Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A Typology of Collaboration Efforts in Environmental Management

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Collaboration involves stakeholders and the public in a process of consensus building to address some of the most difficult environmental management problems facing society today. Collaborative groups vary widely, ranging from small watershed councils to regional ecosystem collaboratives to groups addressing large-scale policy issues. While these collaboratives all match the common principles of collaboration, a closer examination reveals many differences. Using institutional theories about levels of decision making provides a way of classifying collaboratives along a spectrum from action level to organizational level to policy level. This typology is applied to thirty-six collaboration case studies in Australia and the United States that were investigated over a series of years through interviews, observation, document analysis, and surveys. The application reveals different tendencies among the case types in terms of population, size, problem significance, institutional setting, and focus of activities. The typology also reveals functional differences in the types of stakeholders involved, the management arrangements for implementation, and the approaches to implementing change. This typology can help practitioners better understand the challenges and appropriate types of collaborations for different settings. It helps highlight differences in the role of government and decentralization of power. It distinguishes the different theoretical foundations for different types of collaboratives. Finally, it elucidates the different evaluation approaches for different types of collaboratives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agranoff R, McGuire M (2003) Collaborative public management. Georgetown University Press, Washington DC, p 219

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander ER (1995) How organizations act together: interorganizational coordination in theory and practice. Gordon and Breach Publishers, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Altman JA, Petkus E Jr. (1994) Toward a stakeholder-based policy process: An application of the social marketing perspective to environmental policy development. Policy Sciences 27(1):37–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnstein SR (1969) A Ladder of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 35(4):216–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Bardach E (1998) Getting Agencies to Work Together. The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellamy J, Ross H, Ewing S, Meppem T (2002) Integrated catchment management: learning from the Australian experience for the Murray-Darling Basin. Sustainable Ecosystems, CSIRO (Commonwealth Scientifica and Industrial Research Organization), Canberra, Australia, p 227

    Google Scholar 

  • Bemelmans-Videc M-L, Rist RC, Vedung E (1998) Carrots, sticks & sermons: policy instruments and their evaluation. Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, NJ, USA p 280

    Google Scholar 

  • Bender T (1978) Community and social change in America. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ, xiii, p 159

  • Bidwell RD, Ryan CM (2006) Collaborative Partnership Design: The Implications of Organizational Affiliation for Watershed Partnerships. Society & Natural Resources 19(9):827–843

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bingham G (1986) Resolving environmental disputes: A decade of experience. Conservation Foundation, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryson J (1988) Strategic Planning for Public and Nonprofit Organizations. Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell A (1994) Landcare: communities shaping the land and the future. Allen & Unwin, St. Leonards, New South Wales, p 344

    Google Scholar 

  • Center for Watershed Protection (1998) Rapid watershed planning handbook: a comprehensive guide for managing urbanizing watersheds. Center for Watershed Protection, Ellicott City, ND

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng AS, Daniels SE (2005) Getting to the “we”: Examining the relationship between geographic scale and ingroup emergence in collaborative watershed planning. Human Ecology Review 12(1):30–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark BT, Burkardt N, King MD (2005) Watershed management and organizational dynamics: Nationwide findings and regional variation. Environmental Management 36(2):297–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colby SM, Murrell W (1998) Child welfare and substance abuse services: from barriers to collaboration. In: Hampton RL, Senatore V, Gullotta TP (eds) Substance abuse, family violence and child welfare. Bridging perspectives. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp 188–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Colosi T (1983) Negotiation in the public and private sectors: a core model. American Behavioral Scientist 27(2):229–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cortner HJ, Moote MA (1999) The politics of ecosystem management. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis A, Shindler B, Wright A (2002) Sustaining local watershed initiatives: Lessons from Landcare and Watershed Councils. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 38(5):1207–1216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elmore RF (1982) Backward Mapping: Implementation Research and Policy Decisions. In: Williams W (ed) Studying Implementation: Methodological and Administrative Issues. Chatham House Publishers, Inc., Chatham, NJ, pp 18–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Gericke KL, Sullivan J (1994) Public participation and appeals of forest service plans-an empirical examination. Society and Natural Resources 7(2):125–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray B (1989) Collaborating: Finding Common Ground for Multiparty Problems. Jossey-Bass, Inc., San Francisco, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregg F, Born SM, Lord WB, Waterstone M (1991) Institutional Response to a Changing Water Policy Environment. Tempe, Arizona: Water Resources Research Center, University of Arizona. Report nr U.S.G.S. Grant #14-08-0001-G1639

  • Healey P (1997) Collaborative planning. University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson J, Vidal AC, Putnam R, Light I, Souza Briggs Xd, Rohe WM, Gress J, Woolcock M (2004) Symposium: Using Social Capital to Help Integrate Planning Theory, Research, and Practice. Journal of the American Planning Association 70(2):50

    Google Scholar 

  • Imperial MT (1999) Institutional Analysis and Ecosystem-Based Management: The Institutional Analysis and Development Framework. Environmental Management 24(4):449–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Innes JE, Booher DE (1999) Consensus building and complex adaptive systems: a framework for evaluating collaborative planning. Journal of the American Planning Association 65(4):412–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Innes JE, Gruber J, Neuman M, Thompson R (1994) Coordinating growth and environmental management through consensus building. California Policy Seminar, Berkeley, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenney DS (2000) Arguing about consensus: examining the case against Western watershed initiatives and other collaborative groups active in natural resources management. Natural Resources Law Center, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, p 72

