Environmental Management

, Volume 39, Issue 2, pp 261–277 | Cite as

Application of a Karst Disturbance Index in Hillsborough County, Florida

  • Philip van Beynen
  • Nilda Feliciano
  • Leslie North
  • Kaya Townsend
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT

Abstract

Hillsborough County, Florida, is a karst region that is heavily urbanized, yet no study has been undertaken measuring the degree of human disturbance. Van Beynen and Townsend (2005) created a hierarchical and standardized disturbance index specifically designed for karst environments. To address the problem of determining human disturbance in the county, the above index was successfully applied and it was found that Hillsborough was highly disturbed (disturbance score of 0.69 of 1.0) because of its predominant urban and rural land use. Furthermore, the application of the index allowed for its refinement and the highlighting of environmental aspects in need of remediation such as soil compaction, deforestation, disturbance of archaeological sites, and the expanding urban footprint. Several minor issues arose during the application: the need for broader indicator descriptions that encompass a variety of scenarios, the need for a revised water quality indicator, inadequate data on sinkholes, and a lack of data for species richness and species population density. The utility of the index to resource managers arises from emphasizing certain areas of the environment that require immediate attention and determining temporal changes in environmental quality. Future application of the index requires potential retooling of the biota indicators, tightening of scoring descriptions for certain indicators, and further examination of the scale at which the index can be applied.

