Advertisement

Environmental Management

, Volume 36, Issue 3, pp 439–454 | Cite as

Mekong River Fish Conservation Zones in Southern Laos: Assessing Effectiveness Using Local Ecological Knowledge

  • Ian G. BairdEmail author
  • Mark S. Flaherty
  • Ian G. Baird
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT

Abstract

Small-scale fisheries are important in Laos, where rural people heavily depend upon Mekong River and tributary fish stocks for their livelihoods. Increasing pressures from human exploitation and habitat disturbance, however, have raised serious concerns about the potential depletion of various species. This has led to the establishment of large numbers of Fish Conservation Zones (FCZs) or “no-take” fish sanctuaries in southern Laos based on a “community-based fisheries co-management” framework. This study uses the local ecological knowledge (LEK) of fishers to assess the effectiveness of village-managed FCZs in enhancing fish stocks in the mainstream Mekong River in Khong District, Champasak Province. Focus group interviews about species that are believed to have benefited from different FCZs are compared with parameters such as FCZ area, age, depth, localized gradient, water velocity, and the presence of wetland forests nearby. The results suggest that no one aspect is likely to account for variations in fish stocks; rather, it is the interaction between numerous factors that has the largest impact. Secondly, the results indicate that microhabitat diversity and protection are critical for maintaining and enhancing Mekong fisheries. Deep-water pools are particularly important as dry season refuges for many fish species, and FCZ depth may be the single most important environmental factor affecting the success of FCZs in the Mekong River. FCZs have the most potential to benefit relatively sedentary species, but may also benefit highly migratory species, given the right conditions. This study shows that integrated approaches to stock assessment that employ LEK and scientific fisheries management have considerable potential for improving Mekong capture-fisheries management.

Keywords

Asia Small-scale fisheries Marine protected areas Co-management Traditional ecological knowledge Fish sanctuaries 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The Environmental Protection and Community Development in Siphandone Wetland Project, funded by the European Union, supported this study. CESVI Cooperation and Development and the Agriculture and Forestry Division of Champasak Province, Lao PDR implemented the project. We gratefully acknowledge our Lao co-workers: Phongsavath Kisouvannalath, Vixay Inthaphaisy, Bounpheng Phylavanh, Khamsouk Xaiyamanivong, and Bounthong Vongxenesouk. We are also grateful for the comments provided by David Dudgeon, Simon R. Bush, and one anonymous reviewer. We thank Ole Heggen from the Geography Department of the University of Victoria for preparing the maps, and finally, we especially thank the villagers in Khong District who participated in the survey.

