Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Interaction Between the Environment and Animals in Urban Settings: Integrated and Participatory Planning

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In urban ecosystems, the ecological system has become completely unbalanced; this, in turn, has led to an increase in well-known problems such as air pollution, ground pollution, and water pollution. This imbalance has also led to the growth and spread of pathogens harmful to man, animals, and plants. Urban sustainability indicators, both global and local, also “indicate” the percentage of population, but these refer only to the human population, not the animal population. Cities need good waste, water, and air management, effective traffic planning, and good zoning of businesses, crafts, and services; over and above these activities, cities also need for planning to take into account the existence of pets (dogs, cats, and etc.) and nonpet animals (insects, birds, mice, etc.). Cities tend to be designed around humans and “on a human scale,” without taking into account the fact that a huge animal population is living side by side with people. That explains why overcrowding tends to go hand in hand with urbanization; all these populations, including humans, need to adapt to new spaces and often need to drastically change their behavior. This is a fact that must be included when drafting sustainable city plans. The supposed strategy is that of “integrated-participatory” control of the interactions between the environment and animals in the cities. Strategy will focus on the development of integrated approaches and tools for environment and animal management in the context of urban settings. This will require such specific methods as ecological balance sheets and ecoplans for the planning, management, and control of the interrelation among environment, animal, and public health. The objective is to develop a better understanding of urban biodiversity and of urban ecosystem functioning, in order to understand and minimize the negative impacts of human activities on them. The research will focus on assessing and forecasting changes in urban biodiversity, structure, function, and dynamics of urban ecosystems, with relationships among society, economy, biodiversity, and habitats.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ambroise-Thomas P. 2000. Emerging parasite zoonoses: the role of host-parasite relationship. Intl J Parasitol 30:1361–1367

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson R., R. M. May. 1979. Population biology of infectious diseases: Part I. Nature 280:361–367

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ballarini G. 2003. Piano faunistico urbano. [Urban fauna plan]. In V. Puccini, E. Tarsitano (eds), Parassitologia urbana: Città, animali e salute pubblica [Urban Parasitology: Cities, animals and public health]. Il Sole 24 ORE Edagricole, Bologna, Italy, pp 319–331

  • Blonda M., M. Campanile, L. Rubino. 1997. Pianificazione integrata e partecipata [Integrated and participatory planning]. In Proceedings of the Biologist for the sustainable development first meeting ABAP, 8–10 November 1997. Bari, Apulia, Italy, pp 162–174

  • Borrella P., E. Guerrieri, I. Marchesi, et al. 2005. Water ecology of Legionella and protozoan: Environmental and public health perspectives. Biotechnol Annu Rev 11:355–380

    Google Scholar 

  • Botkin D. B., C. E. Beveridge. 1997. Cities as environments. Urban Ecosyst 1:3–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burger J. 2002. Restoration, stewardship, environmental health, and policy: understanding stakeholders’ perceptions. Environ Manage 30(5):631–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burger J., O. Myers, C. S. Boring, et al. 2003. Perceptual indicators of environmental health, future land use, and stewardship. Environ Monit Assess 89(3):285–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cadenasso M. L. 1999. Baltimore long-term ecological research program: Ecology of the city. Baltimore Ecosystem Study Annual Report. Bard College, Annandale-on-the-Hudson, NY

  • Cancrini G. A., A. Frangipane di Regalbono, I. Ricci, et al. 2003. Aedes albopictus is a natural vector of Dirofilaria immitis in Italy. Vet Parasitol 118:195–202

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers N., C. Simmons, M. Wackernagel. 2000. Sharing nature’s interest: Ecological footprints as an indicator for sustainability. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Childs J. E. 2004. Zoonotic viruses of wildlife: Hither from yon. Arch Virol 18(Suppl):1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole D. C., J. Eyles, B. L. Gibson. 1998. Indicators of human health in ecosystems: What do we measure? Sci Total Environ 224:201–213