Keywords

Florida Karst Index Human impact Environmental indicators 

References

  1. Arfib B., G. de Marsily J. Ganoulis. 2000. Pollution by seawater intrusion into a karst system; new research in the case of the Almyros Source (Heraklio, Crete, Greece). Acta Carsol 29:15–31Google Scholar
  2. Baker A., D. Genty. 1998. Environmental pressures on conserving cave speleothems: Effects of changing surface land use and increased cave tourism. J Envir Manage 58:165–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boulton A. J., W. F. Humphreys, S. M. Eberhard. 2003. Imperilled subsurface waters in Australia: Biodiversity, threatening processes and conservation. Aquat Ecosyst Health Manage 6:41–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. City of Tampa. 2005a. Prohibited waste. Solid Waste Department: Tampa, Florida http://www.tampagov.net/dept_Solid_Waste/files/Prohibited_Wastes_Brochure.pdf
  5. City of Tampa. 2005b. Conservation education. Water Department: Tampa, Florida http://www.tampagov.net/dept_water/conservation_education/Educators/education_home.asp
  6. Crawford N. C. 1984. Sinkhole flooding associated with urban development upon karst terrain: Bowling Green, Kentucky. In B. F. Beck (ed), Sinkholes: Their geology, engineering and environmental impact. Multidisciplinary Conference on Sinkholes. Orlando, Florida, pp 283–292Google Scholar
  7. Deming J. 1980. The cultural resources of Hillsborough County: An assessment of prehistoric resources. Historical Tampa/Hillsborough County Preservation Board, Tampa, FloridaGoogle Scholar
  8. de Montmollin W. 1983. Environmental factors and prehistoric site location in the Tampa Bay area. Unpublished M.A. thesis, University of South FloridaGoogle Scholar
  9. Donahue B. 1990. In beauty it is finished. Buzzworm Envir J 2:34–39Google Scholar
  10. Doran N. E., K. Kiernan R. Swain A. M. M. Richardson. 1999. Hickmania troglodytes, the Tasmanian cave spider, and its potential role in cave management. J Insect Conserv 3:257–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Drew D. 1996. Agriculturally induced environmental changes in the burren karst, Western Ireland. Envir Geol 28:137–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Florida Administration Code. (1992) 62–522.300Google Scholar
  13. Florida Administration Code. (1989) 62–610.523Google Scholar
  14. Florida Administration Code. (1989) 62–610.525Google Scholar
  15. Florida Department of Environmental Protection. 2004a. Plant management in Florida waters. Florida agriculture and water use. The Center for Aquatic and Invasive Plants, University of Florida, and the Bureau of Invasive Plant Management, Florida Department of Environmental Protection: Tallahassee, Florida http://www.plants.ifas.ufl.edu/guide/agricul.html
  16. Florida Department of Environmental Protection. 2004b. Florida DEP Releases 5-year Enforcement Record. Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Tallahassee, Florida http://www.dep.state.fl.us/secretary/news/2004/dec/files/enforcement.pdf
  17. Florida Department of Environmental Protection. 2005. Hydrogeology section. Florida Department of Environmental Protection: Tallahassee, Florida http://www.dep.state.fl.us/geology/programs/hydrogeology/hydro_index.htm
  18. Florida Department of State. 2005. Florida master site file. Office of Cultural and Historical Programs: Tallahassee, Florida. http://www.flheritage.com/preservation/sitefile/
  19. Florida Sinkhole Research Institute. Sinkholes in Florida. Report No. 85-86-4, FSRI/UCF, Orlando FloridaGoogle Scholar
  20. Florida Statute. 1998. ch. 810.13Google Scholar
  21. Florida Statute. 2001. ch. 403.0885Google Scholar
  22. Floyd S. (ed) 2003. Florida statistical abstract 2003. University of Florida Press, Gainesville, FloridaGoogle Scholar
  23. Ford D. C., P. W. Williams. 1989. Karst geomorphology and hydrology. Unwin Hyman Ltd., LondonGoogle Scholar
  24. Gilleson D. G. 1996. Caves: Processes, development and management. Blackwell Publishers Ltd., OxfordGoogle Scholar
  25. Goldie H. S. 1993. The legal protection of limestone pavements in Great Britain. Envir Geol 21:160–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gunn J., D. Bailey. 1993. Limestone quarrying and quarry reclamation in Britain. Envir Geol 21:167–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gunn J., P. Hardwick, P. J. Wood. 2000. The invertebrate community of the Peak-Speedwell Cave system, Derbyshire, England: Pressures and considerations for conservation management. Aquat Conserv Marine Freshwater Ecosyst 10:353–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Harding K. A., D. Ford. 1993. Impact of primary deforestation upon limestone slopes in northern Vancouver Island, British Columbia. Envir Geol 21:137–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hillsborough County. 2005a. About the County. Hillsborough County, Tampa, Florida http://www.hillsboroughcounty.org/about/
  30. Hillsborough County. 2005b. Parks, Recreation and Conservation Department: Tampa, Florida http://www.hillsboroughcounty.org/parks/
  31. Hillsborough County. 2005c. Roadway level service report. Transportation Division, Tampa, Florida http://www.hillsboroughcounty.org/pgm/transportation/resources/publications/los/roadwayreport05january.pdf
  32. Jackson R., A. Zelinka, J. Smart, J. Kunz. 2006. A redevelopment revolution. Planning 72:12–16Google Scholar
  33. James J. M. 1993. Burial and infilling of a karst in Papua New Guinea by road erosion sediments. Envir Geol 21:144–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Karst Productions Inc. 2004. Water’s journey: The hidden rivers of Florida. High Springs, FloridaGoogle Scholar
  35. Karst Research Group. 2005. Karst research group. University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida http://www.uweb.cas.usf.edu/~vacher/karsthome.htm
  36. Keith J. H., J. L. Bassestt, J. A. Duwelius. 1997. Findings from MOU-related karst studies for Indiana State Road 37, Lawrence County, Indiana. In B. F. Beck, J. B. Stephenson (eds), The engineering geology and hydrogeology of karst terrains. 6th Annual Multidisciplinary Conference on Sinkholes, Engineering, and Environmental Impacts, Springfield, Missouri, pp 157–171Google Scholar
  37. Lantigua J. 2005. Florida’s pesticide inspectors spread thin. Palm Beach Post 17 July 2005Google Scholar
