Skip to main content

Integrated Risk Framework for Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems

Environmental Management volume 38, pages 286–303 (2006)Cite this article

Abstract

Onsite wastewater treatment systems (OWTS) are becoming increasingly important for the treatment and dispersal of effluent in new urbanised developments that are not serviced by centralised wastewater collection and treatment systems. However, the current standards and guidelines adopted by many local authorities for assessing suitable site and soil conditions for OWTS are increasingly coming under scrutiny due to the public health and environmental impacts caused by poorly performing systems, in particular septic tank-soil adsorption systems. In order to achieve sustainable onsite wastewater treatment with minimal impacts on the environment and public health, more appropriate means of assessment are required. This paper highlights an integrated risk based approach for assessing the inherent hazards associated with OWTS in order to manage and mitigate the environmental and public health risks inherent with onsite wastewater treatment. In developing a sound and cohesive integrated risk framework for OWTS, several key issues must be recognised. These include the inclusion of relevant stakeholders throughout framework development, the integration of scientific knowledge, data and analysis with risk assessment and management ideals, and identification of the appropriate performance goals for successful management and mitigation of associated risks. These issues were addressed in the development of the risk framework to provide a generic approach to assessing risk from OWTS. The utilisation of the developed risk framework for achieving more appropriate assessment and management techniques for OWTS is presented in a case study for the Gold Coast region, Queensland State, Australia.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

39,95 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7

Literature Cited

  • ANZECC. 2000. Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water Quality, Volume 1, The Guidelines (Chapters 1–7). Volume 1–3 Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council (ANZECC) and Agriculture and Resource Management Council of Australia and New Zealand (ARMCANZ), Canberra

  • AS/NZS 1547. 2000. AS/NZS 1547:2000 Onsite domestic-wastewater management, Standards Australia/New Zealand, Strathfield

  • AS/NZS 4360. 1999. AS/NZS 4360:1999 Risk Management, Standards Australia and Standards New Zealand, Sydney and Wellington

  • Beavers, P. D. 1999. Onsite sewerage facilities: what is expected of new regulations. R. A. Patterson, (ed). Proceedings of Onsite ‘99 Conference: Making Onsite Wastewater Systems Work, Armidale, pp 39–44

  • Borchardt M. A., P. D. Bertz, S. K. Spencer, D. A. Battigelli. 2003. Incidence of enteric viruses in groundwater from household wells in Wisconsin. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 69(2):1172–1180

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brouwer, J., and R. M. Bugeja. 1983. Land capability for septic tank effluent absorption fields. Australian Water Resources Council Technical Paper No. 80

  • Brown & Root Services. 2001. Onsite Sewage Risk Assessment System. NSW Department of Local Government, NSW

  • Carroll, S., and A. Goonetilleke. 2004. Assessment of high density of onsite wastewater treatment systems on a shallow groundwater coastal aquifer using PCA. Environmetrics 16:257–274

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll S., A. Goonetilleke, L. Dawes. 2004. Framework for soil suitability evaluation for sewage effluent renovation. Environmental Geology 46(2):195–208

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C. W., L. H. Z. Weintraub, R. A. Goldstein, R. L. Siegrist, and S. Kirkland. 2001. Framework to account for onsite wastewater systems in calculating total maximum daily loads. Onsite Wastewater Treatment. Proceedings of the Ninth National Symposium on Individual and Small Community Sewage Systems, Fort Worth, Texas., ASAE. pp 523–531

  • Cliver, D. O. 2000. Research Needs in Decentralised Wastewater Treatment and Management: Fate and Transport of Pathogens. Proceedings of the National Research Needs Conference: Risk-Based Decision Making for Onsite Wastewater Treatment, Palo Alto, CA, pp 1–36

  • Cromer, W. C. 1999. TrenchTM 3.0: A computer application for site assessment and system sizing. Onsite ‘99: Proceedings of Onsite ‘99 Conference: Making onsite wastewater systems work, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, Lanfax Laboratories. pp 85–88