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • de Neufville J. I. 1986. Usable planning theory: An agenda for research and education. In Checkoway B (ed) Strategic perspectives on planning practice. Lexington Books, Lexington, MA, pp 43–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Deplazes P., D. Hegglin, S. Gloor, et al. 2004. Wilderness in the city: The urbanization of Echinococcus multilocularis. Trends Parasitol 20:77–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eyles J., C. Furgal. 2002. Indicators in environmental health: identifying and selecting common sets. Can J Public Health 93:62–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Foresman T. W., S. T. A. Pickett, K. Kuhlman. 1999. Link globally, act locally: Baltimore ecosystem study. GeoInfoSystems 9(February):24–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenland D., D. Goodin, R. C. Smith. 2003. Climate variability and ecosystem response at long-term ecological research sites. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Guernier V., M. E. Hochberg, J. F. Guégan. 2004. Ecology drives the worldwide distribution of human diseases. PLoS Biology 2(6):740-746

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hales S., N. de Wet, J. Maindonald et al. 2002. Potential effect of population and climate changes on global distribution of dengue fever: an empirical model. Lancet 360:830–834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hancock P. J. 2002. Human impacts on the stream-groundwater exchange zone. Environ Manage 29:763–781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hancock T. 2002. Indicators of environmental health in the urban setting. Can J Public Health 93:45–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs M. 2000. Dengue: emergence as a global public health problem and prospects for control. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 94:7–8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jardine C., S. Hrudey, J. Shortreed, et al. 2003. Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks. J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev 6(6):569–720

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ji C. H. 2004. Factor structure of the new environmental paradigm scale: Evidence from an urban sample in southern California. Psychol Rep 94:125–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalnay E., E. Cai. 2003. Impact of urbanization and land-use change on climate. Nature 423(6939):528–531

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kulasekera V. L., L. Kramer, R. S. Nasci, et al. 2001. West Nile virus infection in mosquitoes, birds, horses, and humans, Staten Island, New York, 2000. Emerg Infect Dis 7:722–725

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marfin A. A., D. J. Gubler. 2001. West Nile encephalitis: an emerging disease in the United States. Clin Infect Dis 33:1713–1719

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • May P. H., A. W. Dabbs, P. Fernandez-Davila, et al. 2002. A corporate approach to social monitoring and assessment for development in a fragile environment. Environ Monit Assess 76:125–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May R. M., R. M. Anderson. 1979. Population biology of infectious diseases: Part II. Nature 280:455–461

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McCool S. F., G. H. Stankey. 2004. Indicators of sustainability: Challenges and opportunities at the interface of science and policy. Environ Manage 33:294–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre N., J. Rango, W. F. Fagan, et al. 2001. Ground arthropod community structure in a heterogeneous urban environment. Landscape Urban Plan 52:257–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMichael A. J., and R. Beaglehole. 2000. The changing global context of public health. Lancet 356:495–499

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meadows D., J. Rothenberg, A. Sinai, et al. 1992. Biology and the balance sheet. Earthwatch 4:6–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Molyneux D. H. 1993. Parassitosis control. In Cox FEG (ed) Modern parasitology. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford. pp 281–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore C. G., C. J. Mitchell. 1997. Aedes albopictus in the United States: Ten-year presence and public health implications. Emerg Infect Dis 3:329–334

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mumford L. 1956. The transformations of man. Harper & Brothers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumford L. 1968. The urban prospect. Secker & Warburg, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Nancy B., J. M. Grove, S. T. A. Pickett, C. L. Redman. 2000. Integrated approach to Long-Term studies of urban ecological systems. BioScience 50:571–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oleskòw J., P. Golinska, F. Stachow. 2003. The Eco balance sheet algorithm. Proceedings of the Formal Methods and data Processing Techniques, ITEE 2003, 24–26 June 2003, Edmonton, Alberta (CD-ROM)