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane MB (2003) Participation, decentralization, and civil society: Indigenous rights and democracy in environmental planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research 22(4):360–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang R (1986) Achieving Integration in Resource Planning. In: Lang R (ed) Integrated Approaches to Resource Planning and Management. The Banff Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, pp 27–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie SH (1996) Integrated resource planning and management: The ecosystem approach in the Great Lakes basin. Island Press, Washington, DC, p 235

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandell M (1999) The impact of collaboratives: Changing the face of public policy through networks and network structures. Policy studies review 16(1):4–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margerum RD (1999) Implementing integrated planning and management: A typology of approaches. Australian Planner 36(3):155–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Margerum RD, Born SM (2000) Co-ordination for environmental management: a framework for analysis. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 43(1):5–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazmanian DA, Sabatier PA (1983) Implementation and public policy. Scott, Foresman and Company, Glenview, IL, pp 18–48

    Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey M (2001) Is this the course you want to be on? Society and Natural Resources 14(4):627–634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyers E, Fischman R, Marsh A (1995) Maryland Chesapeake Bay Critical Areas Program: Wetlands protectin and future growth. In: Porter DR, Salvesen DA (eds) Collaborative planning for wetlands and wildlife: Issues and examples. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 181–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Molnar JJ, Rogers DL (1982) Interorganizational Coordination in Environmental Management: Process, Strategy, and Objective. In: Mann DE (ed) Environmental Policy Implementation. Lexington Books, Lexington, MA, pp 95–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore EA, Koontz TM (2003) A typology of collaborative watershed groups: Citizen-based, agency-based, and mixed partnerships. Society & Natural Resources 16(5):451–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moseley C (1999) New Ideas, Old Institutions: Environment, Community, and State in the Pacific Northwest [Ph.D. Dissertation]. Yale University, New Haven, CT

  • O’Toole LJ, Montjoy JRS (1984) Interorganizational Policy Implementation: A Theoretical Perspective. Public Administration Review 44(6):491–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (1986) A Method of Institutional Analysis. In: Kaufmann FX, Majone G, Ostrom V (eds) Guidance, Control, and Evaluation in the Public Sector. Walter de Gruyter, New York, NY, pp 501–523

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam RD (2000) Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster, New York, p 541

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts NC, Bradley RT (1991) Stakeholder collaboration and innovation: a study of public policy initiation at the state level. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 27(2):209–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum WA (1998) Environmental politics and policy. Congressional Quarterly, Inc., Washington, DC, p 384

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg S, Margerum RD in press. Landowner motivations for watershed restoration: lessons from five watersheds. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management (accepted 11/2007)

  • Sabatier P, Jenkins-Smith HC, Lawlor EF (1996) Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach. Journal of policy analysis and management: [the journal of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management] 15(1):11

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier P, Leach WD, Lubell M, Pelkey NW (2005) Theoretical frameworks explaining partnership success. In: Sabatier P, Focht W, Lubell M, Trachtenberg Z, Vedlitz A, Matlock M (eds) Swimming upstream: collaborative approaches to watershed management. MIT, Cambridge, Mass, pp 173–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier PA (2005) Swimming upstream: collaborative approaches to watershed management. MIT, Cambridge, Mass xvi, p 327

  • San Francisco Estuary Project (1993) San Francisco Estuary Project Comprehensive Conservation and Management Plan. San Francisco Estuary Project, Oakland, CA, p 236

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlager E (1995) Policy making and collective action: Defining coalitions within the advocacy coalition framework. Policy Sciences 28(3):243–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selin S, Chavez D (1995) Developing a Collaborative Model for Environmental Planning and Management. Environmental Management 19(2):189–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith LG, Nell CY, Prystupa MV (1997) The Converging Dynamics of Interest Representation in Resources Management. Environmental Management 21(2):139–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sommarstrom S (1999) An evaluation of selected watershed councils in the Pacific Northwest and Northern California. Sari Sommarstrom & Associates; Prepared for Trout Unlimited and Pacific Rivers Council, Etna, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Susskind L, Cruikshank J (1987) Breaking the Impasse: Consensual Approaches to Resolving Public Disputes. Basic Books, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber EP (2003) Bringing society back in: Grassroots ecosystem management, accountability, and sustainable communities. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, p 317

    Google Scholar 

  • Wondolleck JM, Yaffee SL (2000) Making collaboration work: lessons from innovation in natural resource management. Island Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Zafonte M, Sabatier P (2004) Short-term versus long-term coalitions in the policy process: automotive pollution control, 1963–1989. The Policy Studies Journal 32(1):75–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Planning, Public Policy and Management, 1209 University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, 97403-1209, USA

    Richard D. Margerum

Authors
  1. Richard D. Margerum
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard D. Margerum.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Margerum, R.D. A Typology of Collaboration Efforts in Environmental Management. Environmental Management 41, 487–500 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-008-9067-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-008-9067-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation