Skip to main content
Log in

Reducing Nonpoint Source Pollution Through Collaboration: Policies and Programs Across the U.S. States

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nonpoint source (NPS) pollution has emerged as the largest threat to water quality in the United States, influencing policy makers and resource managers to direct more attention toward NPS prevention and remediation. In response, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) spent more than $204 million in fiscal year (FY) 2006 on the Clean Water Act’s Section 319 program to combat NPS pollution, much of it on the development and implementation of watershed-based plans. State governments have also increasingly allocated financial and technical resources to collaborative watershed efforts within their own borders to fight NPS pollution. With increased collaboration among the federal government, states, and citizens to combat NPS pollution, more information is needed to understand how public resources are being used, by whom, and for what, and what policy changes might improve effectiveness. Analysis from a 50-state study suggests that, in addition to the average 35% of all Section 319 funds per state that are passed on to collaborative watershed groups, 35 states have provided financial assistance beyond Section 319 funding to support collaborative watershed initiatives. State programs frequently provide technical assistance and training, in addition to financial resources, to encourage collaborative partnerships. Such assistance is typically granted in exchange for requirements to generate a watershed action plan and/or follow a mutually agreed upon work plan to address NPS pollution. Program managers indicated a need for greater fiscal resources and flexibility to achieve water quality goals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Born SM and Genskow KD (2000) The Watershed Approach: An Empirical Assessment of Innovation in Environmental management. National Academy of Public Administration, Washington, DC, Research Paper Number 7

  • Clark BT, Burkardt N, King MD (2005) Watershed Management and Organizational Dynamics: Nationwide Findings and Regional Variation. Environmental Management 36(2):297–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cortner HJ, Moote MA (1999) The Politics of Ecosystem Management. Washington DC: Island Press

    Google Scholar 

  • De Jongh P, Captain S (1999) Our common journey: A pioneering approach to Cooperative Environmental Management. London: Zed Books

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleishman R (2004) Watershed Groups in Ohio: The Effects of Organizational Characteristics on Political Behavior, Accomplishments, and Perceived Effectiveness. Unpublished masters thesis. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University

  • John D (1994) Civic Environmentalism: Alternatives to Regulation in States and Communities. Washington, DC: CQ Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenney DS (1999) “Historical and Sociopolitical Context of the Western Watershed Movement”. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 35(3):493–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koontz TM, Thomas CW (2006) “What Do We Know and Need to Know about the Environmental Outcomes of Collaborative Management?” Public Administration Review 66(6 suppliment):109–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Koontz TM, Steelman TJ, Carmin J, Korfmacher KS, Moseley C, Thomas CW (2004) Collaborative Environmental Management: What roles for government? Washington, D.C: Resources for the Future Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Lant CL (1999) “Introduction: Human Dimensions of Watershed Management”. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 35(3):483–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leach WD, Pelkey NW (2001) Making watershed partnerships work: a review of the empirical literature. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 127(6):378–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leach WD, Pelkey NW, Sabatier PA (2002) “Stakeholder Partnerships as Collaborative Policymaking: Evaluation Criteria Applied to Watershed Management in California and Washington”. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 21(4):645–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubell M, Schneider M, Scholz JT, Mete M (2002) “Watershed Partnerships and the Emergence of Collective Action Institutions”. American Journal of Political Science 46(1):148–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meadowcroft J (1999) Cooperative management regimes: collaborative problem-solving to implement sustainable development. International Negotiation 4(2):225–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore EA, Koontz TM (2003) “A Typology of Collaborative Watershed Groups: Citizen-based, Agency-based, and Mixed Partnerships”. Society and Natural Resources 16(5):451–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton MQ (2002) Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd edition). Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA

  • Scheberle D (1997) Federalism and Environmental Policy: Trust and the Politics of Implementation. Georgetown University Press: Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier PA, Focht, Will, Lubell, Mark, Trachtenberg, Zev, Vedlitz, Arnold, Marty Matlock (2005) Swimming Upstream: Collaborative Approaches to Watershed Management. The MIT Press. Cambridge, Massachusetts

  • Ssteelman TA, Carmin J (2002) Community Based Watershed Remediation: Connecting Organizational Resources to Social and Substantive Outcomes. In Toxic Waste and Environmental Policy in the 21st Century United States, edited by Diane Rahm. Jefferson, NC: McFarland Publishers

  • United States Congress. Public Law 100-4, “Water Quality Act of 1987,” Washington GOP (February 4, 1987)

  • USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency) (2007) Clean Water Act Section 319(h) Grant Funds History. http://www.epa.gov/owow/nps/319hhistory.html

  • USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency) (2003) Nonpoint Source Program and Grants Guidelines for States and Territories. EPA FR, 8/23/2003. V. 68, (205): Washington, DC

  • USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency) (2002) Section 319 Success Stories Volume III: The Successful Implementation of the Clean Water Act’s 319 Nonpoint Source Pollution Program. EPA 841-S-01-0001. Washington, DC: EPA, Office of Water

  • USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency) (2000) Stormwater Phase II Final Rule: An Overview. EPA 833-F-00-001. Washington, D.C: EPA, Office of Water

    Google Scholar 

  • USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency) (1996) Why Watersheds? EPA 800-F-96-001. Washington, DC: EPA Office of Water

    Google Scholar 

  • USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency) (1994) What is Nonpoint Source (NPS) Pollution? Questions and Answers. EPA 841-F-94-005. Washington, DC: EPA, Office of Water

    Google Scholar 

  • Wondolleck JM, Yaffee SL (2000) Making Collaboration Work: Lessons from Innovation in Natural Resource Management. Washington, DC: Island Press

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Funding for this research was provided by the Ohio State University School of Environment and Natural Resources and the Ohio State University Social Responsibility Initiative in the College of Food, Agricultural, and Environmental Sciences. The authors are appreciative of the participation by many federal and state personnel who shared their time and expertise.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tomas M. Koontz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hardy, S.D., Koontz, T.M. Reducing Nonpoint Source Pollution Through Collaboration: Policies and Programs Across the U.S. States. Environmental Management 41, 301–310 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-007-9038-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-007-9038-6

Keywords

Navigation