  • Parlange M. 1998. The city as ecosystem. BioScience 48:581–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parr T. W., M. Ferretti, I. C. Simpson, et al. 2002. Towards a long-term integrated monitoring programme in Europe: Network design in theory and practice. Environ Monit Assess 78:253–290

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parr T. W., A. R. Sier, R. W. Battarbee, et al. 2003. Detecting environmental change: Science and society: Perspectives on long-term research and monitoring in the 21st century. Sci Total Environ 310:1–8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Patz J. A., D. Campbell-Lendrum, T. Holloway, et al. 2005. Impact of regional climate change on human health. Nature 438(7066):310–317

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Patz J. A., P. Daszak, G. M. Tabor, et al. 2004. Unhealthy landscapes: Policy recommendations on land use change and infectious disease emergence. Environ Health Perspect 112(10):1092–1098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patz J. A., T. K. Graczyk, N. W. Geller, et al. 2000. Effects of environmental changes on emerging parasitic disease. International. J Parasitol 30:1395–1405

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Petney T. N. 2001. Environmental, cultural and social changes and their influence on parasite infections. Int J Parasitol 31:919–932

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues A. S., S. J. Andelman, M. I. Bakarr, et al. 2004. Effectiveness of the global protected area network in representing species diversity. Nature 428(6983):640–643

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rojas E., J. V. Scorza, G. Morales, et al. 2004. Diversity and species composition of sand flies (Diptera: Psychodidae) in a Venezuelan urban focus of cutaneous leishmaniasis. J Am Mosquito Control Assoc 20(2):189–194

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Romi R. 2001. Aedes albopictus in Italy: An underestimated health problem. Ann Istit Superiore Sanita 37:241–247

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sachs J. D. 2004. Sustainable development. Science 304:649

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro H. T. 1999. Reflections on the interface of bioethics, public policy and science. Kennedy Inst Ethics J 9:209–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherst R. W. 2001. The vulnerability of animal and human health to parasites under global change. Int J Parasitol 31:933–948

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherst R. W. 2004. Global change and human vulnerability to vector-borne diseases. Clin Microbiol Rev 17:136–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanner M. 1989. From the bench to the field: control of parasitic infections within primary health care. Parasitology 99:S81–S92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarsitano E. 2003a. Ecosistema urbano [Urban ecosystem]. In Puccini V, Tarsitano E (eds) Parassitologia urbana: Città, animali e salute pubblica [Urban Parasitology: Cities, animals and public health]. Il Sole 24 ORE Edagricole, Bologna, Italy pp 21–36

  • Tarsitano E. 2003b. Gestione, prevenzione e controllo integrato delle parassitosi urbane [Management, prevention and integrated control of urban parassitosis]. In V. Puccini, E. Tarsitano (eds) Parassitologia urbana: Città, animali e salute pubblica [Urban Parasitology: Cities, animals and public health]. Il Sole 24 ORE Edagricole, Bologna, Italy pp 331–342

  • Twardowska I. 2004. Ecotoxicology, environmental safety, and sustainable development: Challenges of the third millennium. Ecotoxicol Environ Safety 58:3–6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wackernagel M., W. E. Rees 1996. Our ecological footprint: Reducing human impact on the Earth. New Society Publishers, Gabriola Island, BC, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Wackernagel M, N. B. Schulz, D. Deumling, et al. 2002. Tracking the ecological overshoot of the human economy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:9266–9271

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zeier M., M. Handermann, U. Bahr, et al. 2005. New ecological aspects of hantavirus infection: A change of a paradigm and a challenge of prevention. A review. Virus Genes 30(2):157–180

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank Professor Canio Buonavoglia and Professor Maria Tempesta for critical reading of and comments on the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elvira Tarsitano.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tarsitano, E. Interaction Between the Environment and Animals in Urban Settings: Integrated and Participatory Planning. Environmental Management 38, 799–809 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-005-0148-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-005-0148-8

Keywords

Navigation