  • Dawes L., A. Goonetilleke. 2003. An Investigation into the role of site and soil characteristics in onsite sewage treatment. Environmental Geology 44(4):467–477

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • EPRI. 2001. National Research Needs Conference Proceedings: Risk-Based Decision Making for Onsite Wastewater Treatment. Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA. Environmental Protection Agency and National Decentralised Water Resources Capacity Development Project. 1001446. Available online at http://www.ndwrcdp.org/

  • Ganoulis J. 1994. Engineering risk analysis of water pollution: probabilities and fuzzy sets. VCH Publishers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Geary P. M. 1992. Diffuse Pollution from Wastewater Disposal in Small Unsewered Communities. Australian Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 5(1):28–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Geary, P. M., and J. H. Whitehead. 2001. Groundwater contamination from on-site domestic wastewater management systems in a coastal catchment. In Proceedings of the Ninth National Symposium on Individual and Small Community Sewage Systems, Fort Worth, Texas, American Society of Agricultural Engineers

  • Gold, A. J., and J. T. Sims. 2000. Research needs in decentralized wastewater treatment and management: a risk-based approach to nutrient contamination. National Research Needs Conference Proceedings: Risk-Based Decision Making for Onsite Wastewater Treatment, St. Louis, Missouri, pp 1–43

  • Goonetilleke A., L. Dawes, and D. Biddel. 2002. Performance evaluation of septic tanks in the Gold Coast region. Environmental Studies, Gold Coast City Council Research Unit, Volume 8, Gold Coast, Australia

  • Harris P. J. 1995. Water quality impacts from on-site waste disposal systems to coastal areas through groundwater discharge. Environmental Geology 26(4): 262–268

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hoxley, G., and M. Dudding. 1994. Groundwater contamination by septic tank effluent: Two case studies in Victoria, Australia. Pages 145–152 in Water Down Under ‘94: Proceedings of 25th Congress of International Association of Hydrogeologists, Adelaide, Australia

  • Isbell R. F. 2002. The Australian Soil Classification. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, Victoria, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones D. S., A. Q. Armstrong, and M. D. Muhlheim. 2000. Integrated risk assessment/risk management as applied to decentralised wastewater treatment: A high-level framework. Proceedings of the National Research Needs Conference: Risk-Based Decision Making for Onsite Wastewater Treatment, Palo Alto, CA, pp

  • Joubert, L., D. Q. Kellogg, and A. J. Gold. 1996. Watershed nonpoint assessment and nutrient loading using the geographical information system-based MANAGE. Proceedings of Watershed ‘96: A National Conference on Watershed Management, Baltimore, MD, US EPA. pp 84–86

  • Kenway S., R. Irvine, and R. Moorhead. 2001. The onsite sewage risk assessment system. R. A. Patterson, and Jones M. J. (eds.), Proceedings of Onsite ‘01 Conference: Advancing Onsite Wastewater Systems, Armidale, pp 227–234

  • Khalil W. A.-S., A. Goonetilleke, S. Kokot, S. Carroll. 2004. Use of chemometric methods and mulitcriteria decision-making for site selection for sustainable onsite sewage effluent disposal. Analytica Chimica Acta 506(1):41–56

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkland S. 2001. Coupling site-scale fate and transport with watershed-scale modeling of nutrients from onsite wastewater systems. Colorado School of Mines Report, Boulder, Denver, CO

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleene J. W., C. R. Mote, J. S. Allison. 1993. Environmental impact of irrigating lawns with treated domestic wastewater. Journal of Environmental Health 55(5):1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipp E. K., S. A. Farrah, B. Rose. 2001. Assessment and impact of microbial fecal pollution and human enteric pathogens in a coastal community. Marine Pollution Bulletin 42(4):286–293

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McGuinness, R. I., and D. M. Martens. 2003. GIS-based model to assess potential risk of individual onsite effluent management systems: development assessment module (DAM). Proceedings of Onsite ‘03 Conference: Future directions for onsite systems-best management practice, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, Lanfax Laboratories. pp 265–271

