Uruguay.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agrawal, Arun, Clark Gibson (eds) (2001) Communities and the environment. Rutgers University Press, New Jersey
Anthony, Melissa, Barbara Knuth, Bruce Lauber (2004) Gender and citizen participation in wildlife management decision making. Society and Natural Resources 17:395–411
Baral N, Stern M, Heinen J (2007) Integrated conservation and development project life cycles in the Annapurna Conservation Area in Nepal. Biodiversity and Conservation 16(10):2903–2917
Bauer H (2003) Local perceptions of Waza National Park. northern Cameroon, Environmental Conservation 30(2):175–181
Bhatta, Gambhir (2001) Of geese and ganders: mainstreaming gender in the context of sustainable human development. Journal of Gender Studies 10:17–32
Blocker, Jean, Douglas Eckberg (1989) Environmental issues as women’s issues: general concerns and local hazards. Social Science Quarterly 70:586–593
Davidson D, Freudenburg W (1996) Gender and environmental concerns: a review and analysis of available research. Environment and Behavior 28:302–339
Durbin J, Ralambo J (1994) The role of local people in the successful maintenance of protected areas in Madagascar. Environmental Conservation 21(2):115–120
Gupte, Manjusha (2002) Gender, feminist consciousness, and the environment: exploring the ‘natural’ connection. Women & Politics 24:47–62
Heinen J, Mehta J (1999) Conceptual and legal issues in the designation and management of conservation areas in Nepal. Environmental Conservation 26(1):21–29
Heinen J, Mehta J (2000) Emerging issues in legal and procedural aspects of buffer zone management with case studies from Nepal. Journal of Environment and Development 9(1):45–67
Hill, Catherine (1998) Conflicting attitudes towards elephants around the Budongo Forest Reserve. Uganda, Environmental Conservation 25:244–250
Howard, Patricia (ed) (2003) Women & plants: gender relations in biodiversity management and conservation. Zed Books, London
Hunter, Malcolm, Robert Hitchcock, Barbara Wyckoff-Baird (1990) Women and wildlife in southern Africa. Conservation Biology 4:448–451
Kanagy, Conrad, Craig Humphrey, Glenn Firebaugh (1994) Surging environmentalism: changing public opinion or changing publics. Social Science Quarterly 75:804–819
Kellert, Stephen, Joyce Berry (1987) Attitudes, knowledge and behaviors toward wildlife as affected by gender. Wildlife Society Bulletin 15:363–371
Mankin P, Warner R, Anderson W (1999) Wildlife and the Illinois public: a benchmark study of attitudes and perceptions. Wildlife Society Bulletin 27:465–472
McStay, Jan, Riley Dunlap (1983) Male-Female difference in concern for environmental quality. International Journal of Women Studies 6:291–301
Mehta J, Heinen J (2001) Does community-based conservation shape favorable attitudes among locals? An empirical study from Nepal. Environmental Management 28(2):165–177
Mohai P (1992) Men, women, and the environment: An examination of the gender gap in environmental concern and activism. Society and Natural Resources 5(1):1–19
Murombedzi, James (1999) Devolution and stewardship in Zimbabwe’s CAMPFIRE programme. Journal of International Development 11:287–293
Newmark, William, Nancy Leonard, Hashim Sariko, Deo-Gratias Gamassa (1993) Conservation attitudes of local people living adjacent to five protected areas in Tanzania, Biological Conservation 63:177–183
Rao K, Nautiyal S, Maikhuri R, Saxena K (2003) Local peoples’ knowledge, aptitude and perceptions of planning and management issues in Nanda Devi biosphere reserve, India. Environmental Management 31(2):168–181
Raval S (1994) Wheel of life: perceptions and concerns of the resident peoples for Gir National Park in India. Society and Natural Resources 7:305–320
Richards, Michael (1996) Protected areas, people and incentives in the search for sustainable forest conservation in Honduras. Environmental Conservation 23:207–217
Somma, Mark, Sue Tolleson-Rinehart (1997) Tracking the elusive green women: sex, environmentalism, and feminism in the United States and Europe. Western Politics Quarterly 42:627–649
Stern P, Dietz T, Kalof L (1993) Value orientations, gender, and environmental concern. Environment and Behavior 25:322–348
Tindall D, Davies S, Mauboules C (2003) Activism and conservation behavior in an environmental movement: the contradictory effects of gender. Society and Natural Resources 16:909–923
Wee V, Heyzer N (1995) Gender, poverty and sustainable development: towards a holistic framework of understanding and action. Engender, Singapore
Wolch, Jennifer, Jin Zhang (2004) Siren songs: gendered discourses of concern for sea creatures. In: Lise Nelson, Joni Seager (eds) A companion to feminist geography 458–485
Zinn, Harry, Cynthia Pierce (2002) Values, gender, and concern about potentially dangerous wildlife. Environment and Behavior 34:239–256
Zweifel, Helen (1997) The gendered nature of biodiversity conservation. NWSA Journal 9:107–123
Acknowledgments
I would like to thank Nancy Doubleday, Jennifer Wolch, Carolina Villalba, Joel Heinen, and 2 anonymous reviewers for their comments. This research was part of a larger project partially financed by the UNESCO Young Scientists Award.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Martino, D. Gender and Urban Perceptions of Nature and Protected Areas in Bañados del Este Biosphere Reserve. Environmental Management 41, 654–662 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-008-9069-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-008-9069-7