Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Chemicals in Household Products: Problems with Solutions

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The success of a regulatory regime in decreasing point-source emissions of some harmful chemicals has highlighted the significance of other sources. A growing number of potentially harmful chemicals have been incorporated into an expanding range of domestic household products and are sold worldwide. Tighter regulation has been proposed, and the European Commission has introduced the Regulation on the Registration, Evaluation, and Authorisation of Chemicals to address this concern. However, it is clear that in addition to the regulation, there is a potential to effect change through retailer and consumer attitudes and behaviours. Interviews were conducted with 7 key stakeholder groups to identify critical issues, which were then explored using a public survey questionnaire (1,008 respondents) and 8 subsequent focus groups. The findings demonstrated that the issue of chemicals in products is of concern to consumers for reasons of personal health rather than environmental protection. Key obstacles to the wider purchase of “green-alternative” products included perceived high cost and poor performance, lack of availability of products, and poor information concerning such products. Although improved regulation was seen as part of the solution, consumers must also play a role. It was clear from this study that consumers are not currently able to make informed choices about the chemicals they use but that they would be receptive to moving toward a more sustainable use of chemicals in the future if empowered to do so.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allanou R, Hansen BG, van der Bilt Y (1999) Public availability of data on EU high production volume chemicals. EC Joint Research Centre. Institute for Health and Consumer Protection. European Chemicals Bureau

  • Anderson HR, Butland BK, Strachan DP (1994) Trends in prevalence and severity of childhood asthma. British Medical Journal 308:1600–1604

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson HR, Ruggles R, Strachan DP, Austin JB, Burr M, Jeffs D, et al. (2004) Trends in prevalence of symptoms of asthma, hay fever, and eczema in 12–14 year olds in the British Isles, 1995–2002: questionnaire survey. British Medical Journal 328:1052–1053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aspinall D (1993) Greener cleaning. Home Economics and Technology, November

  • Boardman B (2004) New directions for household energy efficiency: evidence from the UK. Energy Policy 32:1921–1933

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commission for the European Communities (2001) White paper. Strategy for a future chemicals policy. COM (2001) 88 final. CEC, Brussels, Belgium

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission for the European Communities (2003) Proposal for regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning REACH. COM (2003) 644 final. CEC, Brussels, Belgium

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission for the European Communities (2005) The attitudes of European citizens towards the environment. Special Eurobarometer 217. CEC, Brussels, Belgium, pp 22

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Environment, Food, and Rural Affairs (2002) Survey of public attitudes to quality of life and to the environment - 2001. DEFRA, London, UK, pp 154

    Google Scholar 

  • Dembkowski S, Hammer-Lloyd S (1994) The environmental value-attitude-system model: a framework to guide the understanding of environmentally-conscious consumer behaviour. Journal of Marketing Management 10:593–603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Environment Agency (2004) Triclosan briefing. Available at: www.http://environment-agency.gov.uk/commondata/acrobat/tricolsanbriefing_886859.pdf. Accessed 14 Sep 2007

  • Environmental Data Services (2001) Toxics in consumer products: the next GM? ENDS Report 320:20–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Environmental Data Services (2004a) Agency requests data on triclosan as chemicals strategy begins to bite. ENDS Report 358:10–11

  • Environmental Data Services (2004b) Agency calls for action ‘now’ on sewage oestrogens. ENDS Report 355:3–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson E, Auffarth K, Eilersen A-M, Henze M, Ledin A (2003) Household chemicals and personal care products as sources for xenobiotic organic compounds in grey wastewater. Water SA 29:135–146

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • European Union (2004) Regulation (EC) no. 648/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on detergents. Official Journal of the European Union L104:1–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiss MF, Rule KL, Vikesland PJ (2007) Formation of chloroform and other chlorinated byproducts of chlorination of triclosan containing antibacterial products. Environmental Science and Technology 41:2387–2394

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Greenpeace UK (2005) The chemical house. Greenpeace, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross-Sorokin MY, Roast SD, Brighty GC (2004) Causes and consequences of feminisation of male fish. Project no. SC030285/SR, Environment Agency, Bristol, UK, pp. 41

    Google Scholar 

  • Grey CNB, Nieuwenhuijsen MJ, Golding J (2005) The use and disposal of household pesticides. Environmental Research 97:109–115

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hoch M (2001) Organotin compounds in the environment — an overview. Applied Geochemistry 16:719–743

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Holstein JA, Gubrium JF (1995) The active interview. Qualitative Research Methods Series 37. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 85

    Google Scholar 

  • Jobling S, Nolan M, Tyler CR, Brighty G, Sumpter JP (1998) Widespread sexual disruption in wild fish. Environmental Science and Technology 32:2498–2506

