Skip to main content

Intelligent Databases Assist Transparent and Sound Economic Valuation of Ecosystem Services

Environmental Management volume 39, pages 887–899 (2007)Cite this article

Abstract

Assessment and economic valuation of services provided by ecosystems to humans has become a crucial phase in environmental management and policy-making. As primary valuation studies are out of the reach of many institutions, secondary valuation or benefit transfer, where the results of previous studies are transferred to the geographical, environmental, social, and economic context of interest, is becoming increasingly common. This has brought to light the importance of environmental valuation databases, which provide reliable valuation data to inform secondary valuation with enough detail to enable the transfer of values across contexts. This paper describes the role of next-generation, intelligent databases (IDBs) in assisting the activity of valuation. Such databases employ artificial intelligence to inform the transfer of values across contexts, enforcing comparability of values and allowing users to generate custom valuation portfolios that synthesize previous studies and provide aggregated value estimates to use as a base for secondary valuation. After a general introduction, we introduce the Ecosystem Services Database, the first IDB for environmental valuation to be made available to the public, describe its functionalities and the lessons learned from its usage, and outline the remaining needs and expected future developments in the field.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  • Ahlqvist O (2005) Using uncertain conceptual spaces to translate between land cover categories. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 19(7):831–857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balmford A, Bruner A, Cooper P, Costanza R, Farber S, Green RE, Jenkins M, Jefferiss P, Jessamy V, Madden J, Munro K, Myers N, Naeem S, Paavola J, Rayment M, Rosendo S, Roughgarden J, Trumper K, Turner RK (2002) Ecology - Economic reasons for conserving wild nature. Science 297(5583):950–953

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bertino E, Catania B, Zarri G (2001) Intelligent Database Systems. New York, Addison-Wesley

    Google Scholar 

  • Boumans R, Costanza R, Farley J, Wilson MA, Portela R, Rotmans J, Villa F, Grasso M (2002) Modeling the dynamics of the integrated earth system and the value of global ecosystem services using the GUMBO model. Ecological Economics 41(3):529–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brilhante V (2004) An ontology for quantities in ecology. Advances In Artificial Intelligence Sbia 2004. 3171:144–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookshire DB, Neill H (1992) Benefit transfer: conceptual and empirical issues. Water Resources Research 28:651–655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter SR, Castilla JC, deGroot RS, Mooney H, Naeem S, Noble I, Zhiyun O, Reid W, Turpie J, William M, Shidong Z (2003) Ecosystems and their services. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: Ecosystems and Human well-being: a Framework for Assessment. New York, NY, Island Press, pp 49–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Costanza R (1999) The ecological, economic, and social importance of the oceans. Ecological Economics 31(2):199–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costanza R, Daly HE (1992) Natural capital and sustainable development. Conservation Biology 6(1):37–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costanza R, dArge R, deGroot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, ONeill RV, Paruelo J, Raskin RG, Sutton P, vandenBelt M (1997) The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387(6630):253–260

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Daily G (1997) Nature’s Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Washington, DC, Island Press

    Google Scholar 

  • DeGroot RS, WMA, Boumans RMJ (2002) A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological Economics 41:393–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duarte CM (2000) Marine biodiversity and ecosystem services: an elusive link. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 250(1–2):117–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards PJ, Abivardi C (1998) The value of biodiversity: Where ecology and economy blend. Biological Conservation 83(3):239–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Environment Canada (2004) EVRI: Environmental Valuation Reference Inventory, Environment Canada. http://www.evri.ca

  • Farber S, Costanza R, Childers DL, Erickson J, Gross K, Grove M, Hopkinson CS, Kahn J, Pincetl S, Troy A, Warren P, Wilson M (2006) Linking ecology and economics for ecosystem management. Bioscience 56(2):121–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gatto M, De Leo GA (2000) Pricing biodiversity and ecosystem services: The never-ending story. Bioscience 50(4):347–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gowdy JM (1997) The value of biodiversity. Land Economics 73:25–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones MB (2003) SEEK EcoGrid: Integrating Data and Computational Resources for Ecology. DataBits: an electronic newsletter for Information Managers Spring issue. http://www.intranet.Iternet.edu/archives/documentsNewsletters/DataBits/03spring

  • Keet CM (2005) Factors affecting ontology development in ecology. Data Integration in the Life Sciences, Proceedings 3615:46–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolas D, Hebeler J, Dean M (2005) Geospatial semantic web: Architecture of ontologies. Geospatial Semantics, Proceedings 3799:183–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krivov S, Villa F (2005) Towards an ontology based visual query system. Data Integration in the Life Sciences, Proceedings 3615:313–316