References

  1. Abramovitz J. 1996. Imperiled waters, impoverished future: The decline of freshwater ecosystems. Paper no. 128. Worldwatch Institute, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmed M., H. Navy, L. Vuthy, M. Tiongco. 1998. Socioeconomic assessment of freshwater capture fisheries in Cambodia: Report on a household survey. Mekong River Commission, Phnom PenhGoogle Scholar
  3. Baird I. G. 2001a. Aquatic biodiversity in the siphandone wetlands. in G. Daconto (ed), Siphandone wetlands. CESVI Cooperation and Development, Bergamo, Italy. Pages 64–71Google Scholar
  4. Baird I. G. 2001b. Towards sustainable co-management of Mekong River inland aquatic resources, including fisheries, in Southern Lao PDR. G. Daconto (ed), Siphandone wetlands. CESVI Cooperation and Development, Bergamo, Italy. Pages 89–111Google Scholar
  5. Baird, I. G. 2005 (in press). Local ecological knowledge and small-scale freshwater fisheries management in the Mekong River in Southern Laos. in N. Haggan, B. Neis, and I. G. Baird (eds.), Putting fishers’ knowledge to work: Changing the face of fisheries science and management. Blackwell Publishing, and UNESCO, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  6. Baird, I. G., and B. Phylavanh. 1999. Fishes and forests: Fish foods and the importance of seasonally flooded riverine habitats for Mekong River fish. Technical report. Environmental protection and community development in Siphandone Wetland Project. CESVI Cooperation and Development, Pakse, Lao PDRGoogle Scholar
  7. Baird I. G., P. Dearden. 2003. Biodiversity and resource tenure regimes: A case study from Northeast Cambodia. Environmental Management 32:541–550Google Scholar
  8. Baird, I. G., P. Kisouvannalath, V. Inthaphaisy, and B. Phylavanh. 1998a. The potential for ecological classification as a tool for establishing and monitoring fish conservation zones in the Mekong River. Technical report. Environmental Protection and Community Development in Siphandone Wetland Project. CESVI Cooperation and Development, Pakse, Lao PDRGoogle Scholar
  9. Baird, I. G., V. Inthaphaisy, B. Phylaivanh, and P. Kisouvannalath. 1998b. A rapid fisheries survey in Khong District, Champasak Province, Southern Lao PDR. Technical report. Environmental protection and community development in Siphandone Wetland Project. CESVI Cooperation and Development, Pakse, Lao PDRGoogle Scholar
  10. Baird, I. G., V. Inthaphaisy, P. Kisouvannalath, B. Phylavanh, and B. Mounsouphom. 1999a. The fishes of Southern Lao (in Lao). Lao Community Fisheries and Dolphin Protection Project, Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, VientianeGoogle Scholar
  11. Baird, I. G., V. Inthaphaisy, P. Kisouvannalth, B. Vongsenesouk, and B. Phylavanh. 1999b. The setting up and the initial results of a villager based system for monitoring fish conservation zones in the Mekong River, Khong District, Champasak Province, Southern Lao PDR. Technical report. Environmental Protection and Community Development in Siphandone Wetland Project. CESVI Cooperation and Development, VientianeGoogle Scholar
  12. Baird I. G., Z. Hogan, B. Phylaivanh, P. Moyle. 2001a. A communal fishery for migratory catfish Pangasius macronema in the Mekong River. Asian Fisheries Science 14:25–41Google Scholar
  13. Baird I. G., B. Phylavanh, B. Vongsenesouk, K. Xaiyamanivong. 2001b. The ecology and conservation of the smallscale croaker Boesemania microlepis (Bleeker 1858-59) in the mainstream Mekong River, Southern Laos. Natural History Bulletin of the Siam Society 49:161–176Google Scholar
  14. Baird I. G., M. S. Flaherty, B. Phylavanh. 2003. Rhythms of the river: Lunar phases and migrations of small carps (Cyprinidae) in the Mekong River. Natural History Bulletin of the Siam Society 51:5–36Google Scholar
  15. Bakker K. 1999. The politics of hydropower: developing the Mekong. Political Geography 18:209–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Batterbury S., T. Forsyth, K. Thompson. 1997. Environmental transformation in developing countries: Hybrid research and democratic policy. The Geographical Journal 2:126–132Google Scholar
  17. Bawa Village Community. 1997. Mozambique’s Tchuma Tchato initiative of resource management on the Zambezi: A community perspective. Society & Natural Resources 10:409–413Google Scholar
  18. Bush S. 2003. “Give a man a fish...”: Contextualising living aquatic resources development in the lower Mekong basin. Working paper series, working paper no. 8. Australian Mekong Resource Centre, University of Sydney, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  19. Bush S. R. 2004. Scales and sales: Changing social and spatial fish trading networks in the Siphandone Fishery, Lao PDR. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography 25:32–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chomchanta P., P. Vongphasouk, S. Chanrya, C. Soulignavong, B. Saadsy, T. J. Warren. 2000. A preliminary assessment of Mekong Fishery Conservation Zones in the Siphandone area of Southern Lao PDR, and recommendations for further evaluation and monitoring. Final report. The Living Aquatic Resources and Research Centre (LARReC), VientianeGoogle Scholar