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kolpin DW, Furlong ET, Meyer MT, Thurman EM, Zaugg SD, Barber LB, et al. (2002) Pharmaceuticals, hormones and other organic wastewater contaminants in U.S. streams, 1999–2000: a national reconnaissance. Environmental Science and Technology 36:1202–1211

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Krarup S, Russell CS (eds) (2005) Environment, information, and consumer behaviour. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, pp. 299

    Google Scholar 

  • Lahl U, Hawxwell KA (2006) REACH―the new European chemicals legislation. Environmental Science and Technology 40:7115–7121

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Levy M, Weitz BA (1992) Retailing management. Irwin, Boston, MA, pp. 774

    Google Scholar 

  • Mainieri T, Barnett EG, Valdero TR, Unipan JB, Oskamp S (1997) Green buying: the influence of environmental concern on consumer behaviour. The Journal of Social Psychology 137:189–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mannino DM, Homa DM, Akinbami LJ, Moorman JE, Gwynn C, Redd SC (2002) Surveillance for asthma―United States, 1980–1999. Centre for Disease Control and Prevention Surveillance Summary 51(SS01):1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Moisander J, Pesonen S (2002) Narratives of sustainable ways of living: constructing the self and the other as a green consumer. Management Decision 40:329–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OSPAR (2004) 2003 Strategies of the OSPAR Commission for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the North-East Atlantic (reference no. 2003–21), Oslo and Paris Commission (OSPAR), London UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Pegram Walters Associates (1994) Consumer attitudes to packaging. PWA 2769. Prepared for INCPEN

  • Pedersen ER, Neergaard P (2005) Caveat emptor―let the buyer beware! Environmental labelling and the limitations of “green” consumerism. Business Strategy and the Environment 15:15–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters RJB (2003) Hazardous chemicals in consumer products. TNO Nederlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research, Apeldoom, The Netherlands, pp. 28

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards JP, Glegg GA, Cullinane S, Wallace HE (2000) Environmental regulation: industry and the marine environment. Journal of Environmental Management 58:119–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards JP, Glegg GA, Cullinane S, Wallace HE (2002) Policy, principle and practice in industrial pollution control: views from the regulatory interface. Environmental Management 29:182–194

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie J, Spencer E (1994) Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: Bryman A, Burgess RG (eds), Analysing qualitative data. Routledge, London, UK, pp 173–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution (2003) Chemicals in products. Twenty-fourth report. The Stationery Office, Norwich, UK, pp. 291

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruckart PZ, Orr MF, Kaye WE (2004) Hazardous chemical release in the home. Journal of Environmental Health 67:14–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Santillo D, Stringer R, Johnston P, Tickner J (1998) The precautionary principle: protecting against failures of scientific method and risk assessment. Marine Pollution Bulletin 36:939–950

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sherriff A, Farrow A, Golding J, Henderson J (2005) Frequent use of chemical household products is associated with persistent wheezing in pre-school age children. Thorax 60:45–49

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Silva E, Rajapakse N, Kertenkamp A (2002) Something from “nothing”―eight weak estrogenic chemicals combined at concentrations below NOECs produce significant mixture effects. Environmental Science and Technology 36:1751–1756

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Slack RJ, Gronow JR, Voulvoulis N (2005) Household hazardous water in municipal landfills: contaminants in leachate. Science of the Total Environment 337:119–137

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ternes TA, Joss A, Siegrist H (2004) Scrutinising pharmaceuticals and personal care products in wastewater treatment. Environmental Science and Technology 15(38):393A–399A

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson BA, Smith VH, Denoyelles F, Larive CK (2003) Effects of three pharmaceutical and personal care products on natural freshwater algal assemblages: Environmental Science and Technology 37:1713–1719

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wong W, Turner W, Stoneman P (1995) Marketing strategies and market prospects for environmentally friendly consumer products. Warwick Business School Research Bureau, University of Warwick, pp. 24

  • Worcester R (1999) British science and the chemical industry. Presented to the Chemical Industries Association in November 1999. MORI, London, UK. Available at: http://www.ipsos-mori.com/publications/rmw/british-science-and-the-chemical-industry.pdf. Accessed 14 Sep 2007

  • World Wildlife Fund (2003) Causes for concern: chemicals and wildlife. WWF, Brussels, Begium

    Google Scholar 

  • World Wildlife Fund (2004) WWF-UK national biomonitoring survey 2003. WWF-UK, Godalming, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahm SH, Ward MH (1998) Pesticides and childhood cancer. Environmental Health Perspectives 106:893–908

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This study was supported by funding from the Clean Water Initiative (Registered Charity No. 1027082).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan P. Richards.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Glegg, G.A., Richards, J.P. Chemicals in Household Products: Problems with Solutions. Environmental Management 40, 889–901 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-007-9022-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-007-9022-1

Keywords

Navigation