Skip to main content
Log in

A Critical Review of Environmental Impact Statements in Sri Lanka with Particular Reference to Ecological Impact Assessment

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article critically reviews environmental assessment (EA) practices in Sri Lanka, with a particular focus on ecology. An overview is provided of the domestic and international influences which have shaped the administrative process which is currently a two-tiered scheme. An Initial Environmental Examination (IEE) provides a preliminary screening tool, prior to the requirement for a full Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA). A comprehensive survey of Sri Lankan national archives showed that 463 EAs were completed in the period 1981–2005, with the bulk of these in the more populated Western and North Western Provinces. Two-thirds were IEE surveys, while the remaining third advanced to full EIA. A representative sample of 130 EAs (both IEEs and full EIAs) spanning a broad range of project types, scales, and environmental settings was selected to evaluate the quality of the ecological investigations within the published environmental impact statements (EISs). These were assigned into five classes of “explanatory power”, on the basis of their scientific content in relation to survey, analysis, and reporting of ecological interests. Within most EISs, the ecological impact assessment (EcIA) was restricted to the lowest two categories of ecological assessment, i.e., tokenistic presentation of reconnaissance-level species lists without further analysis of the development implications for individual organisms or communities. None of the assessments reviewed provided statistically rigorous analysis, which would be required if ecological impact studies are to include quantitative and testable predictions of impact, which could then be followed up by appropriate post-impact monitoring programs. Attention to key local issues such as biodiversity or ecosystem services, which also have strong social dimensions in the developing world, was also notably underrepresented. It was thus concluded that despite the existence of a sound legislative framework in Sri Lanka, the analysis contained within EISs generally fails to convey meaningful information to the relevant stakeholders and decision makers involved in protecting ecological interests and promoting sustainable development. The introduction of strategic environmental assessment (SEA) is considered an important tool to strengthen the institutional capacity of Sri Lankan government to implement current regulations and, in particular, to combat the cumulative effects of incremental development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beanlands GE and Duinker PN (1983) An ecological framework for environmental impact assessment in Canada. Institute for Resource and Environmental Studies, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, and Federal Environmental Assessment Review Office, Hull, Quebec

  • Benkendorff K (1999) The need for more stringent requiments in environmental impact assessment. Shell Cove marine case study. Pacific Conservation Biology 5:214–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Bojorquez-Tapia LA, Garcia O (1998) An Approach for evaluating EIAs – deficiencies of EIA in Mexico. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 18:217–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley RC (1991) Auditing the precision and accuracy of environmental impact predictions in Australia. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 18:1–23

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Canelas L, Almansa P, Merchan M, Cifuentes P (2005) Quality of impact statements in Portugal and Spain. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 25:217–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cashmore M (2004) The role of science in environmental impact assessment: process and procedure versus purpose in the development of theory. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 24:403–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CCD (1997) Coastal Zone Management Plan. Coast Conservation Department, Colombo, Sri Lanka

    Google Scholar 

  • CCD (2003) Coastal Zone Management Plan. Coast Conservation Department, Colombo, Sri Lanka

    Google Scholar 

  • CEA (1993) A Guide for Implementing the EIA Process in Sri Lanka. Central Environmental Authority, Colombo-Sri Lanka

    Google Scholar 

  • CEA (1995) Guidelines for Implementing the EIA Process in Sri Lanka. Central Environmental Authority, Colombo-Sri Lanka

    Google Scholar 

  • CEA (2004) Personal Communication. Colombo, Sri Lanka

  • CRMP Coastal Habitat Survey (2002) Coastal Resources Management Project, Coast Conservation Department. Colombo, Sri Lanka

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberhardt LL (1976) Quantitative ecology and impact assessment. Journal of Environmental Management 4:27–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebisemiju FS (1993) Environmental Impact Assessment: Making it Work in Developing Countries. Journal of Environmental Management 38:247–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • English Nature (1994) Nature Conservation in Environmental Assessment. Peterborough, English Nature

  • Gray IM, Edwards-Jones G (1999) A review of the quality of environmental impact assessments in the Scottish forest sector. Forestry 72:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunawardena MP (2001) A Critical Review of Environmental Impact Assessment in Sri Lanka with special emphasis on Ecological Impact Assessment. Unpublished PhD Thesis. Department of Environmental Sciences, Lancaster University

  • Gunawardena MP, Rowan JS (2005) Economic valuation of a mangrove ecosystem threatened by shrimp aquaculture in Sri Lanka. Environmental Management 36:535–550

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hirst SM (1984) Applied ecology and the real world I. Institutional Factors and Impact Assessment. Journal of Environmental Management 18:189–202

    Google Scholar 

  • IEA (Institute of Environmental Assessment) (1994) Guidelines for baseline ecological input to environmental assessment in the UK: draft for consultation. East Kirkby, Lincs: Institute of Environmental Assessment

  • Johnson DH (2002) The importance of replication in wildlife research. Journal of Wildlife Management 66:919–932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kroodsma RL (1985) Assessing the loss of wildlife habitats in environmental impact statements. Wildlife Society Bulletin 13:82–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee N and Colley R (1990) Reviewing the quality of environmental statements, Occasional Paper 24, Department of Planning and Landscape, University of Manchester

  • Leu W, Williams WP, Bark AW (1996) Development of an Environmental Impact Assessment Evaluation Model and its Application: Taiwan Case Study. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 16:115–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moragahakanda Irrigation Project (1997) Environmental Impact Assessment. Unpublished EIS deposit copy sourced CEA library, Colombo, Sri Lanka

