Environmental Management

, Volume 39, Issue 4, pp 515–525 | Cite as

Environmental Policy Beliefs of Stakeholders in Protected Area Management

Article

Abstract

Although the importance of understanding stakeholder beliefs regarding environmental policy has been noted by many authors, research focusing on the heterogeneity of stakeholder views is still very scarce and concentrated on a product-oriented definition of stakeholders. The aim of the present study is to address this gap by examining environmental policy beliefs of stakeholder groups engaged in protected area management. Questionnaires containing 73 five-point Likert scale items were administered to eight different stakeholder groups involved in the management of Greek protected areas. Items referred to core beliefs on environmental policy, namely, the value framework and sustainable development, and secondary beliefs, that is, beliefs on social consensus and ecotourism development. Our study used as a starting point respondent recruitment on the basis of a traditional product-centered approach. We investigated whether environmental policy beliefs can be used to effectively segregate stakeholders in well-defined segments, which override the product-oriented definition of stakeholders. Indeed, K-means clustering revealed an innovation-introduction and an implementation-charged sample segment. The instrument utilized in this research proved quite reliable and valid in measuring stakeholder environmental policy beliefs. Furthermore, the methodology implied that stakeholder groups differ in a significant number of belief-system elements. On the other hand, stakeholder groups were effectively distinguished on a small set of both core and secondary beliefs. Therefore, the instrument used can be an effective tool for determining and monitoring environmental policy beliefs of stakeholders in protected area management. This is of considerable importance in the Greek case, given the recent establishment of 27 administrative bodies of protected areas, all of which are required to incorporate public consultation into management practices.

Keywords

Ecotourism Environmental policy beliefs Protected areas Social consensus Stakeholders Sustainable development Values 