  21. Claridge G. (compiler). 1996. An inventory of wetlands of the Lao PDR. Wetlands Programme. IUCN—The World Conservation Union, VientianeGoogle Scholar
  22. Claridge G. F., T. Sorangkhoun, I. G. Baird. 1997. Community fisheries in Lao PDR: A survey of techniques and issues. IUCN—The World Conservation Union, VientianeGoogle Scholar
  23. Colchester M., C. Erni. (eds.). 1998. Indigenous peoples and protected areas in South and Southeast Asia. International Work Group for Indigenous Associations, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  24. Cowx I. 1991. Catch effort sampling strategies: Conclusions and recommendations for management. in I. Cowx (ed.), Catch effort sampling strategies: Their application in freshwater fisheries management. Fishing New Books, London. Pages 404–413Google Scholar
  25. Cunningham P., 1998. Extending a co-management network to save the Mekong’s giants. Mekong Fish Catch and Culture 3:6–7Google Scholar
  26. Daconto G., (ed.) 2001. Siphandone wetlands. CESVI Cooperation and Development, Bergamo, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  27. Dudgeon D., 2002. An inventory of riverine biodiversity in monsoonal Asia: Present status and conservation challenges. Water Science and Technology 45:11–19Google Scholar
  28. Fischer F. 2000. Citizens, experts, and the environment: The politics of local knowledge. Duke University Press, DurhamGoogle Scholar
  29. Fisheries Office, Ratanakiri Province and [NTFP] the Non-Timber Forest Products Project, Ratanakiri Province. 2000. A study of the downstream impacts of the Yali Falls Dam in Ratanakiri Province, Northeast Cambodia. Fisheries Office, Ratanakiri Province and NTFP, Ratanakiri, CambodiaGoogle Scholar
  30. [FAO] Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 1999. Aquastat—FAO’s Information System on Water and Agriculture. Lao People’s Democratic Republic. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, RomeGoogle Scholar
  31. Friedlander A., J. C. Nowlis, J. A. Sanchez, R. Appeldoorn, P. Usseglio, C. McCormick, S. Bejarno, A. Mitchell-Chui. 2003. Designing effective marine protected areas in Seaflower biosphere reserve, Columbia, based on biological and sociological information. Conservation Biology 17:1769–1784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Garaway C. J. 1999. Small waterbody fisheries and the potential for community-led enhancement: Case studies in Lao PDR. T. H. Huxley School for the Environment, Earth Sciences and Engineering, Imperial College of Science Technology and Medicine. University of London, LondonGoogle Scholar
  33. Haggan N., B. Neis, I. G. Baird (eds). 2004 Putting fishers’ knowledge to work: Changing the face of fisheries science and management. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford (in press).Google Scholar
  34. Hill M. T., S. A. Hill. 1994. Fisheries ecology and hydropower in the Mekong River: An evaluation of run-of-the-river projects. Mekong Secretariat, BangkokGoogle Scholar
  35. Hirsch, P., and P. Noraseng. 1999. Co-management of fisheries in diverse aqua-ecosystems of southern Laos. Paper presented at the International Workshop of Fisheries Co-Management, Penang, Malaysia, 23–28 August 1999. ICLARM, Pakse, Lao PDRGoogle Scholar
  36. Hirsch, P., and A. Wyatt. 2004. Negotiating local livehoods: Scale of conflict in the San River Basin. Asia Pacific Viewpoint 45:51–68Google Scholar
  37. Hogan Z., 1997. Aquatic conservation zones: Community management of rivers and fisheries. Watershed 3:29–33Google Scholar
  38. Hubbel D., 1999. Food for the people: Natural fisheries of the Mekong River. Watershed 4:22–36Google Scholar
  39. [IIED] International Institute of Environment and Development. 1997. Participatory learning and action. Participation and fishing communities. PLA Notes. International Institute of Environment and Development, LondonGoogle Scholar
  40. [IRN] International Rivers Network. 1999. Power struggle. The impacts of hydro-development in Laos. International Rivers Network, Berkeley, USAGoogle Scholar
  41. Jentoft S., B. J. McCay, D. C. Wilson. 1998. Social theory and fisheries co-management. Marine Policy 22:423–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Johannes R. E. 1998. Dataless management. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 13:243–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Johnson C. 1998. Beyond community rights: Small-scale fisheries and community-based management in southern Thailand. TDRI Quarterly Review 13:25–31Google Scholar
  44. Kolding J. 2002. The use of hydro-acoustic surveys for the monitoring of fish abundance in the deep pools and Fish Conservation Zones in the Mekong River, Siphandone area, Champassak Province, Lao PDR. Technical report from a test survey. LaRREC, VientianeGoogle Scholar