  • Morris P (1995) Ecology - an overview. In: Morris P, Therivel R (Eds). Methods of Environmental Impact Assessment, University College London Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison-Saunders A, Bailey J (1999) Exploring the EIA/environmental management relationship. Environmental Management 24:281–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison-Saunders A, Bailey J (2003) Practioner perspectives on the role of science in environmental impact assessment. Environmental Management 31:683–695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nardini A, Blanco H, Senior C (1997) Why didn’t EIA work in the Chilean project Canal Laja-Diguillin? Environmental Impact Assessment Review 17:53–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NARESA (Natural Resources, Energy and Science Authority of Sri Lanka) (1991) Natural resources of Sri Lanka – Conditions and Trends. NARESA, Colombo, Sri Lanka

  • NCC (Nature Conservancy Council) (1990) Handbook for phase 1 habitat survey: a technique for environmental audit. Peterborough: NCC

  • Owens S, Rayner T, Bina O (2004) New agendas for appraisal: reflections on theory, practice, and research. Environment and Planning 36:1943–1959

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pemadasa A (1996) The Green Mantle of Sri Lanka. University of Ruhuna, Sri Lanka

    Google Scholar 

  • Pischke F, Cashmore M (2006) Title: Decision-oriented environmental assessment: An empirical study of its theory and methods. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 26:643–662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliffe D (ed.) (1977) A nature conservation review, volume 1. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Regier HA and Rapport DJ (1980) Ecology’s finally coming of age in a changing world. In: Biological evaluation of environmental impacts. Biological services program report no. FWS/OBS – 80/26. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Interior

  • Rosenberg DM, Resh VH, Bailing SS, Barnby MA, Collins JN, Durbin DV, Flynn TS, Hart DD, Lamberti GA, McElravy EP, Wood JR, Blank TE, Schultz DM, Marrin DL, Price DG (1981) Recent trends in environmental impact assessment. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 38:591–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross WA (1994) Environmental impact assessment in the Philippines: progress, problems, and directions for the future. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 14:217–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • School of Planning and Landscape (2003) Available online at the following website: http://www.art.man.ac.uk/EIA/publications/leafletseries/leaflet15/eiaarrangementsinlcds.htm

  • Senanayake R (2006) Available online at the following website: http://www.news.mongabay.com/2006/1106-interview_ranil.html

  • Somasekeram T, Perera MP, De Silva MBG and Godellawatta H (Eds) (1997) Atlas of Sri Lanka. Dehiwela, Sri Lanka

  • Spellerberg I, Minshull A (1992) An investigation into the nature and use of ecology in environmental impact assessments. British Ecological Society Bulletin 13:38–45. BES, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Spellergberg IF (1992) Evaluation and Assessment for Conservation. Conservation Biology Series. Chapman and Hall. London

    Google Scholar 

  • Teder T, Moora M, Roosaluste E, Zobel K, Partel M, Koljalg U, Zobel M (2007) Monitoring of biological diversity: a common-ground approach. Conservation Biology 21:313–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The World Bank Group (2006) Available online at the following website: http://www.citet.nat.tn/english/citet/metap/reglementation.html

  • Therivel R Wilson E, Thompson S, Heaney D, Pritchard D (1992) Strategic Environmental Assessment. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson S, Treweek JR, Thurling DJ (1997) The Ecological Component of environmental impact assessment: A critical review of British environmental statements. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 40:157–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treweek J (1996) Ecology and environmental impact assessment. Journal of Applied Ecology 33:191–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treweek JR, Hankard P, Roy DB, Arnold H, Thompson S (1998) Scope for strategic ecological assessment of trunk-road development in England with respect to potential impacts on lowland heathland, the Dartford warbler (Sylvia undata) and the sand lizard (Lacerta agilis). Journal of Environmental Management 53:147–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treweek JR, Thompson S, Veitch N, Japp C (1993) Ecological assessment of proposed road developments: A review of environmental statements. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 36:295–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trincomalee Coal Power Project (1988) Environmental Impact Assessment. Unpublished EIS deposit copy sourced CEA library, Colombo, Sri Lanka

  • Walawe Irrigation Project (1992) An Environmental Appraisal. TEAMS Consultants Ltd., Unpublished EIS deposit copy CEA library, Colombo, Sri Lanka

  • Warnken J, Buckley R (1998) Scientific quality of tourism environmental impact assessment. Journal of Applied Ecology 38:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wegner A, Moore SA, Bailey J (2005) Consideration of biodiversity in environmental impact assessment in Western Australia: practioner perceptions. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 25:143–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wijesundara DSA (1991) Phytosociology of a montane forest in Sri Lanka. MPhil. Department of Botany, University of Peradeniya. Sri Lanka

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work began as part of Miriya Samarakoon’s doctoral thesis at Lancaster University, UK. TEAMS Consultants are acknowledged for funding the studentship and providing logistical support for the subsequent fieldwork. The authors would like to thank the four reviewers of this paper for their valuable and constructive comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John S. Rowan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Samarakoon, M., Rowan, J.S. A Critical Review of Environmental Impact Statements in Sri Lanka with Particular Reference to Ecological Impact Assessment. Environmental Management 41, 441–460 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-007-9039-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-007-9039-5

Keywords

Navigation