    Google Scholar 

  • Limburg KE, O’Neill RV, Costanza R, Farber S (2002) Complex systems and valuation. Ecological Economics 41(3):409–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malczewski J (2006) GIS-based multicriteria decision analysis: a survey of the literature. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 20(7):703–726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McComb G, Lantz V, Nash K, Rittmaster R (2006) International value databases: Overview, methods and operational issues. Ecological Economics 60:461–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2002) Ecosystem and Human well-being: a Framework for Assessment. New York, Island Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsar Convention on Wetlands (2002). The Ramsar Strategic Plan 2003–2008. 8th Meeting of the Conference of the Contracting Parties to the Convention on Wetlands, Valencia, Spain

  • Raskin RG, Pan MJ (2005) Knowledge representation in the semantic web for Earth and environmental terminology (SWEET). Computers and Geosciences 31(9):1119–1125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava DS, Vellend M (2005) Biodiversity-ecosystem function research: Is it relevant to conservation? Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics 36:267–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutton PC, Costanza R (2002) Global estimates of market and non-market values derived from nighttime satellite imagery, land cover, and ecosystem service valuation. Ecological Economics 41(3):509–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swift MJ, Izac AMN, van Noordwijk M (2004) Biodiversity and ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes: Are we asking the right questions? Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment 104(1):113–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turpie JK, Heydenrych BJ, Lamberth SJ (2003) Economic value of terrestrial and marine biodiversity in the Cape Floristic Region: implications for defining effective and socially optimal conservation strategies. Biological Conservation 112(1–2):233–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • US Department of Labor (2006) Consumer Price Index program. http://www.bls.gov/cpi/

  • Villa F (2001) Integrating modelling architecture: a declarative framework for multi-paradigm, multi-scale ecological modelling. Ecological Modelling 137(1):23–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villa F (2007) A semantic framework and software design to enable the transparent integration, reorganization and discovery of natural systems knowledge. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems

  • Villa F, Ceroni M, Mazza A (1996) A GIS-based method for multi-objective evaluation of park vegetation. Landscape And Urban Planning 35(4):203–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villa F, Tunesi L, Agardy T (2002a) Zoning marine protected areas through spatial multiple-criteria analysis: the case of the Asinara Island National Marine Reserve of Italy. Conservation Biology 16(2):515–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villa F, Wilson M, de Groot R, Farber S, Costanza R, Boumans R (2002b) Designing an integrated knowledge base to support ecosystem services valuation. Ecological Economics 41(3):445–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villa F, Ceroni M, DeGroot R (2005) Setting the basis for a worldwide coordination for the economic valuation of ecosystem services. Gund Institute white paper. From http://www.ecoinformatics.uvm.edu/projects/valuation-coordination.html

  • Wall DH (2005) Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning in terrestrial habitats of Antarctica. Antarctic Science 17(4):523–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson MA, Howarth RB (2002) Discourse-based valuation of ecosystem services: establishing fair outcomes through group deliberation. Ecological Economics 41(3):431–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The ESD was developed with the support of grant 9982938/0243957 from the US National Science Foundation (NSF). IDB activities at the Ecoinformatics Collaboratory are also funded through the SEEK grant (NSF 0225676 for Villa and Krivov) and the SEAMLESS grant (European Union 010036-2 for Villa). Important contributions to the ESD contents and architecture were provided by Shuang Liu, Matthew Wilson, Roelof Boumans, and Robert Costanza. Comments by Joe Roman, Rudolf De Groot, Paul Sutton, and an anonymous reviewer greatly helped the clarity and the editorial shape of the manuscript. We also thank Jorge Brenner for useful comments and productive discussions on the ESD.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Ecoinformatics Collaboratory, Gund Institute for Ecological Economics, University of Vermont, 617 Main Street, Burlington, VT, 05401, USA

    Ferdinando Villa, Marta Ceroni & Sergey Krivov

Authors
  1. Ferdinando Villa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marta Ceroni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sergey Krivov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ferdinando Villa.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Villa, F., Ceroni, M. & Krivov, S. Intelligent Databases Assist Transparent and Sound Economic Valuation of Ecosystem Services. Environmental Management 39, 887–899 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-006-0269-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-006-0269-8

Keywords

  • Ecosystem services valuation
  • Intelligent databases
  • Ecoinformatics
  • Environmental decision-making
  • Ecological economics
  • Benefit transfer