  45. Kottelat M., T. Whitten. 1996. Freshwater biodiversity in Asia with special reference to fish. World Bank technical paper no. 343. The World Bank, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  46. Lieng S., C. Yim, N. P. van Zalinge. 1995. Fisheries of the Tonlesap River Cambodia, I: The Bagnet (Dai) Fishery. Asian Fisheries Science 8:258–265Google Scholar
  47. Masae A., A. Nissapa, and S. Boromthanarat. 1999. An analysis of co-management arrangements: A case of fishing community in Southern Thailand. Paper presented at the International Workshop on Fisheries Co-Management, Penang, Malaysia, 23–28 August 1999. CORIN and ICLARM, Songkhla, ThailandGoogle Scholar
  48. Matics K. I. 1997. Recent developments and announcements: Measures for enhancing marine fisheries stock in Southeast Asia. Ocean and Coastal Management 34:233–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. McCay B. J., S. Jentoft. 1996. From the bottom up: Participatory issues in fisheries management. Society & Natural Resources 9:237–250Google Scholar
  50. Memon P. A., B. Sheeran, T. Ririnui. 2003. Strategies for rebuilding closer links between local indigenous communities and their customary fisheries in Aotearoa/New Zealand. Local Environment 8:205–219Google Scholar
  51. Olomola A. 1998. Sources and resolution of conflicts in Nigerian artisinal fisheries. Society & Natural Resources 11:121–135Google Scholar
  52. Pomeroy R. S., M. B. Carlos. 1997. Community-based coastal resource management in the Philippines: a review and evaluation of programs and projects, 1984–1994. Marine Policy 21:445–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pomeroy R. S., B. M. Katon, I. Harkes. 2001. Conditions affecting the success of fisheries co-management: Lessons from Asia. Marine Policy 25:197–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Poulsen A. F. 2001. Deep pools as dry season fish habitats in the Mekong River basin. Report for the assessment of Mekong fisheries component (AMFC). Mekong River Commission, VientianeGoogle Scholar
  55. Poulsen, A. F. and J. Valbo- Jorgensen. 2001a. Deep pools in the Mekong River. Mekong River Catch and Culture 7(1):1, 8–9Google Scholar
  56. Poulsen A. F., J. Valbo-Jorgensen. 2001b. Fish migration and spawning habits in the Mekong mainstream: A survey using local knowledge. CD ROM. AMFC/MRC, VientianeGoogle Scholar
  57. Primack R. B. 1998. Essentials of conservation biology (2nd edition). Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USAGoogle Scholar
  58. Roberts T. R. 1993a. Environmental impact assessment: the EIA on EIA. Asian Society for Environmental Protection Newsletter 9:1–3, 10.Google Scholar
  59. Roberts T. R. 1993b. Just another dammed river? Negative impacts of Pak Mun dam on fishes of the Mekong Basin. Natural History Bulletin of the Siam Society 41:105–133Google Scholar
  60. Roberts T. R. 1993c. Artisinal fisheries and fish ecology below the great waterfalls of the Mekong River in Southern Laos. Natural History Bulletin of the Siam Society 41:31–62Google Scholar
  61. Roberts T. R., I. G. Baird. 1995. Traditional fisheries and fish ecology on the Mekong river at Khone waterfalls in southern Laos. Natural History Bulletin of the Siam Society 43:219–262Google Scholar
  62. Roberts T., T. Warren. 1994. Observations on fishes and fisheries in southern Laos and northeastern Cambodia, October 1993–February 1994. Natural History Bulletin of the Siam Society 42:87–115Google Scholar
  63. Russ G. R., A. C. Alcala. 1999. Management histories of Sumilon and Apo Marine Reserves, Philippines, and their influence on national marine resource policy. Coral Reefs 18:307–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Sjorslev J. G. (ed.). 2000. Luangprabang fisheries survey. AMFC/MRC and LaRREC/NAFRI, VientianeGoogle Scholar
  65. Thorburn C. C. 2001. The house that poison built: Customary marine property rights and the live food fish trade in the Kei Islands, southeast Maluku. Development and Change 32:151–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. [UNDP] United Nations Development Program. 1999. Lao PDR Country Profile. UNDP, VientianeGoogle Scholar
  67. Warren T. J., G. C. Chapman, D. Singhanouvong. 1998. The upstream dry-season migrations of some important fish species in the Lower Mekong River in Laos. Asian Fisheries Science 11:239–251Google Scholar
  68. William G. A., F. Krupp, M. Younis. 2003. Development and management of a network of marine protected areas in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden region. Ocean and Coastal Management 46:741–761CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ian G. Baird
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mark S. Flaherty
    • 1
  • Ian G. Baird
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of GeographyUniversity of VictoriaCanada
  2. 2.Global Association for People and the Environment (GAPE)Pakse

Personalised recommendations