  • McLaughlin J. A., G. B. Jordan. 1999. Logic models: A tool for telling your programs performance story. Evaluation and Program Planning 22:65–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meays C. L., K. Broersma, R. Nordin, A. Mazumder. 2004. Source tracking fecal bacteria in water: a critical review of current methods. Journal of Environmental Management 73(1):71–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noble K. E. 1996. Understanding and managing soils in the Moreton Region. Queensland Department of Primary Industries, Brisbane

    Google Scholar 

  • NH&MRC. 1996. Australian Drinking Water Guidelines. National Health and Medical Research Council, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicosia L. A., J. B. Rose, M. T. Stewart. 2001. A field study of virus removal in septic tank drain fields. Journal of Environmental Quality 30(6):1933–1939

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Otis, R. J., and D. J. Anderson. 1994. Meeting public health and environmental goals: performance standards for onsite wastewater treatment systems. Proceedings of the Seventh National Symposium on Individual and Small Community Sewage Systems, pp 1–10

  • Parveen S., K. M. Portier, K. Robinson, L. Edmiston, M. L. Tamplin. 1999. Discriminant analysis of ribotype profiles of Escherichia coli for differentiating human and nonhuman sources of fecal pollution. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 65(7):3142–3147

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Perkins R. J. 1984. Septic tank, lot size and pollution of water table aquifers. Journal of Environmental Health 46(6):298–304

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan (1999). Ryan versus Great Lakes Council, Federal Court of Australia, 177

  • Scandura J. E., M. D. Sobsey. 1997. Viral and bacterial contamination of groundwater from on-site sewage treatment systems. Water Science and Technology 35(11-12):141–146

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Siegrist, R. L., E. J. Tyler, and P. D. Jenssen. 2000. Design and performance of onsite wastewater treatment soil adsorption systems. Proceedings of the National Research Needs Conference: Risk-Based Decision Making for Onsite Wastewater Treatment, Palo Alto, CA, pp. 1–48

  • Stace H. C. T., G. D. Hubble, R. Brewer, K. H. Northcote, J. R. Sleeman, M. J. Mulcahy, E. G. Hallsworth. 1968. A handbook of Australian soils. Glenside, South Australia, Rellim Technical Publications

    Google Scholar 

  • US EPA. 1997. Response to Congress on Use of Decentralized Wastewater Treatment Systems. United States Environmental Protection Agency. EPA 832-R-97-001b

  • US EPA. 2002. Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems Manual. Office of Water, Office of Research and Development and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. EPA/625/R-00/008

  • Wells, M. 2001. Assessment of Land Capability for Onsite Septic Tank Effluent Disposal, Department of Agriculture Western Australia

  • Whitehead J. H., P. M. Geary. 2000. Geotechnical aspects of domestic onsite effluent management systems. Australian Journal of Earth Sciences 47:75–82

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Whitlock J. E., D. T. Jones, V. J. Harwood. 2002. Identification of the sources of fecal coliforms in an urban watershed using antibiotic resistance analysis. Water Research 36(17):4273–4282

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yates M. V. 1985. Septic tank density and groundwater contamination. Ground Water 31(6):884–889

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Gold Coast City Council and Queensland University of Technology for funding this research project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Urban Development, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, 4001, Australia

    Steven Carroll, Ashantha Goonetilleke & Les Dawes

  2. Gold Coast City Council, Gold Coast, QLO, 4211, Australia

    Evan Thomas

  3. School of Life Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, 4001, Australia

    Megan Hargreaves

  4. School of Physical and Chemical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, 4001, Australia

    Ray Frost

Authors
  1. Steven Carroll
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ashantha Goonetilleke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Evan Thomas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Megan Hargreaves
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ray Frost
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Les Dawes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven Carroll.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carroll, S., Goonetilleke, A., Thomas, E. et al. Integrated Risk Framework for Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems. Environmental Management 38, 286–303 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-005-0280-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-005-0280-5

Keywords

  • Integrated risk assessment
  • Onsite wastewater treatment
  • Water pollution
  • Effluent irrigation
  • Septic tanks