Environmental Management

, Volume 38, Issue 4, pp 532–544 | Cite as

Avian Mortality at Oil Pits in the United States: A Review of the Problem and Efforts for Its Solution

PROFILE

Abstract

Oil production operations produce waste fluids that may be stored in pits, open tanks, and other sites accessible to wildlife. Birds visit these fluid-filled pits and tanks (“oil pits”), which often resemble water sources, and may become trapped and die. The US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) has a program to reduce these impacts by locating problem pits, documenting mortality of protected wildlife species, and seeking cleanup or corrective action at problem pits with the help of state and federal agencies regulating the oil industry. Species identification and verification of protected status for birds recovered from oil pits are performed at the USFWS National Fish and Wildlife Forensics Laboratory. From 1992 to 2005, a minimum of 2060 individual birds were identified from remains recovered from oil pits, representing 172 species from 44 families. The taxonomic and ecological diversity of these birds indicates that oil pits pose a threat to virtually all species of birds that encounter them. Ninety-two percent of identified bird remains belonged to protected species. Most remains identified at the Forensics Laboratory were from passerines, particularly ground-foraging species. Based on Forensics Laboratory and USFWS field data, oil pits currently cause the deaths of 500,000–1 million birds per year. Although law enforcement and industry efforts have produced genuine progress on this issue, oil pits remain a significant source of mortality for birds in the United States.

Keywords

Bird mortality Oil Petroleum Contaminants E&P wastes Pollution Law enforcement Forensics Migratory Bird Treaty Act RCRA 

References

  1. Albers P. H. 1978. The effects of petroleum at different stages of incubation in bird eggs. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 19:624–630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. American Ornithologists Union. 2005. A.O.U. checklist of North American birds, 7th edition and supplements. Available at: http://www.aou.org/checklist/index.php3#phas (Accessed April 2006)
  3. Banks, R. C. 1979. Human related mortality of birds in the United States. United States Dept. of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Special Scientific Report–Wildlife Number 215. Washington, DC, USAGoogle Scholar
  4. EPA. 2000. Profile of the oil and gas extraction industry. EPA/310-R-99-006. Available at: http://www.epa.gov/compliance/resources/publications/assistance/sectors/notebooks/oilgas.pdf (Accessed April 2006)
  5. EPA. 2002. Exemption of oil and gas exploration and production wastes from federal hazardous waste regulations. Available at: http://www.epa.gov/epaoswer/other/oil/oil-gas.pdf (Accessed April 2006)
  6. EPA. 2003. Report of the United States Environmental Protection Agency Region 8 oil and gas environmental assessment effort 1996–2002. Available at: http://epa.gov/region08/land_waste/ogeafinalreport.pdf (Accessed April 2006)
  7. Esmoil B. J., S. H. Anderson. 1995. Wildlife mortality associated with oil pits in Wyoming. Prairie Naturalist 27:81–88Google Scholar
  8. Flickinger E. L. 1981. Wildlife mortality at petroleum pits in Texas. Journal of Wildlife Management 45:560–564Google Scholar
  9. Flickinger E. L., C. M. Bunck. 1987. Number of oil-killed birds and fate of bird carcasses at crude oil pits in Texas. Southwestern Naturalist 32:377–381Google Scholar
  10. Grau C. R., T. Roudybush, J. Dobbs, J. Wathen. 1977. Altered yolk structure and reduced hatchability of eggs from birds fed single doses of petroleum oils. Science 195:779–781Google Scholar
  11. Gregory D. G., W. C. Edwards. 1991. Investigating oiled birds from oil field waste pits. Veterinary and Human Toxicology 33:497–498Google Scholar
  12. Grover, V. L. 1983. The reduction of wildlife mortality in the sump pits of southeast New Mexico. Report for the Bureau of Land Management, Carlsbad, New Mexico, USAGoogle Scholar
  13. Hartung R., G. S. Hunt. 1966. The toxicity of some oils to waterfowl. Journal of Wildlife Management 30:564–570Google Scholar
  14. IPAA. 2005. The oil and gas producing industry in your state. Available at: http://www.ipaa.org/reports/econreports/ IPAAOPI.pdf (Accessed April 2006)
  15. Judah J. 1997. An environmental framework for drilling fluid disposal. Hart’s Petroleum Engineer International 70:54–58Google Scholar
  16. King, C. A. 1956. Waterfowl mortality at oil sumps of the Bighorn River drainage. Wyoming Game and Fish Dept. Report, Cheyenne, Wyoming, USAGoogle Scholar
  17. King K., C. A. LeFever. 1979. Effects of oil transferred from incubating gulls to their eggs. Marine Pollution Bulletin 10:319–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lee R. C., Jr. 1990. Bird kills in contained oil: a biopolitical/enforcement strategy. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of Southeastern Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies 44:444–447Google Scholar
  19. Lee, R. C., Jr. 1994. Migratory bird kills at petroleum pits in Texas. Report of Investigation No. 120, United States Department of Interior, United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Division of Law Enforcement, Lubbock, Texas, USAGoogle Scholar
  20. Leighton, F. A. 1993. The toxicity of petroleum oils to birds. Environmental Review 1:92–103Google Scholar
  21. Piatt J. F., R. G. Ford. 1996. How many seabirds were killed by the Exxon Valdez oil spill? In S. D. Rice, R. B. Spies, D. A. Wolfe, B. A. Wright, (eds), Proceedings of the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Symposium. American Fisheries Society Symposium 18, Bethesda, Maryland, USA. pp 712– 719Google Scholar
  22. Pyle P. 1997. Identification guide to North American birds, Part 1. Slate Creek Press, Bolinas, California, USAGoogle Scholar
  23. Ramirez P., Jr. 1999. Fatal attraction: oil field waste pits. Endangered Species Bulletin 24:10–11Google Scholar
  24. San Sebastián M., A.-K. Hurtig. 2004. Oil exploitation in the Amazon basin of Ecuador: a public health emergency. Pan Am J Public Health 15:205–211Google Scholar
  25. Snyder S. B., J. G. Fox, O. A. Soave. 1973. Mortalities in waterfowl during Bunker C fuel exposure. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California, USA. 48 ppGoogle Scholar
  26. Thomas, R. D. 1971. Wildlife problems associated with San Joaquin oil production facilities. California Dept. of Fish and Game ReportGoogle Scholar
  27. Tully, R. J., and M. Boulter. 1970. Survey of water pollution, soil contamination, and wildlife mortality caused by sludge pits and related oil pumping practices in Colorado. Colorado Division of Wildlife Report, Denver, Colorado, USAGoogle Scholar
  28. USFWS. 1998. Service and EPA tackle deadly oil pits. US Fish and Wildlife News. Nov/Dec. 1998, p. 7Google Scholar
  29. USFWS. 2002. United States Department of the Interior, United States Fish and Wildlife Service Region 2 Environmental Contaminants Program Off-Refuge Investigations Sub-Activity. FY 2002 Final Report, TX, OK, NM- Oilfield PollutionGoogle Scholar
  30. USFWS. 2003. United States Fish and Wildlife Service Region 6 Environmental Contaminants Program. Contaminant issues: oil field waste pits. Available from: http://www.r6.fws.gov/contaminants/contaminants1c.html (Accessed June 2005)
  31. Wood K. A., F. W. Harrod Jr. 2000. Investigation of migratory bird mortality in Arkansas oil pits. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of Southeastern Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies 54:469–477Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Fish and Wildlife Forensics LaboratoryUS Fish and Wildlife ServiceAshlandUSA

Personalised recommendations