References

  1. Abakerli S (2001) A critique of development and conservation policies in environmentally sensitive regions in Brazil. Geoforum 32:551–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bengston DN (1994) Changing forest values and ecosystem management. Soc Natural Resources 7:515–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Björk P (2000) Ecotourism from a conceptual perspective, an extended definition of a unique tourism form. Int J Tourism Res 2:189–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brandon K (1993) Basic steps toward encouraging local participation in nature tourism projects. In: Lindberg K, Hawkins DE (eds), Ecotourism: a guide for planners and managers. The Ecotourism Society, North Bennington, Vermont, pp 134–151Google Scholar
  5. Brown K, Adger N, Tompkins E, Bacon P, Shim D, Young K (2001) Trade-off analysis for marine protected area management. Ecol Econ 37:417–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burger J (2002) Restoration, stewardship, environmental health, and policy: understanding stakeholders’ perceptions. Environ Manage 30:631–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Castro AP, Nielsen E (2001) Indigenous people and co-management: implications for conflict management. Environ Sci Policy 4:229–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cheng AS, Kruger LE, Daniels SE (2003) ‘Place’ as an integrating concept in natural resource politics: propositions for a social science research agenda. Soc Natural Resources 16:87–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cordano M, Frieze IH, Ellis KM (2004) Entangled affiliations and attitudes: an analysis of the influences on environmental policy stakeholders’ behavioral intentions. J Business Ethics 49:27–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. De Avila-Pires FD, Mior LC, Aguiar VP, De Mello Schlemper SR (2000) The concept of sustainable development revisited. Found Sci 5:261–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. De Oliveira JAP (2002) Implementing environmental policies in developing countries through decentralization: the case of protected areas in Bahia, Brazil. World Dev 30:1713–1736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dharmaratne GS, Sang FY, Walling LJ (2000) Tourism potentials for financing protected areas. Ann Tourism Res 27:590–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dunlap RE, Van Liere KD, Mertig AG, Jones RE (2000) Measuring endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm: a revised NEP scale. J Social Issues 56:425–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fall J (2002) Divide and rule: constructing human boundaries in ‘boundless nature.’ GeoJournal 58:243–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fennell DA (1999) Ecotourism: an introduction. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  16. Filho WL (2000) Dealing with misconceptions on the concept of sustainability. Int J Sustain Higher Educ 1:9–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gamborg C (2002) The acceptability of forest management practices: an analysis of ethical accounting and the ethical matrix. Forest Policy Econ 4:175–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Glück P (2000) Theoretical perspectives for enhancing biological diversity in forest ecosystems in Europe. Forest Policy Econ 1:195–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Greek Ministry of Environment, Physical Planning and Public Works (2003) Protected areas: towards an integrated environmental management system. Athens, p 212Google Scholar
  20. Greek National Tourism Organization–WWF Hellas (2000) Designing pilot projects for ecotourism development. Hellenic Republic, Ministry of Development, Athens, p 208Google Scholar
  21. Harré R, Brockmeier J, Mühlhäusler P (1999) Greenspeak—a study of environmental discourse. Sage Publications, LondonGoogle Scholar
  22. Harrison C, Burgess J (2000) Valuing nature in context: the contribution of common-good approaches. Biodiversity Conserv 9:1115–1130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hockings M, Stolton S, Dudley N (2004) Management effectiveness: assessing management of protected areas? J Envir Policy Planning 6:157–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hodgkinson SP, Innes JM (2000) The prediction of ecological and environmental belief systems: the differential contributions of social conservatism and beliefs about money. J Envir Psychol 20:285–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hoffman AJ, Ventresca MJ (1999) The institutional framing of policy debates: economics versus the environment. Am Behav Scientist 42:1368–1392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hovardas T (1999) The Dadia Forest Reserve: the protected area, the local community, and ecotourism development. Aristotle University, School of Biology, Thessaloniki, MSc thesis [in Greek with English summary]Google Scholar
  27. Hovardas T (2005) Social representations on ecotourism—scheduling interventions in protected areas. Aristotle University, School of Biology, Thessaloniki, PhD thesis [in Greek with English summary]Google Scholar
  28. Hovardas T, Stamou GP (2006) Structural and narrative reconstruction of representations on ‘nature,’ ‘environment,’ and ‘ecotourism.’ Soc Natural Resources 19:225–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hull RB, Richert D, Seekamp E, Robertson D, Buhzoff GJ (2003) Understandings of environmental quality: ambiguities and values held by environmental professionals. Environ Manage 31:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Iannantuono A, Eyles J (2000) Environmental health policy: analytic ‘framing’ of the Great Lakes picture. Environ Manage 26:385–392Google Scholar
  31. Jenkins-Smith HC, Sabatier AP (1994) Evaluating the advocacy coalition framework. J Public Policy 14:175–203Google Scholar
  32. Jonas AEG, Bridge G (2003) Governing nature: the re-regulation of resources, land-use planning, and nature conservation. Social Sci Q 84:958–962CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Keulartz J, Van der Windt H, Swart J (2004) Concepts of nature as communicative devices: the case of Dutch nature policy. Environ Values 13:81–99Google Scholar
  34. Korfiatis K (1999) Nature under the light of modern theoretical ecology. In Modinos M, Euthimiopoulos I (eds.), Nature in ecology. Stochastis, Athens [in Greek], pp 32–44Google Scholar
  35. Koskinas K, Papastamou S, Mantoglou S, Prodromitis G, Alexias G (2000) Environment and quality of life: Social representations of the term ‘environment.’ Athens, Greece: Greek letters [in Greek]Google Scholar
  36. Lane MB (2003) Decentralization or privatization of environmental governance? Forest conflict and bioregional assessment in Australia. J Rural Studies 19:283–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lindberg K, Enriquez J, Sproule K (1996) Ecotourism questioned. Case studies from Belize. Ann Tourism Res 23:543–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Louloudis L (1998) Ecology, science, utopia: in the era of creative embarrassment. In: Staurakakis G (ed), Nature, society, politics. Nisos, Athens [in Greek], pp 450–464Google Scholar
  39. Louloudis L (1999a) Geopolitical initiatives of the European Union and its rural South. In: Louloudis L, Beopoulos N (eds), Critical approaches to the development and protection of the rural environment. Stochastis, Athens [in Greek], pp 99–112Google Scholar
  40. Louloudis L (1999b) Risking public health. The politics of the mad cow disease management. In Louloudis L, Georgiadou V, Staurakakis G (eds.), Nature, society, science. In the era of ‘mad cows’. Risk and uncertainty. Nefeli, Athens [in Greek], pp 17–62Google Scholar
  41. Lundqvist LJ (2000) Capacity-building or social construction? Explaining Sweden’s shift towards ecological modernization. Geoforum 31:21–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mascarenhas M, Scarce R (2004) ‘The intention was good’: legitimacy, consensus-based decision-making, and the case of forest planning in British Columbia, Canada. Soc Natural Resources 17:17–38Google Scholar
  43. McCreary S, Gamman J, Brooks B, Whitman L, Bryson R, Fuller B, McInerny A, Glazer R (2001) Applying a mediated negotiation framework to integrated coastal zone management. Coastal Manage 29:183–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Miller CA (2000) The dynamics of framing environmental values and policy: four models of societal processes. Environ Values 9:211–233Google Scholar
  45. Minca C, Linda M (2000) Ecotourism on the edge: the case of Corcovado National Park, Costa Rica. In: Font X, Tribe J (eds), Forest tourism and recreation. Case studies in environmental management. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, Oxon, pp 103–126Google Scholar
  46. Morito B (2003) Intrinsic value: a modern albatross for the ecological approach. Environ Values 12:317–336Google Scholar
  47. Palmer JA (1998) Environmental education in the 21st century. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  48. Paraskevopoulos S, Korfiatis K (2003) Environmental education: theories and methods. Christodoulidis, Thessaloniki [in Greek]Google Scholar
  49. Proctor JD (1998) Environmental values and popular conflict over environmental management: a comparative analysis of public comments on the Clinton Forest Plan. Environ Manage 22:347–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Robertson DP, Hull RB (2003) Public ecology: an environmental science and policy for global society. Environ Sci Policy 6:399–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rosa HD, Da Silva JM (2005) From environmental ethics to nature conservation policy: Natura 2000 and the burden of proof. J Agric Environ Ethics 18:107–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sgardelis S (1996) Environmental planning and environmental education. In: Iatrou GD, Mardiris TA (eds), Ecology, society, education. Nea Sinora, Athens [in Greek], pp 227–238Google Scholar
  53. Stoll-Kleemann S (2001) Barriers to nature conservation in Germany: a model explaining opposition to protected areas. J Environ Psychol 21:369–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Swaffield S (1998) Frames of reference: a metaphor for analyzing and interpreting attitudes of environmental policy influencers. Environ Manage 22:495–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tarrant MA, Cordell HK (2002) Amenity values of public and private forests: examining the value-attitude relationship. Environ Manage 30:692–703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Trakolis D (2001a) Local people’s perceptions of planning and management issues in Prespes Lakes National Park, Greece. J Environ Manage 61:227–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Trakolis D (2001b) Perceptions, preferences, and reactions of local inhabitants in Vikos-Aoos National Park, Greece. Environ Manage 28:665–676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Van den Hove S (2000) Participatory approaches to environmental policy-making: the European Commission Climate Policy Process as a case study. Ecol Econ 33:457–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Van der Steen WJ (1993) A practical philosophy for the life sciences. State University of New York Press, AlbanyGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EcologySchool of Biology, Aristotle UniversityThessalonikiGreece
  2. 2.WWF Greece, Dadia ProjectDadiaGreece

Personalised recommendations