  38. Leighty R. G. 1958. Soil survey, Hillsborough County, Florida. United States Soil Conservation Service, US Government Print OfficeGoogle Scholar
  39. Lewis R. R., M. J. Durako, M. D. Moffler, R. C. Phillips. 1985. Seagrass meadows of Tampa Bay—a review. In S. F Treat., J. L. Simon R. R. Lewis III, R. L. Whitman Jr. (eds.) Proceedings of the Tampa Bay Area Scientific Information Symposium, May 1982, University of South Florida, Tampa pp. 210–246Google Scholar
  40. Loop C. M., W. B. White. 2001. A conceptual model for DNAPL transport in karst ground water basins. Groundwater 39:119–127Google Scholar
  41. McGovern B. (ed) 2004. Florida almanac. Dukane Press, Hollywood, FloridaGoogle Scholar
  42. Moore L. 2001. The U.S. Geological Survey’s revision program for 7.5-minute topographic maps. United States Geological Survey, Rolla, Missouri. http://www.pubs.usgs.gov/of/of00–325/moore.html
  43. Murray F., C. Legget. 1997. A review of environmental indices. In P. P. Rogers, K. F. Jalal, B. N. Lohani, G. M. Owens, C. C. Yu, C. M. Dufournaud, J. Bi (eds), Measuring Environmental Quality in Asia. Division of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Massachusetts, pp 311–368Google Scholar
  44. Nations J. 2004. State of the parks. National Parks Conservation Association, Fort Collins, Colorado http://www.npca.org
  45. OECD. 2004. OECD Key Environmental indicators. OECD Environment Directorate, ParisGoogle Scholar
  46. Pauleit S., R. Ennos, Y. Golding. 2005. Modeling the environmental impacts of urban land use and land cover change—a study in Merseyside, UK. Landscape Urban Plan 71:295–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Quinlan J. F., R. O. Ewers. 1985. Groundwater flow in limestone terrains: Strategy, rationale and procedure for reliable, efficient monitoring of groundwater quality in karst areas. In National Symposium and Exposition on Aquifer Restoration and Groundwater Monitoring, Proceedings, National Water Well Association, Worthington, Ohio, pp 197–234Google Scholar
  48. Randazzo A. F., Jones D. S. 1997. The geology of Florida. The University of Florida Press, Gainesville, 325 ppGoogle Scholar
  49. Salinero M. 2005. Hillsborough to take on Honeywell. Tampa Tribune. November 18, 2005Google Scholar
  50. Samek K. 2004. Unknown quantity: The bottled water industry and Florida’s springs. J Land Use Envir Law 19:569Google Scholar
  51. Sauro U. 1993. Human impact on the karst of the Venetian Fore-Alps, Italy. Envir Geol 21:115–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Silverwood N. 2000. The complex of Mega Mania. Forest and Bird 297:14–18Google Scholar
  53. Sinclair W. C., Stewart J. W., R. L. Kuntilla, A. E. Gilboy, R. L. Miller. 1985. Types, features and occurrence of sinkholes in the karst of west-central Florida. U.S. Geological Survey Water Resources Investigation Report 85–4126Google Scholar
  54. Southwest Florida Water Management District. 1988. Ground-water resource availability inventory: Hillsborough County, Florida. Resource Management and Planning, Dept. of the Southwest Florida Water Management District, Brooksville, FloridaGoogle Scholar
  55. Southwest Florida Water Management District. 1993. Eastern Tampa Bay Water Resource Assessment Project. Southwest Florida Water Management District, Brooksville, FloridaGoogle Scholar
  56. Southwest Florida Water Management District. 2001. The hydrology and water quality of select springs in the southwest Florida water management district. Water Quality Monitoring Program, Southwest Florida Water Management District, Brooksville, Florida. http://www.swfwmd.state.fl.us/documents/reports/springs.pdf
  57. Southwest Florida Water Management District. 2005. Hydrologic conditions. Hydrologic Data Operations Dept., Southwest Florida Water Management District, Brooksville, Florida http://www.swfwmd.state.fl.us/waterres/hydro/files/oct05hydro.pdf
  58. Spencer C, A. I. Robertson, A. Curtis. 1998. Development and testing of a rapid appraisal wetland condition index in South-Eastern Australia. J Envir Manage 54:143–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Tihansky A. B. 1999. Sinkholes, West-Central Florida. In D. Galloway, D. R. Jones, S. E. Ingebritsen (eds), Land subsidence in the United States: USFS Circular 1182, pp 121–140Google Scholar
  60. United States. 1988. Federal Cave Resources Protection Act, 100 Public Law 691Google Scholar
  61. United States Census. 2005a. Hillsborough County, Florida quick facts. United States Department of Commerce: Washington, D.C. http://www.quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/12/12057.html
  62. United States Census. 2005b. New privately-owned residential building permits Hillsborough County, Florida (057). United States Department of Commerce, Washington, D.C. http://www.censtats.census.gov/cgi-bin/bldgprmt/bldgdisp.pl
  63. United States Environmental Protection Agency. 2003. National pollutant discharge elimination system. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. http://www.cfpub.epa.gov/npdes/
  64. United States Environmental Protection Agency. 2005. Florida NPL/NPL caliber cleanup site summaries. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. http://www.epa.gov/region4/waste/npl/nplfls/helenafl.htm
  65. United States Geological Survey (USGS) Florida. 2004. Hillsborough County. Reston, VirginiaGoogle Scholar
  66. van Beynen P. E., K. M. Townsend. 2005. A disturbance index for karst environments. Envir Manage 36:101–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. White E. L., G. Aron, W. B. White. 1984. The influence of urbanization on sinkhole development in central Pennsylvania. In B. F. Beck (ed), Sinkholes: Their geology, engineering, and environmental impact. 1st Annual Multidisciplinary Conference on Sinkholes, Orlando, Florida, pp 275–281Google Scholar
  68. Wood P. J., J. Gunn, J. Perkins. 2002. The impact of pollution on aquatic invertebrates with a subterranean ecosystem—out of site out of mind. Arch Hydrobiol 155:223–225Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Philip van Beynen
    • 1
  • Nilda Feliciano
    • 1
  • Leslie North
    • 1
  • Kaya Townsend
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Environmental Science and PolicyUniversity of South FloridaTampaUSA
  2. 2.Nelson Poynter Memorial Library, University of South Florida, St. PetersburgTampaUSA

Personalised recommendations